Ex-government officials pen letter blasting Kash Patel's FBI 'purge'
The group, which dubs itself The Steady State, claims Agents Brian Driscoll, Michael Feinberg and Walter Giardina were fired as part of a campaign to dismantle the FBI's "long-standing independence" while also setting it up as a "tool of political loyalty."
The Steady State also claimed the agents were canned because they were not loyal to President Donald Trump, before accusing the administration of appointing Patel and Bongino to powerful roles despite not having resumes that meet the "basic standards" to lead the "world's premiere law enforcement agency."
"It is not about reform. It is about control. The aim, it seems, is to transform the FBI from a respected, constitutionally grounded investigative service into a personal enforcement arm of a political figure," the letter reads. "We have seen these dynamics abroad—leaders who demand loyalty from security services not to the law, but to themselves. These regimes do not end well."
"The FBI has long been a bulwark against such corruption: an institution where rule of law and civil liberties are held in balance with the demands of national security," the letter continued. "Its independence is not a bureaucratic feature; it is a democratic necessity."
The Steady State told their friends and colleagues in the FBI that they recognize the pressure they are under.
"The nation is watching, and will be inspired by the FBI. And history will remember," the letter concluded.
Last Thursday, the FBI ousted Driscoll, the former FBI acting director, as well as others, including Giardina, a special agent at the FBI who played a role in the investigation of Trump trade advisor Peter Navarro. Also let go was Steve Jensen, the acting director in charge of the Washington Field Office.
Driscoll, for his part, served as acting director of the FBI prior to the confirmation of Patel, and Jensen played a key role in the January 6 investigations.
Senior FBI officials told the trio they needed to leave by Friday.
The FBI, Bongino and Patel declined to comment on Fox News Digital's questions about The Steady State's claims and on reasons why the agents were removed from their positions.
MSNBC journalist Ken Dilanian shared on social media a copy of the letter from Patel to Giardina.
"This document provides official notice that you are being summarily dismissed from your position at the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and removed from the federal service, under my authority as the FBI Director, effective immediately," Patel wrote. You have exercised poor judgment and a lack of impartiality in carrying out duties, leading to the political weaponization of the government."
Former FBI Agent Phil Kennedy, who has been vocal on social media regarding the new regime's handling of personnel matters, shared The Steady State's letter, referring to the firings as the recent FBI "purge."
"Walter Giardina, the disgraced anti-Trump Agent who worked on Jack Smith's documents case with Kash's pilot, has reportedly been terminated by the FBI," Kennedy wrote in another post. "It's a Bureau bloodbath."
News of the agents' firings comes months after thousands of FBI personnel in February were ordered to fill out a questionnaire asking detailed questions about possible roles in the investigation into the Jan. 6, 2021, U.S. Capitol riots.
The questionnaire, first reported by Fox News Digital, sparked concern that it could be used to retaliate against agents involved in the January 6 investigations. Those concerns reached a fever pitch later that month, after then-Acting Deputy Attorney General Emil Bove ordered the bureau to compile a list of all current and former personnel who worked on January 6 cases.
The Trump administration has not yet said whether it will move to act against the individuals involved.
In February, President Trump declined to answer questions over whether his administration would remove FBI employees involved in the investigation into the Jan. 6, 2021, U.S. Capitol riot, telling reporters only that he believes the bureau is "corrupt" and that then-FBI director nominee, Patel, would "straighten it out."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Will the White House actually host a UFC fight next Fourth of July?
UFC CEO Dana White appeared to confirm that UFC will head to the White House next year. Last month, President Donald Trump announced that he wanted the White House to host a UFC match on July 4, 2026, for the country's 250th birthday. 'We're going to have a UFC fight, think of this, on the grounds of the White House,' Trump said, per the BBC. 'We have a lot of land there.' White spoke to The Associated Press this week about the plans for the fight. 'It's absolutely going to happen,' White said. 'Think about that, the 250th birthday of the United States of America, the UFC will be on the White House south lawn live on CBS.' White will meet with the president and his daughter Ivanka on August 28 'to catch up and discuss logistics' for the fight, per AP. 'When he called me and asked me to do it, he said: 'I want Ivanka in the middle of this,'' White said, per BBC. 'So Ivanka reached out to me, and her and I started talking about the possibilities, where it would be and, you know, I put together all the renderings.' In his announcement, the president stated he expects 20,000 to 25,000 spectators to attend, according to ESPN. Several UFC fighters are interested in fighting in the event, per White. 'Everybody wants to fight this fight,' he told Happy Punch. Trump has already attended two UFC events since his inauguration earlier this year. In July, he also spoke with Derrick Lewis on the phone immediately after he won a heavyweight contest, as the Deseret News previously reported. Lewis was still on the phone while he was declared the winner. UFC's billion dollar deal with Paramount White's comments came days after UFC finalized a massive new media rights deal with Paramount. The seven-year deal will go into effect after UFC's current deal with ESPN expires at the end of this year. The deal 'has an average annual value of $1.1 billion,' AP reported. All UFC content will also be available on the network's streaming platform, Paramount+. 'This historic deal with Paramount and CBS is incredible for UFC fans and our athletes. For the first time ever, fans in the U.S. will have access to all UFC content without a pay-per-view model, making it more affordable and accessible to view the greatest fights on a massive platform,' White said on X.
