Yesterday, bombs fell on the prison where I was jailed. It may be a metaphor for the Iranian people's fate
The last time I saw the gates of Iran's Evin Prison was November, 25, 2020. Handcuffed, blindfolded yet finally out of my cell, I was driven to a point just outside the prison walls. Behind me was a nondescript blue and white sign proclaiming the name of the prison, and a single-lane entrance point with guard posts on either side of three-story stone walls. It was a relatively unimposing thoroughfare for such a consequential symbol of power and brutality.
I was told to stand in front of the gates, now closed to traffic. A man with a television camera mounted on a tripod appeared, and a Revolutionary Guard member started firing questions at me in Farsi. It was clear that I was expected to participate in one final humiliation: a propaganda clip for the evening news broadcast.
Knowing that nothing I said now could possibly derail the deal which had been made to secure my freedom, I stood outside those gates and did my best to render the footage unusable. No, I was not a spy and I do not confess. No, I wasn't treated well in prison. No, I am not thankful to my captors for releasing me, having lost two years and three months of my life to this cruel and barbaric place.
Those gates are instantly recognisable to every Iranian, whether or not they watch the propaganda clips routinely aired on state TV targeting people, like me, who had been held inside. They stand for the immense coercive power of the Islamic Republic and the supremacy of its behemoth security apparatus. They stand for the ability of a totalitarian state to reach deep into the lives of ordinary people, threatening to take from them everything and everyone they hold dear should they, for whatever reason, be unlucky enough to cross its threshold.
Israel's strike on Evin Prison in Tehran in the hours before US President Donald Trump's ceasefire agreement came into effect had no plausible military purpose. Along with other targets, such as the headquarters of the Basij militia and Revolutionary Guard Corps, this was a highly symbolic attack designed to send a message about Israel's longer-term goals for Iran. To the regime, the destruction of the gates of Evin, filmed by the Israeli Defence Force and circulated online shortly after, represented not only the ruination of Iran's feared internal security apparatus, but that of its ideology too. To the political dissidents housed within Evin, and the Iranian people more broadly, the message was similarly clear: The clerical kleptocracy which has oppressed you for four decades is a paper tiger. Rise up, walk out those gates, and free yourselves.
Of course amid all this potent symbolism, Israel has its own narrow interests at play, and these do not necessarily align with those of the Iranian people. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his ministers have made numerous statements about regime change in Iran, as has Trump, but it remains to be seen whether Tel Aviv, Washington or other Western powers will actually do anything to advance the Iranian people's well-documented desire to be rid of the Islamic Republic, beyond talking a big game on social media.
Reports emerging from inside Evin Prison after the strikes paint a concerning picture of fear, chaos and, even while under fire, repression and crackdown. The account of Reza Khandan, the husband of prominent human rights lawyer Nasrin Sotoudeh and an activist himself who is currently imprisoned in Evin, posted a statement online on behalf of a group of prisoners trapped inside. In it, he described inmates injured from broken glass, and a stampede triggered by the panic of those who had 'nowhere to run'. According to Khandan, prison authorities responded with 'threats, intimidation and pressure on prisoners', and have refused to treat the injured.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Sky News AU
30 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
Iranian people are ‘desperate' for regime change: Hirsi Ali
Author Ayaan Hirsi Ali says the Iranian people are 'desperate' for regime change. One ballistic missile has been fired into Israel from Iran after Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu agreed to a bilateral ceasefire. 'They just need a little bit of help from us,' Ms Hirsi Ali told Sky News host Peta Credlin. 'I hope that Donald Trump and Netanyahu rise to the occasion.'

