Homeowners with smart doorbells or CCTV could face £100k fine, expert warns
Carlos stressed the need for homeowners equipped with devices like smart doorbells and CCTV cameras to be fully aware of the legalities involved to sidestep hefty fines and potential legal battles.
He cautioned: "Many homeowners unknowingly break the law with their security cameras and smart doorbells. While having a security system is a great idea, if it records footage outside your property line, like a public sidewalk or your neighbour's garden, you could face hefty fines (up to £100,000) or even criminal charges for violating data protection laws."
The Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) holds the authority to enforce actions against homeowners who fail to comply. For our free daily briefing on the biggest issues facing the nation, sign up to the Wales Matters newsletter here
Homeowners should consider the following advice to ensure their home security setup remains within legal boundaries and operates effectively:
Understanding data protection laws
If your security equipment captures images beyond your property's confines, such as neighbouring homes, gardens, communal areas, or public spaces, you must adhere to the Data Protection Act (DPA) and the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).
Failing to adhere to these legal requirements could result in enforcement measures and fines from the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) or legal action from those impacted, reports the Manchester Evening News.
Steps towards compliance.
Carlos, a home security specialist, stressed the significance of proper signage.
He explained: "It's increasingly common for homeowners to install surveillance systems for safety benefits. However, it's essential to follow guidelines to avoid unlawfully filming individuals. Secretly filming, even on private property, is illegal.
"To avoid this, put up clear and visible signs at key entry points informing people that recording devices are in operation. This transparency deters crime and fulfils legal requirements."
He also underlined the importance of respecting privacy, stating: "For those considering CCTV or smart camera installations, it's vital to inform neighbours and ensure signs are prominently displayed to notify individuals of the recording.
"Remember, security shouldn't come at the expense of your neighbours' privacy. Inform them and anyone potentially captured on camera, especially if the camera's view extends beyond your property. This proactive approach not only fosters community awareness but also helps in safeguarding privacy and avoiding misunderstandings or complaints."
Discussing the importance of proper storage, he remarked: "When managing recordings, make sure they have accurate timestamps for easy review and have sufficient storage capacity to retain footage as needed. These measures not only support legal compliance but also enhance the effectiveness of security systems in protecting homes and occupants."
He further stressed the value of professional assistance in setting up security systems, stating: "When installing CCTV or smart cameras, consider engaging a specialist security firm. They can ensure that your system is set up in compliance with legal requirements, including proper signage and data protection protocols.
"Expert installation not only mitigates legal risks but also optimises the effectiveness of your security measures, providing peace of mind during this summer season."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South Wales Argus
16 hours ago
- South Wales Argus
Newport RAF veteran forced out of military seeks apology
This renewed expression of contrition follows an Argus report into the case of Kevin Jones, a Lliswerry man now living with an aggressive form of prostate cancer. Kevin is seeking accountability for the premature end of his military career, which he says was unfairly derailed due to his sexuality. Kevin told the Argus that he jumped before he was pushed, describing the suspicion, scrutiny and pressure he endured while serving as a gay man. He now seeks access to his service records in pursuit of redress; however, records have gone missing, which Kevin finds as frustrating as the lack of an apology and accountability. "I just want my apology and an explanation of why my records were destroyed. Without them, what can I prove?" Kevin said. In response to the story, the Ministry of Defence expressed deep regret over the treatment of LGBT personnel between 1967 and 2000, describing it as wholly wrong and completely unacceptable. However, it stopped short of speaking about Kevin's individual case. Historic Newport pub hosts its first same sex wedding Firefighters tackle huge fire at scrapyard for 24 hours to bring it under control Tributes paid to 'fearless' Monmouth environmentalist Kevin has said his efforts toward justice have been obstructed by the destruction of documentation during a 'shredding party' that saw thousands of cases erased. The MOD said the record destruction was in line with government policy and data protection legislation. The MOD confirmed that most records relating to decriminalised sexual offences were destroyed between 2010 and 2011. Officials stated that these documents were considered to hold no further investigative value and contained sensitive personal information. General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), a stricter successor to earlier data laws, was incorporated into British law in 2018. Kevin continues to seek answers and accountability for the loss of his otherwise unblemished career. The general apology coincides with the ongoing Government Financial Recognition Scheme, launched on 13 December, 2024. The scheme offers a flat-rate payment of £50,000 to individuals dismissed or discharged due to their sexuality or gender identity and additional awards between £1000 and £20000 pounds for other impacts, assessed by an independent panel. The MOD encourages affected individuals to contact LGBT-FRScheme@ for support. Instructions issued by the Defence Police Chiefs Forum in 2010 mandated the removal of historical investigation and conviction records, aligning with legal reforms that eliminated these offences from criminal background checks. Eligibility for the Dismissed or Discharged Payment includes those ordered to retire or resign, medically discharged or administratively removed due to their sexuality or gender identity. Individuals who exited voluntarily or due to contract expiry may still be eligible for the LGBT Impact Payment. The MOD states it is fully committed to recruiting and retaining in an inclusive way
