Put the paintbrush down – AI can restore artworks quicker and better
Artificial intelligence (AI) could spell the end of art restoration by humans after MIT showed that damaged paintings can be repaired in just a few hours.
Typically, conservators spend months or years researching and matching paints, colours and techniques to ensure the finished product is as close to the original as possible.
But Alex Kachkine, an engineering graduate at MIT, has shown it is possible to use AI to fill in the damaged areas digitally, then print the restored layers onto a thin film to attach on top of the painting.
It means the painting appears restored even though the original is still intact beneath.
The method was applied to a highly damaged 15th-century oil painting, and AI immediately identified 5,612 separate regions in need of repair, and filled in these regions using 57,314 different colours. The entire process, from start to finish, took just three and a half hours.
'There is a lot of damaged art in storage that might never be seen,' said Mr Kachkine. 'Hopefully with this new method, there's a chance we'll see more art, which I would be delighted by.'
In recent years, digital restoration tools have allowed conservators to create virtual representations of restored works.
AI algorithms can quickly sift through huge amounts of data about artists and time periods to generate a digitally restored version of a particular painting, in a way that closely resembles the correct style.
However, digital restorations are usually displayed virtually or printed as stand-alone works and until now there has never been a way to translate the digital restorations on to the original work.
The new technique involves first scanning the painting and then using software to create maps of the areas that require repair, before matching the correct colours.
The maps are then inkjet printed onto two sheets of a film. One film, which sits underneath, is printed in white so that the colours overlaid on the second sheet are not muddied by the colours of the original painting.
The layers are carefully aligned and overlaid by hand onto the original painting and adhered with a thin spray of varnish.
The printed films are made from materials that can be easily dissolved with conservation-grade solutions, in case conservators need to reveal the original, damaged work. The digital file of the mask can also be saved as a detailed record of what was restored.
For the painting that Mr Kachkine used, the method was able to fill in thousands of losses in just a few hours.
'A few years ago, I was restoring this baroque Italian painting with probably the same order magnitude of losses, and it took me nine months of part-time work,' he said. 'The more losses there are, the better this method is.'
The new technique may even help restore botched restorations such as Elias Garcia Martinez's Ecce Homo, which was restored so badly it was dubbed Monkey Christ, because of the Simian features of Jesus.
Mr Kachkine acknowledges that there were ethical issues to consider, in terms of whether a restored version was an appropriate representation of an artist's original style and intent.
He said the process should be carried out in consultation with conservators with knowledge of a painting's history and origins to check the AI programme was not going off-piste.
'Restoring a painting is fun, and it's great to sit down and infill things and have a nice evening,' he added 'But that's a very slow process.'
The research was published in Nature.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
The surprising scene that the ‘Andor' cinematographer loved the most
Andor Season 2 switched directors every three episodes, but the same wasn't true of its cinematographers. Christophe Nuyens photographed the first six episodes of the 12-part season, including both the action-packed opening arc and the subsequent introduction of the planet Ghorman. On Andor, director of photography is not a simple job. Nuyens had to do a lot over the course of his six episodes, from filming action scenes (like Diego Luna's titular protagonist saving his friends from stormtroopers in a stolen TIE fighter) to figuring out the visual aesthetics for new planets like Ghorman. More from GoldDerby Clancy Brown, Joel McHale, and more actors who self-submitted at this year's Emmys 'Cross' star Aldis Hodge on building an aspirational hero - who's not a superhero Get a taste of 'The Valley' (literally) with this food and beer FYC event 'The nice thing is that Episodes 1, 2, and 3 were more like a classic Star Wars arc,' Nuyens tells Gold Derby, 'while Episodes 4, 5, and 6 show the more human side of the story. On Ghorman, it feels more like a spy movie. It was really nice to work on both of those. We really tried to give each arc of three episodes a different feel. That was really important for us.' The first three episodes of Season 2 were written by Andor showrunner Tony Gilroy, who is an experienced director in his own right. That means his scripts are loaded with visual details, according to Nuyens, but Gilroy also allows his collaborators room to come up with their own ideas, too. 