&w=3840&q=100)
Iran's missiles hit near Tel Aviv military HQ: Did Israel's Iron Dome and air defences fall short?
A major Iranian missile strike near Tel Aviv's key military base has raised serious questions about Israel's air-defence capabilities. Despite intercepting many incoming missiles, several still caused casualties and property damage. Was this a rare breach or a sign that systems like Iron Dome are no longer foolproof? read more
Missiles launched from Iran are intercepted, as seen from the city of Ashkelon, Israel, June 13, 2025. Reuters
Iran launched several waves of ballistic missile attacks targeting Israeli territory in the early hours of Saturday. Among the locations struck was the Kirya area of Tel Aviv, which houses Israel's military headquarters and the Israeli Ministry of Defence.
The incident has reignited scrutiny of Israel's famed air-defence network, including the widely celebrated Iron Dome system, amid reports of multiple missile impacts, civilian casualties, and visible damage across parts of central Israel.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The strikes came in retaliation to what has been described as Israel's most extensive assault on Iranian soil to date — an operation involving fighter jets and drones that infiltrated Iranian territory to strike nuclear and military targets.
According to Iran's representative to the United Nations, 78 people were killed and over 320 injured in that Israeli offensive.
The Israeli side has claimed the mission was launched to prevent Tehran from nearing the capacity to develop an atomic weapon, though assessments by the US government and independent experts had not found Iran to be actively working on such a weapon before the Israeli strike.
What damage did Iran do in Israel?
One of the most dramatic moments of the Iranian counterstrike was captured on video, showing a missile descending into the Kirya district of Tel Aviv. This area is known as the nerve centre of the Israeli military, housing both the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) and the Ministry of Defence.
Footage showed interceptor missiles being launched moments before a powerful blast erupted on impact, sending plumes of smoke skyward.
The Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) claimed responsibility for targeting Israeli air bases and military infrastructure.
The IRGC stated that the missile campaign was a direct response to Israel's earlier attacks on sensitive Iranian sites, including the Natanz nuclear facility, and the killing of top Iranian military commanders.
Witnesses in both Tel Aviv and Jerusalem reported hearing sirens and multiple explosions through the night, with Israel's emergency alert systems urging civilians to seek shelter.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
In central Israel, including Tel Aviv and surrounding cities such as Rishon Lezion, residential buildings were damaged or destroyed, leaving residents trapped under rubble and emergency services scrambling to respond.
Civilian casualties in Israel confirmed
Emergency agencies have confirmed multiple fatalities and scores of injuries following the missile strikes. Israel's national ambulance service, Magen David Adom, stated that 'an Iranian missile struck near homes in central Israel,' resulting in the deaths of two individuals and injuries to at least 19 others.
In a separate incident, Beilinson Hospital in Tel Aviv confirmed the death of a woman and treatment of several others injured during the strikes.
Ichilov Hospital, another major medical centre in Tel Aviv, reported that it treated seven people injured in the attack, including one with moderate injuries and the rest with minor wounds.
Fire and Rescue Services of Israel noted that four homes were significantly damaged in the missile barrage, and additional efforts were underway to rescue individuals trapped beneath debris.
The Israeli military stated that it was continuing to intercept incoming projectiles while urging civilians to remain in shelters amid fresh warnings of additional attacks.
Did Israel's air-defence network fail against Iran?
Israel's much-vaunted multilayered air-defence system, built over decades and backed by significant US funding, faced a stern test during this large-scale assault. The system is composed of several integrated components:
Arrow system : Designed to counter long-range ballistic missiles, including those launched from Iran and by Yemen-based Houthis. Developed in partnership with the US, the Arrow operates outside the atmosphere.
David's Sling : Developed for intercepting medium-range missiles, particularly those launched by groups like Hezbollah, which has a vast arsenal of guided weapons.
Iron Dome : Perhaps the most well-known system, the Iron Dome focuses on intercepting short-range rockets. It has seen thousands of successful interceptions since its deployment, boasting a success rate of over 90 per cent during recent conflicts with Hamas and Hezbollah.
