Former IS leader in Germany set for deportation hearing next month
The former leader in Germany of the Islamic State terrorist group, Abu Walaa, will have a first hearing next month in his legal battle to avoid deportation.
According to dpa sources, the hearing is scheduled for June 11.
Abu Walaa was sentenced to 10-and-a-half years in prison and must remain behind bars until 2027. After that, he is due to be deported from Germany.
After an urgent appeal against his deportation a year ago largely went against him, the full case will now be heard in court.
Judges ruled during the urgent proceedings that the danger posed by Abu Walaa to public safety was so serious that the interests of his seven children did not prevent him from being deported.
According to the court, the upcoming proceedings relate to the revocation of his residence permit and conditions of his eventual release, such as staying exclusively in a certain city and reporting to the police every day.
After a trial that lasted more than three years, a court in Celle in 2021 found the Islamic preacher guilty of support and membership in a foreign terrorist organization.
The presiding judge said that he had been appointed by Islamic State as its top representative in Germany.
In that capacity, he radicalized young people in north-western Germany and recruited them for Islamic State's self-declared caliphate abroad, the judge said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
How much damage has Israel inflicted on Iran's nuclear programme?
Israel's strikes on Iran have taken aim at its nuclear facilities, amid fears that the Islamic republic is seeking to develop nuclear weapons -- an accusation Tehran denies. Experts told AFP that while the attacks might have caused some damage to Iran's nuclear programme, they are unlikely to have delivered a fatal blow. - What is the extent of the damage? - Israel's operation included strikes on Iran's underground uranium enrichment sites at Natanz and Fordow, and a uranium conversion facility at Isfahan, according to the UN's International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), citing information from Iranian officials. IAEA said on Friday that a key, above-ground component of Iran's Natanz nuclear site had been destroyed, also citing Iranian officials. There was "extensive" damage to the site's power supply, according to a report from the Institute for Science and International Security (ISIS), a US-based organisation specialising in nuclear proliferation, which analysed satellite images. A loss of electricity to underground facilities can significantly damage the site's centrifuges, the machines used to enrich uranium, the ISIS institute said. If backup power is lost, "at the least, the enrichment plant is rendered inoperable for the time being", it said. Iran has said the damage to Fordow, south of Tehran, was minor. But experts said it is impossible at this stage to determine the impact the strikes might have had on uranium stockpiles believed to be stored around the Isfahan site. Ali Vaez, International Crisis Group's Iran project director, told AFP that if Iran managed to transfer significant quantities to "secret facilities," then "the game is lost for Israel". - Can the programme be destroyed? - While "Israel can damage Iran's nuclear programme... it is unlikely to be able to destroy it", Vaez said, arguing that Israel does not have the massively powerful bombs needed "to destroy the fortified, bunkered facilities in Natanz and Fordow". Destroying those would require US military assistance, added Kelsey Davenport, an expert with the Arms Control Association. She also stressed that Israel's unprecedented attack cannot erase the expertise Iran had built up on nuclear weapons, despite killing nine Iranian nuclear scientists. - What are the risks to the Iranian population? - The IAEA has not detected any increase in radiation levels at the affected sites. "There is very little risk that attacks on Iran's uranium enrichment facilities would result in a harmful radiation release," said Davenport. But an attack on Bushehr, Iran's only nuclear power plant, could "have a serious impact on health and the environment", she added. After Israel launched its strikes, IAEA chief Rafael Grossi said that nuclear facilities "must never be attacked" and that targeting Iranian sites could have "grave consequences for the people of Iran, the region, and beyond". - Is Iran close to developing a nuclear bomb? - After the United States unilaterally withdrew in 2018 from a landmark deal that sought to curb Tehran's nuclear activities, Iran has gradually retreated from some of its obligations, particularly on uranium enrichment. As of mid-May, the country had an estimated 408.6 kilogrammes enriched to up to 60 percent -- just a short step from the 90 percent needed for a nuclear warhead. Iran theoretically has enough near-weapons-grade material, if further refined, for about 10 nuclear bombs, according to the definition by the Vienna-based IAEA. Iran is the only non nuclear-armed state producing uranium to this level of enrichment, according to the UN nuclear watchdog. While the IAEA has been critical of Iran's lack of cooperation with the UN body, it says that there is "no credible indications of an ongoing, undeclared structured nuclear programme". Tehran has consistently denied ambitions to develop nuclear warheads. But Davenport warned the strikes could strengthen factions in Iran advocating for an atomic arsenal. "Israel's strikes set Iran back technically, but politically the strikes are pushing Iran closer to nuclear weapons," she said. anb/sr/djt/rmb
