No goo-goo gaga: Humans stand alone in using ‘baby talk' — great apes don't do it, study finds
ZURICH, June 29 — Talking to babies in a high-pitched voice and using exaggerated pronunciation seems natural to most parents. This way of speaking, found in all human cultures, is thought to facilitate language learning in young children. But is this universal human practice shared by our closest cousins? A study published in the journal Science Advances reveals that great apes communicate very little with their young, suggesting that our propensity for 'baby talk' is a distinctive feature of the human species.
Previous research has shown that this 'baby talk' promotes vocabulary and language skills, but its evolutionary origins remained a mystery. To find out more, a team of biologists and linguists from the University of Zurich and the University of Neuchâtel teamed up with colleagues from France, Germany, and the US. Together, they studied five species of great apes (humans, bonobos, chimpanzees, gorillas and orangutans) to observe how they communicate with their young in their natural environment.
They found that humans stand out significantly for their use of 'baby talk,' unlike their primate cousins. 'We were surprised by how little of this type of communication we actually observed in our closest living relatives,' explains Franziska Wegdell, UZH postdoc and one of the three first authors of the study, quoted in a news release.
This raises the question: how do the young of these great ape species learn to communicate? Researchers believe that the answer lies in indirect listening. In humans, infants acquire new words simply by listening to conversations around them. The team therefore compared this 'infant-surrounding communication' in the five species studied and found that all infants are exposed to it in a similar way, except for orangutans. It may therefore be that, like humans, great apes acquire certain aspects of their communication system socially, but by relying on communication in the surrounding environment rather than direct exchanges.
This study nevertheless has limitations. The researchers focused solely on vocal communication, whereas great apes also communicate with their young through gestures. 'We know that non-human great apes direct gestures at their infants, and that some of these gestures even exhibit features also found in human infant-directed communication,' says study co-first author, Caroline Fryns, of the University of Neuchâtel.
Understanding the evolution of language requires studying our closest living relatives, because language does not remain static over time. This study reveals that 'baby talk' has developed particularly in humans, even though other species — monkeys, bats, cats, and dolphins — also communicate directly with their young. This unique feature could partly explain why humans excel in the art of speech. — ETX Studio
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
18 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Hot and bothered? Science explains why some people melt in the heat — and others don't
PARIS, June 29 — When summer temperatures rise, not everyone handles the heat in the same way. Some people breeze through scorching days, while others seem to wilt in the warmth. What lies behind these different coping abilities? The answer can be found in a combination of physical traits, genetic influences and behavioural habits When the warm weather arrives, two distinct camps emerge: those who love the heat and those who hate it. And each tribe has its own rituals and interests. The former dream all year round of jetting off to sun-soaked destinations, while the latter head for northern climes to avoid scorching temperatures. A matter of taste, some would say. But also of physical constitution. Indeed, we're not all equal when it comes to the summer heat. Some people tolerate it less well than others, whether it's a dry or humid kind of heat. These inequalities depend on a number of factors, including age, gender, build and hormonal balance. Human beings are 'homeothermic' animals, meaning that we keep our core temperature relatively constant despite any changes in the surrounding conditions. But, at the same time, our bodies naturally produce heat, which also makes us 'endothermic' creatures, like other mammals. When our bodies are exposed to intense heat, they thermoregulate by producing sweat. It is the evaporation of this sweat through the pores of the skin that evacuates the heat, thus lowering the body's temperature. Biological inequalities But this internal climate-control system doesn't work in the same way for everyone. Babies and older people sweat less than adults, which explains why they are so sensitive to ambient heat. They are also more likely to suffer from dehydration, as they don't tend to feel as thirsty. Yet the body needs a sufficient supply of water to produce sweat and adjust its core temperature. In addition to age, our ability to withstand high temperatures depends on our biological sex. The assumption that women are more sensitive to heat than men is confirmed by numerous scientific studies. Research from the Netherlands, published in 2021 in the journal International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, reports that deaths during heatwaves are higher among women than men. These differences are due to a number of possible causes, including differences in height, weight, perspiration, cardiovascular strain and hormones. However, it would be wrong to say that women's greater discomfort in summer is solely linked to biology. It also stems from social factors, with the Dutch researchers explaining that women are less likely than men to be well-equipped to cope with the heat due to income inequalities. Changing behaviour to better tolerate heat In addition to the physical differences between individuals, heat tolerance is closely linked to lifestyle. When temperatures rise, many people turn on the air conditioning. And this may be a good idea in the heat of the moment, but it can be less so in the longer term. The stronger the air conditioning, the greater the difference with the outside temperature. This puts our bodies to the test when we leave the air-conditioned space. Too severe a change in temperature (over 10°C) can lead to thermal shock, and in the worst case, loss of consciousness or even cardiac arrest. So it's best to use air conditioners sparingly. Diet also has an impact on our tolerance to high temperatures. Fatty or high-protein foods contain compounds that are relatively difficult to digest. Our bodies have to expend more energy to process them, and therefore generate more heat. That's why we often sweat profusely after eating sausages, burgers and other grilled meats at a barbecue. When the mercury rises, opt for light meals with vegetables, lean meats or fish. Similarly, it's important to limit alcohol consumption. Generally speaking, it's perfectly possible to change your habits to acclimatise better to the heat. And that's good news as the effects of global warming become more keenly felt. Over the period of February 2023 to January 2024, the global surface air temperature was 1.52°C higher compared to pre-industrial levels of 1850-1900, according to the EU's Copernicus monitoring programme. In this context, we're going to have to be adaptable if we're to learn to live in a world where our tolerance to heat will be increasingly challenged. — ETX Studio
