US Supreme Court grills Trump administration over birthright citizenship
The hearing on Thursday represented the first time the top court in the United States has heard a case related to Trump's January 20 order seeking to do away with the more-than-century-old policy, which grants citizenship to nearly all infants born on US soil, regardless of their parents' legal status.
It was not immediately clear when the court would issue a ruling in the case, although an outcome could take weeks. It also remained unclear if the justices would address the underlying constitutionality of Trump's order, or if they would only rule on the narrower question of whether lower federal court justices are empowered to block the implementation of the order nationwide.
Still, demonstrators and lawmakers who gathered outside of the Washington, DC courthouse said any ruling challenging birthright citizenship would corrode the national fabric of the US.
'We are here at the highest court in the land because a fundamental promise of America is under attack. And we are here to say not on our watch,' Ama Frimpong, the legal director of CASA, told those gathered in protest.
'All persons born in the US are citizens of the US,' Frimpong said.
Legal experts have also said a ruling limiting federal courts' ability to order a 'national' or 'universal' injunction to block Trump's executive actions would in and of itself be transformative.
'That question, in a normal sense, would already shake the legal foundation of the country: whether lower courts have the right to order nationwide injunctions,' said Al Jazeera's Heidi Zhou-Castro from outside the courthouse.
'But it's the second question that really people are focused on, and that is if Trump has the power to cancel birthright citizenship for the children born to undocumented immigrants and certain visa holders visiting the US,' she said.
'Now it is up to the justices whether they want to go in either of those directions.'
Over two hours of questioning, lawyers for the Trump administration, as well as those representing states and individuals who have challenged Trump's order, addressed matters both of constitutional grandeur and legal minutia.
Solicitor General John Sauer began by laying out the Trump administration's broad argument that the US Constitution's 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868, has been incorrectly interpreted since then. The amendment, Sauer argued, 'guarantees citizenship to the children of former slaves, not to illegal aliens or temporary visitors'.
Trump also reiterated that position in a Truth Social post ahead of the hearing, saying birthright citizenship makes the US a 'STUPID Country' that incentivises people to visit to have children.
Sauer also took aim at the three federal judges who have ruled in favour of separate lawsuits challenging the law's constitutionality. Plaintiffs in those cases include 22 state attorneys general, immigrant rights organisations, and individuals affected by the rule. Sauer argued that the judges' decisions should only apply to the plaintiffs in the cases, and not the entire nation.
Liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor questioned whether the broader constitutional question could be unpicked from the narrower question of the judges' reach, saying the president's order violates 'by my count, four established Supreme Court precedents'.
That included the 1898 Supreme Court case, United States v Wong Kim Ark, which first established that the 14th Amendment applies to immigrants, she said.
Other justices questioned the implications of a scenario where the court ruled that the judges could not issue 'national injunctions' in the case, without answering the underlying constitutional question.
Legal scholars have noted that this could create a situation where Trump's end to birthright citizenship would not apply to states and individuals who successfully challenged his order in court. That would mean birthright citizenship – at least temporarily – would end in 28 other states if they do launch their own challenges.
'Does every single person that is affected by this EO [executive order] have to bring their own suit?' Justice Elena Kagan questioned.
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson said the Trump administration's argument turns the US justice system into a 'catch me if you can kind of regime'.
Under that, 'everybody has to have a lawyer and file a lawsuit in order for the government to stop violating people's rights'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
4 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
European leaders to shore up Ukraine's Zelenskyy for DC talks with Trump
European leaders will join Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy during his visit to Washington, DC, seeking an end to the Russia-Ukraine war, after United States President Donald Trump dropped both his push for a ceasefire and the threat of punitive actions against Russia following his Alaska summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Securing a ceasefire in Ukraine, more than three years after Russia's invasion, had been one of Trump's core demands before Friday's Alaska summit, to which Ukraine and its European allies were not invited. Special US envoy Steve Witkoff said on Sunday that Putin agreed at the summit with Trump to allow the US and European allies to offer Ukraine a security guarantee resembling NATO's collective defence mandate as part of an eventual deal to end the 3 1/2-year war. 'We were able to win the following concession: That the United States could offer Article 5-like protection, which is one of the real reasons why Ukraine wants to be in NATO,' he said on the CNN news programme State of the Union. Witkoff said it was the first time he had heard Putin agree to that. Ukraine's Zelenskyy, speaking in Brussels on Sunday after meeting European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, said the current front lines of the war should be the basis for peace talks. 