Iron Beam: An upcoming laser-based system, not yet operational, which is expected to drastically reduce interception costs. While still under development, Israeli officials have projected that the Iron Beam will cost just a few dollars per interception — compared to roughly $50,000 for each Iron Dome launch and up to $2 million for higher-tier systems.
Despite these layered defences, several missiles managed to bypass interception efforts and strike populated areas.
A US official, speaking to AP anonymously, confirmed that American ground-based air-defence systems were deployed in the region to assist Israel during the Iranian missile assault.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Nevertheless, Israeli authorities acknowledged that some missiles evaded the systems and caused 'a few impacts on buildings.'
The IDF, while confirming that they were engaged in interception efforts, declined to comment on the precise locations and number of successful or failed intercepts, saying only that the defence systems were 'in active operation.'
Has Israel's Iron Dome failed before?
This is not the first time concerns have been raised over the performance of Israel's air-defence systems under heavy and coordinated fire.
In September 2024, Hezbollah fired a major salvo of rockets into northern Israel, including cities like Safed, Haifa, and Karmiel. The attack marked a rare breach of the Iron Dome's capabilities and was viewed as a significant vulnerability in Israel's national defence.
Hezbollah's rockets — more advanced and numerous than those of Hamas — are believed to include a mix of short-range, medium-range, and precision-guided munitions, many of them provided by Iran.
The Israeli military, as of last year, estimated Hezbollah's missile inventory at approximately 150,000, including thousands of guided systems capable of reaching central Israeli cities.
A similar concern was raised in October 2024, when the Golani Bridge base operated by the IDF was struck in what became the deadliest enemy drone attack on Israeli territory.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
That incident, too, sparked concern about whether the Iron Dome and related systems were becoming less effective against modern and high-volume threats, especially with the growing prevalence of drones, cruise missiles and coordinated rocket fire.
Israeli officials have long pointed out that no defence system is infallible, and that their air-defence architecture is designed to focus on protecting population centres and vital infrastructure.
In such a model, systems like the Iron Dome are programmed to intercept only those projectiles that are likely to strike sensitive or populated areas, letting others fall in uninhabited zones.
But the recent hits near the Kirya and other residential areas have resulted in fresh questions over whether the system is being overwhelmed or outpaced by evolving threat profiles.
Iran's decision to launch direct missile attacks — rather than rely on proxy groups — marks a notable departure from its usual posture.
Its state media, IRNA, reported that the missile strikes were a direct answer to the bombing of the underground Natanz nuclear complex and the targeted assassination of senior Iranian commanders.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The incident has already disrupted fragile diplomatic efforts between Tehran and Washington. Negotiations scheduled for Sunday to revive aspects of the nuclear accord have now been cast into doubt.
