21 Body Horror Wikipedia Pages
Fatal Familial Insomnia — An extremely rare genetic neurological disorder that causes progressive insomnia, leading to total sleep deprivation and death.
At the most basic level, FFI affects the part of the brain that controls sleep. People with this rare disorder slowly lose the ability to sleep, and this leads to serious problems like confusion, trouble moving, body changes (like sweating a lot or having a fast heartbeat), and eventually death — usually within a year or two. Currently, there is no cure or treatment. Doctors can test for the gene, but they can only treat the symptoms to keep the person as comfortable as possible.
Guatemala Syphilis Experiments — Unethical medical studies conducted by the US government in the 1940s, where researchers intentionally infected prisoners, soldiers, and mental patients in Guatemala with syphilis and gonorrhea without consent.
Without the people's knowledge or permission, researchers deliberately infected hundreds of Guatemalan prisoners, soldiers, sex workers, children, and even mental hospital patients with syphilis and other sexually transmitted diseases to test if antibiotics like penicillin could prevent or treat them. Many of the people were never treated, and some suffered serious health problems or died. These experiments were kept secret for decades and only became public in 2010, when the U.S. government formally apologized for the abuse and wrongdoing.
Unit 731 — Japan's WWII biological and chemical warfare research unit that conducted live human experiments.
Unit 731 was a covert biological and chemical warfare unit of the Imperial Japanese Army during World War II, based in occupied Manchuria (present-day China). Operating under the guise of epidemic prevention, it conducted brutal human experiments on civilians and prisoners of war, including vivisection, forced infection with deadly diseases, and frostbite testing. These experiments led to the deaths of an estimated 300,000-plus people.
After the war, the U.S. granted immunity to many Unit 731 members in exchange for their research data, allowing key figures like Ishii to avoid prosecution. The unit's atrocities remain one of the most horrifying examples of wartime human experimentation.
The Monster Study — A 1939 unethical speech experiment that was conducted on orphaned children in Iowa. Some were psychologically abused to induce speech problems.
Led by a researcher named Wendell Johnson, this controversial experiment set out to find out if telling kids they had a speech problem could actually make them stutter. They worked with 22 children from an orphanage — some who already stuttered and some who didn't. The researchers told some of the kids with normal speech that they spoke badly and needed to be careful, even though that wasn't true. As a result, some of those kids became shy, nervous, and had trouble speaking, even though they hadn't stuttered before. The experiment caused lasting emotional harm, and it was later called the 'Monster Study' because of how unethical it was. In 2007, a lawsuit filed by former test subjects and estate representatives of those who have since died was settled for $925,000.
Radium Girls — A group of young women in the 1910s and 1920s who worked in factories painting watch dials with glowing paint that contained radium, a radioactive element, ultimately leading to their horrifying deaths from radiation.
The young women were told the paint was safe and were even encouraged to lick their brushes to get a fine point. Over time, many of them became very sick — losing teeth, suffering from broken bones, and developing terrible jaw problems — because the radium was poisoning them from the inside. When the companies refused to take responsibility, some of the women fought back by taking them to court, winning a settlement in 1928.
FOP (Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva) — An extremely rare condition where a person's soft tissues — like muscles, tendons, and ligaments — slowly turn into bone over time, essentially turning people into 'living statues.'
Because of this condition, parts of the body that are supposed to move and bend can become locked in place by extra bone growing where it shouldn't. Even small injuries, like bumps, can trigger this bone growth. As FOP gets worse, it can become very hard to move, eat, or even breathe because of extra bone forming around the rib cage, restricting expansion of the lungs. There's no known cure yet, and doctors try to help by avoiding anything that might cause flare-ups and by managing symptoms as best they can.
Tuskegee Syphilis Study — A racist and unethical 40-year medical experiment carried out by the U.S. government where Black men with syphilis were deliberately left untreated.
From 1932 to 1972, the Tuskegee Syphilis Study involved hundreds of poor Black men in Alabama who had syphilis but were never told they had the disease. Instead of treating them, doctors studied how the illness would progress if left untreated — even after penicillin became the standard cure in the 1940s. The men were misled and denied proper care for decades, which caused serious harm and death. The study only ended after a news report exposed it, leading to public outrage and a formal government apology in 1997.
Teratoma — A type of tumor that commonly contains teeth, hair, fat, or muscle. They can even contain a liver, lungs, eyes, or even a brain, though it's not as typical. Teratomas are sometimes mistaken for parasitic twins.
