logo
Pressure mounting on reluctant Trump to impose sanctions on Russia

Pressure mounting on reluctant Trump to impose sanctions on Russia

Straits Times4 days ago

FILE PHOTO: Russian soldiers, who were involved in the country's military campaign in Ukraine, march in columns during a parade on Victory Day, marking the 80th anniversary of the victory over Nazi Germany in World War Two, in Red Square in central Moscow, Russia, May 9, 2025. REUTERS/Anton Vaganov/File Photo
FILE PHOTO: A participant wearing a mask depicting the Statue of Liberty attends a rally against U.S. President Donald Trump's stance on the Russia-Ukraine war, amid Russia's attack on Ukraine, in front of the U.S. embassy in Kyiv, Ukraine March 8, 2025. REUTERS/Valentyn Ogirenko/File Photo
WASHINGTON - Some Republicans in Congress and White House advisers are urging U.S. President Donald Trump to finally embrace new sanctions on Moscow as frustration mounts over Russian President Vladimir Putin's military assault on Ukraine.
Trump has held off on such penalties for months, believing he could have fruitful dealings with Putin to end the war and considering sanctions in general to be overused and often ineffective.
White House officials say Trump still hopes to develop an economic partnership with Russia. He sees sanctions as an escalation in tensions with Moscow that could derail hopes of a ceasefire in the three-year-old conflict.
But his frustration with Putin is genuine and increasingly severe, according to aides. They said he is giving sanctions serious consideration after Russia escalated its attacks in recent days.
"He is always looking at different ways to apply pressure," a senior White House official said. "This is no different. He's always weighing his options."
U.S. officials have prepared new economic sanctions against Russia, including banking and energy measures. They say that sanctions package is ready to implement based on Trump's order.
One option supported by some Trump advisers would be for the president to embrace, or at least not obstruct, legislation introduced by Republican Senator Lindsey Graham and Democratic Senator Richard Blumenthal last month that would set a 500% tariff on goods imported from countries that buy Russian oil.
Some advisers believe the bill could be useful because it would allow consequential sanctions to go into effect while Trump could in essence tell Putin the sanctions decision was out of his hands, according to one U.S. official with direct knowledge of the matter. That in turn could help Trump maintain a viable line of communication with Putin.
That U.S. official and another person familiar with internal deliberations said the Trump White House believes secondary sanctions - that is to say sanctions on countries that do business with Russia, not just Russia itself - are needed for them to be effective.
Graham and fellow Republican Senator Chuck Grassley, both close Trump allies, said this week that now is the time to increase pressure on Putin.
"I believe President Trump was sincere when he thought his friendship w Putin would end the war. Now that being the case, IT'S TIME FOR SANCTIONS STRONG ENUF SO PUTIN KNOWS 'game over,'" Grassley said in a social media post on Tuesday.
WAR DRAGS ON
Trump entered office in January predicting he would be able to end the war in Ukraine in 24 hours. But in the months since, he has absorbed the grim reality that the conflict is more intractable than he originally believed and has blamed his predecessor, Joe Biden, for allowing it to happen.
Last week, Trump spoke with Putin for two hours and thought he had a deal to begin ceasefire negotiations immediately. Then Russia launched a barrage of drone and missile attacks on Ukraine, prompting Trump to say Putin had "gone absolutely CRAZY" and that he was "playing with fire" by refusing to engage in ceasefire talks with Kyiv.
Speaking to reporters in the Oval Office on Wednesday, Trump explained why he felt imposing sanctions could antagonize Putin.
"If I think I'm close to getting a deal, I don't want to screw it up by doing that," he said.
Asked whether Putin wanted to end the war, Trump said, "I can't tell you that, but I'll let you know in about two weeks," noting he was waiting on Russia to submit its latest peace proposal.
"We're going to find out whether or not he's tapping us along or not, and if he is, we'll respond a little bit differently," Trump added.
Trump has threatened sanctions before, only to back off. He talked about the possibility of sanctions back in January and again before his most recent call with Putin.
Putin said last week that he had agreed to work with Ukraine on a memorandum that would establish the contours of a peace accord, including the timing of a ceasefire. Russia says it is currently drafting its version of the memorandum and cannot estimate how long that will take.
Republicans generally have followed Trump's lead on foreign policy in the months since he began his second term in office, making their pursuit of sanctions on their own noteworthy.
White House officials have held conversations with Senate Republicans about the contents of the sanctions bill, according to one of the U.S. officials.
Should the Senate bill move forward, there is a bipartisan companion bill in the House of Representatives, although support for Ukraine among House Republicans has been notably weaker than in the Senate.
The European Union, meanwhile, has been ramping up sanctions on Russia. An EU measure adopted last week hit over 130 entities and individuals, and listed 75 new sanctions entities including major oil firm Surgutneftegaz.
In meetings in recent days in Washington, U.S. officials have said they have no qualms with the new measures, according to one person with direct knowledge of the matter. REUTERS
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