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Concord City Council to hold public hearing on possible social district
Concord city councilors voted unanimously this week to hold a public hearing next month on a proposal to create a social district, a designated area where patrons can buy alcohol and take it with them. When the new law takes effect next month, New Hampshire will become the ninth state to allow people to purchase alcohol at local bars and restaurants, then take it with them in a to-go cup while moving through designated 'sip and stroll' areas downtown. Local officials determine the boundaries of the social district, then work with the liquor commission and the state to ensure that all requirements under state law are met and develop a working plan to ensure safety in the district. Elected boards in communities that adopt the social districts are also given the authority to limit the hours when the activity is allowed. Voters must then approve creation of a social district at town meeting or a city election. 'I'll be supporting this action,' said City Councilor Jennifer Kretovic. 'I think it's really important for our community to look at the organizations we support, like InTown Concord — for Market Days, they typically have a beer tent. This would allow them to have a social district at their event, it could be more expansive and more inclusive. It'll also allow the opportunity for other nonprofit organizations to as well, have events. 'We are about to embark on our 250th/300th anniversary in the city of Concord — and oddly enough, our Constitution was ratified because people were drinking alcohol.' The statute takes effect on Sept. 5. State Rep. Bill Boyd, R-Merrimack, sponsored HB 467, modeling it after one that North Carolina adopted in 2021 and working with Chief Mark Armaganian, director of the New Hampshire Liquor Commission's Division of Enforcement and Licensing. The new ordinance restricts open containers to materials other than glass, usually plastic cups, with no more than 16 fluid ounces in them at one time. Stickers or other labels are required, and drink limits are enforced. Drinks cannot be carried outside of social district boundaries, which are marked with prominent signs. Maps of the district boundaries are posted online. Anyone with alcohol still in the cup and exiting the social district must throw it away unless the person is going back to the place where the alcohol was purchased from initially. Concord Deputy City Solicitor John Conforti said he city currently grants licenses to several licensees to expand the service area for alcoholic beverages adjacent to their properties. 'Social districts would allow a designated alcoholic beverage consumption area that is shared by multiple establishments that are licensed to sell alcohol,' Conforti said. 'It appears that districts can be established on a temporary basis with limitations on hours or days of operation. Social districts must be clearly defined both by location and time and dates when the district is in effect. Businesses that wish to participate must only sell alcohol on their premises in containers that are subject to strict labeling and size requirements. 'Moreover, patrons cannot bring alcohol from one establishment within the district into another.' Additional administrative rules related to social districts are expected from the Liquor Commission. Municipalities that are interested in social districts are required to hold a public hearing on putting a question on a ballot on establishing one locally at least 15 days but no more than 30 days before the election. If Concord is looking to put the question on a ballot for the Nov. 4 municipal election, a public hearing must be held at the council's Sept. 8 meeting to determine if the public is interested in doing so, officials said. 'We don't have any particular areas in mind,' City Manager Tom Aspell said. 'It's just, if you want to keep this option out there, this has to be on the ballot that comes up in November.' 'Approving it on the ballot would just give you the opportunity to set up social districts in the future,' Conforti said. 'You — the municipality — would then have to make a decision on where you would set it up, and then there's a maintenance plan that would need to be established and submitted to the Liquor Commission. The Liquor Commission would then need to approve that. So there are a number of things that we already know need to happen.' Concord City Councilor Ali Sekou asked if the city has the authority to dictate how much alcohol people can consume. 'People that have their license have to take that ownership,' Conforti said. 'The responsibility for serving and all the rules and laws associated with that remain with the licensee who's serving the alcohol. We will have some responsibilities with regard to maintaining the district and signage and security and those types of things, and making sure that we make clear where the boundaries are of that district, but in terms of the actual service that that responsibility would remain with the licensee.' Nashua officials have discussed the possibility of creating a social district. Legislators from Portsmouth and North Conway said it was likely to be seriously considered there as well. Jodie Nazaka, Manchester's economic development director, said in May her department hasn't heard any businesses or aldermen express interest in establishing this type of district in Manchester. An attempt to reach her this week for an updated comment was unsuccessful. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Failed New Mexico candidate gets 80 years for convictions in shootings at officials' homes
ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. (AP) — A failed political candidate was sentenced to 80 years in federal prison Wednesday for his convictions in a series of drive-by shootings at the homes of state and local lawmakers in Albuquerque in the aftermath of the 2020 election. A jury convicted former Republican candidate Solomon Peña earlier this year of conspiracy, weapons and other charges in the shootings in December 2022 and January 2023 on the homes of four Democratic officials, including the current state House speaker. Prosecutors, who had sought a 90-year sentence, said Peña has shown no remorse and had hoped to cause political change by terrorizing people who held contrary views to him into being too afraid to take part in political life. Peña's lawyers had sought a five-year sentence, saying their client maintains that he is innocent of the charges. They have said Peña was not involved in the shootings and that prosecutors were relying on the testimony of two men who bear responsibility and accepted plea agreements in exchange for leniency. 'Today was a necessary step toward Mr. Peña's continued fight to prove his innocence," said Nicholas Hart, one of Peña's attorneys. "He looks forward to the opportunity to appeal, where serious issues about the propriety of this prosecution will be addressed.' The attacks took place as threats and acts of intimidation against election workers and public officials surged across the country after President Donald Trump and his allies called into question the outcome of the 2020 presidential election. Prosecutors said Peña resorted to violence in the belief that a 'rigged' election had robbed him of victory in his bid to serve in the state Legislature. The shootings targeted the homes of officials including two county commissioners after their certification of the 2022 election, in which Peña lost by nearly 50 percentage points. No one was injured, but in one case bullets passed through the bedroom of a state senator's 10-year-old daughter. Two other men who had acknowledged helping Peña with the attacks had previously pleaded guilty to federal charges and received yearslong prison sentences.