This type of tumor happens when certain cells that are supposed to develop into any part of the body grow in a confused or mixed-up way. Teratomas can be found in places like the ovaries, testicles, or even the chest or brain. Most are harmless and can be removed with surgery, but some can be cancerous and need more serious treatment. Even though they can sound strange or scary, many teratomas are treatable, especially when found early.
MKUltra — A highly secretive human CIA experimentation program that tested mind control techniques, often without subjects' consent.
MKUltra began in 1953 and ran through the 1960s. The program consisted of a series of projects that experimented with mind control techniques — often without people's knowledge or consent. They tested drugs like LSD, hypnosis, and other methods on prisoners, hospital patients, and even regular citizens, hoping to learn how to control thoughts or extract secrets. Many people were harmed, and some were permanently affected or died. The project was kept hidden until the 1970s, when it was exposed by journalists and government investigations.
Body Integrity Dysphoria — A rare condition where a person feels like a part of their own body — such as a leg, arm, or even their vision or hearing — doesn't belong to them, sometimes giving them a desire to amputate healthy body parts.
Even though the body part is healthy, the person might feel very distressed and strongly believe that they would feel better or 'whole' if it were removed or disabled. This condition is not well understood, and it can be very upsetting for those who experience it. Treatment is challenging, and doctors usually try to help through therapy and support, rather than surgery, since the condition is more about how the brain sees the body rather than something physically wrong.
Exploding Head Syndrome — A harmless but startling condition where a person hears a sudden loud noise — like a bang, crash, or explosion — just as they're falling asleep or waking up.
Even though it sounds real, there's no actual sound and nothing is physically happening when people experience this. It doesn't cause pain, but it can be scary and confusing. Some people also see flashes of light or feel a jolt in their body. Experts aren't sure exactly what causes it, but it may be related to how the brain shuts down for sleep.
Lobotomy — A once-popular psychosurgery technique involving destruction of the brain's frontal lobe, often resulting in severe personality changes.
Though it's since been discredited, at the time, this brain surgery was used to treat severe mental illnesses like schizophrenia and depression. It involved cutting connections in the brain's frontal lobes to reduce symptoms, but often caused serious side effects such as personality changes, cognitive impairment, and emotional dullness. Popularized in the 1930s through to the 1950s — especially by neurologist Walter Freeman's 'ice-pick' method — it was eventually abandoned due to its harmful effects and the rise of psychiatric medications.
Resignation Syndrome — A rare and mysterious condition where children, usually refugees, fall into a coma-like state after experiencing extreme stress or trauma — often related to uncertainty about asylum or fear of deportation.
Children with this condition will stop talking, eating, walking, and responding to the world around them, as if they've completely shut down. It has mostly been seen in Sweden among children from war-torn countries. Recovery can take months or even years, and often begins once the family's asylum situation becomes more secure.
Necrotizing Fasciitis — Also known as 'flesh-eating bacteria,' is a rare but very serious bacterial infection spreads rapidly and is often fatal.
Necrotizing fasciitis spreads quickly and destroys the body's soft tissue, especially under the skin. It's sometimes called a "flesh-eating disease," though the bacteria don't actually "eat" flesh — they release toxins that kill tissue. It often starts from a small cut, bruise, or surgery site and can rapidly cause swelling, severe pain, redness, and fever. Without fast treatment, like antibiotics and surgery to remove dead tissue, it can become life-threatening.
Harlequin Ichthyosis — A very rare and severe genetic disorder where babies are born with thick, hard skin that forms large diamond-shaped plates separated by deep cracks.
This tight skin can pull on the eyelids, lips, and chest, making it hard to move, eat, or even breathe. It's caused by a gene mutation that affects how the skin forms a protective barrier. Babies with this condition are at high risk for infections and dehydration. While it was rare for affected infants to survive the newborn period with this condition, today babies with it now have a much better chance of living to childhood and early adulthood.
Morgellons — A controversial and poorly understood condition where people feel like they have bugs crawling on or under their skin and often report finding strange fibers or particles coming out of their skin.
For people affected by this condition, these symptoms are usually very distressing and can include itching, sores, and pain. Many doctors believe Morgellons is linked to a mental health condition called delusional parasitosis, where a person mistakenly believes they're infested with parasites. However, some patients and researchers argue it's a physical illness that hasn't been fully explained yet.
Brain-Eating Amoeba (Naegleria fowleri) — Sometimes called the "brain-eating amoeba," it is a rare but deadly microscopic organism found in warm freshwater like lakes, hot springs, and poorly maintained pools.
