LaFrance administration aims to set up 24 'microunits' in Anchorage pilot program for homeless
May 26—Mayor Suzanne LaFrance's administration told members of the Assembly that it hopes to have a new pilot project providing homeless residents substance abuse treatment in a small community of "microunits" by October.
"This could be unrealistic," special assistant to the mayor Thea Agnew Bemben said of the tight timeline. "But we're just gonna give it a whirl."
Bemben detailed the plan to members of the Assembly during a Housing and Homelessness Committee meeting Wednesday.
The goal of the "Microunit Recovery Residences" pilot program, according to Bemben's presentation, is to "create immediate access to transitional living and treatment for people experiencing homelessness with substance use disorders."
To do that, the administration aims to put 24 tiny houses on a piece of municipal land, potentially near the U-Med District in the area of Tudor and Elmore roads.
"These are small structures," Bemben said — around 100 square feet per unit. "Inside you just basically have the basics for one person. So it's a bed, some storage, a fridge, a microwave, a window."
Outside the single-person domiciles are bathrooms and, potentially, on-site showers as well as a communal indoor space.
[Town Square Park, Anchorage's troubled downtown centerpiece, is set for a major overhaul]
The municipality had been studying the idea of using tiny homes as a partial solution to homelessness since 2023, she said, and it was looked at separately by members of the Assembly too. For several months the administration has consulted locally with a similar initiative, In Our Backyard, which as of last year had six small units for seniors set up on the property of a church in Fairview. They also took lessons from different tiny-home projects in Atlanta; Corvallis, Oregon; and elsewhere.
There would be two components: operations and treatment.
In the plan Bemben presented to the Assembly, the Anchorage Community Development Authority would oversee physical components of the pilot. That would mean purchasing or building the tiny homes, developing the selected parcel of land and connecting the site to utilities, including electricity and water.
The Anchorage Community Development Authority is a quasi-governmental municipal entity that traditionally has overseen parking lots, garages and meters but has increasingly helped connect public and private resources for redevelopment projects in the municipality, particularly housing.
Bemben said the administration wants the Assembly to approve a plan to use about half of the $2.4 million the municipality currently has from a legal settlement with opioid manufacturers that it believes can be spent on the program, since it is geared toward people in treatment and recovery from substance abuse. Though the exact amount is still being fine-tuned, Bemben said they think $1.2 million of the settlement passed to the authority will be enough to hire a contractor to construct and install the microunits and get them set up for tenants.
"I just want to double check my math here," said Assembly member Zac Johnson, who represents South Anchorage. "$1.2 million for 24 units to have them built and connected to services, I mean that's about $50,000 a pop —"
"$47,000," Bemben interjected.
"That's pretty good value," Johnson replied.
The second component of the pilot is drug and alcohol treatment as a requirement for eligibility.
"This is designed to be a very low-barrier way of getting people into treatment," Bemben said. "In order to remain there you would have to remain compliant with the program."
The municipality would not be the one funding treatment and operating costs. As early as June 10, the administration could submit a measure to the Assembly that includes a request for $500,000 for startup costs to help a third-party health care provider get a treatment program established in the recovery residences, Bemben said. The Anchorage Health Department will be in charge of selecting a provider that is qualified to charge Medicaid for behavioral health services to residents. Creating a program that can bill the federal health care system will be essential to making it financially sustainable, Bemben said, something they'd learned from looking at treatment provider peers in Wasilla and Fairbanks.
Assembly member Daniel Volland, from the downtown district, asked how standing up a community of two dozen tiny homes compared to the municipality buying an apartment or hotel building to provide shelter and treatment, an approach to homelessness and addiction the municipality has pursued with varying degrees of focus for several years. Bemben told him the city should be working on both.
"The advantage of this is it can be done quickly," she said.
In the ideal timeline, Bemben said, the Assembly will approve funding for the pilot program in June, a contractor will be selected in July, and work begun in August or September so that tenants are able to move in in October, before winter hits. Developing the treatment program with a health care provider would happen simultaneously on a parallel track.
