Philippines says China has no right to object or interfere with its 'lawful' activities in the South China Sea
The ministry said it also "rejects and refutes" recent statements of the Chinese embassy in Manila that Beijing has indisputable sovereignty over the Spratly islands.
The Philippines, Malaysia, Vietnam, Taiwan and China between them have claims and a presence on dozens of features in the Spratly archipelago, ranging from reefs and rocks to islands, natural and artificial. China's manmade islands there include runways, radar towers, ports and missile systems.
"We urge China to respect the Philippines' sovereignty and jurisdiction, even as we continue to pursue peaceful and legal means to manage differences and the situation at sea," foreign ministry spokesperson Teresita Daza said in a statement.
China and the Philippines traded accusations last week following a confrontation between two of their vessels in contested waters of the South China Sea, the latest incident in a long-running row in the strategic waterway.
The Philippines' fisheries bureau said the lives of a civilian crew were put at risk when the Chinese coast guard fired water cannons and sideswiped a vessel as it conducted marine research around a disputed reef.
The Chinese coast guard said two Philippine vessels had illegally entered waters near Subi Reef, a Chinese-built artificial island, and organised personnel to land on the unoccupied sandbars of Sandy Cay.
"The Philippines is clearly within its rights to conduct routine maritime operations and scientific research in and around these features, and will continue to do so," Daza said. "China has no right to object much less interfere with these lawful and routine activities."
China claims sovereignty over nearly all the South China Sea, including parts of the exclusive economic zones of Brunei, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines and Vietnam. An international arbitral tribunal in 2016 said Beijing's expansive claim has no basis under international law.
The Chinese embassy in its statement sent to media on Monday said the Philippines had since January made 27 "unauthorised landings" on features, despite a 2002 agreement among Southeast Asian countries and China to refrain from doing so.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Atlantic
9 minutes ago
- Atlantic
Trump Trades National Security for a Deal With China
After making a show of getting tough on China, President Donald Trump desperately needs a trade agreement to prove that his disruptive tactics get results. This week, the United States and China agreed to extend their negotiations, avoiding—for now—another round of tariffs that would have hurt business between the world's two largest economies. But the president's newfound willingness to allow the export of vital AI chips to China indicates that an eventual deal could imperil American interests. Eager for a pact, Trump may give up more than he receives. In 2022, then-President Joe Biden prohibited the export of advanced AI chips to China. Just four months ago, Trump expanded those restrictions. This week, though, Trump confirmed the details of an unusual arrangement effectively reversing that move: The American companies Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices will be allowed to sell certain chips to Chinese firms if the companies give the U.S. government a 15 percent cut of the revenue from these sales. In essence, Trump sold exemptions to technology-export controls that many experts consider crucial to protecting American security. In a letter last month, Matt Pottinger, who was Trump's deputy national security adviser during the president's first term, and 19 other policy professionals urged the administration not to allow the sale of Nvidia's H20 chip to China, calling the decision a 'strategic misstep that endangers the United States' economic and military edge in artificial intelligence.' Derek Thompson: The disturbing rise of MAGA Maoism Trump may see the arrangement not as a national-security issue but as a business deal: There's a lot of money to be made selling chips to China, and now the U.S. government will materially benefit. But Trump must also realize that he's made a concession to Chinese President Xi Jinping. Beijing has persistently demanded that Washington remove U.S. export controls on advanced chips, and Xi personally pressed Biden for relief without success. Trump justified his flip-flop by arguing that the H20 chip is not among Nvidia's most high-powered products. He's right about that, but it's far from outdated. Chinese companies crave the H20 to help them deploy AI services. Indeed, the demand for the H20 appears to have alarmed Chinese authorities, who would prefer that local companies use homemade alternatives. Even as Beijing fights the U.S. restrictions, officials have tried slowing the rush by signaling in state media that the Nvidia chip is unsafe. Although Chinese designers have developed a similar chip, they are unable to produce enough, also due to U.S. restrictions that prevent them from using the top chip manufacturer, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company. Trump has left the door open to further concessions. Because China's tech industry still can't match Nvidia's AI chips, Beijing is likely to prod Trump to ease restrictions on more advanced semiconductors. Rather than firmly committing to export controls, Trump suggested on Monday that he would be open to permitting Nvidia to sell China downgraded versions of its most powerful chips. Xi has every reason to ask for more. Trump's desire for a deal gives Chinese leaders leverage. And given Trump's pattern of sudden policy reversals, he has likely left an impression that anything could be on the table. Beijing is clearly all in on the negotiations. According to U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, the Chinese government sent 75 officials to the most recent round of talks, in Stockholm in late July, compared with his own skeleton crew of 15. 