'Tony's pitch for Ghorman was that it should feel somewhere between Italy and France,' Nuyens says. 'So we looked for references, one of which was the Italian film The Great Beauty, just looks-wise. We thought of Ghorman like Turin, in the Italian mountains. The story had to take place in winter, so always low sun, but with all the sun behind the mountains, so there's this blue gloom that we could mix with the warm practical lights. For us, it was important that this planet feel totally different and inspired by France and Italy as much as possible.' Not all of the action on Andor is violent, and not all of the violence is visible. The emotional climax of the first three episodes, after all, is a dance scene. At her daughter's wedding, Mon Mothma (Genevieve O'Reilly) channels all of her conflicting emotions about family and politics onto the dancefloor. O'Reilly previously told Gold Derby that 'the chaos that is within her emerges through this big dance number … at different times in our lives, we've all done that dance for many different reasons.' Nuyens' job was to complement that aspect of her performance with the camerawork. 'It's a really chic wedding, but it was important for Tony that the dance sequence at the end feel like a rave,' Nuyens says. 'From the moment that she starts losing herself, we decided to use the camera that turns around her. We start with a fix on her, just fixed shots. But then she decides, 'OK, I'm going to go dance.' She takes one shot and goes on the dance floor, and from that moment the camera starts turning around her and stays with her, just zooming in on her. So we have the feeling that, together with her, we start to lose control of everything that's happening.' Part of Mon Mothma's emotional vortex in that moment is that she realizes her comrade Luthen Rael (Stellan Skarsgård) is going to kill her old friend Tay Kolma (Ben Miles) for threatening to expose him. Tay's murder is not shown on screen, but it doesn't have to be. The audience sees him get into a lift driven by diehard revolutionary Cinta Kaz (Varada Sethu) and we know he's toast. Most shows don't demonstrate that kind of restraint, but that's exactly what Nuyens loves about Andor. 'It's incredible because normally in a TV show, those things are all written and we see everything,' Nuyens says. 'On some shoots, I'm trying to convince the director, 'but we don't have to see this. We need to let the viewer use a little bit of imagination, like they're reading a book.' That's something that Tony does really well in his writing. All the beats that we have to see are written, the ones we don't have to see are not written. So we can really play with keeping a little bit of mystery for the viewer, so they can fill it in with their imagination. I think it's really important for a television show to leave a little room for the viewer.' Perhaps surprisingly, Nuyens' favorite scene to shoot in Season 2 of Andor didn't involve murder or stormtroopers at all. Lucasfilm/Disney 'There are a lot of setpieces I liked filming, but actually the scene I most liked filming is a simple scene. It's the scene between Syril (Kyle Soller) and Dedra (Denise Gough), When Syril's mom (Kathryn Hunter) comes to dinner,' Nuyens says. 'It's so well-written and also so well-played. The three of them are so talented. It was so fun to film, even though visually it's quite a simple scene. We tried to accentuate the awkwardness with central shots slightly too wide, which worked quite well. Kyle and Denise added those little extra bits to their performances, which worked really well on camera. That scene remains in my head one of the nicest to film, and I think if you ask the crew, they would say the same. I remember the crew was having fun filming that scene because it was so good. We were feeling the energy.' Nuyens continues, 'I'm always 10 times happier when I go home and a scene is really well-played. It's so much more important than beautiful lights and beautiful shots. I think it's just everything coming together, which is really nice.' Best of GoldDerby 'The best job I ever had': 'From 'Supernatural' to 'The Boys,' Eric Kripke talks his biggest hits — and miss (ahem, 'Tarzan') 'Cross' star Aldis Hodge on building an aspirational hero — who's not a superhero Jonathan Pryce on the 'great responsibility' of playing a character with dementia in 'Slow Horses' Click here to read the full article.