A location for the tiny homes has not been selected, but the prime candidate is a municipal-owned parcel near the Tozier track by the intersection of Tudor and Elmore roads. Bemben said the site had a lot of what the city needs to make it successful and cost effective like paving, fencing and proximity to utilities.
"This one's the most promising so far," she said.
Assembly Chair Chris Constant pointed out that the municipality owns that particular parcel in a land swap that was part of a redevelopment plan that imagined adding more permanent housing, a new Health Department building and a grocery store to the area.
Bemben responded that one of the draws of a pilot program was that if it didn't work, then the microunits could be moved elsewhere or scrapped entirely.
"We have choices after that two-year period," she said.
Erin Baldwin Day, who was elected this spring to represent the area, told Bemben that neighborhoods around that land have had a lot of experience with homeless encampments in the area. She asked the administration, if the parcel is ultimately selected, to commit to holding town halls or community listening sessions to inform residents of the plan and build support for it.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
The assisted dying movement is gaining momentum. These opponents are pushing back
What does it mean to die well, with dignity? The question is at the heart of the contentious debate over whether legalizing physician-assisted death for terminally ill patients is an act of compassion, upholding an individual's dignity, or a troubling step toward devaluing human life. The debate has recently returned to the spotlight in New York, where the state Assembly passed a bill in April that would allow terminally ill patients with a prognosis of six months or less to live to request life-ending medication. It also came up in May, when 'Dilbert' cartoonist Scott Adams revealed that he only has a few months to live and indicated that he might take advantage of California's End of Life Option Act. New York's proposal requires confirmation from two doctors, who must verify the diagnosis and ensure the patient is mentally sound. The measure passed narrowly — 81 to 67 — after more than four hours of debate. Its fate now rests with the state Senate, where it needs 32 votes to pass and currently has 26 co-sponsors. Currently, 12 jurisdictions — including Oregon, Colorado and the District of Columbia — permit what's commonly known as 'medical assistance in dying' (MAiD) or 'assisted suicide.' On May 20, Delaware became the latest state to legalize medical assistance in dying, and at least 19 other states are considering similar laws. Canada, Switzerland, Belgium and the Netherlands have adopted MAiD laws, some extending eligibility to people without terminal illnesses. The United Kingdom is also reviewing a similar bill, with a vote expected later in June. 'Passing this bill is about love, compassion, and reducing needless suffering. No one should have to endure agony when there is a better, humane choice available. This is not a political issue — it's a human issue, and we owe it to New Yorkers to pass the Medical Aid in Dying Act,' said the bill's sponsor, Assemblymember Amy Paulin, D-Westchester, in a press release. Supporters argue that allowing patients to choose death in the face of unbearable suffering respects their dignity and autonomy. For those speaking out against the bill, legalizing physician-assisted suicide devalues life and puts vulnerable populations at risk, including people with disabilities, poor people and people with mental illness. Dr. Lydia Dugdale, a physician and ethicist at Columbia University, wrote in a recent New York Times op-ed that the debate isn't about dying well. 'It is about relieving society — government, medical systems, even families — of the responsibility to care for those who need the most help: the mentally ill, the poor, the physically disabled,' she wrote. Opponents worry about a 'slippery slope,' arguing that vague eligibility requirements could lead to the kind of expansion seen in Canada, where assisted suicide has become available to people suffering not only from terminal illness, but also from conditions like loneliness, eating disorders and mental illness. 'I cannot get through a day ... It's physical torture,' said a Canadian woman with a series of nonterminal diagnoses, whose journey seeking, and receiving, MAiD is the focus of a recent New York Times story. 'Once we go down this road, there is no going back,' said Ed Mechmann, the director of public policy at the Archdiocese of New York, speaking at a recent event in New York hosted by Communion and Liberation, a Catholic lay movement, along with other opponents of physician-assisted suicide. 