Lifetime Isa penalties too complex for even 'financially literate' savers to grasp
Early Lifetime Isa withdrawal penalties are too complicated, a government report suggests, with even clued-up savers losing out due to a lack of understanding.
HMRC found that even those classed 'highly financially literate' often 'overlooked the fact the withdrawal charge penalises the saver beyond the level of bonus on the amount originally invested.'
The report added: 'Very few Lisa holders in this research understood the withdrawal charge in full.'
For those that were unaware of the full conditions placed on Lisa withdrawal, many viewed the charges as unfair, according to HMRC.
Shaun Moore, tax and financial planning expert at Quilter, said: 'People simply do not realise it's not just a clawback of the Government bonus – it's a loss on their own money.'
Lisas, launched in 2017, allow holders to save or invest up to £4,000 per tax year, on which they will receive a 25 per cent bonus from the Government on contributions up until they reach 50.
Savers can withdraw their funds, along with the bonus, when they purchase their first house, reach the age of 60 or have a terminal illness.
Lisa holders can choose to withdraw their funds from their account without meeting these requirements, but doing so will incur a 25 per cent penalty.
But not only does this knock out the 25 per cent from the Government, it will also eat into the savings the account holder has themselves contributed.
For example, a Lisa containing £800 as well as a £200 contribution from the Government would face a charge of £250 for an unauthorised withdrawal.
This means that you would lose out on £50 of your original contribution – scaled up for an account holding £10,000 including the bonus, this is a £2,500 penalty and a loss of £500 of the original contribution.
Moore said: 'Once participants in the research understood this, there was broad consensus that the current rules feel unfair.
'Many supported a reduction of the withdrawal charge to 20 per cent, which would at least allow savers to break even if circumstances forced them to dip into their pot.'
'This sentiment was particularly strong among lower-income "irregular" and "cushioned savers", who felt they were being penalised for financial instability rather than poor planning.'
'Savers reported feelings of resentment and frustration at the idea of being charged to access what they saw as their own money, particularly when providers are profiting from holding those funds.'
Houses purchased using a Lisa must also be worth less than £450,000, something that has become a problem for many buyers with house prices having risen considerably since the accounts were introduced.
If the limit had increased with inflation it would now be around £600,000.
Moore added: 'People are much more likely to understand the product if it has one clear purpose: to get on the housing ladder.
'To improve transparency and engagement, we believe the Government should simplify the product and rebrand it as a "First Home Account".'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Record
41 minutes ago
- Daily Record
Retirement expert shares simple way employees can boost pension pots by over £41,000
Only 35 per cent of UK workers are enrolled in their company's salary exchange scheme. Workers could boost their pension pots by £41,200 - more than a year's average salary - by opting into their employers' salary exchange scheme, according to new figures from Scottish Widows. Average salary workers - taking home £37,4301 annually - could increase their take home pay by £150 a year, simply by opting into their employers' salary exchange scheme. If this extra cash is then redirected into their pension pot, alongside the savings the employer makes through reduced national insurance contributions, their pension savings would be boosted by £528 a year. For a worker aged 30 and retiring at age 67, and assuming 58 per cent investment growth, this would add £41,200 to their pension savings. Those opting in a decade later, at age 40, would see a £24,500 boost to their pension pot. With the future of salary exchange under the spotlight following recent HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) research, Scottish Widows' analysis emphasises the positive boost that these schemes have on workers' financial empowerment. Among those workers enrolled in salary exchange, 79 per cent said it makes them feel more confident about maximising their pension savings and being tax efficient when managing their money (77%). An encouraging three-quarters (74%) believe the scheme helps ensure their money is working as hard as possible, and the same proportion (74%) say it boosts their productivity at work, knowing that they are financially secure. However, just a third (35%) of workers surveyed are already enrolled in their company's salary exchange scheme, so there is still a significant gap to bridge. A fifth (20%) of workers don't even know if their employer offers salary exchange Often misinterpreted, salary exchange - also known as salary sacrifice - is an arrangement where employees exchange part of their salary in return for an employer pension contribution. Because the salary is being exchanged rather than paid directly, it benefits both employers and employees as neither pays National Insurance Contributions on the amount exchanged. The exchanged amount can then be paid into the employee's pension plan as an employer contribution - creating tangible savings for both employee and employer, while boosting workers' retirement savings. Commenting on the findings, Susan Hope, Scottish Widows Retirement Expert, said: 'Questions loom over the future of salary exchange, despite it being the best way to maximise workers' retirement savings. Cutting or abolishing it completely would ignore the long-term boost it delivers to people's finances. Our data shows not only the positive impact on people's take home pay, and pension wealth, but also the halo effect it has on people's financial confidence. 'The term 'salary sacrifice' is a red herring because neither the employer nor employee has to give anything up when they take advantage of this scheme. It's truly a win win. 'The key to unlocking additional savings into pensions is awareness, and this needs improving so schemes like salary exchange can positively impact more people's finances. We should be empowering our workforce's future and salary exchange is one way to do this.'
