Distilleries liable to pay full pay to excise officers deputed to their manufacturing units: Kerala HC
The Bench led by Justice Anil K. Narendran made the observation recently while allowing the appeals filed by the State government against the ruling of a single judge's verdict that only the additional allowance and not full pay of the officers needs to be paid to the government. The single judge's order came on writ petitions filed by the private distilleries which sell their products to the the Kerala State Beverages (Manufacturing and Marketing) Corporation challenging the collection of full pay.
Senior government pleader Vinitha B. submitted that under the provisions of the Abkari Act, the Kerala Distillery and Warehouse Rules 1968, Foreign Liquor (Storage in bond) Rules 1961 and Kerala Rectified Spirit Rules 1972, the State government is authorised to depute excise officials for supervising activities and the cost for deputing such officers has to be borne by the distilleries. She also pointed out that as per the licence conditions, the distilleries are bound to pay the actual cost payable to the officer deputed. Therefore, the distilleries could not take the stand that only the charge allowance would be paid under section 53(b) of part I of Kerala Service Rules. Besides, the charge allowance was actually the one payable under Section 53(b) between the State government and its employees.
The court observed that payment of establishment cost is one of the license conditions for granting the privilege of manufacturing intoxicating liquor. The court noted that there are no permanent cadre posts created for the supervisory functions of distilleries. The officers are deployed by the government. Therefore, private distilleries cannot contend that they are liable to pay only the charge allowance for the additional duty of an officer deputed to supervise the distilleries.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
3 hours ago
- The Hindu
24-hour span to produce accused before magistrate begins when the person is detained: HC
The Kerala High Court has said the 24-hour period to produce an accused before a magistrate commenced from the time the person is effectively detained or his/her liberty curtailed, and not from the time of arrest that the police recorded. A Bench of Justice Bechu Kurian Thomas said the non-recording of arrest under one pretext or another was often resorted to under the guise of investigation. Police brutalities generally occured during these periods of uncontrolled authority. Unless there was a check, such unrecorded periods of custody could be the source of human rights violations, the court observed. The Constitution mandates that the person arrested be produced before the nearest magistrate within 24 hours of the arrest. Other than the time needed to reach the magistrate court from the place of arrest, there is a peremptory prohibition that the person arrested shall not be detained beyond the said period without the magistrate's authority, it said and granted bail to Biswajit Mandal of West Bengal, who had been arrayed as accused in a drug case. Mr. Mandal contended that he was detained beyond the 24-hour period, in violation of constitutional and statutory prescriptions and had sought bail. To decide the legal issue regarding when the 24-hour period began, the court had appointed Nikhina Thomas and Neha Babu, second-year students of Ramaiah College, Bengaluru, as amici curiae for providing assistance.
The Hindu
4 hours ago
- The Hindu
HC modifies order, says washrooms in fuel outlets should remain open to public round the clock
The Kerala High Court has modified its interim order that had put curbs on members of the public being permitted to use washrooms in petroleum retail outlets located beside national highway corridors. The court on Wednesday directed that the washrooms remain open to members of the public round the clock. Display boards announcing their availability too must be put up, the court said, adding that permission to use washrooms would be subject to matters like safety protocol and security considerations. The modified order by a Bench of Justice C.S. Dias comes in the wake of a submission by the State government about guidelines issued in December 2020 by the Union Ministry of Road Transport and Highways. It speaks of the need for drinking water and washrooms in retail fuel outlets round the clock, for use by the public. In its affidavit, the Indian Oil Corporation (IOC) said as per its marketing guidelines, washrooms must be available to customers and transit travellers at all times, subject to safety protocols. However, it maintained that these cannot be termed as public toilets by local bodies. Allowing access to people who are not customers and travellers, remained the discretion of the retail dealer or manager. The other petroleum majors sought more time to submit their responses. The court had in June issued an interim order stating that the government cannot insist that toilets in private petroleum retail outlets be allowed for use by members of the public. The order was passed on a petition filed by the Petroleum Traders Welfare and Legal Service Society and five retailers, challenging a move by the government and local bodies to convert these toilets as public toilets. They contended that the private toilets they maintained at their retail outlets for emergency use by customers were often being forced to be opened for public use. Many members of the public and even those who arrived on tourist buses were thus seeking access to the toilets, disrupting regular functioning of the outlets and sometimes leading to altercations on the high-risk premises. Citing protection under Article 300A of the Constitution, they argued that toilets they built within their premises were private property.