'It will change the nature of health care, of living and dying forever,' Mechmann said. The terms 'physician-assisted death' or 'assisted suicide' typically refer to a medical practice in which a terminally ill person is provided a lethal dose of medication they can take to end their life. The term 'medical assistance in dying' is commonly used in U.S. and Canada policy discussions and often refers to both assisted suicide and euthanasia. Euthanasia, by contrast, involves a medical professional administering a life-ending medication, typically by injection, at the patient's request. Euthanasia is not legal in the states that have legalized MAiD, whereas countries like Canada and the Netherlands allow both. Although the proponents of MAiD often frame assisted suicide as a matter of personal autonomy, those who oppose it believe that in reality, it would accomplish the opposite and endanger vulnerable patients who struggle to access care and support. 'As a practicing physician, I will tell you this does not become a matter of choice for most people,' said Dugdale, author of the 2020 book 'The Lost Art of Dying,' speaking at the New York event. 'The concern is that once you have a choice legalized for the privileged few, it will then threaten life for many others who find it difficult to maintain life for a variety of reasons.' Weak safeguards of the laws and ambiguous definitions would likely contribute to eventually including a wide range of chronic conditions, including diabetes, heart disease, cancer and even mental health disorders like anorexia, Mechmann noted. In such cases, choosing death may not reflect true autonomy but rather systemic neglect, he said. In Colorado, for instance, patients with anorexia have already qualified for assisted death on the grounds that the condition can be fatal if untreated. In 2024, Quebec, a province in Canada, established the right for a person with a serious and incurable illness to choose a medically assisted death in advance. Also in Canada, patients with a mental illness as an underlying medical condition will be eligible for MAiD in 2027. But even with long-term patients, it can be difficult to determine whether a desire to die stems from informed decision-making or untreated depression, Dugdale said. 'The people who tend to seek to end their lives through lethal prescription, who want assisted suicide, are at high risk for depression demographically,' Dugdale said. Among those groups are older adults with advanced cancer, especially white men. Depression is often overlooked or misdiagnosed, despite being treatable. In Oregon, where MAiD has been legal the longest, less than 1% of patients requesting lethal prescriptions are referred for psychological evaluation. 'This is a major oversight that fails to protect depressed people from making flawed decisions,' Dugdale wrote in her op-ed. Opponents also challenge the popular narrative of MAiD as a carefully considered choice made by an informed patient with a long-trusted physician. 'Very few patients have a doctor they call their own anymore, or a doctor who knows them,' said Dr. Eve Slater, a physician and Columbia University professor at an online event hosted by Plough, a Christian magazine, on June 2. Slater, who previously served as assistant secretary for Health and Human Services, said that for many today, especially in New York, care is fragmented, which makes it more challenging to make intimate and ethically sound decisions. She added that legalizing physician-assisted death could further erode the foundational trust between doctor and patient. Physicians also often misjudge how long terminally ill patients will live, according to Slater. 'I've been thankfully proved wrong on many occasions,' Slater said. ' I think there is a fallacy in the premise that you qualify if you have less than six months to live, because any doctor who declares that is assuming a crystal ball that they don't have.' In reality, legalizing assisted death risks creating a new social norm — one that pressures vulnerable individuals, especially those who are alone, seriously ill or unsupported, into feeling like death is their best or only option. In 2019, Kate Connolly, a communications professional in New York City, received a call that her mother had been rushed to the hospital with a brain aneurysm, she recalled while speaking alongside Dugdale and Mechmann. For the next four and a half years, her mother remained confined to her bed and wheelchair, on a feeding tube, unable to do much without assistance. Yet, even in a severely disabled state, her mother's presence was cherished by her family before she died, Connolly said. 'Her family's role, which was also a great sacrifice, was to be steward, not dictators, but respectful stewards of a precious gift,' Connolly said. Around the same time, Connolly learned her unborn son had developed a cystic hygroma — a condition often considered incompatible with life. Both with her mother and her son, Connolly described pressure from medical professionals to end their life prematurely — through abortion or withdrawal of care, which were presented as practical and compassionate choices. She chose to continue her pregnancy, giving birth to a son and holding him after he died. Although hastening death may sometimes seem like a more compassionate and pragmatic decision, this mindset fosters a view of suffering lives as disposable, Connolly said. 