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
Ex-England World Cup star Trevor Sinclair declared bankrupt over £36k tax bill
Former England international Trevor Sinclair was not in court as he was judged to be bankrupt after failing to come to an arrangement to pay a debt of more than £36,000 Former England international Trevor Sinclair has been declared bankrupt after racking up a debt of more than £36,000. The 52-year-old failed to pay taxes and penalties that he owed. The ex-Premier League ace 's debt related to punditry work undertaken in the 2021/22 tax year and was previously handed extra time to come up with a solution. But he did not turn up to court on Thursday after failing to come up with the money or offer an alternative proposal. Judge Caroline Wilkinson said HMRC had not heard from the former QPR, West Ham and Manchester City player. That lack of contact saw the conclusion that he is 'unable to pay his debts as they fall due', report the Independent. A judge in April, at the Central London County Court, heard Sinclair owed the money after his accountant passed away. The figure emerged in relation to two sums that totalled more than £13,000 in addition to outstanding National Insurance and penalty payments. HMRC had wanted a bankruptcy order on that occasion but the case was adjourned to give him longer to pay the bill. Lawyer Robert Lee told the court at that time that Sinclair was conducting media work and was "currently in receipt of a job offer in Saudi Arabia". Lee said that his client's debt arose due to an error that saw Sinclair "being considered self-employed when he ought not to have been". But the HMRC lawyer revealed on Thursday that Sinclair had again failed to make contract and asked the judge to confirm their bankruptcy petition. The case was initially paused to offer the opportunity for Sinclair to enter an 'individual voluntary arrangement' rather than bankruptcy. Judge Wilkinson said: "Mr Sinclair is not in attendance today and no proposals have been put forward for paying his debt. In the circumstances, the court finds that Mr Sinclair is unable to pay his debts as they fall due and it will make the bankruptcy order." Sinclair started his career at Blackpool before the Seasiders earned a record fee from QPR in 1993 to move to the Premier League. In 1997, Sinclair earned the goal of the season award for an impressive bicycle kick from outside of the box. In 1994, the Republic of Ireland attempted to call up Sinclair ahead of the World Cup in the United States but he was unable to feature for his mother's homeland having already represented the Three Lions at under-21s level. It wasn't until 2001 that he earned an England cap and ultimately four of his 12 outings came during the 2002 World Cup and impressed for the Three Lions on the left.
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Japan PM instructs ruling camp to include cash handout in election pledge
TOKYO, June 13 (Reuters) - Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba said on Friday he had instructed the ruling coalition to include cash handouts as part of its election campaign pledge to aid households coping with inflation. The handout would be 20,000 yen ($139) per person and an additional 20,000 yen would be added on top of that per child or low-income earner, Ishiba said. The handout plan could add to concerns over the government's already tattered finances, as lawmakers seek to appease voters ahead of an upper house election slated for July. ($1 = 144.0800 yen)