'We need real negotiations, which means we can start where the front line is now,' Zelenskyy said, adding that European leaders support this and reiterating his long-held position that it was necessary to establish a ceasefire in order to then negotiate a final deal. But after the summit on Friday with Putin yielded no clear breakthrough, Trump ruled out an immediate ceasefire – a move that aligns with Putin, who has long argued for negotiations on a final peace deal. According to a New York Times report, after his meeting with Putin, the US president also told European leaders that he had offered to support a plan to end the war that involved Ukraine giving up parts of its territory to Russia. Ukraine and its European allies have criticised Putin's stance as a way to buy time and press Russia's battlefield advances, and they have expressed unease over Trump's land swap proposal from the outset. In an effort to try show a firm, united front to the US president in White House talks on Monday, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, French President Emmanuel Macron, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte, Finland's President Alexander Stubb, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni and von der Leyen will accompany Zelenskyy to Washington, DC. 'The talks will address, among other things, security guarantees, territorial issues, and continued support for Ukraine in its defence against Russian aggression,' the German government said in a statement about the trip to the US capital. 'This includes maintaining pressure on sanctions.' Ahead of the visit, von der Leyen said on X that she would welcome Zelenskyy for a meeting in Brussels on Sunday, which other European leaders would join by video, before accompanying the Ukrainian leader on his US trip at his 'request' and with 'other European leaders'. This afternoon, I will welcome @ZelenskyyUa in Brussels. Together, we will participate in the Coalition of Willing VTC. At the request of President Zelenskyy, I will join the meeting with President Trump and other European leaders in the White House tomorrow. — Ursula von der Leyen (@vonderleyen) August 17, 2025 Strength and safety in numbers appear to be factors in the group visit, with memories still fresh about the hostile reception Zelenskyy received in February from Trump and US Vice-President JD Vance in a public White House dressing-down, castigating the Ukrainian leader as being ungrateful and 'disrespectful'. No land swaps While Zelenskyy has welcomed Trump's efforts to end the war, in a post on social media on Saturday, he warned that 'it may take a lot of effort to get Russia to have the will to implement far greater – peaceful coexistence with its neighbors for decades'. The Ukrainian president has also repeatedly reiterated that Kyiv will not swap any of its land to attain a ceasefire. Ukraine's constitution forbids the ceding of territory. According to Zelenskyy, Putin has asked that Russia be handed over all of Ukraine's eastern Donetsk region, a third of which Kyiv still holds. In exchange, Russian forces would halt their offensive in the Black Sea port region of Kherson and Zaporizhia in southern Ukraine, where the main cities are still under Ukrainian control. Earlier this month, the Ukrainian president said that 'Ukrainians will not give their land to the occupier' and pointed out that he doesn't have the authority to sign off on land swaps. He said that changing Ukraine's 1991 borders runs counter to the country's constitution. Russia launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 and has been gradually advancing for months. In his statement after the Alaska summit, Putin signalled no movement in Russia's long-held demands, which also include a veto on Kyiv's desired membership in the NATO alliance. He also warned Ukraine and its European allies not to 'create any obstacles' and 'that they will not attempt to disrupt the emerging progress through provocation or behind-the-scenes intrigue'. Trilateral summit in the works? The diplomatic focus now switches to Zelenskyy's talks at the White House on Monday with the European leaders in tow. In an interview with broadcaster Fox News after his sit-down with Putin, Trump had suggested that the onus was now on Zelenskyy to secure a peace deal as they work towards an eventual trilateral summit with Putin. 'It's really up to President Zelenskyy to get it done,' Trump said. European powers, however, want to help set up a trilateral meeting between Trump, Putin and Zelenskyy to make sure Ukraine has a seat at the table to shape its future. They also want security guarantees for Ukraine with US involvement, and the ability to crank up pressure on Moscow if needed. 'They will spell out what they consider essential in terms of security guarantees: what they can do themselves, what falls to the coalition of volunteers, and also what they expect from the United States,' a European government official told the Reuters news agency. 'Indeed, they expect a very robust commitment.'
Al Jazeera
6 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Huge rally in New York demands end to Gaza starvation
Huge rally in New York demands end to Gaza starvation NewsFeed Thousands rallied in New York for a 'Mass March for Humanity' demanding an end to Israel's imposed starvation of Gaza and the complicity of the US. Protesters honoured slain journalists, including Al Jazeera's Anas al-Sharif, and accused Israel of targeting media workers. Video Duration 02 minutes 16 seconds 02:16 Video Duration 00 minutes 33 seconds 00:33 Video Duration 02 minutes 25 seconds 02:25 Video Duration 01 minutes 21 seconds 01:21 Video Duration 01 minutes 59 seconds 01:59 Video Duration 00 minutes 39 seconds 00:39 Video Duration 00 minutes 57 seconds 00:57
Al Jazeera
18 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Trump to meet Ukraine's Zelenskyy after ‘successful' talks with Putin
