National Donut Day 2025: Free deals from Dunkin', Krispy Kreme and others
National Donut Day will be celebrated on Friday, June 6, which was first started by Salvation Army in 1938 to give a tribute to the organisation's Donut Lassies and Donut Girls, who had travelled to France to serve donuts and other snacks to soldiers during the World War I, as per a report.
While, the Salvation Army will celebrate the day by giving free donuts to veterans in several cities across the United States and have planned other events, like the National Donut Day World Donut Eating Championship, even donut distributors in the US will also be part of the celebration by giving away free donuts on June 6, as per USA Today.
Here's a list of all the National Donut Day deals that you must not miss, as compiled by USA Today.Classic donut will be available for free with any beverage that is purchase at participating Dunkin' locations across the US on June 6, as per the report. Customers can get their hands on some limited-edition Dunkin' merchandise created with Stoney Clover Lane and in some Dunkin' outlets, the single donuts will be served in mini donut bags created in partnership with the luxury lifestyle brand, reported USA Today.
ALSO READ: 90 deals in 90 days: Donald Trump mocked for begging countries for a trade deal
All customers can get one free donut to all customers, without buying any other product, on June 6, as per the report. While, customers can also get a dozen Original Glazed Doughnuts for just $2 when they buy any other dozen at the regular price, reported USA Today.The celebration just doesn't end there, as Krispy Kreme has also planned more deals from the following day, Saturday, June 7, with the "14 Days of Original Glazed' promotion, which includes these deals: June 7- June 20: Members of the Krispy Kreme Rewards loyalty program can get a dozen Original Glazed doughnuts for $9.99, reported USA Today.
June 13: All customers can get a dozen Original Glazed doughnuts for 13 cents if they buy any dozen at the regular price, as per the report.
June 20: Consumers can get a dozen Original Glazed doughnuts for only $2 if they buy any dozen at the regular price, and multiple customers will be randomly selected at participating shops to win 12 months of free Original Glazed doughnuts, reported USA Today.
Duck Donuts: In the stores of Duck Donuts, customers can get a free cinnamon sugar donut, without buying anything else, and can also get a half dozen cinnamon sugar donuts for just $6, which is available in-store and online, reported USA Today. Honey Dew : Customers can get a free donut, if they purchase any medium beverage on June 6, as per the report.
: Customers can get a free donut, if they purchase any medium beverage on June 6, as per the report. The Original Donut Shop Coffee : The store is offering a 50% off on all coffee and K-Cup Pod products on Keurig.com using the code DONUT50 from June 6 to June 8, according to the report.
: The store is offering a 50% off on all coffee and K-Cup Pod products on Keurig.com using the code DONUT50 from June 6 to June 8, according to the report. Shipley Do-Nuts: Customers can get a free glazed donut, if they buy any other product on June 6, which will be applicable for in-person or online orders with code DonutDay25, as per USA Today.
When is National Donut Day this year?It's on Friday, June 6, 2025.
Can I get free donuts on National Donut Day? Yes. Many places like Dunkin', Krispy Kreme, and Duck Donuts offer free donuts with or without purchase of other products.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
United News of India
32 minutes ago
- United News of India
US SC gives Trump admin's DOGE dept full authorisation to access social security data
Washington, June 7 (UNI) The US Supreme Court on Friday authorised officials from the Trump administration's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) to access Social Security Administration data, giving it complete access to all sensitive private data of American citizens. The Supreme Court issued the authorisation after allowing an emergency petition filed by the administration of President Donald Trump to ask for a lifting of an injunction issued by a district judge in Maryland, who stated that privacy must be safeguarded, reports said. 'Under the present circumstances, SSA may proceed to afford members of the SSA DOGE Team access to the agency records in question in order for those members to do their work,' the court said in a three-paragraph order. The order didn't, however, give the reasoning behind its ruling, which has become a very controversial issue. The order was also challenged by the court's three liberals — Justices Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson — all of whom dissented. In an opinion joined by Sotomayor, Jackson said the court was 'creating grave privacy risks for millions of Americans.' In the SSA case, US Solicitor General D. John Sauer told the Supreme Court that 'the government cannot eliminate waste and fraud if district courts bar the very agency personnel with expertise and the designated mission of curtailing such waste and fraud from performing their jobs.' The DOGE department, which was created by the Trump administration and was until recently headed by SpaceX CEO Elon Musk, before his resignation following his spat with the POTUS, while not an official government department, was designed specifically to monitor data fraud and misinformation. The disputed data includes Social Security numbers, addresses, birth and marriage certificates, tax and earnings records, employment history, and bank and credit card information. The lawsuit challenging DOGE's actions alleged that allowing broader access to personal information would violate a federal law called the Privacy Act, as well as the Administrative Procedure Act. U.S. District Judge Ellen Hollander had ruled that DOGE had no legitimate need to access the specific data in question, according to Xinhua. The 4th circuit court of appeals, based in Richmond, Virginia, declined to block Judge Hollander's decision, prompting the Trump administration to file an emergency request with the Supreme Court. In a separate order issued Friday in another case involving DOGE, the Supreme Court granted an additional request filed by the Trump administration, allowing it to shield DOGE from Freedom of Information Act requests for the time being. UNI ANV PRS
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
UK Military Rhetoric Doesn't Match Fiscal Reality
