Samsung's Android Problem—This Completely Changes Your Phone
Anadolu via Getty Images
Despite the glitz of Google's Android I/O, there's a new problem that's now the biggest threat to the world's leading OS since inception. Whisper it quietly, but everything could suddenly change — not immediately, but when it does there will be no turning back. This impacts Samsung most and for Galaxy users it completely changes your phone.
Google has essentially challenged Samsung to recover from its One UI 7 nightmare in the next few weeks, restoring confidence in Android's leading OEM. Android 16, says Google, will rollout to Samsung and other OEMs 'starting this summer.'
Not Pixel, though. Android 16 will come to Google's phones weeks if not months before any others. Per Android Police: 'Why should someone who spent over $1,000 on a flagship Samsung device have to wait for features available on a $499 Pixel?'
Good question. Samsung is Android's leading OEM, outelling Pixels more than 10 to 1. Pixel isn't even second. China's leading OEMs all dwarf Pixel as well. Xiaomi, Oppo and Vivo all outsell Pixel several times over. As does Huawei — albeit those phones now run their own OS and are Google-free. Watch this space. There's now talk in China that those other OEMs may join Huawei in ditching Android for a Made In China OS.
Huawei's OS was conceived as an IOT architecture that was then expanded to phones when U.S. sanctions hit. It's leaner and better optimized for today's devices, and it underpins an Apple-like connected ecosystem. Android, in contrast, seems bloated.
If China does split, Android would essentially be all about Samsung. The vast majority of Android phones would all come from the Galaxy-maker. And yet its OS would come from the Pixel-maker, which has now joined its mobile phone and mobile phone OS teams within a single unit. It's hard not to see the problem. This won't work.
This disconnect is becoming ever more apparent. We saw it with Samsung's Android 15 delays and we see it each month with a complex security update that is shamed by Pixel's efficient Apple-like approach. Pixel doesn't flex its OS for carriers, and so it's a one-and-done deal to update its ecosystem. Samsung takes the full month to deploy, and users of all but the latest flagships often wait weeks for critical updates.
This is now being called out by Android users. 'Why pick Pixel over iPhone or Samsung,' a Reddit thread has just asked. 'Why do you choose to use a Google Pixel (let's say the Pixel 9 Pro) over a Samsung or iPhone, given that the Pixel may have slower software and hardware?'
Per Droid Life, the response that 'basically covers what almost everyone said in summary format' is clear and neatly frames the problem: 'Against Samsung, Pixel has arguably better cameras, better AI features and a non-bloated version of Android. I'm not sure how true this is, but I also assume Pixel's version of Android should be better optimized for the hardware considering the hardware and software are both made by Google, kind of how Apple makes both iPhones and iOS.'
Arguably Pixel does compete with iPhone, but only really in the U.S. and only to a limited extent. Apple sells as many (and sometimes more) phones than Samsung. But it's the Galaxy-maker that really competes with Apple, its S25 Ultra is Android's nearest thing to an iPhone killer. But can Samsung really compete with iPhone when it doesn't own the full hardware and software stack? Not long term.
For Samsung owners this disconnect completely changes your phone. It holds up monthly updates and has even resulted in missed CISA update deadlines in the U.S., as an increasing number of Android zero-days are flagged and patched. And it delays Google's security innovations such as live threat detection and scam defenses.