China rejects Trump's accusation that it breached Geneva trade deal, World News
China rejects Trump's accusation that it breached Geneva trade deal, World News

AsiaOne

time34 minutes ago

  • AsiaOne

China rejects Trump's accusation that it breached Geneva trade deal, World News

China said on Monday (June 2) that US President Donald Trump's accusations that Beijing had violated the consensus reached in Geneva trade talks were "groundless", and promised to take forceful measures to safeguard its interests. The comment by the commerce ministry was in response to Trump's remarks on Friday that China had breached a bilateral deal to roll back tariffs. The ministry said China had implemented and actively upheld the agreement reached last month in Geneva, while the US had introduced multiple "discriminatory restrictive" measures against China. Those measures included issuing guidance on AI chip export controls, halting sales of chip design software to China and revoking visas for Chinese students, the ministry added. "The US government has unilaterally and repeatedly provoked new economic and trade frictions, exacerbating uncertainty and instability in bilateral economic and trade relations," the ministry said in a statement. It did not elaborate on what forceful measures it might take in response. Beijing and Washington agreed in mid-May in Geneva to pause triple-digit tariffs for 90 days. In addition, China also promised to lift trade countermeasures that restricted its exports of the critical metals needed for US semiconductor, electronics and defence production. Trump on Friday also announced a doubling of import tariffs on steel and aluminium to 50 per cent. While China is the world's largest steel producer and exporter, it ships very little to the United States after a 25 per cent tariff imposed in 2018 shut most Chinese steel out of the market. China ranks third among aluminium suppliers. [[nid:717864]]

Trump moves to lift Biden-era curbs on Arctic oil drilling
Trump moves to lift Biden-era curbs on Arctic oil drilling

Straits Times

time35 minutes ago

  • Straits Times

Trump moves to lift Biden-era curbs on Arctic oil drilling

Utqiagvik, Alaska - The Trump administration is moving to repeal Biden-era curbs blocking oil drilling across most of the mammoth petroleum reserve in Alaska that is home to an estimated 8.7 billion barrels of recoverable oil. Interior Secretary Doug Burgum announced the planned policy shift late on Sunday at a townhall meeting in Utqiagvik, a village on the Chukchi Sea coast, as he and fellow members of President Donald Trump's Cabinet visit Alaska to promote energy development in the region. The measure would open up new opportunities for oil and gas development in the 23 million acre (9.3 million ha) National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska (NPR-A), an Indiana-size parcel in the north-west of the state that was set aside as a source of energy for the navy a century ago. The action responds to a directive that Mr Trump issued after his inauguration in January, when he signed an executive order compelling a host of policy changes meant to expand oil, natural gas and mineral development in Alaska. The reserve holds an estimated 8.7 billion barrels of recoverable oil, according to a 2017 assessment by the US Geological Survey. And its production is set to skyrocket, with the development of recent discoveries. Alaska has forecast that crude production from the reserve will climb to 139,600 barrels per day in fiscal year 2033, up from 15,800 barrels per day in fiscal year 2023. Mr Trump's measure would repeal a 2024 rule imposed under former president Joe Biden, who designated 13 million acres (5.25 million ha) of the reserve as 'special areas', limiting future oil and gas leasing, while maintaining leasing prohibitions on 10.6 million acres (4.3 million ha) of the NPR-A. The rule has complicated future oil drilling and production in the reserve where companies including ConocoPhillips, Santos, Repsol and Armstrong Oil & Gas have been active. ConocoPhillips is developing its 600-million-barrel Willow project in the refuge, and is expected to start producing commercial volumes of crude oil there in 2029. Mr Burgum's announcement was greeted with applause inside a heritage centre in Utqiagvik, where local residents had gathered to speak with officials from the Trump administration, as well as Senator Dan Sullivan and Alaska Governor Mike Dunleavy, about resource development. Mr Burgum, who leads the National Energy Dominance Council, was joined by the panel's vice-chairman, Energy Secretary Chris Wright, and Environmental Protection Agency administrator Lee Zeldin. Mr Wright said he anticipated increased oil development in Alaska – possibly quadrupling oil output on its prolific North Slope – and decried years of policies he said were 'smothering' the region's potential. Mr Rex Rock Sr, the head of the Arctic Slope Regional Corporation, one of 13 Alaska native regional corporations created under federal law, said that the 2024 rule restricting energy development in the far north did not have the backing of the region. Environmentalists had argued that Mr Biden's rule was essential to protect a large stretch of unspoiled land in the Arctic, a vast region of tundra and wetlands that teems with wildlife. And, they insisted, in a warming world, there is insufficient justification for burning the large cache of oil the reserve contains. The new proposal will give the public 60 days to comment, setting the stage for a potentially rapid reversal and new leasing in the reserve. Conservationists who cheered the original protections could seek to challenge the pivot in federal court. Bloomberg Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

Hong Kong activist challenges China's Tiananmen taboo from exile in Taiwan, Asia News
Hong Kong activist challenges China's Tiananmen taboo from exile in Taiwan, Asia News

AsiaOne

timean hour ago

  • AsiaOne

Hong Kong activist challenges China's Tiananmen taboo from exile in Taiwan, Asia News

TAIPEI - Fu Tong and his wife Elaine To were among the first demonstrators in Hong Kong to be charged with rioting in 2020 after pro-democracy and anti-China protests started in 2019 in the former British colony. After leaving for Taiwan, Fu continued his activism and is now preparing to mark this year's anniversary of Beijing's bloody June 4, 1989, crackdown on protesters in and around Tiananmen Square. Fu has co-hosted a Hong Kong human rights exhibition in Taipei, showcasing artwork from the protest movement, and leads guided tours of the displays. "When Hong Kong can no longer hold the June 4 vigils, and can no longer even mention it, Taiwan's existence becomes very important," Fu, 43, told Reuters in Taipei. "It's one of the very few places in Asia, where people can openly commemorate the accident on June 4, discuss it, and even condemn the Chinese Communist Party. The existence of such a space is already hugely significant," he said. Taiwan is the only part of the Chinese-speaking world where June 4 can be remembered openly, though Chinese communities in the United States, Britain, Australia and other Western countries will also mark it. In Hong Kong, a national security law has outlawed such events, which previously drew tens of thousands of people. Fu says he remains committed to advocating for Hong Kong issues and the values of freedom. "I really feel like I've been chosen to be in this era. If I don't step up to do things that seem foolish and unrewarding, then who will? As long as I can, I'm willing to keep going," he said. Before dawn on June 4, 1989, Chinese tanks rolled into Tiananmen Square, crushing weeks of pro-democracy demonstrations by students and workers. China has never provided a full death toll, but rights groups and witnesses say the figure could run into thousands. Public discussion of what happened is taboo in China, which blamed the protests on counter-revolutionaries seeking to overthrow the ruling Communist Party. [[nid:717396]]

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store