Reported birthday card from Trump to Epstein shines new light on their friendship
A report from The Wall Street Journal on Thursday uncovers new details about the relationship between the president and disgraced financier and convicted sex offender, whose death and connections to Trump are at the center of an explosive feud between his allies and right-wing figures demanding more information about the case.
A letter bearing Trump's name, which the report claims was reviewed by The Journal , contains several lines of typewritten text framed by a drawing of a naked woman. His signature is a squiggly 'Donald' below her waist, mimicking pubic hair, according to the report.
The letter is reported to conclude: 'Happy Birthday — and may every day be another wonderful secret.'
In an interview with The Journal, Trump denied writing the letter or drawing the picture: 'This is not me. This is a fake thing. It's a fake Wall Street Journal story.'
Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein pictured in 1992. A new report shed new light on the friendship between the two men (NBC News)
'I never wrote a picture in my life. I don't draw pictures of women,' he told the conservative-leaning newspaper, which is owned by Rupert Murdoch, who has over the years supported Trump.
'It's not my language. It's not my words,' Trump told the newspaper.
Following The Journal 's report, the president said he intends to sue the outlet and parent company News Corp — then instructed Attorney General Pam Bondi to 'produce any and all pertinent Grand Jury testimony' related to the case, 'subject to Court approval.'
He claimed on his Truth Social account that the newspaper printed a 'false, malicious, and defamatory story' after Trump and White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt personally warned Murdoch and editor Emma Tucker against running it.
In another Truth Social post around 10 p.m. Thursday, the president said, 'The Wall Street Journal printed a FAKE letter, supposedly to Epstein. These are not my words, not the way I talk. Also, I don't draw pictures. I told Rupert Murdoch it was a Scam, that he shouldn't print this Fake Story. But he did, and now I'm going to sue his ass off, and that of his third rate newspaper. Thank you for your attention to this matter! DJT.'
The Journal reported a typewritten note styled as an imaginary conversation between Trump and Epstein, written in the third person, is included inside the outline of the naked woman, in Trump's alleged birthday letter to Epstein.
The newspaper claims to have reviewed pages from a leather-bound album of birthday cards that were examined by Department of Justice officials who investigated Epstein and his former girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell, who was found guilty of child sex trafficking and other offenses in 2022.
In the imagined conversation, Trump reportedly says 'we have certain things in common, Jeffrey,' to which Epstein replies, 'Yes, we do, come to think of it.'
'Enigmas never age, have you noticed that?' Trump writes, according to The Journal.
Epstein died while in prison facing sex trafficking charges. While conspiracies have swirled about his 'client list,' Trump officials have recently said that no list exists ()
The revelation follows a disastrous week for the Trump administration as the president repeatedly tries to dismiss the so-called Epstein files as a Democratic 'hoax.'
Thursday's report illustrates a closer than previously reported relationship between the president and Epstein, who was accused of sexually abusing dozens of minors before he was found dead in his jail cell in 2019.
A Justice Department memo on July 6 had effectively closed the case, affirming that no such 'client list' exists despite demands from Trump's supporters and allies for a full accounting of Epstein's death and alleged ties to a wider child trafficking conspiracy implicating powerful figures.
On the campaign trail, Trump repeatedly promised to release FBI files related to Epstein, who was found dead in his jail cell on on August 10, 2019 while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges. But the president's promises fell flat.
Bondi, on Trump's directive, also promised to release the files, but after months of delays, the memo from the Justice Department and FBI said agencies would not be releasing any more documents relating to the case.
Bondi had claimed the files were 'sitting on her desk' in February. She invited right-wing influencers to the White House for a photo-op at the end of that month, where they held up binders containing 'Phase 1' of the Epstein files, largely made up of already publicly available information about the case.
Bondi continued to stall. In May, she claimed there were 'tens of thousands of videos of Epstein with children or child porn,' which fueled further conspiracy theories that powerful people were being protected, and that 'Phase 1' binders were allegedly buying time.
The administration's failure to release any other details about the investigation has been a major blow for Trump's supporters — including those within Trump's own administration. Deputy FBI director Don Bongino, who last year amplified conspiracy theories that Epstein was murdered, almost walked over the memo, according to reports.