This amoeba can enter the body when water goes up the nose — usually during swimming or diving — and then travels to the brain, causing a severe and often fatal infection called primary amebic meningoencephalitis (PAM). Symptoms start with headache, fever, and nausea, and quickly progress to confusion, seizures, and coma. It's almost always fatal, but very rare, and you can't get it from drinking water — only from water entering the nose.
The Thalidomide Scandal — A major medical disaster in the late 1950s and early 1960s, where a drug called thalidomide was given to pregnant women to treat morning sickness and help with sleep, but actually caused birth defects.
At the time, the drug was thought to be safe, but it caused severe birth defects in thousands of babies across the world. Many were born with shortened or missing arms and legs, and some had problems with their ears, eyes, or internal organs. It took five years for the connection between the drug and the birth defects to be made. The tragedy led to stricter drug testing and approval rules in many countries, especially during pregnancy.
Randy Gardner sleep deprivation experiment — Randy Gardner was a high school student who, in 1964, stayed awake for 11 days straight (264 hours) as part of a science fair experiment — the longest scientifically recorded period of sleep deprivation.
During the experiment, he experienced mood swings, memory problems, trouble concentrating, and even hallucinations, but surprisingly had no long-term health effects. Researchers used the experiment to learn more about how important sleep is for the brain and body. Afterward, Randy recovered by sleeping for about 14 hours and then returning to a more normal sleep pattern.
Trepanation — The oldest surgical procedure known to man, which was the practice of drilling or cutting a hole into the skull to treat head injuries, relieve pressure, or for spiritual reasons.
Evidence shows trepanation (trepanning) was practiced over 7,000 years ago in many ancient cultures. Surprisingly, some people survived multiple procedures. Today, it has evolved into modern craniotomy — a safer, more precise surgery used to treat brain injuries, remove tumors, or relieve pressure, performed with sterile tools and medical imaging.
Finally, Biosphere 2 — A sealed greenhouse-like structure built in Arizona in the early 1990s to test whether humans could live in a self-sustaining environment, like a mini Earth, for space travel. Although it sounded cool, people ended up starving and "gasping for breath."
Inside, the structure had different ecosystems — like a rainforest, ocean, and desert — and was meant to recycle air, water, and food for eight people living inside for two years. While the idea was exciting, the experiment faced major problems: oxygen levels dropped significantly, food became scarce, and people argued, making it hard to live and work.
Obsessed with this kind of content? Subscribe to the That Got Dark newsletter to get a weekly post just like this delivered directly to your inbox. It's a scary good time you won't want to miss.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
15 hours ago
- Fox News
Russia and China tick Doomsday Clock toward midnight as Hiroshima bombing hits 80 years
Wednesday marks the 80th anniversary of when the U.S. employed the first ever nuclear bomb over the Japanese city of Hiroshima, followed by the bombing of Nagasaki three days later on Aug. 9. But despite nearly a century of lessons learned, nuclear warfare still remains a significant threat. "This is the first time that the United States is facing down two nuclear peer adversaries – Russia and China," Rebeccah Heinrichs, nuclear expert and senior fellow at the Hudson Institute, told Fox News Digital. Heinrichs explained that not only are Moscow and Beijing continuing to develop new nuclear capabilities and delivery systems, but they are increasingly collaborating with one another in direct opposition to the West, and more pointedly, the U.S. "It's a much more complex nuclear threat environment than what the United States even had to contend with during the Cold War, where we just had one nuclear peer adversary in the Soviet Union," she said. "In that regard, it's a serious problem, especially when both China and Russia are investing in nuclear capabilities and at the same time have revanchist goals." Despite the known immense devastation that would accompany an atomic war between two nuclear nations, concern has been growing that the threat of nuclear war is on the rise. The bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki – which collectively killed some 200,000 people, not including the dozens of thousands who later died from radiation poisoning and cancer – have been attributed with bringing an end to World War II. But the bombs did more than end the deadliest war in human history – they forever changed military doctrine, sparked a nuclear arms race and cemented the concept of deterrence through the theory of mutually assured destruction. Earlier this year the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists moved forward the "Doomsday Clock" by one second – pushing it closer to "midnight," or atomic meltdown, than ever before. In January, the board of scientists and security officials in charge of the 78-year-old clock, which is used to measure the threat level of nuclear warfare, said that moving the clock to 89 seconds to midnight "signals that the world is on a course of unprecedented risk, and that continuing on the current path is a form of madness." Despite the escalated nuclear threats coming out of North Korea, and international concern over the Iranian nuclear program, the threat level largely came down to the three biggest players in the nuclear arena: Russia, the U.S. and China. The increased threat level was attributed to Russia's