HR cutbacks imperil benefits for former federal workers, their families, Raskin says
Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience.
Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience.
Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience. Generate Key Takeaways
Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-8th) addresses the crowd at a Democratic party rally attended by then-President Joe Biden in Rockville on Aug. 25, 2022. (File photo by Danielle E. Gaines/Maryland Matters)
For two weeks, Lisa Lederman called the federal government's Office of Personnel Management practically whenever she had a moment to spare.
But the result was always the same, she said: Shortly after she dialed, the line would go dead.
For Lederman, a Silver Spring resident whose late husband was a federal worker, the saga began in February, after her checking account was compromised. Closing the bank account meant she stopped receiving her monthly survivor's benefit from the federal government. And her efforts to fix the problem online weren't working. So, she started calling, several times a day.
'My son was in the car with me on the way to school one day, and he's like: 'Who are you calling so early?'' said Lederman, 54. 'I'm calling the office trying to get my money.'
But after weeks without success, a dispirited Lederman threw in the towel. Months later, Lederman said she still hasn't received a deposit — or gotten in contact with OPM.
'It's like a ghost,' she said of the office. 'It's like: 'Who's behind the curtain?''
That's a question local lawmakers are trying to answer.
On Tuesday, Lederman's congressman, Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-8th) joined with Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-Va.) to send a letter to the acting director of the Office of Personnel Management, arguing that Lederman is not alone.
'Mass firings' of human resources staff, both within federal agencies and at OPM, have exacerbated 'the ongoing crisis of dysfunction throughout the federal government,' read the letter.
Forty other members of Congress signed on, including every other Maryland Democrat: Reps. Sarah Elfreth, Steny Hoyer, Glenn Ivey, April McClain Delaney, Kweisi Mfume and Johnny Olszewski Jr.
Human resources deficiencies have made matters worse for federal employees recently fired by Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency, or federal workers who recently 'ended their careers in public service earlier than planned,' according to the letter.
'At a time when they are manufacturing a crisis in the workforce, they are also disabling the personnel and human resource officers who would be dealing with all of the corresponding problems,' Raskin said in an interview Monday.
But in a statement, OPM spokesperson McLaurine Pinover pushed back against the allegations in the letter, and blamed problems on the prior administration.
'This letter is filled with baseless claims in an effort to make headlines. There have been no changes to the constituent services process,' Pinover wrote. 'Unfortunately, the issues with this process predate this administration and OPM is actively working to modernize it to best serve the American people.'
But the letter says some former federal workers cannot access the retirement benefits they earned, or are receiving incorrect benefits. Normally, they might contact the human resources office in their former department, but in many cases, those offices have been 'eliminated or significantly downsized.'
At OPM, the main human resources agency and personnel policy manager for the federal government, the situation doesn't seem any better, according to the lawmakers' letter. OPM's congressional liaison officers, who worked with staffers on the Hill to address concerns from constituents, 'appear to be on administrative leave,' as well as managers.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
'Alarmingly, our last remaining liaison contacts at OPM – who as recently as early April reassured our staff that their casework operations were ongoing – are now gone,' states the letter.
It's an 'emergency situation,' according to the letter, which calls on Charles Ezell, the acting director of OPM, to halt all firings of OPM staff and HR staff across the federal government and pursue reinstatements.
In a statement, Chloe Scott, a spokesperson for Ivey, said that their office was notified on April 12 that 'OPM has made the decision to close their constituent services department. The office now emphasizes the importance of using their web-based portal for inquiries and that their correspondence division will route inquiries as proper.'
'This is very concerning as this change affects the ability to address Member's concerns that are shared on behalf of their constituents and is creating added delays in processing inquiries at this agency,' Scott said.
Lederman had been receiving the monthly survivor's payments for herself and her three children since 2013, when her husband, Gordon, died after a battle with cancer. Lederman last served as a national security adviser to Sen. Joe Lieberman of Connecticut, and before that was an aide to Sen. Susan Collins and a staffer for the 9/11 Commission, his wife said.
When benefit payments stopped, and Lederman couldn't access OPM's online portal — or contact the agency by phone — she wasn't sure where to turn, until a friend recommended Raskin's office.
Now, she said one of the congressman's caseworkers is helping with her case.
Raskin said his caseworkers have been facing challenges corresponding with OPM for several weeks, and so he decided to issue a formal letter, in hopes of bringing it to the attention of agency leadership.
'I keep wondering whether these people are aware of the long-term repercussions for the federal government and its ability to recruit people,' Raskin said. 'I hope that this is just a short-term problem and that OPM will get on top of it.'
Lederman said she was alarmed to learn that, amid the Trump administration's broader cuts to the federal workforce, HR staffers may have been targeted as well.
'There have to be some reasonable heads that recognize that customer service — and being able to troubleshoot and talk to the constituents and the public — has to be part of staffing,' she said.
Lederman said her family has been getting by since the payments stopped several months ago, but they are being more frugal than usual, and losing out on funds that would normally go into savings.
'It's part of my budget. Part of my budget goes into savings and for a rainy day. And I have a kid who's going off to college,' she said.
Lederman said she was glad to hear that members of Congress were raising awareness about the HR issues. She hopes that it will help not just her, but other citizens struggling to access benefits, including those who may be disadvantaged by language barriers or technology hurdles.
'It's like they're holding my money hostage,' she said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
What the Trump-Musk Feud Means for SpaceX and NASA
The U.S. government relies on SpaceX to support NASA and other agencies, and the company has received more $20 billion in federal contracts for it. As Musk and Trump threaten to cut ties, here's what that would mean for the U.S.'s space ambitions.
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Nvidia's Stock and Business: How Did I Do With My 5-Year Predictions Made in 2020?
Co-founder and CEO Jensen Huang is still leading the company, as I predicted in 2020. Nvidia's GPUs are still the gold standard for artificial intelligence (AI) training, as I predicted in 2020. Nvidia stock has "solidly outperformed the market" -- an understatement --- as I predicted in 2020. 10 stocks we like better than Nvidia › In March 2020, I outlined where I thought tech giant Nvidia's business and stock would be in five years, or in March 2025. It's now a little past the five-year mark, so how did I do? Overall, I'd give myself a B or a B+. I was mostly correct in my business predictions and accurate about what investors care about the most, the stock price: "I feel very comfortable predicting that Nvidia stock will solidly outperform the market over the next half decade," I wrote. Indeed, from March 1, 2020 (when my five-year predictions article published) through March 1, 2025, Nvidia stock's total return was 1,760% -- nearly 15 times the S&P 500's return of 118%. In other words, Nvidia stock turned a $1,000 investment into a whopping $18,600 over this five-year period. (Nvidia stock's five-year return through the date of this writing, June 4, is a little lower, as the chart below shows. Shares are up since March 1; it's the change in the 2020 start date that slightly lowers their current five-year return.) Nvidia stock's fantastic performance has largely been driven by the incredible demand for the company's graphics processing units (GPUs) and related technology that enable artificial intelligence (AI) capabilities. Status: Correct. In March 2020, I wrote that "as long as [Huang] stays healthy, the odds seem in favor of his still being at Nvidia's helm in five years." For context, Jensen Huang, who co-founded the company in 1993, turned 62 in February, according to public records. Nvidia investors should certainly hope that Huang remains the company's leader for some time. As I wrote in June 2024: Nvidia is many years ahead of the competition in AI-enabling technology thanks to Huang's foresight. Starting more than a decade ago, he began to steadily use profits from Nvidia's once-core computer gaming business to position the company to be in the catbird seat when the "AI Age" truly arrived. Status: Correct. Here's part of what I wrote in the March 2020 article: Nvidia dominates the market for discrete graphics processing units (GPUs) -- the key component in graphics cards for desktop computer gaming. In the fourth quarter of 2019, the company controlled 68.9% of this market. Nvidia has increased its leadership position over the last five years. In the fourth quarter of 2024, it had an 82% share of the desktop discrete GPU market, compared with longtime rival Advanced Micro Devices' 17% share, according to Jon Peddie Research. Intel, which entered this market in 2022, had a 1% share. Growth in Nvidia's gaming market platform will be covered below. Status: Correct. In March 2020, I wrote: "In 2025, the gaming market should be much bigger [relative to 2020]." By all counts -- the number of global gamers, total computer gaming market revenue, and computer gaming PC revenue -- the computer gaming market has grown solidly over the last five years. And Nvidia has benefited nicely from this growth. In fiscal year 2020 (ended late January 2020), the company's gaming market platform generated revenue of $5.52 billion. In fiscal 2025 (ended in late January), this platform's revenue was $11.35 billion. This increase amounts to a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 15.5%. This is strong growth for such a huge market. It might not seem so only because Nvidia's data center market platform's growth has been phenomenal