Trump has spoken out against those questioning him about the release of the Epstein files. (AP)
While the White House likely hoped MAGA's fury would blow over quickly, outrage has only intensified. Frustrated, Trump lashed out at his supporters this week and reportedly complained in private that they won't 'shut the f*** up' about the Epstein files.
Trump has spent several days publicly calling the Epstein case 'boring' and 'bulls***' as he questioned the loyalty of gullible 'weaklings' who demanded more from his Justice Department.
'Let these weaklings continue forward and do the Democrats work, don't even think about talking of our incredible and unprecedented success, because I don't want their support anymore!' Trump said in a Truth Social fury post.
Even the White House has tried to temper the fury. On July 17, Leavitt was asked whether the president would appoint a special prosecutor to oversee the Epstein case.
'The president would not recommend a special prosecutor in the Epstein case,' Leavitt said. 'That's how he feels. And as for his discussions with the attorney general, I'm not sure.'
Trump's friendship with Epstein spanned the late 1980s, 1990s and early 2000s, and Trump's phone number — as well as First Lady Melania Trump's — were included in Epstein's infamous leaked address books. Trump's name also appeared seven times in passenger logs for Epstein's planes.
The pair reportedly fell out in 2004, when Epstein and Trump both tried to buy a Palm Beach estate. The next year, the FBI began investigating Epstein for child sex trafficking. He pleaded guilty to a state charge of soliciting sex from a minor in 2008.
Trump distanced himself from his former friend after Epstein's arrest in 2019, when Trump was president.
'Well, I knew him like everybody in Palm Beach knew him,' Trump said on July 9, 2019, one day after Epstein's arrest. 'I mean, people in Palm Beach knew him. He was a fixture in Palm Beach. I had a falling out with him a long time ago. I don't think I've spoken to him for 15 years. I wasn't a fan.'
Asked three days later what contributed to that 'falling out,' Trump said 'the reason doesn't make any difference, frankly.'
One month later, Epstein was found dead in his cell at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York City.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
28 minutes ago
- The Independent
Dismembered remains found by hiker in Utah belong to fisherman missing for 28 years, cops confirm
Dismembered remains found by a hiker in Utah were found to belong to a fisherman who had been missing for nearly three decades, cops say. In May, a hiker and his dog came across a hiking boot with the remains of a human foot inside on the shores of Fish Lake, the Sevier County Sheriff's Office said in a Facebook post Tuesday. Investigators determined the shoe was only made for one year, in 1996, and the sheriff's office had a missing persons case from 1997. David White of Washington, Utah — about a two and a half hour drive southwest of Fish Lake — had vanished in September of that year while on a fishing trip. There were no witnesses. White had rented a hotel room near the lake and he was supposed to go fishing with his friends, but the plans fell through, the sheriff's office said. White decided to go fishing anyway and was never seen again. His boat was later reportedly found trolling across the lake, but no one was on board, the Sheriff's office said. Trolling is a fishing method where a baited line trails behind a boat. 'A shoe and hat were found floating in the water giving a possible indication where White was believed to have fallen in,' according to the Facebook post. The initial search for White lasted five days with no further evidence found, and now, just about 28 years later, his family has some closure. DNA was taken from the boot and one of White's daughters and testing showed a '99.9994% certainty' the samples were related. Stefanie Bennett, one of White's daughters, said in a statement: 'We are also deeply grateful to the individual and his dog who found the shoe – without them, we would not be where we are today.' She also thanked the authorities and others for 'their incredible support and tireless efforts.' Sheriff Nathan J. Curtis said in a statement: 'This case has been on the mind of every one of the SAR [search and rescue] members who were involved in the search 28 years ago. It is good to finally have some closure for the family and the searchers.'
