Aviation Regulator DGCA Orders Audit Of Helicopter Services In Uttarakhand
Aviation safety regulator Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) has ordered special audits/enhanced surveillance into helicopter operations involved in shuttle services in Uttarakhand following a spate of "occurrences" involving choppers during the Char Dham Yatra, according to an official statement on Monday.
As a precautionary measure, DGCA is also reviewing the necessity of "curtailing" helicopter operations to Char Dham if required, it said.
On June 7, six people, including the pilot, had a narrow escape last Saturday when a Kestrel Aviation helicopter on its way to Kedarnath made an emergency landing on the highway in Rudraprayag district of Uttarakhand after developing a technical snag during take-off.
DGCA has also intensified its oversight of Char Dham helicopter operations by actively monitoring live camera feeds provided by the Uttarakhand Civil Aviation Development Authority (UCADA) at Kedarnath, it said.
Recently, multiple occurrences involving helicopter operations during the Char Dham Yatra in Uttarakhand have underscored the "necessity for further strengthening the safety oversight of these operations," the regulator said.
Safety investigation has been initiated for each of these occurrences to identify contributing factors, including mechanical failures, operational errors, and weather-related challenges, according to the statement.
"Reaffirming its steadfast commitment to aviation safety, DGCA is responding proactively on these occurrences and has ordered special audits/enhanced surveillance for helicopter operators involved in shuttle services and charter operations in Uttarakhand," it said.
Additionally, it said, directives have been issued to all helicopter operators, restricting operations to OGE conditions till further order.
"As a precautionary measure, DGCA is also reviewing the necessity of curtailing helicopter operations to Char Dham, if required," the DGCA said.
On Monday, the DGCA said, two helicopter operators conducting shuttle and charter services to Kedarnath from their respective helipads failed to adhere to standard operating procedures (SOPs), particularly regarding proper helicopter parking.
"As a result, swift action was taken, and their operations were suspended for two hours," it said.
According to the regulator, any deviation from the SOPs by helicopter operators is detected in real time, which allows immediate corrective measures.
Emphasising that it has a "zero tolerance" policy for safety violations, the regulator said in its latest enforcement action the operations of Kestrel Aviation Pvt Ltd in Uttarakhand has been suspended with immediate effect, pending investigation.
This is further to suspension of operations of another operator for safety violations in May, it said, without naming the operator.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
4 days ago
- New Indian Express
Going beyond blame game to address fear of flying
Not a day has passed since the Air India crash in Ahmedabad when there has not been an incident involving planes—takeoffs aborted, aircraft skidding off runways, engines catching fire, flights returning to base after takeoff, cancellations, and diversions to other airports due to technical glitches have almost become routine. We also had six helicopter crashes involving pilgrims in Uttarakhand in this period, out of which two were fatal accidents. No wonder a sense of foreboding pervades the public's mind. The vivid live video of the Boeing 787 Dreamliner fireball and images of its aftermath are still haunting the imagination of the nation and the world. Though more people die in road and train accidents in India than anywhere else in the world, people are asking, 'Is it safe to fly?' This is why we have to look at the larger picture of Indian aviation today. First, of course, is Air India. The preliminary investigation report into its flight 171 crash has raised more questions than answers. It has stoked conspiracy theories and TV-presenters-on-steroids are working overtime sowing confusion. Aspersions are being cast by the pilots' association on the integrity and fairness of the probe agencies. Charges are being levelled that the truth has already been made a casualty. Given the trepidation in the air, the aviation ministry and Directorate General of Civil Aviation must do everything to earn the confidence of the public and the aviation community. They must speedily conclude the full investigation and publish the report for public knowledge. The cause of the accident must be established without fear—to learn from and avoid future disasters. For itself, Air India has to get its act together fast and earn back the reputation of its glory days during JRD Tata's charismatic leadership in the pioneering phase before independence. The airline lost its sheen and glamour after nationalisation and JRD's exit from the airline. It has had never-ending woes ever since.