'Xi now feels more emboldened to probe for a wider range of potential concessions, not only economic but also security concessions,' Ali Wyne, an expert on U.S.-China relations at the International Crisis Group, told me. Wyne fears this could lead to a 'lopsided bargain' in China's favor. Thomas Wright: Trump wasted no time derailing his own AI plan Xi has already gained on his top-priority issue: Taiwan. He urged Trump to approach Taiwan 'with prudence' during a phone conversation in June, according to the Chinese government's official summary. Washington then reportedly canceled meetings with Taiwan's defense minister, a step that surely pleased Beijing, which strives to isolate the island's government. The Trump administration also appears to have discouraged Taiwanese President Lai Ching-te from making stopovers in U.S. cities while en route to Latin America for diplomatic visits. Xi has done little in exchange. Beijing's most significant goodwill gesture was a June decision to restrict the sale of two chemicals that are used to make the illegal fentanyl circulating on American streets, an issue of utmost importance to the Trump team. But Beijing's action on curtailing the fentanyl trade will likely remain conditional on Trump's good behavior. Trump recently called on Xi in a social-media post to buy more U.S.-grown soybeans—which would be great for some American farmers, but is hardly an even swap for China's access to high-tech chips. Meanwhile, Xi has deftly created and deployed levers of pressure. Amid the escalating trade war in April, Beijing imposed controls on the export to the U.S. of rare-earth metals—an industry that China dominates—and then used their easing as a negotiating tool. In the end, Xi may not get all he wants. But he is winning just by talking. China's leaders have apparently learned that they can distract Trump from more strategic issues by haggling with him over tariff rates and soybean sales. The desire for a deal has so consumed the Trump team that any grander strategy to contend with China's growing power seems to have gotten lost. Last week, Trump imposed high tariffs on India in an attempt to compel New Delhi to curtail purchases of Russian oil—angering a potential partner in the global competition with China. Friendlier relations with China are certainly better than open hostility. The question has always been: At what cost? Trump may eventually seal a trade deal with China that benefits him, but not necessarily the nation.
39 minutes ago
The EU urges China to lift 'unjustified' sanctions on Lithuanian banks
VILNIUS, Lithuania -- The European Union on Thursday called on China to revoke sanctions imposed on two Lithuanian banks, arguing there is no justification for them. Beijing announced the measures this week against Urbo Bank and Mano Bank in retaliation for EU penalties on two Chinese lenders. The Lithuanian banks do not operate in China, giving Beijing's move a largely symbolic character. Nonetheless, the tit-for-tat measures underscore deepening tensions between the EU and China over Beijing's support for Russia in its war on Ukraine. In this case, China targeted banks from an EU member with whom diplomatic ties have been particularly strained due to Lithuania's relationship with Taiwan. At EU headquarters in Brussels, European Commission spokesperson Olof Gill defended the bloc's sanctions on Chinese banks. China 'must respect the problems we have identified,' Gill said. 'Our sanctions are the centerpiece of our efforts to minimize the effectiveness of the Russian war machine.' He said the Commission does not believe that the Chinese countermeasures 'have any justification or are evidence based, and therefore we call on China to remove them even now.' The EU's latest Russia sanctions package, adopted in July and effective August 9, included Heihe Rural Commercial Bank and Heilongjiang Suifenhe Rural Commercial Bank. The bloc accused them of providing crypto-asset services that help Moscow evade restrictions. In explaining its sanctions on the Lithuanian banks, the Chinese Ministry said the EU sanctions on Chinese firms had "a serious negative impact on China-EU economic and trade relations and financial cooperation.' The banks and the government in Lithuania said the sanctions were not expected but would likely have little practical impact. 'According to the preliminary assessment, this decision will not have a significant impact on either the country's financial system or the activities of the banks themselves, since the business models of the mentioned banks are focused on the local market,' the Bank of Lithuania said on Wednesday in a statement. Marius Arlauskas, the head of administration of Urbo Bank, said: 'Since we do not have any business partnerships with Chinese individuals or legal entities, the sanctions will have no impact on the activities of Urbo Bank and the implementation of prudential regulations." The Baltic nation has drawn China's ire for years. Beijing expelled Lithuania's ambassador in 2021 in response to Lithuania allowing Taiwan to open a liaison office in Vilnius, the Lithuanian capital. China regards Taiwan as a breakaway province and prohibits other countries from having formal ties with Taipei. Taiwan has long sought closer relations with the Baltic states, citing their past experiences under authoritarian rule and embrace of multiparty democracy and liberal values. severing of two undersea data cables. One runs under the Baltic Sea between Lithuania and Sweden.