With inputs from agencies

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
8 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Iran did not anticipate Israeli attack before nuclear talks with US: Report
Iran's top leadership had been preparing for a potential Israeli attack if nuclear talks with the US failed, but made a key misjudgment – they did not expect Israel to strike before the next round of talks, scheduled for Sunday in Oman, The New York Times report said citing officials close to Iran's leadership. They believed Israeli warnings of imminent strikes were propaganda aimed at pressuring Iran into nuclear concessions. As a result, planned safety measures were reportedly ignored. On the night of the strikes, senior commanders, including Gen. Amir Ali Hajizadeh of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) aerospace unit, stayed in their homes instead of seeking shelter. Hajizadeh and top aides were killed during an emergency war meeting at a Tehran base hit by Israel, The NYT report added. With Israeli PM Netanyahu warning that the offensive may last weeks and calling on Iranians to rise against their clerical rulers, fears of a wider regional conflict are mounting. Israel sees Iran's nuclear programme as an existential threat, claiming the strikes were necessary to prevent Iran from reaching the final stage of building a nuclear weapon. Iran insists its programme is peaceful, though the UN nuclear watchdog recently reported that Tehran had violated non-proliferation obligations. Israel's strikes severely damaged Iran's defence systems, dismantling key radars and air defenses, crippling its ballistic missile access, and killing senior military leaders. Private messages obtained by The New York Times revealed Iranian officials expressing frustration over the failure to detect or stop the assault. 'Where is our air defense?' and 'How can Israel come and attack anything it wants, kill our top commanders, and we are incapable of stopping it?' some wrote. The NYT further quoted Hamid Hosseini, a government-aligned member of Iran's Chamber of Commerce, as saying that the attacks exposed critical weaknesses. 'Israel's attack completely caught the leadership by surprise, especially the killing of top military figures and nuclear scientists. It also exposed our lack of proper air defense and their ability to bombard our critical sites and military bases with no resistance,' he said. Hosseini added that Israel's ability to smuggle missile parts and drones into Iran hinted at a deep infiltration of Iran's security apparatus. Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who had been moved to a secure location, declared in a televised address: 'They should not think they attacked and it is over. No, they started it. They started the war. We will not allow them to escape from this crime unharmed.' In response, Iran launched multiple missile waves targeting Tel Aviv and Jerusalem. Earlier, Khamenei told Iran's Supreme National Security Council that he wanted revenge but urged caution, saying he 'did not want to act hastily,' according to officials familiar with the meeting, as quoted in the report.


Hindustan Times
16 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Donald Trump warns Iran: ‘Full might of US military will come down on you if…'
US President Donald Trump issued a stark warning to Tehran as hostilities escalated between Israel and Iran with fresh overnight attacks. Trump threatened to launch 'full strength and might' of US military, if Iran were to target American assets. Distancing the Washington from Israel's military strikes Trump cautioned Iran, saying, 'If we are attacked in any way, shape or form by Iran, the full strength and might of the US armed forces will come down on you at levels never seen before,' he said in a message posted on Truth Social. He also suggested that a diplomatic resolution was possible. 'However, we can easily get a deal done between Iran and Israel, and end this bloody conflict,' Trump said, though he did not elaborate on the terms of any potential agreement. The warning came amid intense fighting between Israel and Iran. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu further raised fears of broader escalation, saying, 'What Iran has seen so far is nothing compared with what is coming in the next days." Israel's military also warned Iranians residing near nuclear facilities to evacuate immediately, raising fears of a broader escalation. Iran's foreign minister Abbas Araqchi accused Israel of launching attacks to derail nuclear negotiations with the US set to resume in Oman on Sunday. Araqchi further said that Israel's actions are clearly supported by the US, and Iran is only exercising its right to self-defence, reported Reuters. Israel has maintained that the ongoing campaign is aimed at dismantling Iran's nuclear weapons ambitions and neutralizing its ballistic missile infrastructure. Officials acknowledged that airstrikes alone are unlikely to completely halt Iran's nuclear programme, but said that the offensive might lay the groundwork for a broader diplomatic settlement involving the US and Iran. Tehran claimed that 78 people were killed on the first day of Israeli strikes, with many more casualties reported on the second. Among the dead were 60 civilians, including 29 children, killed when a missile flattened a 14-storey apartment building in Tehran. The latest barrage of Iranian missiles targeting Israel began late Saturday night, with sirens sounding in Jerusalem and Haifa around 11 PM local time. In a notable expansion of the conflict, Yemen's Iran-backed Houthi rebels claimed responsibility for launching several ballistic missiles at central Israel's Jaffa on Sunday — marking the first time a regional Iranian ally had entered the conflict, according to news agency Reuters. Iran has warned that military bases belonging to Israel's allies in the region will also be targeted if they assist in intercepting Iranian missiles.