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Israel issues warning to Iran amid tit-for-tat strikes: ‘Tehran will burn'
Israel issued a stark warning to Iran on Saturday as the two nations continue to exchange fire: Stop the strikes or 'Tehran will burn.' 'If [Iranian Supreme leader Ayatollah Ali] Khamenei continue to fire missiles at the Israeli home front, Tehran will burn,' Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz wrote on social platform X following a closed-door meeting, according to a translation. 'The Iranian dictator is making the residents of Tehran hostage to his criminal policies for the survival of his regime,' he added. His comments come after Iran launched retaliatory drone and air strikes toward Israel Friday in response to the Israeli military's surprise attack a day earlier — which targeted Tehran's nuclear facilities and ballistic missile sites. In the initial strike, several prominent officials were killed, including a close adviser of Khamenei, two top Iranian nuclear scientists, the commander and deputy commander of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and the deputy commander in chief of Iran's armed forces. In tit-for-tat exchange continued into Saturday. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his military have vowed to cripple nuclear facilities under its Operation Rising Lion mission. Strikes overnight on Tehran killed about nine senior scientists tied to warfare developments in the Islamic republic, according to Israeli officials. '9 senior scientists and experts responsible for advancing the Iranian regime's nuclear weapons program. All of the eliminated scientists and experts, eliminated based on intelligence, were key factors in the development of Iranian nuclear weapons,' The Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) wrote in a post online. 'Their elimination is a significant blow to the regime's ability to acquire weapons of mass destruction. Two other senior defense and intelligence officials were pronounced dead by the Iranian regime on Saturday, NBC News reported. Civilians have not been shielded from violence, either, as 320 people were wounded in the round of attacks on Iran and 78 more killed due to continued air strikes, per the AP. The IDF said it would continue to target East Azerbaijan and the Iranian cities of Kermanshah and Lorestan as Iran's counterattacks in Jerusalem and Tel Aviv persist. Explosions and sirens were blaring across the Jewish State overnight. Two rockets were also launched from Gaza toward Israel, although there were no corresponding injuries, officials said. Turbulence in the region has also put a damper on nuclear talks between Washington and Tehran. President Trump has sought to create a new agreement with Iran that would include dismantling its nuclear capabilities. On Friday, Trump responded to Israel's surprise strike by urging the Iranian regime to come back to the negotiating table and make a deal. 'There has already been great death and destruction, but there is still time to make this slaughter, with the next already planned attacks being even more brutal, come to an end,' the president posted to Truth Social. 'Iran must make a deal, before there is nothing left, and save what was once known as the Iranian Empire,' he added. 'No more death, no more destruction, JUST DO IT, BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE.' Trump also suggested in a separate post that the moment was a 'second chance.' Despite the pressure, Iran signaled that it could pull out of the upcoming nuclear talks, which are scheduled for Sunday in Oman. The administration said earlier Friday that they were not involved in Israel's attack on Iran. Later in the day, however, the U.S. did begin to military shift assets and assist with shooting down incoming ballistic missiles. Tehran has also warned that it will strike ships in the Red Sea if Britain, France or the U.S. engage in warfare. U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee (R), who remains in Israel, reflected on the overnight sirens that signaled air raids as several voices among Trump's allies have urged Trump to make a move on Iran. 'Been rough nite in Israel. Had to head to shelter 5 times during the nite. It's now Shabbat here. Should be quiet. Probably won't be,' Huckabee wrote Saturday on X. 'Entire nation under orders to stay near shelter.' In another post, the former Arkansas governor issued a reminder to those who want the U.S. to stay out of the conflict. 'If you hear 'Israel is no concern to USA' remember 700,000 AMERICANS live in Israel. That is equivalent to a full House District,' he continued 'More Americans here than in any other country except Mexico! ' 'Iran isn't just attacking Israel but your fellow Americans who live here,' he added. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Newsweek
8 hours ago
- Newsweek
Iran Issues Threat to US, Risks 'Catastrophic' Washington Response