All told, this is a big summer for Android. Not in the U.S., with Google's glitzy Android I/O announcements, but in quieter corridors in Seoul, Guangdong and Shenzhen where the future of Android as we know it today is more likely to be decided.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Gmail on Android is getting another round of Material 3 Expressive tweaks
Google's already given the Gmail app on Android two rounds of Material 3 Expressive facelifts, and it looks like the third round is now inbound. The first of the bunch started landing early in June, followed by more visual changes late in the same month. Google, however, isn't stopping there. With Gmail being one of the tech giant's biggest and most important apps, keeping it fresh and modern is high on its priority list. First highlighted by the folks over at 9to5Google, the app's third batch of UI facelifts brings subtle layout adjustments, a new pill-based layout for emails, and, finally, the ability to mark emails as read from the notification shade. For starters, the change brings a slimmed-down version of the app's top-aligned search bar. It functions the same, albeit with the hamburger menu (left) and profile setting/switcher icon (right) moved out of the search bar. Old (left), new (right) For what it's worth, the change isn't live for me on the latest Gmail version on two different phones and three Gmail accounts, suggesting a staggered rollout strategy. Naturally, this means that the pill-based email layout isn't widely available yet either. What's available with the build, however, is the functionality to mark an email as read directly from its notification. Get triaging First spotted in testing in late June, the convenient feature is finally available. Previously limited to Delete and Reply, Gmail notifications will now highlight a "Mark as read" action positioned right in the middle, essentially offering users a simple quality of life upgrade that streamlines inbox management. If tapped by mistake, users will have the option to quickly undo the change, as seen in the second screenshot above. Force close the Google app and Gmail if you don't see the new notification option after updating to Gmail version Gmail Google LLC COMMUNICATION Price: Free 4.2 Download
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Apple's 10% Stock Pop: Time to Invest in the Technology Giant Embracing America?
Key Points Apple has increased its spending plans in the United States from $500 billion to $600 billion. There are positives and negatives to the announcement from an investor's perspective. Shares of Apple stock look expensive today relative to its growth rate. 10 stocks we like better than Apple › Investors are back on the Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL) train. The stock of the multinational technology giant is still down slightly in 2025 but popped over 10% in the last week after management announced new planned spending in the U.S. CEO Tim Cook even visited the White House in a joint press conference with President Donald Trump to announce this new planned spending on components for the iPhone as well as other Apple products in America. It has helped the company achieve some breathing room around potential tariffs on semiconductors, iPhone components, and iPhones themselves getting imported to America. Apple's stock got its mojo back on this upsized spending news, but should you actually buy shares today? Here's what the numbers say. A $600 billion investment Earlier this year, Apple announced that it would spend $500 billion over the next four years in the United States. Last week, it upped its estimate to $600 billion, or $150 billion annually. This is different than a company's announced capital expenditure plans, such as when Amazon promises $100 billion in investments related to data centers and its delivery network. Apple is spending money with its suppliers, including advanced glass screens and various semiconductor manufacturers. It is more of an announcement around committed orders for products, which will spur demand for factory work in the United States. Apple is a sprawling company, and the announced spending will occur in all 50 states, impact 450,000 jobs, and involve 79 different factories. It is astounding how complex Apple's supply chain for the iPhone and other computing hardware is today. However, Apple is still not at the point of a "Made in America iPhone" as assembly and other services are performed in China and India, with Apple negotiating with the U.S. government around what is feasible to bring to the United States. Investors applauded the spending plans as a way to shy away from tariff risks on iPhone and semiconductor imports, which could have added huge costs to Apple's supply chain, damaging its profits. Now, it seems to be in good standing with the U.S. government and regulation authorities again. Does the announcement matter? In regard to tariffs, this spending announcement won't necessarily hurt the company, it just prevents Apple from having future cost increases across its supply chain. However, since the U.S. has higher salaries and labor standards, this investment may lead to higher input costs for product components, which could lead to margin compression. Apple's operating margin has steadily risen since the COVID-19 pandemic, hitting a record high of 32% over the last 12 months. Sourcing components in the United States may reverse this expansion. What matters more at the end of the day is demand for Apple's products. Last quarter, the company released solid figures for the three months ending in June. Total revenue grew just under 10% year over year, driven by services revenue and iPhone revenue growth. Even though the iPhone is almost 20 years old, it remains the bread and butter of Apple's business today. This puts the company in a tough spot. Even though the iPhone remains wildly popular, unit volumes have stagnated for years, meaning Apple is only able to grow revenue by increasing prices. This is not an ideal position to be in. Price increases may be necessary just to maintain profit margins in the future if input costs grow due to the Made-in-America investments. All in all, this