refusal to comply with international nuclear treaties amid its continuously escalating war in Ukraine and its hostile opposition to NATO nations, as well as China's insistence on expanding its nuclear arsenal. But the Bulletin, which was founded by scientists on the Manhattan Project in 1945 to inform the public of the dangers of atomic warfare, also said the U.S. has a role in the increased nuclear threat level. "The U.S. has abdicated its role as a voice of caution. It seems inclined to expand its nuclear arsenal and adopt a posture that reinforces the belief that 'limited' use of nuclear weapons can be managed," the Bulletin said. "Such misplaced confidence could have us stumble into a nuclear war." But Heinrichs countered the "alarmist" message and argued that deterrence remains a very real protectant against nuclear warfare, even as Russia increasingly threatens Western nations with atomic use. "I do think that it's a serious threat. I don't think it's inevitable that we're sort of staring down nuclear Armageddon," she said. Heinrichs argued the chief threat is not the number of nuclear warheads a nation possesses, but in how they threaten to employ their capabilities. "I think that whenever there is a threat of nuclear use, it's because adversaries, authoritarian countries, in particular Russia, is threatening to use nuclear weapons to invade another country. And that's where the greatest risk of deterrence failure is," she said. "It's not because of the sheer number of nuclear weapons." Heinrichs said Russia is lowering the nuclear threshold by routinely threatening to employ nuclear weapons in a move to coerce Western nations to capitulate to their demands, as in the case of capturing territory in Ukraine and attempting to deny it NATO access. Instead, she argued that the U.S. and its allies need to improve their deterrence by not only staying on top of their capabilities but expanding their nuclear reach in regions like the Indo-Pacific. "The answer is not to be so afraid of it or alarmed that you capitulate, because you're only going to beget more nuclear coercion if you do that," she said. "The answer is to prudently, carefully communicate to the Russians they are not going to succeed through nuclear coercion, that the United States also has credible response options. "We also have nuclear weapons, and we have credible and proportional responses, and so they shouldn't go down that path," Heinrichs said. "That's how we maintain the nuclear peace. That's how we deter conflict. And that's how we ensure that a nuclear weapon is not used."
Yahoo
15 hours ago
- Yahoo
New ocean expedition captures images of 13 WWII shipwrecks from major naval battles
A new ocean expedition in the South Pacific has revealed striking new images of more than a dozen ships sunk during key World War II battles. Researchers on the Ocean Exploration Trust vessel Nautilus conducted an archaeological survey of 13 shipwrecks from the Solomon Islands campaign, one of the war's fiercest naval confrontations. Using advanced remotely operated vehicles equipped with high-definition cameras and submersible drones, they also rediscovered two long-lost vessels, the USS New Orleans and the Imperial Japanese Navy destroyer Teruzuki. While some of the wrecks were first located over 30 years ago, the latest expedition allowed for a far more detailed and comprehensive survey, thanks to cutting-edge imaging technology, researchers said. 'This expedition was special, allowing us to film these sites in a manner not possible back then, as well as document other ships, while at the same time sharing our work live to the entire world,' Ocean Exploration Trust president Robert Ballard said in a statement. The wreck site, known as Iron Bottom Sound, lies in the Solomon Islands between Guadalcanal, Savo, and Nggela islands. Between August and December 1942, Iron Bottom Sound was the site of five major naval battles during the Second World War, resulting in the loss of more than 20,000 lives, 111 naval vessels, and 1,450 aircraft. Dozens of shipwrecks lie on the seafloor at this site, just off the coast of Honiara, within a relatively compact area measuring less than 25 nautical miles wide, 40 nautical miles long, and up to 1,400 metres deep. But fewer than 100 of these American, Japanese, Australian, and New Zealand military ships and planes have been located to date. 'This survey of the ships of the United States, Australia, and Japan will add immeasurably to the understanding of one of the costliest naval campaigns in history, a campaign that hopefully will never be repeated,' said Samuel J Cox, Naval History and Heritage Command director. In the latest survey, researchers mapped more than 386 square miles of seafloor using the uncrewed surface vehicle DriX, operated by the University of New Hampshire. The crew spent nearly 140 hours exploring various wrecks using ROVs, some located more than 3,280 feet beneath the ocean's surface. For the first time, researchers took pictures of the bow that was blown off the World War II heavy cruiser USS New Orleans. The USS New Orleans was struck by a Japanese 'Long Lance' torpedo during the November 1942 Battle of Tassafaronga, off the coast of Guadalcanal. The powerful explosion sheared off nearly a third of the ship, including its entire bow, and claimed the lives of more than 180 crew members. 'The use of our uncrewed vessel allowed a tremendous increase in exploration efficiency as we were able to continuously map and identify potential targets while the Nautilus was deploying its ROVs,' said Larry Mayer, director of the Center for Coastal and Ocean Mapping at the University of New Hampshire. 'This technological achievement, combined with the tremendous historical significance of our discoveries, made this one of the most rewarding missions I have ever participated in.'