The Wire
5 days ago
- The Wire
Crucial DGCA Unit Meant to Audit Aircraft Safety Is Half-Empty and Neglected
Mumbai: A crucial unit at the frontline of India's air safety apparatus, meant to keep a check on aircraft fitness, lies half-empty and neglected. India's Directorate of Airworthiness (DAW), a unit within the Director General of Civil Aviation (DGCA), is meant to conduct surprise technical checks on aircraft and ensure that private airline operators are not compromising on passenger safety. The job is crucial: within the DGCA, the DAW is meant to certify whether aircraft are 'air-worthy', which, as per the International Civil Aviation Organisation, means to check whether it is safe to fly. India's DGCA, in its manual, admits that the DAW is meant to investigate defects in aircraft and 'suggest corrective actions to arrest trends', to 'investigate major problems or defects', and to perform 'periodic and unannounced surveillance' checks on private airline operators to check if they are following safety norms. It is also meant to monitor the maintenance processes that airlines adopt, and verify that they aren't cutting corners. Yet, the DGCA has admitted, in a response to an Right to Information (RTI) query filed by this correspondent, that of the 310 total posts in the directorate, 133, i.e. 43% of them, are lying empty. But even more worrying are the vacancies in the posts of airworthiness officers (AWO), the backbone of the DAW and the first line of oversight into aircraft safety and maintenance. Of the 121 posts created for such officers, only 47 have been filled by the DGCA. The remaining 74 lie empty, meaning a whopping 61% vacancy rate. According to the DGCA's RTI response, despite such a high rate of vacancies, the pace of recruitment has been unhurried and sluggish. Since 2022, the DGCA has been able to appoint only 20 airworthiness officers, rather than fill up all the vacant posts. Also read: Half the Positions at DGCA Vacant, Says Civil Aviation Ministry Air-safety experts and insiders in the DGCA said such vacancies render the DAW toothless and powerless to be able to effectively monitor private airlines and their aircraft fleet. 'The airworthiness directorate is at the heart of air safety,' said Rajendra Prasad, a former director of the DAW who retired in June 2023. With such crippling shortages of manpower, Prasad said it was 'not possible at all for the DAW to function' and carry out its responsibilities. 'This situation benefits everyone: from those in the DGCA who don't want to work, as well as the private airline operators who can then cut corners in aircraft maintenance and safety without anyone watching,' Prasad said. This is a part of a dangerous pattern of negligence the DGCA suffers from: The Wire had, on June 19 this year, reported how the Modi government has cut the budget allocated to Ministry of Civil Aviation (MoCA) – under which DGCA falls –from Rs 3,113 crore in 2023-24 to Rs 2,357 crore in 2024-25, despite the country's aviation sector only growing. Even worse, the ministry's capital outlay has been slashed by 91% since the 2023-24 budget and it now stands at just Rs 70 crore this year from Rs 755 crore two years ago. The Wire 's RTI query had asked the DGCA about the budget allotted to the airworthiness directorate. However, it said the information 'did not pertain to this office', and forwarded the query to another section for a response on July 10. Yet, 19 days on, there has been no further response from the DGCA. The Wire has sent emails to both, the DGCA chief Faiz Ahmed Kidwai as well as the Press Information Bureau additional director general in-charge of the MoCA, Sanjay Roy, but they chose not to respond. A dangerous shortag The DAW's work – to perform both periodic, scheduled checks on airlines and surprise, unannounced checks, as well as track the maintenance systems that airlines employ to see whether they conform to standards – is crucial for India's aviation industry. The DAW, among all the 13 different wings within the DGCA meant to conduct surveillance inspections, carries out the highest number of such inspections. In 2024, according to the DGCA's surveillance plan, the DAW was to conduct 1,246 surveillance inspections, and in 2025, it is meant to conduct 1,596 such inspections. However, with 43% of the posts empty, many doubt the quality of these inspections. A former airworthiness consultant, appointed by the DGCA, said that such inspections were often conducted hastily. 'We have a fixed target of inspections given to us each year which we must meet,' he said. 'If we don't have enough manpower, we do what anyone would in that scenario: rush through inspections, wrap them up as quickly [as possible] and move on to the next task at hand.' Prasad, the retired DAW director, agreed, saying the 'quality' of inspections as well as those staffing the DAW had been dipping. Also read: The DGCA Has Played Fast and Loose With Pilots' Wellbeing A former Indian pilot in a commercial airline, who also served in the DGCA, said they often witnessed the poor quality of auditors in their job with the airline. 'Often, DAW auditors would come and not be able to inspect and survey the important parts of the aircraft and its maintenance. Instead, they would just focus on smaller issues that were just not as important,' the pilot said, recounting an episode where a DAW auditor pointed out how the crew seat's seat belt was worn out but refused to thoroughly check the aircraft for any major defects or flaws. 