Forbes
8 hours ago
- Forbes
How to Future-Proof Your Workforce for AI
Stand Together Is AI poised to automate all human work — or will it bring us more meaningful, higher-paying jobs? It depends who you ask. Tech CEOs have warned of a coming tidal wave. Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei predicted AI could eliminate half of all entry-level white-collar jobs within five years. OpenAI's Sam Altman expects artificial general intelligence to surpass humans at all economically valuable tasks. Some economists see a slower story. MIT's Daron Acemoglu estimates that AI will increase U.S. productivity by just 0.05% annually over the next decade — based on the idea that most companies won't change how they operate. Predicting exactly how AI will reshape jobs might be impossible. But if you're leading a business, your priority isn't knowing precisely who's correct — it's preparing your organization and workforce for an AI-driven future. But why is forecasting AI's impact on jobs so difficult, even for experts? Understanding the forces that make it hard to predict is also what helps leaders understand how to prepare. I think of this as AI's "Three-Body Problem" — a nod to the famously unpredictable physics phenomenon, where adding a third interacting body makes future trajectories chaotic and impossible to forecast. Similarly, three interacting factors — AI capabilities, adoption speed, and job creation potential — make AI job predictions uniquely challenging. Let's briefly explore each one. 1. What will AI be able to do? Experts fundamentally disagree about how powerful — and how fast — AI models will become. Some predict artificial superintelligence could emerge as soon as 2027, driven by self-improving systems that compound capabilities exponentially. Others believe we're nearing the limits of current scaling laws, and that even human-level intelligence may still be 15 years away. Additionally, AI's abilities are uneven — superhuman in some tasks yet subhuman in others. For example, Ethan Mollick recently demonstrated that GPT-4o could ace an MBA-level strategy case with remarkable nuance — yet failed at solving a basic riddle requiring common sense logic. It's a reminder that raw capability doesn't guarantee reliability across domains. 2. How will we choose to use AI? Just because AI can automate a job — or parts of one— doesn't mean it will. The pace at which we integrate AI into the workplace will be wildly uneven. Some sectors will move as fast as the technology itself. Others will be slowed by regulation, union rules, institutional inertia, or cultural preferences. In industries with little financial pressure to cut costs, there may simply be no urgency to change. Something I think about a lot: We still have gas station attendants pumping gas in Oregon and New Jersey — not because it's technologically necessary, but because we've chosen to protect those jobs. Predicting where and how fast adoption will happen is tough, because it's ultimately a question of human behavior. 3. What new jobs will AI create? AI will create new jobs — but how many, and what kind, remains unknown, especially if it quickly automates even the roles it helps create. Historically, new technology has been a net job creator. The internet gave rise to SEO specialists and app developers, and the smartphone boom created whole industries around mobile design and delivery. But AI is different: It could quickly take over the roles it helps create, making it harder to predict the net effect on employment. Taken together, the Three-Body Problem makes AI job forecasting impossible to pin down. AI capabilities, adoption speed, and job creation are all unpredictable — yet understanding these complexities is only half the battle. When nobody can confidently predict AI's trajectory, how do you prepare your business and your employees for what's ahead? Precisely because AI's trajectory is uncertain, organizations must build the muscle to adapt quickly. Readiness is the best hedge against uncertainty. As Bijal Shah, CEO of Guild, put it, 'Employers who win in this new world of work driven by AI will be those who invest in making their workforce more adaptable and resilient — not just for today's skills, but for tomorrow's unknowns.' So, where should leaders begin? The following strategies are no-regrets investments — moves that deliver value no matter how fast AI change arrives. They offer ways not just to survive the shifts ahead, but to build more agile organizations and more meaningful, purposeful work for employees. Forget titles. Jobs are a collection of skills and abilities. Titles make jobs sound fixed. But they're really collections of skills and abilities — Lego pieces —that can be reassembled creatively. Organizations like Censia are already shepherding adaptations — such as Dunkin' cashiers becoming pharmacy techs. Thinking in skills and desired traits frees businesses and workers from obsessing over whether a job stays or goes. 