'The truth is, from what I've seen, dying is not a problem to be solved,' she said. 'It is an experience to be lived and even embraced. It is a sacred time, truly set apart from any experience.' End-of-life decisions must involve thoughtful, peaceful conversations between patients, families and doctors, Connolly noted. 'What is the right course of action? What is reasonable or what is needlessly extending pain and suffering?' she said. 'You cannot ask these questions thoughtfully or with any real meaning when you're being pushed to just do the expedient thing and end the life in front of you.' According to studies from Canada, the top reasons that patients say they seek a lethal prescription are more social rather than physical. In Canada, the 2022 annual report revealed that the most commonly cited reasons for requesting MAiD were loss of ability to engage in meaningful activities (86%) and loss of ability to perform daily activities (81%). While supporters of MAiD often argue that alleviating pain is one of the main reasons for hastening the death of a patient, about 59% are concerned about 'controlling pain.' According to Oregon data, nearly 30% of MAiD-seeking patients cite current and future concerns about pain. 'So it's much more an issue of control,' Dugdale said, adding that the U.S. has robust pain control. 'Dying in pain is not an issue. It should not be an issue.' Instead, loss of independence and fear of being a burden often are. These fears should be met with care, not a prescription, Mechmann said. 'It's incumbent on us to make sure people don't feel (like a burden).' With her medical trainees, Dugdale observed a shift in attitudes toward physician-assisted dying. In recent conversations, she said, some trainees wondered, 'Why don't we just do away with our societal aversion to suicide altogether?' and embrace the view that if individuals wish to end their lives, they should be free to do so without interference. Once, she was asked whether assisted suicide can be a solution to the problem of loneliness. With this mindset, end-of-life decisions would be made through a utilitarian and individualistic lens. Many physicians are uneasy about appearing 'paternalist,' Dugdale said. 'And so to mitigate that, we defer everything to the patient,' she said. The core ethical principles of beneficence (doing good) and non-maleficence (avoiding harm) have, in practice, been overshadowed by an almost singular focus on autonomy, Dugdale said. For doctors, she continued, MAiD can offer a controlled intervention in the often unpredictable process of dying, providing a sense of agency amid uncertainty. 'There's already a growing pressure to sacrifice one's life for the so-called 'greater good' and to rid the world of expensive, hopeless cases,' she said. Normalizing the idea of choosing death, especially in a society already grappling with high health care costs and an aging population, may cause younger health care professionals to view seriously ill, expensive patients as burdens. A study from Oxford University points to a correlation between legalized assisted suicide and euthanasia and increased rates of more common forms of suicide in both the U.S. and Europe. 'Once it becomes widely acceptable that I can end my life on my own terms, that feeds a culture of death,' Dugdale said. In Canada, euthanasia is now the fifth most common cause of death. 'At some point, the vast majority of people in the state of New York are gonna be laying in a hospital bed. And when the doctor shows up, what are we gonna think? Is this my ally or is this my enemy?' Mechmann said. So what, then, is the way forward? Investing in meaningful relationships and community and maintaining deep personal connections through family, faith communities, clubs or friendships is a bulwark against loneliness and despair, experts agreed. It's human connection — not lethal prescriptions — that is the real antidote to suffering, participants in the event said. 'Suffering is inevitable,' Mechmann said. But the assisted suicide is a 'bad answer' to the problem of suffering. 'It's love, it's community, it's not despairing. It's being willing to embrace some of the suffering and to live with it and to walk with it.' Editor's note: This story deals with the practice of assisted suicide. If you or someone you know is struggling with thoughts of self-harm, the 988 Suicide and Crisis Line is always available. You can text or call 988 any time or chat at In Utah, you can also reach out to SafeUT, 833-372-3388, or download the SafeUT app.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Sacramento DA, sheriff urge changes to state's mental health diversion law