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
17 minutes ago
- Business Standard
US-China trade truce likely leaves military-use rare earth issue unresolved
The renewed US-China trade truce struck in London left a key area of export restrictions tied to national security untouched, an unresolved conflict that threatens a more comprehensive deal, two people briefed on detailed outcomes of the talks told Reuters. Beijing has not committed to grant export clearance for some specialised rare-earth magnets that US military suppliers need for fighter jets and missile systems, the people said. The United States maintains export curbs on China's purchases of advanced artificial intelligence chips out of concern that they also have military applications. At talks in London last week, China's negotiators appeared to link progress in lifting export controls on military-use rare earth magnets with the longstanding US curbs on exports of the most advanced AI chips to China. That marked a new twist in trade talks that began with opioid trafficking, tariff rates and China's trade surplus, but have since shifted to focus on export controls. In addition, US officials also signalled they are looking to extend existing tariffs on China for a further 90 days beyond the August 10 deadline agreed in Geneva last month, both sources said, suggesting a more permanent trade deal between the world's two largest economies is unlikely before then. The two people who spoke to Reuters about the London talks requested not to be named because both sides have tightly controlled disclosure. The White House, State Department and Department of Commerce did not immediately respond to requests for comment. China's Foreign and Commerce ministries did not respond to faxed requests for comment. President Donald Trump said on Wednesday the handshake deal reached in London between American and Chinese negotiators was a "great deal," adding, "we have everything we need, and we're going to do very well with it. And hopefully they are too." And US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said there would be no "quid pro quo" on easing curbs on exports of AI chips to China in exchange for access to rare earths. CHINA CHOKEHOLD But China's chokehold on the rare earth magnets needed for weapons systems remains a potential flashpoint. China dominates global production of rare earths and holds a virtual monopoly on refining and processing. A deal reached in Geneva last month to reduce bilateral tariffs from crushing triple-digit levels had faltered over Beijing's restrictions on critical minerals exports that took shape in April. That prompted the Trump administration to respond with export controls preventing shipments of semiconductor design software, jet engines for Chinese-made planes and other goods to China. At the London talks, China promised to fast-track approval of rare-earth export applications from non-military US manufacturers out of the tens of thousands currently pending, one of the sources said. Those licenses will have a six-month term. Beijing also offered to set up a "green channel" for expediting license approvals from trusted US companies. Initial signals were positive, with Chinese rare-earths magnet producer JL MAG Rare-Earth, saying on Wednesday it had obtained export licences that included the United States, while China's Commerce Ministry confirmed it had approved some "compliant applications" for export licences. But China has not budged on specialized rare earths, including samarium, which are needed for military applications and are outside the fast-track agreed in London, the two people said. Automakers and other manufacturers largely need other rare earth magnets, including dysprosium and terbium. BIG ISSUES REMAIN The rushed trade meeting in London followed a call last week between Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping. Trump said US tariffs would be set at 55% for China, while China had agreed to 10% from the United States. Trump initially imposed tariffs on China as punishment for its massive trade surplus to the United States and over what he says is Beijing's failure to stem the flow of the powerful opioid fentanyl into the US. Chinese analysts are pessimistic about the likelihood of further breakthroughs before the August 10 deadline agreed in Geneva. "Temporary mutual accommodation of some concerns is possible but the fundamental issue of the trade imbalance cannot be resolved within this timeframe, and possibly during Trump's remaining term," said Liu Weidong, a US-China expert at the Institute of American Studies, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. An extension of the August deadline could allow the Trump administration more time to establish an alternative legal claim for setting higher tariffs on China under the Section 301 authority of the USTR in case Trump loses the ongoing legal challenge to the tariffs in US court, one of the people with knowledge of the London talks said. The unresolved issues underscore the difficulty the Trump administration faces in pushing its trade agenda with China because of Beijing's control of rare earths and its willingness to use that as leverage with Washington, said Ryan Hass, director of the John L. Thornton China Center at the Brookings Institution. "It has taken the Trump team a few punches in the nose to recognise that they will no longer be able to secure another trade agreement with China that disproportionately addresses Trump's priorities," Hass said.