Malay Mail
18 hours ago
- Malay Mail
No goo-goo gaga: Humans stand alone in using ‘baby talk' — great apes don't do it, study finds
ZURICH, June 29 — Talking to babies in a high-pitched voice and using exaggerated pronunciation seems natural to most parents. This way of speaking, found in all human cultures, is thought to facilitate language learning in young children. But is this universal human practice shared by our closest cousins? A study published in the journal Science Advances reveals that great apes communicate very little with their young, suggesting that our propensity for 'baby talk' is a distinctive feature of the human species. Previous research has shown that this 'baby talk' promotes vocabulary and language skills, but its evolutionary origins remained a mystery. To find out more, a team of biologists and linguists from the University of Zurich and the University of Neuchâtel teamed up with colleagues from France, Germany, and the US. Together, they studied five species of great apes (humans, bonobos, chimpanzees, gorillas and orangutans) to observe how they communicate with their young in their natural environment. They found that humans stand out significantly for their use of 'baby talk,' unlike their primate cousins. 'We were surprised by how little of this type of communication we actually observed in our closest living relatives,' explains Franziska Wegdell, UZH postdoc and one of the three first authors of the study, quoted in a news release. This raises the question: how do the young of these great ape species learn to communicate? Researchers believe that the answer lies in indirect listening. In humans, infants acquire new words simply by listening to conversations around them. The team therefore compared this 'infant-surrounding communication' in the five species studied and found that all infants are exposed to it in a similar way, except for orangutans. It may therefore be that, like humans, great apes acquire certain aspects of their communication system socially, but by relying on communication in the surrounding environment rather than direct exchanges. This study nevertheless has limitations. The researchers focused solely on vocal communication, whereas great apes also communicate with their young through gestures. 'We know that non-human great apes direct gestures at their infants, and that some of these gestures even exhibit features also found in human infant-directed communication,' says study co-first author, Caroline Fryns, of the University of Neuchâtel. Understanding the evolution of language requires studying our closest living relatives, because language does not remain static over time. This study reveals that 'baby talk' has developed particularly in humans, even though other species — monkeys, bats, cats, and dolphins — also communicate directly with their young. This unique feature could partly explain why humans excel in the art of speech. — ETX Studio
Malay Mail
19 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Plastic to paracetamol: Scientists engineer E. coli to turn waste into painkillers, but doubts remain
LONDON, June 29 — Scientists have found a way to use the bacteria to convert plastic waste into a popular painkiller, a study said Monday, though outside experts doubted the technique would make a dent in the fight against plastic pollution. Paracetamol, which is one of the most commonly used drugs worldwide, is made from the derivatives of fossil fuels, often by Asia-based subcontractors using cheap, polluting methods that contribute to climate change. The world is also facing an escalating crisis of plastic pollution, with countries set for another bruising round of negotiations in August in the hope of sealing an international treaty to reduce plastic waste. The British team of researchers behind the new study sought to find a solution to the two problems by roping in a third — which is normally known for making people sick when they eat contaminated food. First the chemists used a molecule derived from PET plastic, which is used in bottles and many other plastic products the world over, to spark a chemical reaction in a strain of This created a molecule they called PABA, according to the Nature Chemistry study, which was partly funded by drug firm AstraZeneca. By genetically modifying the bacteria, the chemists were able to transform their molecule into acetaminophen, also known as paracetamol. 'This work demonstrates that PET plastic isn't just waste or a material destined to become more plastic — it can be transformed by microorganisms into valuable new products, including those with potential for treating disease,' lead study Stephen Wallace said in a statement. Singaporean researchers not involved in the study praised how it combined synthetic and biological chemistry. But 'several practical considerations remain' to take this idea beyond the proof-of-concept stage, they wrote in a linked commentary in the journal Nature Chemistry. The chemical reaction produces only a limited amount of PABA molecules, which 'may be insufficient for industrial applications', they wrote. Melissa Valliant, communications director of the Beyond Plastics project of Bennington College in the United States, expressed scepticism. 'A new 'plastic-eating bacteria' pops up in the news every few months and has been doing so for years,' she told AFP. 'These discoveries never scale up to anything significant enough to tackle the massive plastic pollution problem.' This 'crisis needs to be stopped at the source,' she added, which means 'companies and policymakers must reduce the amount of plastic being produced and used in the first place'. — ETX Studio