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Iran has issued a warning to the U.S. and its allies not to help Israel repel its retaliatory attacks. The statement on Iranian state media was addressed to the U.S., France and the U.K., which have strategic assets in the Middle East. Hamidreza Azizi, a visiting fellow at the German Institute for International and Security Affairs, told Newsweek that if Iran targeted U.S. sites in the Middle East in its response to Israeli attacks on its nuclear capabilities, the move could be "catastrophic" for the Islamic republic. Newsweek has contacted the U.S. State Department for comment. This photo shows rocket trails and intercepts over the Israeli city of Netanya on June 14. This photo shows rocket trails and intercepts over the Israeli city of Netanya on June It Matters Iran has said its talks with the U.S. over the Iranian nuclear program were "meaningless" following Israel's strikes on its nuclear infrastructure on Friday. Tehran has accused Washington of supporting the attack. While the U.S. has denied the allegation that it is complicit in Israel's attacks, anticipation is building over whether American assets in the Middle East will get caught up in Iran's response. What To Know Iran continued to fire missiles on Israel on Saturday in its response to Israeli attacks on the heart of its nuclear program and armed forces. On Saturday, Iran said it had officially informed the U.S., France and the U.K. that it would launch large-scale attacks against Israel. Tehran warned that any country that helped repel Iranian attacks on Israel could face attacks by the Islamic Republic, which would target regional bases "of the collaborating state." This includes sites in the Persian Gulf states and naval vessels in the Persian Gulf and the Red Sea, according to the statement on Iranian state media. The U.S. operates permanent and temporary military sites across at least 19 locations in the region, the Council on Foreign Relations said. Azizi said there was an understanding in Tehran that everything happening now—Israeli strikes and the broader military campaign—was approved by Washington. In that sense, Iran might believe it already had enough justification to take on the U.S. and target American bases in the region—such as those in Iraq and member states in the Gulf Cooperation Council—thus expanding the scope of its target options. This would allow Iran to use some of its shorter-range missiles to sustain the war, instead of relying solely on its longer-range missiles to target Israel, Azizi said. But Tehran is concerned that such action would almost certainly provoke a strong American response, possibly even more effective than Israel's, he added. Iran relies on support—or at least neutrality—from Arab states with which it has been engaged in a process of rapprochement. Targeting U.S. bases in Arab countries at this moment would likely be seen as a serious escalation, alienating those states and isolating Iran diplomatically, Azizi said. As Newsweek previously reported, James Anderson, a former acting undersecretary of defense for policy, warned that it would be "suicidal" for Iran if its forces tried to target American interests in the region. Israeli flags near damaged buildings in the city of Ramat Gan near Tel Aviv, Israel, on June 14. Israeli flags near damaged buildings in the city of Ramat Gan near Tel Aviv, Israel, on June are growing concerns over whether the U.S. could be pulled into the war via Iranian strikes or attacks by its proxy forces on American personnel in the region. If Israel's attacks against Iranian nuclear facilities are not effective and provide Tehran with an excuse to race toward developing nuclear weapons, then U.S. officials may use military force to prevent this worst-case scenario, according to William F. Wechsler, the senior director of the Atlantic Council's Middle East programs. Justin Logan, the director of defense and foreign policy at the Cato Institute, told Newsweek that U.S. President Donald Trump should not ask American service members to protect Israel from Iranian retaliation and should immediately remove U.S. troops from regional bases. Meanwhile, Sina Toossi, a senior nonresident fellow at the Center for International Policy, said that even without direct involvement, Washington now faced the prospect of indefinite intelligence and diplomatic backing for Israel. What People Are Saying The Iranian government said on Telegram: "Any country that participates in repelling Iranian attacks on Israel will be subject to the targeting of all regional bases of the collaborating state, including military bases in the Persian Gulf states and naval vessels in the Persian Gulf and the Red Sea." Hamidreza Azizi, a visiting fellow at the German Institute for International and Security Affairs, told Newsweek: "At this stage, Iran has no desire to expand the scope of the war or invite direct U.S. involvement by targeting American bases and interests in the region. Iran might believe it already has enough justification to take on the United States. But on the other hand, it's also a question of capabilities and consequences—a cost-benefit analysis." Justin Logan, the director of defense and foreign policy at the Cato Institute, told Newsweek: "The American president should make clear that the United States had no part in the Israeli attack on Iran. He should not ask U.S. service members to protect Israel from Iranian retaliation, and should immediately remove U.S. troops from bases in Iraq, Syria, and elsewhere that do nothing other than welcome Iranian reprisals." Sina Toossi, a senior nonresident fellow at the Center for International Policy, told Newsweek: "For the United States, the consequences could be profound. Even without direct involvement, Washington now faces the prospect of indefinite resupply, intelligence, and diplomatic backing for Israel." What Happens Next Israel Katz, the Israeli defense minister, said on Saturday that Iran "will burn" if Tehran continued to launch missiles. The Israel Defense Forces has said the country's air force is ready to resume striking targets in Iran, which has continued to send missiles into Israel.