announcement does matter. It just might be a negative for Apple's business, contrary to the stock's initial reaction. The truth about Apple stock There are a lot of arguments to be made -- both bearish and bullish -- for Apple stock. Bulls might say this is a fantastic brand with major lock-in effects along with a growing services division with strong profit margins. Bears may say that Apple's unit volumes for the iPhone have fallen with no new successful products coming down the pipeline. For example, the Apple Vision Pro has turned into a total product bust, likely losing the company billions if not tens of billions of dollars. A deciding factor in this debate could be the stock's valuation. Apple's price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) is 35. This is quite expensive for a business with low revenue growth. Compare that to Alphabet, which has grown its revenue significantly faster than Apple over the last few years but trades at a more reasonable P/E ratio of 22. Apple may be a great business, but that doesn't mean you should ignore the price you pay when analyzing its stock. Avoid buying shares of Apple after this post-announcement pop. Should you invest $1,000 in Apple right now? Before you buy stock in Apple, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Apple wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $663,630!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,115,695!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,071% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 185% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 13, 2025 Brett Schafer has positions in Alphabet and Amazon. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, Amazon, and Apple. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Apple's 10% Stock Pop: Time to Invest in the Technology Giant Embracing America? was originally published by The Motley Fool Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Here's why Google might have to sell Chrome, and which companies want to buy it
A federal judge ruled that Google illegally maintains a monopoly in online search and ad markets. A court will this month decide on a remedy, which could force Google to sell Chrome. Several competitors have expressed interest in buying the web browser, including Perplexity. Chrome is the world's most popular web browser. But how much longer it belongs to Google is an open question. A court last year ruled that Google had violated antitrust laws by maintaining a monopoly on internet search. A second ruling in April found Google also monopolized open-web digital ad markets. The Justice Department asked a judge to force Google to divest its premier web browser to remedy the case. A court is expected to rule on that by the end of this month. Chrome, a free web browser developed by Google, is an important distribution tool for Google Search and its other services. It also provides insights into users' search habits and is the most popular web browser on the market. Being forced to sell Chrome would be an undeniable blow to Google and its parent company, Alphabet Inc. Analysts at Barclays said such an action could be a black swan scenario for Google stock, sparking an estimated 15% to 25% decline. Google denies it's a monopoly. It said in a blog post in May that offloading the web browser to another party could render it "obsolete" and "expose billions of people to cyber-attacks." Although the judge has not yet decided Chrome's ultimate fate, competitors are already lining up to gladly take it off Google's hands. an AI search chat platform, confirmed to Business Insider that it made a $35 billion bid for Chrome this week. JP Morgan and several private equity firms backed the bid. is a division of the digital marketing company Public Good, which acquired in July. Public Good President Melissa Anderson and CEO Danny Bibi told Business Insider they reached out to Google on Wednesday. "Given the number of worldwide users Chrome has, it's a really just phenomenal way to scale user adoption," Anderson said. The pair said they're committed to using AI ethically, which means offering its search for free in an effort to make knowledge accessible for all. They also said founded in 1998, already has a network of clients, so finding potential advertisers wouldn't be a heavy lift. Perplexity Perplexity, an AI search startup, made a $34.5 billion bid for the web browser this week. The company launched an AI-native browser, Comet, in July. Although the bid is higher than Perplexity's entire valuation, The Wall Street Journal reported that several investors have agreed to back the potential deal. Perplexity said it would continue supporting Chromium, Google's open-source web browser project that's the foundation of Chrome, as part of the deal, according to the outlet. The outlet reported that Perplexity would continue to keep Google as the default search engine, but users could change that through settings. OpenAI Although OpenAI's ChatGPT turned it into the leading AI startup in Silicon Valley, the company is a tiny fraction of the size of a Big Tech mammoth like Google. Purchasing Chrome, however, would help even the playing field. During Google's antitrust hearing in April, OpenAI's head of ChatGPT testified that the company would be interested in acquiring Chrome if Google were forced to divest. "Yes, we would, as would many other parties," Nick Turley told the court, according to Bloomberg. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman also recently said he'd be interested in snapping up Chrome. "If Chrome is really going to sell, we should take a look at it," Altman told a group of journalists on Thursday, according to The Verge. Yahoo Yahoo, a direct competitor of Google, would also be interested in bidding on Chrome, Bloomberg reported. Brian Provost, the general manager for Yahoo Search, said Chrome is "arguably the most important strategic player on the web" during a hearing for Google's antitrust case in April. "We would be able to pursue it with Apollo," Provost said, referring to Yahoo's owner, Apollo Global Management Inc. Read the original article on Business Insider Sign in to access your portfolio