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy will meet United States President Donald Trump in Washington, DC, on Monday to discuss an end to Moscow's more than three-year war in Ukraine, a meeting announced hours after Trump's talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska ended without a concrete deal. In a post on his Truth Social platform after holding phone conversations with European Union and NATO leaders, Trump said the talks with Putin on Friday 'went very well'. 'It was determined by all that the best way to end the horrific war between Russia and Ukraine is to go directly to a Peace Agreement, which would end the war, and not a mere Ceasefire Agreement, which often times do not hold up,' Trump wrote. Speaking to top officials in Moscow a day after the talks in Alaska, Putin said the talks had been 'timely' and 'very useful', according to the Kremlin. 'We have not had direct negotiations of this kind at this level for a long time,' he said, adding: 'We had the opportunity to calmly and in detail reiterate our position.' 'The conversation was very frank, substantive, and, in my opinion, brings us closer to the necessary decisions,' Putin said. Al Jazeera's Osama Bin Javaid, reporting from Moscow, said the talks have been largely considered a success in Russia. 'Trump's remarks on the need for a larger peace agreement fall in line with what Putin has been saying for the last few months,' he said. On Saturday, the Ukrainian leader and his European allies, who have been seeking a ceasefire, welcomed the Trump-Putin talks but emphasised the need for a security guarantee for Kyiv. Zelenskyy, who was publicly berated by Trump and his officials during his last Oval Office meeting in February, said, 'I am grateful for the invitation.' The Ukrainian leader said he had a 'long and substantive conversation with Trump' after the summit. 'In my conversation with President Trump, I said that sanctions [on Russia] should be tightened if there is no trilateral meeting, or if Russia evades an honest end to the war,' the Ukrainian leader said. He said Ukraine needs a real, long-lasting peace, and not 'just another pause' between Russian offensives. 'Security must be guaranteed reliably and in the long term, with the involvement of both Europe and the US,' he said on X after a call with the European leaders. Zelenskyy stressed that territorial issues can only be decided with Ukraine. Trilateral meeting In his first public comments after the Alaska talks, Zelenskyy said he supported Trump's proposal for a meeting involving Ukraine, the US and Russia, adding that Kyiv is 'ready for constructive cooperation'. 'Ukraine reaffirms its readiness to work with maximum effort to achieve peace,' the Ukrainian president posted on X. But Putin's foreign affairs adviser, Yuri Ushakov, said on Russian state television on Saturday that a potential meeting involving Trump, Putin and Zelenskyy had not been raised during the US-Russia discussions. 'The topic has not been touched upon yet,' Ushakov said, according to the Russian state news agency RIA Novosti. Trump rolled out the red carpet on Friday for Putin, who was in the US for the first time in a decade, but gave little concrete detail afterwards of what was discussed. Trump said in Alaska that 'there's no deal until there's a deal' after Putin claimed the two leaders had hammered out an 'understanding' on Ukraine and warned Europe not to 'torpedo the nascent progress'. Al Jazeera's Charles Stratford, reporting from Kyiv, said that Trump has been heavily criticised by the US media over the meeting in Alaska. 'They are concerned about what has been described as far more of a conciliatory tone by Trump towards Putin without coming out of that meeting with even a ceasefire,' he said. Stratford said that eyes are now on Monday's meeting in Washington, DC, as Zelenskyy and Trump try to set up a trilateral summit with Putin. 'If all works out, we will then schedule a meeting with President Putin,' the US president said. During an interview with the Fox News channel after the talks, Trump insisted that the onus going forward might be on Zelenskyy 'to get it done,' but he said there would also be some involvement from European nations. Meanwhile, several European leaders on Saturday jointly pledged to continue to support Ukraine and maintain pressure on Russia until the war in Ukraine ends. In a statement, European Union leaders, including the French president and German chancellor, outlined key points in stopping the conflict. They said: 'Ukraine must have ironclad security guarantees to effectively defend its sovereignty and territorial integrity.' Russia cannot have a veto against Ukraine's path to the EU and NATO, the statement said. 'It will be up to Ukraine to make decisions on its territory. International borders must not be changed by force.' German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said on Saturday that the US is ready to be part of security guarantees for Ukraine. '[The] good news is that America is ready to participate in such security guarantees and is not leaving it to the Europeans alone,' Merz told the German public broadcaster ZDF after being briefed together with other European leaders by Trump on his talks with Putin. The leaders of Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Iceland, Latvia, Lithuania, Norway and Sweden said in a statement that achieving peace between Ukraine and Russia requires a ceasefire and security guarantees for Ukraine. 'We welcome President Trump's statement that the US is prepared to participate in security guarantees. No limitations should be placed on Ukraine's armed forces or on its cooperation with other countries,' the statement said. Shifting battlefield lines The ebb and flow of the battlefield lines in Ukraine has taken on greater political significance as Trump pushes for an end to the war, with Russia advancing in Ukraine's Donetsk oblast, part of the Donbas region . Zelenskyy had revealed on Tuesday that Russia wanted Ukraine to withdraw from the remaining 30 percent of Donetsk that it still controls as part of a deal, stating that he would not agree on the basis that it was unconstitutional and that it would incentivise Russian aggression. Ahead of Putin's meeting with Trump, Zelenskyy had played down Russian advances in the region, as Moscow's troops reportedly closed in on the strategic town of Pokrovsk, having seized the village of Yablunivka and the settlement of Oleksandrohrad. On Saturday, as Russia's Defence Ministry said that it had taken control of the village of Kolodyazi in Donetsk, Zelenskyy maintained in a post on X that Ukrainian troops were 'defending our positions along the entire front line', achieving 'successes in some extremely difficult areas in the Donetsk region'. On other fronts, Russia's Defence Ministry also said on Saturday that it controlled Vorone in the Dnipropetrovsk region. The Ukrainian military said that it had pushed Russian forces back by about 2km (1.2 miles) on part of the Sumy front in northern Ukraine, with fighting raging near the villages of Oleksiivka and Yunakivka, which both lie close to the Russian border.