Standing before images of abused toddlers, Sacramento County's law enforcement leaders warned that California's mental health diversion program is allowing too many defendants to escape punishment. At a town hall in south Sacramento attended by about 50 people, Sacramento County Sheriff Jim Cooper and District Attorney Thien Ho urged residents to push lawmakers for more restrictions on the statewide program, which was established in 2018. Under the law, defendants who present a mental health diagnosis usually have their charges dismissed and records cleared after completing a treatment plan. 'Pretty much anybody can qualify for mental health diversion,' Cooper said. The event's panelists — Cooper, Ho, Undersheriff Mike Ziegler and Sheriff's Office Sgt. John Sydow — repeatedly pointed to the wide range of disorders, including erectile dysfunction and caffeine withdrawal, that can justify diversion and the short list of offenses for which the program is off limits. The town hall came five weeks after a bill that would have added several child abuse crimes to that list failed in the Assembly's Public Safety Committee. Cooper had testified in favor of the bill, which was introduced by Assemblymember Maggy Krell, D-Sacramento. AB 433 only mustered two votes in the committee in April and did not move on to the full Assembly. 'That really just — it made me mad,' said Cooper, who added that he hoped the bill could be reintroduced in the next legislative session. 'You have to stand with the children.' But another bill to tighten the mental health diversions — AB 46, introduced by Assemblymember Stephanie Nguyen, D-Elk Grove — passed the Assembly, 56-7, last month. It is now under consideration in the Senate. Under the current law passed in 2018, judges are required to presume that a defendant's diagnosed mental health disorder was a factor that caused them to commit the crime, Ho said. Nguyen's bill removes that presumption in cases where the diagnosis came after the offense or more than five years earlier. It also broadens prosecutors' latitude to argue that a diversion should be denied because the defendant poses a threat to public safety. Sydow, who leads the sheriff's Child Abuse Bureau, spoke about two recent cases, with images of the abused children displayed behind him. In one of them, 1-year-old 'Baby A' had suffered severe injuries including blunt force trauma while in her father's custody, and the father received a mental health diversion in connection with her death, Sydow said. He said he feared an attempt to seek mental health diversion would be the defense attorney's next step in the case of 'Baby R,' a 20-month-old girl who remains under medical care following alleged torture at the hands of her father. The dad and the mother, who was in Florida during the abuse, are charged with child abuse and torture — crimes that authorities said would be eligible for the diversion program. Cooper argued that the law's list of crimes for which defendants are ineligible for mental health diversion — including murder, rape and sex crimes — leaves out other serious offenses. He noted that people who receive treatment instead of potential prison time have their cases wiped from their criminal records, inaccessible to future background checks. 'I choose kids over offenders,' said Cooper, who told ABC 10 on Thursday morning that he would seek a second term as sheriff in 2026. Ho said his office objected to 977 attempts to pursue mental health diversion in 2024, an increase from 144 the year before. 'It's being used as a sword, versus a shield, and it's being used quite regularly by the Public Defender's Office,' Ho said. 'I am all for somebody getting the treatment that they need, but this law needs to be changed because it's being abused.' The Public Defender's Office could not be immediately reached for comment Thursday morning. Keyan Bliss, a member of the activist groups Decarcerate Sacramento and the Anti Police Terror Project, stood at the back of the room, interjecting at one point to challenge the panelists' claims that the diversion program was not working. After the event, Bliss said the Sacramento County Main Jail is overpopulated and failing to adequately treat mentally ill inmates. He called Cooper and Ho's calls to reform the mental health diversion program 'a massive deflection from the reality that most of the people that are inside the jail every day haven't even been before a judge yet.' 'Many of them are struggling with mental health illnesses, and a significant number of them are homeless,' he said. In an interview, Cooper said he does not oversee the jail's mental health services but that mentally ill inmates 'are being dealt with.' Still, he and Ho contended that the diversion program allows nearly anyone to claim mental health problems and evade accountability.
