
I tested ChatGPT Study Mode vs NotebookLM — here's which one came out on top
They're not the same product, and Study Mode doesn't include the podcasting feature that helped NotebookLM go viral, but it's a great way to tackle a complex problem without the AI just giving you the answer.
I'm currently doing a distance learning degree with the U.K.'s remote learning Open University organization, focusing on a range of science and technology topics. Having a tool like NotebookLM allows me to work through the material and ask questions without judgment. ChatGPT Study Mode is that — but with a better LLM and an interface designed for learning, not just sourcing information.
Study Mode isn't as radical a shift as NotebookLM. Essentially, it's an adapted version of ChatGPT itself with a focus on learning and interactivity. It's OpenAI directly building into ChatGPT something that startups have been using the underlying LLM to create themselves — including the likes of Duolingo.
Even Claude has a Study option that lets you create Artifacts around a particular topic. This isn't a new idea, but OpenAI's implementation is surprisingly effective.
Technically, you could create a version of 'Study Mode' yourself using a project, your own data files, and custom instructions — that's essentially how it was built. The custom instructions behind Study Mode are designed to encourage participation, self-reflection, and provide actionable feedback. It basically becomes a tutor.
Comparing the two is a challenge as they work very differently but serve a similar purpose. NotebookLM lets you upload your own data and then work across it. For example, you could upload a PDF of the course textbook plus YouTube video tutorials, and use it like a chatbot trained specifically on that data.
Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips.
Both systems were built with academia in mind — Study Mode for college students trying to get to grips with new material, NotebookLM more for advanced learners or specialists exploring a subject in depth.
Study Mode in ChatGPT is more of a framework of responses tailored to learning new material. You can still ground it in your own documents by adding them to the chat, but its superpower is the custom instructions that guide it to ask academic-level questions and tailor responses to your skills and topic.
Both systems were built with academia in mind — Study Mode for college students trying to get to grips with new material, NotebookLM more for advanced learners or specialists exploring a subject in depth.
When it comes to specific features, the differences become more apparent.
Study Mode offers real-time feedback loops, adjustable difficulty levels, and Socratic questioning that adapts based on your responses. It can create mind maps, flashcards, and even suggest related topics to explore. NotebookLM, meanwhile, excels at cross-referencing multiple sources, creating comprehensive summaries, and its standout audio feature that turns any document into a podcast-style discussion. NotebookLM also offers better citation tracking, crucial for academic work where source attribution matters.
I gave each of them my notes from a recent Open University module that allows the use of AI for learning new topics (just not in writing). I was exploring the concept of sustainability in product design.
While NotebookLM was able to give me very specific responses to questions I had about a particular aspect — something I was working on for a final essay — its responses were just that: a block of text. Even when I asked it to turn the content into a quiz, it gave me something printable, rather than something interactive.
Giving ChatGPT Study Mode the same notes, it asked about my experience and skill level and then built a personal tutor for me. This included tailoring the response to my experience and creating a genuinely interactive quiz.
My only issue with ChatGPT is that the output isn't exclusively based on the contents of the study notes. So if you're writing something that requires strict adherence to course material, you risk introducing uncited information. NotebookLM, by contrast, is fully grounded in the data you upload.
Much like you wouldn't try to do everything in Excel — although I know some people who would if they could — you shouldn't expect either ChatGPT or NotebookLM to do it all. There's plenty of room for both tools in a student toolkit.
There's plenty of room for both tools in a student toolkit.
For example, you could use NotebookLM to create an audio overview and listen to a discussion of the class material as if you were in a lesson with two teachers explaining it conversationally.
You can also have it extract reports on key moments or elements within the class data. This is invaluable if you're working on a tricky essay point or need to expand to hit a word count.
Then you could feed that NotebookLM-generated report into a new ChatGPT Study Mode session and have the OpenAI platform turn it into an interactive quiz or guide you through answering questions.
A quote from a student shared by OpenAI sums up the value of Study Mode: "The best way I'd describe it is a live, 24/7, all-knowing 'office hours.'"
Both tools have their strengths. NotebookLM feels like a modern take on an interactive textbook — great for digging into course materials and pulling out exactly what you need. Study Mode is more like having a patient tutor who's available whenever you are. If you're trying to actually understand something rather than just get through it, Study Mode stands out. Used together, they cover a lot of ground and can genuinely change how you approach learning.
The future of AI-powered learning tools looks promising, with both platforms likely to evolve rapidly. OpenAI has hinted at adding collaborative features to Study Mode, potentially allowing students to share sessions or work together on problems. NotebookLM might expand its audio capabilities to include different presentation styles beyond the current podcast format.