Los Angeles Times
16 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
The true cost of abandoning science
Any trip to the dark night skies of our Southern California deserts reveals a vista full of wonder and mystery — riddles that astrophysicists like myself spend our days unraveling. I am fortunate to study how the first galaxies formed and evolved over the vast span of 13 billion years into the beautiful structures that fill those skies. NASA's crown jewel, the James Webb Space Telescope, has delivered measurements of early galaxies so puzzling that, more than three years after its launch, we are still struggling to understand them. My work on ancient galaxies may seem to have no relevance to the enormous challenges that confront our nation every day. But if we look back over the last 80 years, ever since World War II turned America into the epicenter of global science, curiosity-driven investigation — in astronomy, quantum materials, evolutionary biology and more — has been a pillar of American progress. But science in America is now under dire threat. President Trump's administration is laying waste to both national laboratories and federal support for academic science. Scientific staff is being sharply reduced from the National Park Service to the National Science Foundation and everywhere in between. Looking at the president's science funding proposals across many agencies, the 2026 fiscal year budget calls for a 34% cut to basic research. The plan slashes NASA's budget to the lowest amount since human space flight began more than 60 years ago, canceling or defunding dozens and dozens of NASA missions. Already, the NSF has halved support for the most promising American graduate students. Scientists are speaking up against this destruction, of course. There are strong practical reasons to back science: It is a powerful engine for economic growth, and it is essential for understanding and mitigating the dangers of the natural world — whether they be the Los Angeles wildfires (which my family fled in January) or the tragic floods in Texas last month. As important as these pragmatic arguments are, their focus on quantifiable, short-term benefits undervalues the true worth of the scientific enterprise. Occasionally, curiosity-driven inquiry — basic science — rapidly enables new technology, but more often its first impact is the wonder we experience at novel measurements, whether contemplating ripples in space-time generated by colliding black holes, underwater ecosystems that draw energy from geothermal vents rather than the sun, or the relic microwave radiation of the Big Bang. The practical impacts that follow are unpredictable; if the goal is to explore the unknown, then the benefits are also unknown. (Let us not forget that even Columbus was sorely mistaken about what his journey would uncover!) Only through hard work to understand and unpack new discoveries do their full benefits become clear, and that can take decades, as with how Einstein's theory of relativity (published from 1905 to 1915) eventually enabled GPS technology. Government support is essential in this process. Although Hollywood often portrays scientific discovery as the work of lone geniuses, far more often it is an incremental process, inching ahead through insights from disparate research groups leveraging cutting-edge infrastructure (such as Arctic research facilities and orbiting telescopes), which can only be built through the focused resources of government investment. Every American taxpayer has helped enable innumerable scientific advancements because they are largely due to our nation's investments in the public goods of people and facilities. Of course, these advances have cost money, and we must always ask how best to balance the long-term benefits of science against our country's other urgent needs. (The enormously popular James Webb Space Telescope, for example, was massively over budget, which led to budget-estimation reforms at NASA.) In 2024, the total science budget, outside of medical research (and its obvious practical benefits), was about $28 billion. This is a large number, but it is still just over one-half of 1% of all spending outside of Social Security and Medicare: For every $1,000 in spending, about $6 — one tall Starbucks Caffè Mocha or Big Mac in California — supports fundamental scientific inquiry. Yet the current administration has chosen to hack away at budgets rather than do the hard work of self-examination and improvement. American science, and especially the emerging generation of young scientists, will not survive these cuts. If implemented, the administration's framework will choke off new technologies before they are only half an idea, leave fundamental questions about the universe unanswered and chase a generation of scientists to other countries. By any measure, American science is the envy of the world, and we now face a choice: to remain at the vanguard of scientific inquiry through sound investment, or to cede our leadership and watch others answer the big questions that have confounded humanity for millennia — and reap the rewards and prestige. Only one of those options will make the future America great. Steven R. Furlanetto is a professor of physics and astronomy at UCLA.