New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
Joe Rogan once again rips ICE raids: ‘Great, you're going to get rid of the landscaper'
Joe Rogan once again criticized the Trump administration's immigration raids, telling a MAGA lawmaker on Wednesday that people were protesting deportations because they were thinking, 'Great, you're going to get rid of the landscaper.' Rogan pressed Rep. Anna Paulina Luna to defend her claims about recent immigration protests and challenged the scope of federal enforcement, using his podcast to question whether the government has gone far beyond its promise to target dangerous offenders. During a conversation Wednesday on 'The Joe Rogan Experience,' Luna, a Florida Republican, alleged that demonstrations against Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids in June were fueled by 'Chinese money.' 4 Joe Rogan is a critic of certain aspects of the Trump administration's immigration policies. The Joe Rogan Experience Rogan said he was open to the idea, but reminded her that the public anger also reflected fear about how the raids were being carried out. 'I absolutely believe this is true,' he said, before adding, 'but also, it was in reaction to some of the ICE raids.' Rogan described why he thinks the response was so strong, arguing that people recoiled at the idea of officers grabbing ordinary workers. 'It was a visceral reaction that a lot of people had to the idea of people just showing up and pulling people out of schools and pulling people out of Home Depot and pulling people that were just hard-working people,' he said. 'That's what freaks people out.' He later summed up how many voters saw the administration's pledge, saying the expectation was the removal of violent criminals rather than tradesmen and day laborers. 4 Federal agents, including members of ICE, drag a man away after his court hearing as they patrol the halls of immigration court at the Jacob K. Javitz Federal Building in New York City last month. Getty Images 'When people thought about ICE, they thought, 'Great, we're going to get rid of the gang members,' they didn't think, 'Great, you're going to get rid of the landscaper.'' The exchange underscored a growing split between tough rhetoric around border enforcement and what critics say is the reality on the ground. Rogan has backed President Donald Trump and his hard-line agenda, but he has increasingly criticized how immigration sweeps have been conducted. The podcast host pushed back on the familiar refrain that migrants should simply 'get in line' legally, arguing that many of those doing low-wage work lack the resources to navigate the system. 4 Rogan pressed Rep. Anna Paulina Luna to defend her claims about recent immigration protests. The Joe Rogan Experience 'If you're just a landscaper, you're just a guy who lives in a third-world country and you want a better life, and you say, 'I heard you can get across, and I heard when you get across you can get work,'—like what is that guy going to do?' he asked. 'That guy doesn't have the money to hire a lawyer.' Luna responded by pointing to the policies of the Biden and Obama administrations, but the two agreed on two themes often heard from both sides of the debate: companies should not rely on undocumented labor, and the border should be secure. Last month, Rogan criticized enforcement tactics as overly broad, saying the focus has landed on the wrong targets. 'It's insane,' he said on his show last month. 4 Rogan said that some who supported Trump assumed that the administration would target violent offenders. The Washington Post via Getty Images 'The targeting of migrant workers—not cartel members, not gang members, not drug dealers. Just construction workers. Showing up in construction sites, raiding them. Gardeners. Like, really?' He added, 'I don't think anybody would have signed up for that.' Trump has repeatedly pledged to pursue 'the worst of the worst,' but a review by ABC News shows that people without criminal records have increasingly been swept up, reinforcing Rogan's argument that the practice no longer matches the promise. While the podcast host praised Trump's broader agenda, he has rejected aspects of its execution. He has also criticized the administration on unrelated issues, accusing it of 'gaslighting' around the Jeffrey Epstein scandal. According to the Associated Press, the large majority of those in ICE custody at the end of June had no criminal convictions, a data point that contrasts with campaign promises to focus on serious offenders. A Department of Homeland Security spokesperson told The Post that '70% of ICE arrests are of illegal aliens who have charges or convictions in the US.' 'And that's just the tip of the iceberg: that statistic does not account for foreign fugitives, terrorists, gang members, and human rights abusers or individuals who have criminal records in foreign countries,' the spokesperson added. The Post has sought comment from Luna and the White House.