For students deciding between them, consider your learning style: if you're an auditory learner who benefits from discussion, NotebookLM's podcast feature is invaluable. If you prefer interactive problem-solving and guided learning, Study Mode's tutoring approach will serve you better. The ideal scenario? Use both — they're complementary tools that, together, create a comprehensive learning ecosystem.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a few seconds ago
- Yahoo
Reddit (RDDT) Sees Q2 2025 Earnings Surge With Revenue Growth
Reddit recently reported strong financial results for Q2 2025, with substantial revenue growth and profitability, showing a turnaround from last year's net loss. Despite legal challenges related to Google's AI changes and a class action lawsuit, the stock saw a significant price increase of 99% over the last quarter. This positive movement occurred amid a broader tech rally, with indexes like Nasdaq reaching record highs, driven by gains in other major tech stocks. While specific challenges weighed on Reddit's stock earlier, its recent earnings may have supported confidence, aligning with the overall market uptrend. Buy, Hold or Sell Reddit? View our complete analysis and fair value estimate and you decide. AI is about to change healthcare. These 26 stocks are working on everything from early diagnostics to drug discovery. The best part - they are all under $10b in market cap - there's still time to get in early. The recent positive movement in Reddit's share price, following their strong Q2 financial results, underscores investor confidence in the company's turnaround from last year's net loss. Despite the ongoing legal challenges, the substantial share price increase indicates a market reaction that aligns with broader tech industry trends as major indices reach record highs. The company's share performance over the last year is notable, with a total return exceeding 307.18%, providing a stark contrast to the recent short-term surge, and showcasing its resilience in a competitive digital landscape. In comparison to the US Interactive Media and Services industry, Reddit's one-year return surpassed the industry average of 32.9%, highlighting its strong market position. The recent legal uncertainties may influence future revenue and earnings forecasts, primarily if these challenges impact advertiser relationships or data licensing opportunities. Despite such challenges, Reddit's revenue growth prospects remain robust, powered by its expanding international footprint and increasing user engagement. Considering the current share price of US$215.44, it exceeds the consensus analyst price target of US$195.96, indicating a potential overvaluation in the short term. Analysts anticipate a revenue growth of 31.8% annually over the next three years, necessitating careful consideration of Reddit's capacity to sustain such growth amidst advertising reliance and international expansion dependencies. The strong long-term returns could be attributed to its strategic initiatives and successful penetration into new markets, yet these factors, along with the recent news, interlace complex implications for future projections. In light of our recent valuation report, it seems possible that Reddit is trading beyond its estimated value. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Companies discussed in this article include RDDT. This article was originally published by Simply Wall St. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@ Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Engadget
2 minutes ago
- Engadget
OpenAI brings GPT-4o after users melt down over the new model
Following the rollout of OpenAI's latest GPT-5 model earlier this week, a certain user base was adamantly calling for the return of the previous GPT-4o model. Outspoken users complained about the writing quality of the updated model, with some even going so far as to grieve the loss of GPT-4o, which some said they considered a friend and confidant. In the latest OpenAI update that labels GPT-5 as the "smartest, fastest, most useful model yet," the company removed the option to choose which model to use and defaults to GPT-5 instead. With the new model, GPT-5 uses a "real-time router" that switches between a more efficient model for basic questions and a deeper reasoning alternative for more complex demands. The initial rollout ran into some issues that made GPT-5 seem "way dumber," according to OpenAI's CEO Sam Altman, who also opened up a Reddit AMA to offer more insight into the changes. On Reddit, Altman responded to a question by saying GPT-5's writing quality is better than previous models, but asked users if this felt true. In response, several Redditors voiced their opinion that the GPT-5 felt "sterile" and "much worse" and answered "briefly and dryly." In response to the initial outcry, Altman posted on X that OpenAI would let Plus subscribers choose between using GPT-5 or GPT-4o. "We for sure underestimated how much some of the things that people like in GPT-4o matter to them, even if GPT-5 performs better in most ways," Altman said on X. The return of GPT-4o was celebrated, but there's still no guarantee that OpenAI will keep its older model around indefinitely. In the same X post, Altman said that OpenAI "will watch usage as we think about how long to offer legacy models for." In the meantime, OpenAI is focusing on finishing the GPT-5 rollout and making changes that will "make it warmer." However, for users who have grown attached to GPT-4o as more than just an AI chatbot, this could be the beginning of the end.


Fox News
33 minutes ago
- Fox News
Mid-decade redistricting is ‘blatantly political,' GOP lawmaker argues
Rep. Jay Obernolte, R-Calif., discusses the impeding re-districting battle across the U.S., Google's investments in AI and potential nuclear reactors on the moon on 'Fox News Live.'