over this same period. In fiscal 2020, gaming was Nvidia's largest platform, accounting for 51% of its total revenue. In fiscal 2025, gaming was its second-largest platform behind data center, contributing about 9% of its total revenue. Status: Correct. In March 2020, I wrote: The company's GPU-based approach to accelerating computing is considered the gold standard for DL [deep learning, the dominant type of AI] training, the first step in the two-step DL process. [The second step is inferencing.] This statement is extremely likely to hold true in 2025, in my opinion. Since 2020, both AMD and Intel have launched GPUs for AI-powered data centers, but Nvidia's grip on this market -- which is growing like wildfire -- remains tight. IoT Analytics, a technology market research firm, estimates Nvidia had a 92% share of the data center GPU market in 2024. As an added plus, since 2020, Nvidia's GPUs have gone from having very little share of the AI inferencing chip market to having the largest chunk of this market. Inferencing is the running of an AI application. In fiscal 2020, Nvidia's data center platform's revenue was $2.98 billion. It skyrocketed to $115.2 billion in fiscal 2025, equating to about a 107% compound annual growth rate (CAGR). This amazing growth powered the data center to account for 88% of Nvidia's total revenue in fiscal 2025, up from 27% in fiscal 2020. Status: My timeline was too optimistic. In March 2020, I wrote: "In 2025, fully autonomous vehicles should be legal -- or very close to being so -- across the United States. Nvidia is well positioned to majorly profit from [this event]." I wouldn't say that fully autonomous vehicles are "very close" to being legal across the U.S. This event seems at least a few years away. But I continue to believe this watershed event will "turbocharge" Nvidia's growth thanks to its widely adopted AI-powered DRIVE platform. Status: Correct. In March 2020, I wrote: "Nvidia is incredibly innovative, so there seems a great chance that the company will introduce at least one major new technology that takes nearly everyone by surprise." Over the last five years, Nvidia has launched a good number of major new technologies that have likely taken most investors and Wall Street analysts by surprise. One example is its Omniverse platform, which launched in 2021. This is a simulation platform that enables the creation of virtual worlds and digital twins. It's been widely adopted by a broad industry range of large enterprise companies -- including Amazon, PepsiCo, and BMW Group -- for uses such as designing products and optimizing facility workflow. Status: Correct. Here's what I wrote in March 2020: It's impossible to predict a company's stock price in five years because so many unknowns ... can have a huge influence on the market in general. That said, given the projections made in this article, I feel very comfortable predicting that Nvidia stock will solidly outperform the market over the next half decade. Stay tuned. I'm planning on a predictions article similar to my 2020 one. Hint: It's going to be optimistic, as Nvidia's highly profitable strong revenue growth is far from over, in my opinion. Before you buy stock in Nvidia, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Nvidia wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $668,538!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $869,841!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 789% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025 John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Beth McKenna has positions in Nvidia. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Advanced Micro Devices, Amazon, Intel, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool recommends Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft and recommends the following options: short August 2025 $24 calls on Intel. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Nvidia's Stock and Business: How Did I Do With My 5-Year Predictions Made in 2020? was originally published by The Motley Fool
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Jefferies Downgrades Chewy (CHWY) to Hold, Flags Valuation Concerns
On June 5, Jefferies downgraded Chewy, Inc. (NYSE:CHWY) to Hold from Buy, highlighting concerns over valuation. Despite that, the price target was raised to $43 from $41, and the analysts observed that Chewy's stock has surged 41% year-to-date. A close-up shot of a store shelf stocked with pet food and supplies. The analysts had reservations about Chewy's capacity to outperform Street estimates in the upcoming Q1 results, to be released on June 11. Jefferies observed that Chewy, Inc. (NYSE:CHWY) is seeing gains from sponsored ads and data-driven insights from its website and mobile application. However, the analysts believe that the current share price has already factored in these positive developments, which can temper potential gains outside of management's projected guidance. The downgrade happened because of Chewy's valuation, as analysts see limited scope for price appreciation. Jefferies maintains a conservative stance regarding the company's future performance. Chewy, Inc. (NYSE:CHWY) is an online American pet retailer that sells pet food, supplies, medications, and services through its website and mobile app. While we acknowledge the potential of CHWY as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: and .