Japan to deploy long-range anti-ship missiles in Kumamoto
The Defense Ministry is finalizing a plan to deploy long‑range anti-ship missiles at a site in Kumamoto Prefecture as a deterrence to China, several government sources said.
The domestically produced Type 12 missiles will be installed at the Ground Self-Defense Force's Camp Kengun in Kumamoto Prefecture during this fiscal year, at a time of stepped-up Chinese military maneuvers around the Nansei islands, the sources said.
Japan's fiscal year runs through March 31.
The government plans to operate the upgraded version of the Type 12 surface-to-ship missiles as a standoff capability, operating outside the enemy's range.
The enhanced Type 12 missile has a range of 1,000 kilometers, greater than its predecessor. It can reach China's coastline.
Government sources said the missile will be deployed to GSDF Camp Yufuin in the future, although the date has not been decided. It could come next fiscal year or later.
Deployment to the GSDF's Vice Camp Katsuren in Okinawa Prefecture is also under consideration.
Mass production of the upgraded Type 12 missile began in fiscal 2023. The weapon was test-fired last year on Niijima island south of Tokyo.
The government named a standoff missile capability in its three revised security-related documents in 2022.
However, the possession of these missiles has raised concerns from some quarters.
One concern is that it increases the likelihood of the bases being targeted during hostilities.
Another concern is that possessing standoff missiles is in conflict with Japan's Constitution, which limits the Self-Defense Forces to protecting the country.
(This story was written by Mizuki Sato and Daisuke Yajima.)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Japan Today
6 hours ago
- Japan Today
80 years after the Pacific War: Japan's reckoning with history
By Jeff W. Richards This month marks 80 years since Japan surrendered in World War II, ending the Pacific War. In this episode of Japan Today Spotlight, we look at how the country is commemorating the anniversary — and what unresolved questions remain. From memorials in Hiroshima and Nagasaki to continued demands for wartime apologies, Japan's war legacy remains a source of both reflection and controversy. The emperor's visits to former battle sites, renewed debate over the pacifist Constitution, and political pressure from South Korea and China all raise the question: how should Japan remember its wartime past? And what does the future hold? Watch the full episode here: How should Japan approach its wartime history 80 years later? And what responsibility — if any — does the U.S. still bear for the atomic bombings? Chapters 0:00 Intro 0:56 Hiroshima and Nagasaki ceremonies 1:58 Has the world learned anything? 4:39 The question of apologies 6:00 The emperor's role 7:22 The sex slave issue 9:32 Yasukuni Shrine 10:37 The firebombing of Tokyo 11:37 Peace prize winners speak out 12:50 Outro Japan Today sources: See the Japan Today Spotlight series: Don't forget to like, subscribe and turn on notifications so you never miss an update on Japan's biggest news stories on our YouTube channel: Follow us for more updates: The views and opinions expressed in this video are those of the host and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of GPlusMedia, Inc. © Japan Today
The Diplomat
8 hours ago
- The Diplomat
Philippine House Seeks Reversal of Supreme Court Ruling on VP's Impeachment
The Philippine House of Representatives has challenged a recent Supreme Court ruling nullifying its impeachment of Vice President Sara Duterte, filing a Motion for Reconsideration urging the court to reverse its ruling. Duterte was impeached by the House of Representatives in February for 'violation of the constitution, betrayal of public trust, graft and corruption, and other high crimes.' These include alleged corruption, involvement in extrajudicial killings, and a threat to assassinate President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. However, in a unanimous ruling on July 25, the Supreme Court said that the impeachment had violated a constitutional rule known as the 'one-year bar,' which states that only one impeachment proceeding may be initiated against any official within one year. In its motion to the Court, which was filed on Monday, lawyers for the House argued that impeachment 'is primarily a political process, as emphasized by the Constitution's entrusting it to Congress and not to the Judiciary.' It added, 'Thus, any ruling of this Honorable Court on impeachment must reflect impeachment's true nature. It must give due deference to the branch of government to whom impeachment is entrusted.' The Supreme Court argued that the House violated the one-year bar by accepting and archiving three prior impeachment complaints, and that the fourth should have been barred. But the House motion claimed that this was the result of a factual error, and 'it is rather the fourth impeachment complaint which barred all other impeachment complaints from being initiated.' In a video statement on Monday, House Speaker Martin Romualdez, a cousin of President Marcos, said that the motion was 'an exercise in constitutional stewardship – an affirmation that every branch must act with fidelity to the Charter that gives us all our power.' He added, 'We act not to provoke a clash of institutions, but to prevent the erosion of the people's right to accountability.' Duterte, the daughter of former President Rodrigo Duterte, has denied the charges laid out in the articles of impeachment and described it as a politically motivated witch hunt. In response, her allies have made a number of legal attempts to block to advance of the impeachment, including a resolution in the Senate and several complaints to the Supreme Court. The impeachment drama grew out of the