'The winners in this AI era will be those who stop managing roles and start orchestrating skills,' said Joanna Riley, CEO of Censia. Make work suck less. AI can automate or reduce tedious job aspects, helping less experienced employees quickly take on more complex, meaningful, and better-paid work. 'The new versions of these jobs are just better — more interesting, creative, and human-oriented,' said Brandon Sammut, chief people officer at AI company Zapier. While there's a risk that these more meaningful and productive jobs will mean fewer jobs overall, the immediate opportunity is clear: Deploy AI tools that make jobs more enjoyable (less rote, routine work) and purposeful. Help people do harder stuff. Automating simpler tasks means work becomes more rewarding and challenging. Companies must help employees elevate their skill levels and continuously push into domains where humans have a unique advantage. 'We're headed toward a world where only high-skill, high-complexity work survives,' David Blake, CEO of Degreed, noted. 'The real challenge is helping people make that leap.' Durable human skills — like creativity, problem-solving, empathy, and mathematical reasoning — will remain essential. Support employees to use AI in daily work. It's management malpractice not to. 'It is management malpractice not to create an environment where employees are using AI in concrete ways in their daily work,' Sammut said. Knowing how to use AI is fast becoming table stakes to stay employable. The people most at risk of being replaced aren't being replaced by AI — they're being replaced by other humans who know how to use it. Helping employees integrate AI into their daily workflow doesn't just boost productivity — it also strengthens your employer value proposition. People are drawn to workplaces where they remain relevant, are continually challenged, and engage in meaningful, purposeful work. Waiting for certainty isn't an option. Leaders must act now, building strategies resilient to multiple outcomes. If you want to future-proof your business, start by future-proofing your people. Follow Allison Salisbury's writing and insights on her LinkedIn. Allison Salisbury is CEO of Humanist Venture Studio, which is supported by Stand Together, an organization that partners with changemakers who are tackling the root causes of America's biggest problems. Learn more about Stand Together's efforts to transform the future of work and explore ways you can partner with us.
Forbes
8 hours ago
- Forbes
Rigetti Computing Stock Down 37% As Nvidia CEO Sees ‘Inflection Point'
Nvidia CEO says quantum computing is reaching 'an inflection point' and Rigetti Computing stock is up slightly — but down 37% in 2025. Should you buy? Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang is now a quantum computing booster after a March conversion. Actively traded Rigetti Computing enjoyed a slight boost to its stock price which is down 37% in 2025 — after a 970% increase since June 2024. The company's recent earnings report does not support a bull case for Rigetti stock. Yet the longer-term opportunity for quantum computing could be significant, according to my June 10 interview with MIT expert Jonathan Ruane. Quantum computing — which uses super-cooled metal to power more calculations per circuit than classical computing can perform — is capturing the attention of investors. How so? Publicly-traded quantum computing stocks soared Wednesday before reversing direction later in the day. For example, according to Yahoo! Finance The reason? 'Quantum computing is reaching an inflection point,' Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang told a crowd at Nvidia GTC Paris Wednesday, reported Yahoo! Finance. 'We are within reach' of using quantum computers for 'areas that can solve some interesting problems in the coming years,' Huang added. This brings up an important observation about the industry: when Jensen Huang talks about quantum computing, people listen. That's my modern-day twist on the old catchphrase — 'When E.F. Hutton talks, people listen' — from a TV commercial for the late brokerage firm. Rigetti is among the most heavily traded public companies on the stock exchange — but should it be? The arguments opposing investor interest seem compelling: the company's stock has fallen 37% so far in 2025 and its first quarter 2025 financial results. Yet if prognosticators such as MIT Lecturer John Ruane are correct, the future of quantum computing could be very bright if certain problems are solved in the next five to ten years, he told me in a June 10 interview. Meanwhile Rigetti sees a bright future. 'We are four to five years from real commercial value of quantum computing,' Rigetti CEO Subodh Kulkarni told Asking For A Trend. 