Netanyahu decides on full occupation of Gaza
Israel controlled Gaza for 38 years, from 1967 until 2005. After the IDF and Israeli settlers withdrew from the enclave, it was left to be governed by the Palestinian Authority, which also controlled parts of the occupied West Bank. Hamas took control of Gaza after it won elections there in 2006. Since then, no elections have been held.
Several ministers reportedly said Netanyahu referred to the term 'occupation of the Strip' during private conversations, reflecting his vision for expanding military operations. It marks a significant shift in tone as the government prepares to discuss the future of the campaign.
'The die is cast – we are going for a full occupation of the Gaza Strip... There will be operations even in areas where hostages are being held. If the IDF chief of staff doesn't agree, he should resign,' a senior official close to Netanyahu was quoted by Ynet as saying.
The IDF currently claims to hold approximately 75% of the territory. Under the new plan, the military would be expected to occupy the remaining area as well, bringing the entire enclave under Israeli control.
The Times of Israel claims the IDF is against the idea of taking all of Gaza under control. The military believes it could take years to dismantle all Hamas infrastructure. Additionally, this approach could put hostages at risk of execution if troops move too close to where they are being held.
The conflict between Hamas and Israel erupted in October 2023 with a surprise attack by Hamas in southern Israel, leaving about 1,200 dead and 250 taken hostage. Around 50 hostages have not yet been returned, with fewer than half believed to be still alive. Israel's counterattack has led to widespread destruction in Gaza, with the enclave's health authorities estimating at least 60,000 deaths.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
3 hours ago
- Russia Today
Israeli government tries to fire head of Netanyahu corruption probe
The Israeli government voted unanimously on Monday to fire Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miara, who is currently prosecuting Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for corruption. The move was immediately suspended by the Israeli High Court. Netanyahu and his supporters have accused Baharav-Miara of exceeding her powers by blocking decisions by the elected government, including a move to dismiss the head of Israel's domestic security agency. In a statement after the vote, Baharav-Miara called her dismissal 'unlawful' and vowed that she and her office would remain faithful to the law and continue to act professionally and honestly. 'This is a fateful blow to the rule of law, equality before the law, human rights, and the ability of the law enforcement system to deal with government corruption,' she added. The attempt to fire the attorney general for the first time in the country's 78-year history was immediately frozen by the High Court until justices can rule on its legality. The government is barred from appointing a new attorney general and influencing Baharav-Miara's operations before further instructions are issued. Netanyahu did not take part in the hearing or vote on Baharav-Miara's dismissal due to a conflict of interest over his ongoing criminal trial and the attorney general's role as head of the prosecution. Three criminal cases have been opened against Netanyahu, who has been charged with bribery, fraud, and breach of trust. He could face up to ten years in prison over the bribery allegations, while the fraud and breach of trust charges each carry up to three years. Several hearings in Netanyahu's long-running corruption trial have been canceled after a court accepted requests by the prime minister on classified diplomatic, security, and health grounds. Opposition politicians have criticized the attorney general's dismissal, calling it part of Netanyahu's controversial judicial reform plan which sparked one of the largest protests in Israel's history. Opponents claim that the reform would violate democratic principles as the ruling coalition would concentrate more power in its hands and Netanyahu would attempt to avoid criminal liability.
Russia Today
6 hours ago
- Russia Today
Former ICC judges slam sexual misconduct investigation into chief prosecutor
The International Criminal Court's handling of a sexual misconduct investigation into chief prosecutor Karim Khan raises major questions over its timing and procedural irregularities, according to four former judges. The case followed Khan's decision to seek arrest warrants for Israeli leaders over the Gaza war. Khan applied for arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former defense minister Yoav Gallant in May 2024, accusing them of crimes against humanity. The ICC official had also previously secured a warrant for Russian President Vladimir Putin over the alleged deportation of Ukrainian children. Neither Russia nor Israel recognizes the ICC's jurisdiction. Moscow has condemned the court's accusations as 'outrageous' and stressed that its decisions are legally 'null and void for Russia.' While the warrant for Putin was welcomed by Kiev's Western backers – including the US, despite Washington's own non-recognition of the court – the Netanyahu case prompted a backlash. The US imposed sanctions on Khan and four ICC judges, calling the charges politically motivated and warning of further punitive steps. Shortly after the Israeli warrants were issued, allegations of sexual misconduct against Khan surfaced. Former ICC judge Cuno Tarfusser told Middle East Eye he was 'deeply disturbed, even scandalized,' by the proceedings, claiming the investigation appeared 'tailored' for Khan. Another former judge warned the process had entered 'bandit country' where 'anything can happen.' The court's oversight body, the Assembly of States Parties, drew further scrutiny for publicly naming Khan and outsourcing the investigation to the UN's Office of Internal Oversight Services, even though the ICC's own mechanism had previously closed two internal probes after the complainant declined to cooperate. As noted by MEE, the original complaint was made as Khan prepared the Israeli warrants. The allegations re-emerged months later just before the warrants were announced, and escalated in May 2025 as Khan reportedly pursued further charges against Israeli officials. Le Monde has also reported that British lawyer Andrew Cayley, who led the ICC's Palestine investigation, had been warned by Dutch intelligence that he was 'an enemy of Israel' and later advised by the UK Foreign Office that he could face US sanctions. He subsequently resigned.
Russia Today
20 hours ago
- Russia Today
EU is complicit in Israeli crimes through inaction
The EU can be seen as complicit in the Israeli war crimes in Gaza since it fails to act 'in the face of a clear case of massive human rights violations,' the bloc's former top diplomat, Josep Borrell, has said. Brussels is extremely reluctant to punish West Jerusalem for its transgressions, even though they 'surpass' other crimes the bloc had condemned, he admitted. Israel has been repeatedly accused of war crimes amid its ongoing conflict with Hamas in Gaza. West Jerusalem launched its military campaign in the enclave in response to the October 7, 2023, attack in which the Palestinian militants killed 1,200 people and took over 200 hostages. Since then, more than 60,000 people, mostly civilians, have been killed in Gaza, according to the enclave's health ministry. West Jerusalem also faced accusations of obstructing humanitarian aid in the area. According to Borrell, a third of Israeli bombs falling on Gaza 'are made in Europe.' 'Many member states simply don't want to impose sanctions on Israel,' Borrell told the EU Observer in an interview published on Monday. He also believes that the EU Commission head, Ursula von der Leyen, also plays a major role in stalling the process as she simply does not put the issue of sanctions against Israel on the agenda and prevents an open debate on its within the commission. According to the former top diplomat, Brussels only imposed restrictions against 'maybe 20 people' over the Israeli settlement activities in the West Bank, despite such policies being considered illegal by the international community. 'We sanctioned thousands in Russia for less,' he said, adding that restrictions considered by Brussels against West Jerusalem are nothing but 'a bad joke.' 'What [Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin] Netanyahu has done in Gaza surpasses many war crimes we've condemned,' Borrell stated, calling the situation in Gaza an example of 'horrors' that are 'greater than others.' According to Borrell, further inaction in the face of Israel's violations could cost the EU its international image and reputation. 'There's a growing sense that inaction is starting to make us responsible for what's happening.'