Times
an hour ago
- Times
Keir Starmer must let in sunlight to avoid further lobbying scandals
Lord Cameron of Chipping Norton long ago predicted that lobbying would be 'the next big scandal' to hit politics, warning of the dangers of what happens behind closed doors. 'We all know how it works. The lunches, the hospitality, the quiet word in your ear, the ex-ministers and ex-advisers for hire, helping big business find the right way to get its way,' he said in 2010. It was somewhat apt that despite introducing the first real oversight for lobbyists, the former prime minister was caught in just such a scandal after he departed from office. Despite a repeated cycle of scandals involving what Lord Cameron spoke of, lobbyists have continued to work in the shadows. As this newspaper has exposed, the Starmer government is facing serious questions over 'cash for access' after businesses were approached by a Labour group offering private meetings with 'an influential Labour figure'. The Labour Infrastructure Forum (LIF), which is run by lobbyists from Bradshaw Advisory along with an advisory council of senior party figures, has offered businesses the chance to meet 'key policymakers' to help 'shape the discussion'. The forum has offered sponsorship packages for potential clients, including breakfast meetings for almost £9,500. Darren Jones, the chief secretary to the Treasury, has spoken at an LIF event. • Labour 'leaving public in the dark' about payments from lobbyists Although the LIF insists that the sponsorship money is used to cover costs, the group declined a request by The Times to disclose details of which companies had sponsored events at what cost until its next annual report. The Labour Party too has declined to say which senior figures had attended any LIF meetings. Yet undercover reporting has shown Gerry McFall, director of the forum alongside his leading role at Bradshaw Advisory, boasted of meetings between his clients and senior figures in government, including Jonathan Reynolds, the business secretary. There is a clear problem here that must be addressed. The Office of the Registrar of Consultant Lobbyists, which was set up during Lord Cameron's premiership, governs lobbying and is supposed to ensure it is transparent and open. Businesses who regularly engage in lobbying, known as 'consultant lobbyists', are required to register their activities. Yet the LIF was not required to register as it did not fall under this category: in-house lobbyists who are employed directly by companies, think tanks or 'forums' are not required to register. This must be addressed: all lobbying activity should be recorded, along with the details of who exactly is meeting which ministers. That being said, ministers should show more common sense. Mr Jones should have done due diligence before speaking at an LIF event. The same goes for Mr Reynolds, the minister most exposed to the potential influence of businesses. The lack of records charting his meeting with a Bradshaw Advisory client at a Labour conference highlights another flaw in transparency rules, which does not require ministers to report meetings at such events not deemed to be in a ministerial capacity. Even if the party insists it was instead 'held in a political capacity', Mr Reynolds should have realised that he should strive for transparency. • How we exposed Labour's cosy links to lobbyists None of this is to say that all lobbying is inherently bad, or that onerous restrictions are required. It is essential to good policy making that ministers hear from businesses — particularly a government that has as little private sector experience as this one. But it must be done in an open and transparent manner, something lacking at present. According to an analysis by the Chartered Institute of Public Relations, registered Westminster lobbyists account for just 0.5 per cent of registered lobbyists across a host of similar countries. If Sir Keir Starmer is to avoid further such scandals, he must strengthen the oversight. By letting in as much sunlight as possible, it will go some way to curtail any sense of wrongdoing, real or perceived.
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
South Korea says Samsung, SK Hynix will not be subject to 100% US chip tariffs
SEOUL, Aug 7 (Reuters) - South Korea's top trade envoy Yeo Han-koo said on Thursday that Samsung Electronics ( opens new tab and SK Hynix ( opens new tab will not be subject to 100% U.S. tariffs on chips. Yeo said on radio that among various countries, South Korea will face the most favourable U.S. tariff rates on chips under the trade deal between Washington and Seoul. He did not elaborate. U.S. President Donald Trump said on Wednesday the United States will impose a tariff of about 100% on semiconductors imported from countries not producing in the U.S. or planning to do so. But it would not apply to companies that had made a commitment to manufacture in the U.S. or were in the process of doing so. Trump's comments were not a formal announcement and much remains unclear. Samsung has invested in two chip fabrication plants in Austin and Taylor, Texas, while SK Hynix has announced plans to build an advanced chip packaging plant and research and development facility for artificial intelligence products in Indiana. "While both Samsung and SK Hynix have made U.S. investments, there are doubts about whether SK Hynix's packaging plant alone would fully qualify for tariff exemptions," said Baik Gil-hyun, an analyst at Yuanta Securities. "Samsung, on the other hand, appears to be benefiting not only from that but also from news that it has joined Apple's supply chain." Apple (AAPL.O), opens new tab said on Wednesday that Samsung Electronics will supply chips from its production plant in Texas for Apple products including iPhones. Shares in Samsung Electronics climbed 2.6% while shares in SK Hynix were trading up 0.6% in line with the broader market. Both companies declined to comment on Trump's remarks.