Scottish Sun
a day ago
- Scottish Sun
I'm fuming after spotting my neighbour's camera – it looks directly into my garden and records everything my kids do
Plus, what are your legal rights if this happens to you CAM ON NOW I'm fuming after spotting my neighbour's camera – it looks directly into my garden and records everything my kids do Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) A WOMAN was left fuming after claiming her neighbour has installed a camera in their window which looks directly into her garden. The mum said she was especially concerned as her kids play in the garden in full view of the alleged recording device. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 1 A woman claimed her neighbour is 'filming' into her garden The woman claimed: 'He's now recording me. 'I can't cope. 'He's watching my kids, this is enough.' She didn't share whether or not she had already confronted her neighbour, but people were quick to chime in with their views on the video. Many people urged her to report the neighbour to the police, with some calling it a privacy violation. However, another said: '2 sides to every story.' The person replied: 'I don't do anything that untoward, I get anxious with confrontation. 'Next door go to sleep at 10, I respect that and make sure my house is in bed too cos not to make any noises! They scare my [sic] I'm alone with 3 small kids!' WHAT ARE YOUR RIGHTS? It's typically not illegal for a neighbour's security camera to capture images beyond their property boundary, but it can be intrusive and raise privacy concerns. If your CCTV footage captures images beyond your property boundary then you are subject to the data protection laws. Your kids are breaking law if they kick their ball over neighbour's fence, High Court rules after couple sued next door Legal experts say you will be regulated under the General Data Protection Regulation and the Data Protection Act. You may be familiar with this when it comes to websites storing your data or companies sending you emails. Joanne Ellis, a partner at Warrington-based solicitor Stephensons, said if CCTV being captured falls outside of a homeowner's property boundaries, the person capturing the CCTV becomes a data controller. This creates a set of responsibilities for the CCTV owner. The person captured has a right to be told a CCTV system is being used and what information is being recorded. Ellis said a subject access request can be made if a neighbour refuses to do this. She said: "You can ask for the footage captured of you to be deleted - but it can be refused if there is a legitimate reason to keep it such as it captures a burglar. "Any third parties that the CCTV is disclosed to, such as police and insurers, are also obliged to process the footage in accordance with the rules." CAN YOU REFUSE TO BE FILMED? Ellis said that a neighbour can request they are not captured on CCTV, but this might not be granted if the filming complies with regulations. The CCTV owner must also process data in a lawful and transparent manner and only for specified and legitimate purposes. Ellis said: "In a domestic context, this is usually to deter or record burglaries or theft. "If the CCTV footage for example covers a potential entrance or exit and is not too intrusive for the neighbour the use is likely to be considered legitimate." As always with disputes, Ellis said, the best course of action is to speak with the neighbour, voice your concerns and try to reach agreement. If that fails it may be worth taking legal advice, but this can be pricey.
Daily Mail
a day ago
- Daily Mail
Arsonist gets painful dose of instant karma after setting shop on fire
A clumsy arsonist set himself on fire while trying to burn down a grocery store in Argentina. The suspect was caught on camera approaching Villa Fox Market in Zárate, Buenos Aires and dousing the entrance with a flammable liquid, surveillance footage showed He then began to pour the liquid from the canister over a canopy and lit a lighter over the wet canvas. The flames covered canopy and the ground and spread towards the entrance as the suspect stepped forward. The video showed the suspect, who disguised his identity with a hat and hoodie, running away while his hand, foot and the container were on fire. Moments later, the owner of a neighboring shop was seen on video tossing water on the flames before the fire department arrived. The incident took place the evening of July 6 but the suspect remained on the run as of Monday. The owner of Villa Fox Market, who was identified as Carlos, told Somos AMBA TV, that he was grateful for his quick neighbor's response. 'When I arrived, there were neighbors there, and the firefighters were on their way,' he said. 'A neighboring business owner threw buckets of water at the fire to control it. Luckily, it didn't get inside the store.' Law enforcement sources told online news portal Infobae that the store owner mentioned that he had been involved in a dispute with his former girlfriend and her son. The prosecutor handling the case is looking into whether the quarrel between both parties may been related to the arson attack. It's unclear how badly injured the arsonist was in the blaze.