The Age
33 minutes ago
- The Age
Support for military action should depend on rule of law
To submit a letter to The Age, email letters@ Please include your home address and telephone number below your letter. No attachments. See here for our rules and tips on getting your letter published. WAR The recent US airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities raise serious questions, not just about Iran's objectives, but about how military force is authorised in a democracy. President Donald Trump's decision to bypass Congress wasn't only constitutionally shaky, but it also set a dangerous precedent for unchecked executive power. Some have been quick to call any hesitation or push for diplomacy a sign of weakness. However, that's a simplistic view of a complex issue. Australia's decision to advocate for talks shows that we're thinking things through and sticking to what is right while keeping our long-term interests in mind. Backing our allies doesn't mean nodding along with every move they make. Our support should reflect our democratic values and respect for the rule of law. Bombs don't build peace; working together through proper channels has a much better chance of achieving it. Alistair McLellan, Yarrawonga Rethink alliance If only there were more Geoffrey Robertsons around to dispense incisive comment moulded by critical thinking (' Trump's rap sheet is long, but this may be his worst crime ', 23/6). The crux of the issue, with regards to the US' unprovoked bombing of another country, is entwined in the past efforts of United Nations members who, with honest intentions, strived to make the planet a safer, more secure place after the horrors of World War II. The UN has become hobbled by its own members. The fact that the Security Council has five permanent members of which two are actively engaged in 'aggressor actions' against fellow UN members speaks for itself. That these five countries have veto powers is beyond comprehension, and makes a mockery of the United Nations concept. President Trump, egged on by Benjamin Netanyahu, obviously never thought it through when he mulled over the idea of bombing Iran's alleged nuclear facilities. Australia has to tread carefully here and rethink its alliance with a potentially dangerous ally. David Legat, South Morang Iranian risks downplayed In downplaying Iran's threat to Israel, Geoffrey Robertson neither mentions the Iranian regime's 46-year-long commitment to destroy the Jewish state, nor that due to Iran, for over 20 months Israel has been fighting a war on as many as seven fronts. (And it's Israel who Iran primarily refers to as Little Satan, not the UK). Robertson is just another Israel critic who not only attempts to criminalise Israel's right to self defence, but who also condemns any other nation that assists Israel to this end. His likening of Saddam Hussein's 'mythical weapons of mass destruction' to Iran's nuclear program is absurd, given the atomic watchdog's explicit concerns about Iran's large stockpile of near weapons-grade uranium. Geoff Feren, St Kilda East Not all citizens In an effort to reduce conflating toxic governments with innocent people can we all make a concerted effort to add 'government' after talking about countries involved in current conflicts – Iran, Israel, Palestine, Russia, US – the list goes on. From talking to people from many of these countries in recent days, it strikes me that this distinction would make a difference to the racism experienced by citizens who did not ask to be led by dictators and zealots. Sara McMillan, Frankston South Slavish support As more reports surface that the US bombing of Iran was against international law, our relationship with the US seems to be undergoing change, (' PM stance marks shift from past ', 24/6). Our PM has now endorsed the attack, saying nothing about the legality of the action Australia must consider. Do we uphold international law or are we slavishly committed to support the US, the AUKUS deal and the erratic actions of Donald Trump? We can't have it both ways. For me, the law wins. Lorel Thomas, Blackburn South Nuclear powers Your correspondent seemingly sees no difference between the governments of Iran and Russia, and Israel and the US (Letters, 23/6), or why some can have nuclear weapons but Iran can't. Israel's Netanyahu is a democratically elected leader, like Trump, and has been fighting wars started and forced on his country by Iran and its proxies. They are determined to destroy the Jewish state, just as Russia is to destroy Ukraine. Neither the US nor Israel intend to destroy any state. Iran's regime, like Russia's, is autocratic, oppresses its own people, and strives for regional hegemony. Iran does so by having its proxies destabilise and cause violence throughout the region. A nuclear-armed Iran would be a total disaster for any prospect of Middle East peace. Unlike Israel, Iran is a signatory to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Agreement, which entitled it to international assistance in accessing nuclear energy for peaceful purposes in exchange for refraining from developing nuclear weapons. It is clearly in breach of this agreement. Mark Kessel, Caulfield North History repeats Talk of regime change has reminded Age correspondents of disasters in Iraq and Afghanistan. Surviving CIA patriots who pursued US strategic and business interests in places like Central America, Vietnam, the Congo, Brazil and Chile – and many more – should probably be confined to their retirement communities. Norman Huon, Port Melbourne

Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
Ayaan Hirsi Ali on why the Iranian regime needs to be ‘brought down'
Author Ayaan Hirsi Ali says the Iranian regime is committed to expanding 'terror' beyond its borders. One ballistic missile has been fired into Israel from Iran after Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu agreed to a bilateral ceasefire. 'The reason why it is really important, in my view, to bring this particular regime down is because it is explicitly committed to exporting the Islamic revolution beyond Iran's borders,' Ms Hirsi Ali told Sky News host Peta Credlin. 'At this very moment, it is weak, and I think we have been doing for many decades ... a half-done job.'