(Bloomberg Opinion) -- Not long before World War I, HMS Dreadnought, a battleship that made all existing vessels obsolete, was launched at Portsmouth in the presence of the King-Emperor Edward VII. Fire-breathing patriots soon took up the cry, 'We want eight and we won't wait.' Winston Churchill, then a young home secretary in a government committed to spending more on welfare, wryly noted of the popular clamor for a naval race with Germany: 'The Admiralty had demanded six ships; the economists offered four; and we finally compromised on eight.' British debates about defense spending follow a familiar trajectory, although this time it's politicians, rather than civilians, insisting that more should be spent on firepower. A military revolution in warfare is underway, too. Drones, off-the-shelf technology far cheaper than Dreadnoughts, are being deployed to lethal effect on the battlefields of Ukraine and further afield - the daring 'Spider Web' raid last weekend destroyed as much as a third of Russia's strategic bombing force based thousands of miles away from Europe. But the UK needs to replace expensive military hardware too, and make good shortages of munitions. Economists fear the government can't afford the outlay without large tax increases. Who will prevail? In a speech prior to the publication of his government's Strategic Defence Review (SDR) this week, Prime Minister Keir Starmer sounded eerily reminiscent of an old-fashioned jingoist, circa 1914. Britain, he said, faces a threat 'more serious, more immediate and more unpredictable than at any time since the Cold War.' The UK needs to move to 'war-fighting readiness.' Alas, reality and rhetoric don't match. UK defense spending is planned to rise to only 2.5% of gross domestic product by 2027, with a notional ambition to reach 3% by the mid-2030s. In the 1980s, at the end of the Cold War, it stood at almost 4%. When the dogged Defence Secretary John Healey attempted to impose a fixed timeline for a bigger military budget, he was immediately slapped down by the Treasury. Within days, however, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization trumped Starmer. The Western Alliance has reached near consensus on a 5% commitment, with 3.5% going directly on the armed services and a further 1.5% on related spending. On Thursday, US Secretary of Defense Peter Hegseth, ordered Starmer to saddle up, saying 'it is important that the UK gets there.' On Tuesday, German Defense Secretary Boris Pistorius talked of raising expenditure by annual increments to reach 5% of GDP, aimed at creating the strongest conventional army in Europe. At home, the popular hue and cry is not for an arms race with Russia, which remains a niche preoccupation at Westminster and in security circles, but for reversing cuts to pensioners' winter-fuel allowances. Labour's backbenchers oppose projected welfare reductions. Meanwhile, the economists warn that the bond market won't countenance more borrowing to pay for guns or butter - gilt yields remain elevated amid jitters over the Trump administration's ballooning deficit. Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves rules out raising taxes in the autumn — though few believe her. Something's got to give. UK prime ministers have a habit of over-promising and under-delivering on military commitments. Starmer's Conservative predecessors squandered the Cold War peace dividend for over a decade even as Russia rearmed and attacked its neighbors. Wishful thinking can also lead to embarrassment. Starmer recently proclaimed 'a coalition of the willing' ready to take the place of the US in policing a ceasefire in Ukraine by dispatching a 'reassurance force.' Washington, however, refused to offer air cover — and in any case the British army has shrunk to 70,000, levels last seen before the war with Napoleon — so the UK can no longer assemble an expeditionary force. The best it can offer Ukraine is a support mission. As for crippling the Russian war effort, the UK, like other European nations, sanctioned Russian oil and gas after its invasion of Ukraine. But according to a new study by the Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air (CREA), the value of Russian crude oil and liquid natural gas shipped under British ownership or insurance since the war began tops £200 billion ($270 billion). A dark fleet of ships working for the Russians supplements the trade. The government is wary of severing these links for fear of triggering another energy price rise spiral and a round of the ruinous inflation and cost of living crisis that sank its Tory predecessor. To be fair, the SDR has met a mostly warm reception from military specialists. At least it puts the focus back on the European theater — previous reviews suggested fanciful scenarios in which British aircraft carriers, without a full complement of aircraft and naval escorts, might be deployed to Asia. With commendable honesty, the authors of this week's report also own up to 'the hollowing out of the Armed Forces warfighting capability' and cite inadequate stockpiles of munitions after years of 'underinvestment.' Without a rapid improvement in military housing and in the absence of conscription, army numbers are unlikely to rise. With its suggestion that the UK should build up its maritime forces — namely the Trident nuclear deterrent and the commissioning of 12 new attack submarines — the SDR implies the UK is set on going back to a strategic stance familiar to Churchill and his contemporaries in 1914, known to historians as the British Way of Warfare, avoiding a continental military commitment at scale. Today, however, the Royal Navy no longer rules the waves as it did in 1914. That means cutting back on the rhetoric and working closely with allies to deploy the few troops available for land-based conflict. 'This is a once-in-a-generation inflection point for collective security in Europe,' concludes the SDR. Unless British public opinion changes, however, the UK's neglect of its military needs and obligations looks set to continue. More from Bloomberg Opinion: This column reflects the personal views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners. Martin Ivens is the editor of the Times Literary Supplement. Previously, he was editor of the Sunday Times of London and its chief political commentator. More stories like this are available on
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Reconciliation on cards? Elon Musk deletes ‘Trump is in the Epstein files' tweet
Days after his feud with Donald Trump exploded publicly, Elon Musk on Saturday deleted his controversial tweet claiming 'Trump is in the Epstein files', signalling a possible attempt to dial down the tension. It was on Thursday, when in a post on X, Tesla CEO dropped a 'big bomb.' 'Donald Trump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public.' 'Mark this post for the future. The truth will come out,' he added. The former advisor-turned-foe, who is at loggerheads with Trump over his 'Big Beautiful Bill,' left the US administration last month to focus more on his business that suffered while he spearheaded the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).