Medscape
4 days ago
- Medscape
Aid-in-Dying Vote Sparks Historic Medical Debate
A wide-ranging majority of deputies in the National Assembly approved a bill authorising assisted suicide and euthanasia. The phrase may be overused, but it is no exaggeration to call it a historic day for the Assembly — on par with the legalisation of abortion or same-sex marriage. After 2 weeks of review and nearly 100 hours of debate, the lower house of Parliament passed the assisted dying bill by 305 votes in favour and 199 against. Right- and far-right Members of Parliament (MPs) largely opposed it, while those from the centre and left voted in favour. However, as all political groups gave their members the freedom to vote on this extremely complex issue, some MPs did not hesitate to vote against their party's line. Nineteen MPs from the National Rally, including Sébastien Chenu and Jean-Philippe Tanguy, and seven members of The Republicans voted in favour of legalising assisted dying. Conversely, opposition to the bill came from the left: Sophia Chikirou, an MP from La France Insoumise, voted against the assisted dying bill; a Green MP; a Communist MP; and four Socialist MPs voted against it. The bill authorises assisted dying through either assisted suicide or euthanasia in cases where the patient is physically unable to end their life, though these terms are not explicitly used in the text. Palliative Care To access assistance in dying, a person must meet the following conditions: Being at least 18 years old. Be of French nationality or reside in a stable and regular manner in France. Suffering from a serious and incurable condition, whatever the cause, which is life-threatening, in an advanced phase, characterised by the entry into an irreversible process marked by the worsening of the state of health of the sick person, which affects their quality of life, or in a terminal phase. Present constant physical or psychological suffering linked to this condition, which is either resistant to treatment or unbearable, depending on when they have chosen not to receive or to stop receiving treatment. Psychological suffering alone cannot, in any case, allow one to benefit from assistance in dying. Be able to express one's will in a free and informed manner. The last two conditions have given rise to and will continue to give rise to significant terminological debates. Immediately prior to the vote on assisted dying, MPs unanimously adopted a separate bill focused on palliative care. This legislation outlines a 10-year strategy to enhance the provision of palliative care across France. Key measures include the establishment of 'support and palliative care homes aimed at improving access to pain relief and end-of-life support for patients.' 'The vote by the National Assembly on the texts on the development of palliative care and assisted dying is an important step,' said French President Emmanuel Macron on social media platform X. 'Regarding sensitivities, doubts, and hopes, the path of fraternity that I wished for is gradually opening up. With dignity and humanity,' Macron said. The Association for the Right to Die with Dignity expressed satisfaction that France has embarked on the path to freedom. 'I am thinking of all the patients and their loved ones. There are days you know you will never forget. I will never forget this day,' said Olivier Falorni, the general rapporteur of the bill and long-time advocate for legalising assisted suicide. Despite this progress, the government remains divided. Health Minister Catherine Vautrin championed the bill, whereas Junior Health Minister Yannick Neuder, a cardiologist, expressed reservations. Speaking to France Info, Neuder stated he was 'not certain he would have voted for the bill if he had been a member of parliament.' 'Active assisted dying must not become a fallback for inadequate palliative care or limited access to treatment,' he said. 'I have confidence in the parliamentary process to resolve all questions,' said Prime Minister François Bayrou, despite being known for his scepticism towards legalised assisted suicide. The two bills will now proceed to the Senate, where the right-wing majority is expected to propose significant amendments to the assisted dying legislation, potentially limiting its scope or entirely rejecting it. A joint committee and negotiations may be necessary to reconcile the differences between the two houses. President Macron has indicated that in the case of a parliamentary deadlock, he may resort to a referendum to resolve the issue.