'The auditor was happy that he was able to point this out one, albeit minor, flaw and the airline was happy that there wasn't anything major the auditor could find. It was a win-win,' the pilot said. Proof of negligence The result of such shoddy work has been increasingly visible in India's civil aviation space. Between January 2019 and July 24, India's domestic sector saw 2,353 technical faults in flights operated by Indian carriers, according to MoCA in the Rajya Sabha in July 2024, in response to a question raised by MP Sanjay Singh. In the last week alone, the country saw at least four instances of aircraft developing technical snags, leading to cancellations or delays – an Air India flight with 182 passengers developed a mid-air snag and was forced to return to Calicut two hours after take-off, an Air India flight wasn't able to take off from the Hindon airport in Ghaziabad due to a technical glitch, a Goa-Indore IndiGo flight developed a technical snag just before it landed, whereas another Ahmedabad-Diu IndiGo flight was forced to abort take-off after it detected a technical snag just before it was about to fly. In 2024, the country had 23 instances where domestic airline operators flouted air safety norms, the MoCA told Parliament in February this year. Twelve of these 23 instances came from Air India and its subsidiaries, including a serious incident when Air India paired non-qualified crew to operate a Mumbai-Riyadh flight last year. Insiders argue that many of them could have been prevented, if the country's air safety apparatus was strong enough. The pilot who was previously with the DGCA said that audits and inspections carried out by the DAW were essential because they 'were not reactive, they were predictive processes'. 'Such audits and inspections could help prevent major tragedies and accidents. The crux of a good safety system is how proactive it is in preventing accidents, not in how they react to incidents,' the former official added.
Time of India
6 days ago
- Time of India
Runway 2 used by 3K flights sans adequate fire safety for 6 months
Chennai: More than 3,500 flights operated on Chennai airport's secondary runway during simultaneous use of the two runways between April and October 2024 without adequate fire safety measures, an audit by the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) found. The audit, done in October 2024 found the airport had only four crash fire tenders instead of the stipulated six — three each for the main runway and secondary runway. There was only one fire tender for the secondary runway, that too had suffered multiple technical snags and failed to meet the requirements. "At least three fire tenders were unserviced and lacked equipment, and a non-functional dry chemical powder tender was deployed as a responding vehicle for several days," said the report. It also noted that two fire tenders in use since 2008 were past their shelf life of 10 years. You Can Also Check: Chennai AQI | Weather in Chennai | Bank Holidays in Chennai | Public Holidays in Chennai The survey highlighted 63 safety parameters as unsatisfactory, including three 'level-1 lapses' to be complied with on a priority basis before Nov 2024. The task and resource analysis (TRA) for Chennai airport was not updated after 2022 in line with the simultaneous operations on the runways. Aerodrome Rescue and Firefighting (ARFF) Services is the first line of defence during any aircraft-related emergency at airports. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Learn More - How Donating Sperm May Support Your Income SpellRock Undo Their role spans rescue, fire control, passenger safety, and coordination, making them vital to aviation safety and disaster preparedness. They are aligned with ICAO (International Civil Aviation Organisation) and DGCA standards to respond to the situation and initiate rescue operations within three minutes. DGCA said ambulances stationed at the airport were past their expiry date. Other deficiencies included expired proximity suits, inadequate breathing apparatus for firefighters, and lower quality of foam used to extinguish fire. An airport official said the airport needed just three fire tenders as per DGCA Civil Aviation Requirements (CAR), but it had an additional tender. "We responded to the DGCA report and addressed the lapses. The ambulances were replaced in June this year, and two new crash fire tenders were added in May," said an official. Reply to an RTI application revealed reduced simultaneous operations on the two runways after the DGCA report. While the number of flights operated from the secondary runway ranged from 700 to 950 between April and Oct, it came down to around 300 in the following months as flights were operated on the secondary runway when the main runway was closed for operations twice weekly. Captain Ranganathan, a former pilot and air safety expert, said that ARFF, unlike other fire services, is not about precaution but a mandatory procedure. "For even abnormalities during take-off and landing of flights, the airport should be prepared for crash landing, for which the ARFF should be ready to respond," he said. He recalled the Air France crash at Chennai airport in 1999 and the Air India Express flight crash in Mangaluru in 2010 and said the casualties would have been fewer had the ARFF teams reached the site immediately. DGCA can initiate action for not complying with 'level-1 lapses' beyond the deadline, he said.