bitter ongoing feud between Duterte and Marcos. Their two political families formed a formidable partnership ahead of the presidential election of 2022, and Duterte and Marcos won their respective elections in a landslide. But the partnership between the two camps has since deteriorated, due to a toxic combination of political differences and personal idiosyncrasies. In June 2024, Duterte resigned from Marcos' cabinet, where she served as education secretary, and immediately came under investigation for her alleged misuse of government funds. This provided the backdrop to her outburst during a livestream in November, during which she claimed that her life was at risk, and that she had had hired a hitman to assassinate the president, his wife, and House Speaker Romualdez, in the event of her own murder. The month after Duterte's impeachment, her father was arrested by Philippine police on an arrest warrant issued by International Criminal Court in The Hague. Duterte is now in the court's custody awaiting trial for crimes against humanity linked to his violent 'war on drugs' campaign. While the Supreme Court said that it had not absolved Duterte of the charges, its ruling offered a last-minute reprieve for Duterte, who was awaiting a Senate trial that could have stripped her of the vice presidency and disqualified her from public office for life. The vice president is widely expected to launch a campaign for the presidency in 2028, in a bid to succeed Marcos, who is limited to a single six-year term in office. If successful, she will no doubt use the powers of her office to pursue retribution against the Marcoses and their allies. If the Supreme Court ruling stands, its net effect may simply be to ensure that the Duterte-Marcos feud continues to dominate Philippine politics up to, and maybe beyond, the next presidential election.
Nikkei Asia
8 hours ago
- Nikkei Asia
India's Modi plans first China visit in 7 years, as tensions with US rise
NEW DELHI (Reuters) -- Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi will visit China for the first time in over seven years, a government source said on Wednesday, in a further sign of a diplomatic thaw with Beijing as tensions with the United States rise. Modi will go to China for a summit of the multilateral Shanghai Cooperation Organization that begins on Aug. 31, the government source, with direct knowledge of the matter, told Reuters. India's foreign ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment. His trip will come at a time when India's relationship with the U.S. faces its most serious crisis in years after President Donald Trump imposed the highest tariffs among Asian peers on goods imported from India, and has threatened an unspecified further penalty for New Delhi's purchases of Russian oil. Modi's visit to the Chinese city of Tianjin for the summit of the SCO, a Eurasian political and security grouping that includes Russia, will be his first since June 2018. Subsequently, Sino-Indian ties deteriorated sharply after a military clash along their disputed Himalayan border in 2020. Modi and Chinese President Xi Jinping held talks on the sidelines of a BRICS summit in Russia in October that led to a thaw. The giant Asian neighbors are now slowly defusing tensions that have hampered business relations and travel between the two countries. Trump has threatened to charge an additional 10% tariff on imports from members -- which include India -- of the BRICS group of major emerging economies for "aligning themselves with anti-American policies." Trump said on Wednesday his administration would decide on the penalty for buying Russian oil after the outcome of U.S. efforts to seek a last-minute breakthrough that would bring about a ceasefire in the war in Ukraine. Trump's top diplomatic envoy, Steve Witkoff, is in Moscow, two days before the expiry of a deadline the president set for Russia to agree to peace in Ukraine or face new sanctions. Meanwhile, Indian national security adviser Ajit Doval is in Russia on a scheduled visit and is expected to discuss India's purchases of Russian oil in the wake of Trump's pressure on India to stop buying Russian crude, according to another government source, who also did not want to be named. Doval is likely to address India's defense cooperation with Russia, including obtaining faster access to pending exports to India of Moscow's S400 air defense system, and a possible visit by President Vladimir Putin to India. Doval's trip will be followed by External Affairs Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar in the weeks to come. U.S. and Indian officials told Reuters a mix of political misjudgment, missed signals and bitterness scuttled trade deal negotiations between the world's biggest and fifth-largest economies, whose bilateral trade is worth over $190 billion. India expects Trump's crackdown could cost it a competitive advantage in about $64 billion worth of goods sent to the U.S. that account for 80% of its total exports, four separate sources told Reuters, citing an internal government assessment. However, the relatively low share of exports in India's $4 trillion economy is expected to limit the direct impact on economic growth. On Wednesday, the Reserve Bank of India left its GDP growth forecast for the current April-March financial year unchanged at 6.5% and held rates steady despite the tariff uncertainties. India's government assessment report has assumed a 10% penalty for buying Russian oil, which would take the total U.S. tariff to 35%, the sources said. India's trade ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The internal assessment report is the government's initial estimate and will change as the quantum of tariffs imposed by Trump becomes clear, all four sources said. India exported goods estimated at $81 billion in 2024 to the U.S.
