Nine Kurds elected to local councils across Finland
Also in World
Kurdistan Region marks first presence at Paris Book Fair
President Barzani arrives in Paris to meet Macron
China well-prepared to counter Trump's tariff strategy: Researcher
37 Kurds run for Finnish local elections
A+ A-
ERBIL, Kurdistan Region - