Mali's former prime minister charged with embezzlement after criticizing junta
Maiga is accused of "embezzlement of public funds," his lawyer Cheick Oumar Konare told Agence France-Presse (AFP), adding that no date has yet been set for his trial. "We believe in justice, we are calm while awaiting the trial," Konare said, explaining that Maiga would remain in prison.
Eight of his former colleagues from his time as prime minister had also been placed in custody, although his former chief of staff has been released while awaiting trial. Confirming the charge of embezzlement, another judicial source told AFP that Maiga was specifically accused of "damage to public property, forgery, use of false documents."
Maiga was arrested one week ago, days after the junta carried out dozens of arrests to quash an alleged plot within the army's ranks to topple the government in turn. "Choguel Maiga says he is calm and believes that a politician should expect anything, including prison and death," his lawyer Konare said in a statement.
Ramped up repression
His sacking in November 2024 appeared at the time to confirm that the army, which went back on a pledge to hand the reins back to civilians by the end of March 2024, had tightened its grip on power.
Having been named to the post following the second coup in 2021, Maiga was fired after he publicly condemned the lack of clarity regarding when the military would give up power in the West African country. Mali's junta replaced the civilian prime minister with General Abdoulaye Maiga, who had previously served as government spokesman in the West African country.
Impoverished Mali has been gripped by a security crisis since 2012, fuelled notably by violence from groups affiliated with Al-Qaeda and the Islamic State jihadist group, as well as local criminal gangs.
The junta, led by President Assimi Goita, has turned away from Western partners, notably former colonial power France, to align itself politically and militarily with Russia. The regular army and its Russian allies are frequently accused of committing atrocities against civilians, with the junta ramping up repression of its critics in the face of widespread jihadist unrest.
Witnesses recount horrific conditions inside the Wagner Group's secret detention centers in Mali
"They beat me on the head until I passed out. I lost a lot of blood," recounted Nawma, a Malian survivor tortured by Russian mercenaries from the Wagner Group. On July 31, 2024, this Fulani shopkeeper was arrested by auxiliaries of the Malian army in the village of Toulé, in central Mali. He was taken to the Nampala military camp, about 15 kilometers away. There, the interrogations began, involving torture and humiliation.
This testimony is one of many collected by Le Monde, Forbidden Stories and media partners. Our investigation revealed the existence of at least six bases where Russian mercenaries secretly imprisoned Malians, often arrested arbitrarily.
Read more Subscribers only Russian Wagner group fighters secretly detained and tortured civilians in Mali
In July, a bill passed by the military-appointed legislative body granted Goita a five-year presidential mandate, renewable "as many times as necessary" and without elections.
Le Monde with AFP
Reuse this content
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
21 minutes ago
- Euronews
Who really pays for the war in Ukraine? Kyiv, the EU and US in numbers
As transatlantic talks over Ukraine's future intensify, one topic looms large, particularly in the statements made by US President Donald Trump: Who is paying what? The debate over the billions poured into the war effort to help Ukraine fend off the Russian attacks in Moscow's all-out war since February 2022, and whether the burden is shared fairly, now sits at the centre of the ongoing diplomatic efforts. Euronews breaks down exactly who is paying what, and more importantly — how much of a burden this cost is, relative to each country. Defence spending in terms of US and EU GDP In November of last year, Ukraine's parliament, the Verkhovna Rada, approved a record military budget of 2.23 trillion hryvnias (€45.9bn) for 2025. At the time, this amounted to 26.3% of the country's GDP or 55% of its total budget. In July, the amount was revised to include an extra 412.3 billion hryvnias (€8.6m) for additional military personnel support, weapons procurement and manufacturing, bringing the total up to 31% of GDP or 67% of all central government spending. Spending as a share of the budget indicates the proportion of a government's own resources allocated to a priority, such as defence, compared to all other expenditures. Whereas spending as a share of GDP measures that same amount against the size of the entire economy—so it includes private companies and other economic