'That's where the market is really supposed to grow and be large enough where things like sales and EPS start becoming much more critical at that point. At this point, it's all about technology development and how we are getting the milestones done so that we enable this large $100 plus billion market in the future,' he added. Huang's views on QC have evolved significantly this year. He went from saying in January QC could be 15 to 30 years away from offering practical solutions to business problems, noted Investopedia, to seeing QC at an inflection point on June 11. During the interim, in March Huang announced a bet on a Boston-area research center to help Nvidia overcome the impediments to realizing the technology's potential, I wrote in my March Forbes post. At the moment, QC is based on fragile hardware and error rates that are unacceptably high for most practical applications. Classical computers rely on linear algebra, noted Yahoo! Finance. QCs, however, have far more processing capability because they apply quantum mechanics and advanced mathematics — making them amenable to solving problems in 'cybersecurity, cryptography, and chemistry,' reported Yahoo! Finance. Perhaps Huang was motivated to make his Wednesday remarks by IBM — which on June 10 announced plans to launch in 2029 a large-scale QC capable of 'operating without errors,' according to IEEE Spectrum. Google released a quantum computing chip called Willow in December, saying the technology "paves the way to a useful, large-scale quantum computer," noted Yahoo! Finance. While Amazon and Microsoft announced two quantum chips in February. Compared to these recent announcements, Huang's remarks were relatively content free. Meanwhile, Rigetti seems to have relatively little capital compared to these tech giants. What's more, the company says it is years away from being little more than a technology researcher hoping for a breakthrough from which the company can generate revenues. Rigetti's first quarter 2025 results were disappointing. The company's $1.5 million in revenue for the quarter fell more than 42% short of expectations while earnings per share of 13 cents missed by 84%, according to Google Finance. Rigetti net profit was less then met the eye. The company reported a $42.6 million profit in the first quarter of 2025, 'driven mainly by non-cash gains tied to financial instruments,' noted Quantum Insider. As Rigetti ramped up utility-scale quantum systems, the company revealed a $21.6 million operating loss. One thing Rigetti has going for it is the 970% increase in the company's stock price in the last year. The company has wisely capitalized on that increase to sell $350 million in common stock to raise its cash balance to about $570 million, according to Perhaps this cash will shore up the company's finances over the next four or five years as a hoped-for increase in revenue ultimately emerges. 'Quantum computing breakthroughs in science and engineering will make the tool more valuable for business. Better error correction algorithms will make QC less expensive and more consistent. Better performance will increase QC's commercial viability. Google's Willow chip showed big improvements in error correction,' Ruane told me in a June 10 interview. 'Engineering larger systems — including the chip and the surrounding infrastructure — that work together can improve QC's value to business. Google and IBM will operate across a rage of innovations to build powerful hardware platforms. Software startups will develop technology which venture capitalists will find amenable.' Ecosystems will be essential if the U.S. wants to lead the world in QC. 'Universities like MIT and Harvard will collaborate with large companies and startups to build ecosystems. Nvidia's Boston-based Accelerated Quantum Research Center is a good example. In May 2025, a new act was proposed — the quantum sandbox — aims to help create QC ecosystems,' he said. Problems with hardware and algorithms will need to be solved before achieving quantum advantage — where quantum surpasses classical computing. 'QC has the potential to make pharmaceutical development more efficient. This is not certain. There is a need to focus on hardware and algorithms. MIT and Harvard have algorithm developers like Aram Harrow,' he explained. It remains to be seen which problems will be more amenable to QC than classical computing. 'It is unclear whether QC will help make large language models easier to train and operate. Who could know what AI would end up doing?' 'There will never be a day when every person can have their own quantum computer — due to the physics. The use cases of QC are also unclear. QC may be operating more like supercomputers in hybrid clouds with classical computers. Everybody could end up using QC through apps powered by the hybrid cloud.' Business leaders will need new skills to take advantage of QC. Executives must 'learn how to reimagine solutions to previously unsolvable business problems using QC. This could be in areas such as logistics where a company is trying to optimize its supply chain.' If quantum advantage is near, will Rigetti be able to capitalize on it — or will IBM, Nvidia, Amazon, Google, and Microsoft get the lion's share?