Time of India
6 hours ago
- Time of India
Will Old Pension Scheme benefits be given to these government employees? Here's what finance ministry says
Academy Empower your mind, elevate your skills What does OM No. 57/05/2021-P&PW(B) say? SBI employees' eligibility for Old Pension Scheme What is Old Pension Scheme (OPS)? What is National Pension System (NPS)? There have been continuous attempts by central government employees whose appointments were done on the basis of vacancies advertised before implementation of NPS , that they should be allowed to get Old Pension Scheme . This question was raised in Lok Sabha to which the government Finance Ministry has said that Old Pension Scheme (OPS) benefits won't be extended to central government employees who were appointed against the vacancies advertised before the issuing of the notification of National Pension System (NPS) on December 22, Chaudhary, Minister of State for Finance, said in a Lok Sabha session on Tuesday (August 13, 2025) that in light of various court judgements, the government had issued instructions vide OM No. 57/05/2021-P&PW(B) dated 03.03.2023, giving a one-time option to central government civil employees for inclusion under the CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972 (now 2021).Also Read: Old Pension Scheme benefits in UPS: Central Govt employees can claim OPS benefits in Unified Pension Scheme for these cases The minister clarified that no proposal is under consideration for extended OPS benefits to such employees, whether they are employed in Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) or Public Sector a memorandum dated March 3, 2023, Department of Pension and Pensioners Welfare said that in consultation with the Department of Personnel & Training, Department of Expenditure and Department of Legal Affairs, in the light of the various representations/references and decisions of Hon'ble Courts, issued instructions vide OM No. 57/04/2019-P&PW(B) dated 17.02.2020, giving a one-time option to Central Government employees who were declared successful for recruitment in the results declared on or before December 31, 2003, against vacancies which occurred before January 01, 2004, and were covered under the National Pension System on joining service on after January 01, 2004, to be covered under the CCS(Pension) Rules, 1972 (now 2021). There was a fixed time schedule for different activities under the aforesaid OM dated Read: Central government employees, in NPS, can choose OPS under certain conditions; Check eligibility, forms to submit Chaudhary was referring to the query of Dharamvira Gandhi, a member of Parliament from the Patiala constituency, who also asked whether the government ensures that all the employees of State Bank of India , whose recruitment process was conducted before August 1, 2010, but whose appointments were delayed due to unavoidable circumstances and took place after August 1, 2010, are also included in the Old Pension Scheme?Chaudhary said, 'As per the State Bank of India Employees' Pension Fund Regulations, 2014, the old pension will not be applicable to those who joined the services of SBI on or after 01.08.2010.'Old Pension Scheme (OPS) is an age-old pension system in India that dates to the 19th century. It went through many changes ever since and got its present form post independence in 1947. The striking change was when the retirement age was increased from 58 to 60. The scheme provides a defined pension at retirement. It also has the features of pension commutation and family scheme was discontinued by the central government in January 2004 and replaced with New Pension System (NPS). However, many states still follow Old Pension Scheme (OPS).NPS replaced OPS for central government employees on January 1, 2004. It is a defined contribution system where employees get market-linked returns. Unlike OPS, it doesn't provide a defined pension. Central government employees can open a Tier I NPS account. At 60 years of age, they can withdraw up to 60 per cent of their corpus as a lump sum amount. From the remaining amount, they need to purchase an annuity plan, which provides them a monthly pension.