activity — to show the burden on the nation's economy as a whole. While Ukraine's 2.64 trillion hryvnias (€55bn) defence budget reflects immediate survival needs, the broader war costs reveal a €700 billion total burden spanning reconstruction, humanitarian needs, and economic losses. Defence spending, though historically unprecedented, represents just one component of the war's financial impact on the country. In comparison, the EU's spending on Ukraine's defence efforts — which includes both EU direct spending and bilateral spending by member states — is around €72 billion for the three-year period, 2022-2024. In terms of percentage of GDP, that comes out at around 0.3% of EU GDP per year. The US spending on Ukrainian defence alone over the same three years has been $66.9 billion (€57.3bn), according to the State Department. This is much lower than the $300 billion figure US President Donald Trump has mentioned in the past. In terms of percentage of GDP, it amounts to about 0.08% of US GDP per year. We put together the graph below to visualise the stark differences. While it comes as no surprise that the amount spent on Ukraine's defence for economic powerhouses like the US and EU is only a sliver of their annual GDP, it puts the total, real cost of Russia's war for Ukrainians into perspective. Cost of the war in Ukraine in terms of the burden to individual citizens Another way to put the numbers into context is how much each individual citizen pays for the defence costs of Ukraine. If we were to take Ukraine's defence spending budget and divide based on a general estimate of its current population, at around 37.86 million — figures are unclear due to a large number of refugees and internally displaced Ukrainians — then we can deduce that over the 2022–2024 period, each Ukrainian effectively paid around €3,424 toward defence or about €1,312 per year. This is far higher, both absolutely and relatively, than what US or EU citizens contribute. Pinning down a firm, fixed figure for funding sent by the US to Ukraine since 2022 is difficult as funding and dispersement decisions do not neatly align with defence or spending budgets the way they did for our Ukraine calculation, but let us assume the most generous numbers. If we were to take the Kiel Institute's figure of $130.6 billion (€111.28 billion) — this includes both the defence support and humanitarian aid figures over at least three years — and split that by the US population number, then each US citizen has paid $127 (€108) per year for the defence of Ukraine. For the EU, if we once again take the Kiel Institute's estimates of total military and financial commitments at around €138 billion, then the figure for each EU citizen is around €95 per year. Now, unlike the US estimate, the figures should technically not be the same for the entire bloc because some countries contribute more to Ukraine's defence and others contribute little-to-nothing apart from the joint EU budget, like Hungary. Also, some non-EU countries in Europe such as Norway contribute to the Ukraine's defence via an additional instrument, the European Peace Facility. Most estimations of EU aid to Kyiv do not include the EPF funds. But for the sake of estimation, let us say the burden is evenly spread out. The graph below illustrates the stark difference from the known figures. Of course, it should be said that the average annual salary of a Ukrainian citizen is around €3,500 — making their contribution to the war effort equivalent to about a third of the average annual salary. The numbers above seem much less of a burden if we compare the average salary in the EU, which is around €29,600 according to Eurostat, and in the US, which is around $62,000 or €56,880. Costs of wartime destruction Ukraine faces €448.6 billion in reconstruction needs over the next decade, nearly nine times the 2025 defence budget. The World Bank's Fourth Rapid Damage and Needs Assessment, released on 25 February, documented €150 billion in direct infrastructure damage. Housing damage and destruction lead all sectors at €48.8 billion, affecting 2.5 million households and requiring €71 billion for reconstruction. Transport infrastructure sustained €31.6 billion in damage, needing €66.7 billion for full restoration. The energy sector, targeted heavily in 2024, faces reconstruction costs reaching €58.2 billion. In comparison, the US and the EU have seen no direct infrastructure costs or damages due to fighting, apart from incidents related to Russian sabotage such as the damage done to subsea telecom cables in the Baltic region in December 2024. These figures capture only the economic side of the war. The far greater cost is borne in lives lost, families displaced and communities destroyed — numbers that no ledger can fully account for.
Euronews
2 hours ago
- Euronews
West Bank settlement project approved as IDF begins Gaza City assault
Israel has given final approval for a controversial settlement project in the occupied West Bank in a significant blow to the prospects of Palestinian statehood. Settlement development in E1, an open tract of land east of Jerusalem, has been under consideration for more than two decades, but was frozen due to US pressure during previous administrations. The Israeli occupation of Palestinian territories is illegal under international law. Last year, the International Court of Justice declared in a landmark ruling that Israel should end settlement activity in the West Bank and East Jerusalem and end its occupation of those areas, as well as Gaza, as soon as possible. Far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, a former settler leader, cast the approval as a rebuke to Western countries that announced their plans to recognise a Palestinian state in recent weeks. 'The Palestinian state is being erased from the table not with slogans but with actions,' he said on Wednesday. 'Every settlement, every neighbourhood, every housing unit is another nail in the coffin of this dangerous idea.' Several countries, including the UK and the Netherlands, have in recent weeks moved to sanction Smotrich, as well as National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir for inciting settler violence against Palestinians and calling for the ethnic cleansing of Gaza. In a post on X, British Foreign Secretary David Lammy condemned the approval of the E1 project, calling it "a flagrant breach of international law". Germany's Foreign Ministry spokesperson Josef Hinterseher also condemned the move during a news conference on Wednesday. "The position of the federal government is clear: we strongly reject this approval. The settlement construction violates international law and relevant UN Security Council resolutions." The location of E1 is significant because it is one of the last geographical links between the major West Bank cities of Ramallah, in the north, and Bethlehem, in the south. The two cities are 22 kilometres apart, but Palestinians traveling between them must take a wide detour and pass through multiple Israeli checkpoints, spending hours on the journey. The hope was that, in an eventual Palestinian state, the region would serve as a direct link between the cities. Israel's expansion of settlements is part of an increasingly dire reality for Palestinians in the occupied West Bank as the world's attention focuses on the war in Gaza. There have been marked increases in attacks by settlers on Palestinians, evictions from Palestinian towns, Israeli military operations, and checkpoints that choke freedom of movement. Israel military says it has begun Gaza City offensive The Israeli military has announced it has begun the first stage of its planned military offensive to seize the enclave's largest urban centre, Gaza City. Brigadier General Effie Defrin, Israel's military spokesperson, said on Wednesday that "IDF forces are holding the outskirts of Gaza City". Israel is calling up 60,000 reservists as it ramps up fighting in Gaza while negotiators scramble to strike a ceasefire to end the war in Gaza, now nearing its two-year mark. US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee has blamed a recent breakdown in Gaza ceasefire talks on the decision by some European leaders to recognise Palestinian statehood. Huckabee, who is himself a long-time opponent of Palestinian statehood, said the 'noise that has been made by European leaders recently ... is having the counterproductive effect that they probably think that they want," in an interview with the Associated Press. In a country of fewer than 10 million people, the call-up of reservists is the largest in months and carries economic and political weight. It comes days after hundreds of thousands of Israelis rallied for a ceasefire, and as rights groups warn that an expanded assault could deepen the crisis in the Gaza Strip, where most of the roughly 2 million inhabitants have been displaced, many areas have been reduced to rubble, and the population faces the threat of famine.
AFP
3 hours ago
- AFP
Video of Indian military chief saying '250 soldiers were killed in Indian-Pakistan clash' is edited
"Indian Army Chief Upendra Dwivedi admits to losing more than 250 soldiers in war against Pakistan. Pakistan was aware of our every single movement due to Chinese satellites," reads a shared on July 29. The post includes a video showing Dwivedi speaking behind a podium in Hindi with a watermark belonging The Indian Express. "Taking this tradition forward, during Operation Sindoor also, the Indian Army, with the same valour and determination, targeted the Pakistan-backed terrorist infrastructure and effectively thwarted other aggressive actions of Pakistan and won a decisive victory," Dwivedi says in the clip at the 0:36 mark, referring "The Indian army suffered heavy losses along the LoC (Line of Control) as 250 Indian soldiers were martyred, and at the same time the entire movement of our assets was being closely monitored by Pakistan and Chinese satellites," he goes on. "We gave peace a chance, but they (Pakistan) carried out a cowardly act and we responded with valour." Image Screenshot of the false Facebook post taken on August 19, 2025 with a red X added by AFP The posts emerged after Dwivedi gave a speech on July 26 during a ceremony marking the 26th anniversary of India's victory over Pakistan in the 1999 Kargil war, where he also praised the military in the recent clash with Islamabad (archived link). A surprise ceasefire on May 10 brought a halt to the clash, which killed more than 70 people on both sides (archived here and here). Pakistan claimed its Chinese-supplied jets had shot down six Indian aircraft -- including three French-made Rafale fighters. India's chief of defence staff, Anil Chauhan, called Pakistan's claims "absolutely incorrect", but appeared to confirm New Delhi had lost an unspecified number of aircraft without giving details (archived link). The same clip appeared in false posts on Instagram, X and TikTok. But the audio was dubbed and the original video made no mention of casualties. A reverse image search of keyframes found the original video by The Indian Express (archived link). Dwivedi can be heard making the same remarks at the 1:46 mark. But contrary to the false clip, it does not show him speaking about the hundreds of casualties along the LoC, or that Pakistani and Chinese satellites tracked Indian troop movement. Image Screenshots comparison of the false post (left) and the Indian Express video His speech can also be heard in a livestream from another Indian outlet The Hindu at the 4:32 mark, which also does not show him speaking of the casualty figures in the false post (archived link). AFP has previously debunked misinformation related to the India-Pakistan conflict here.
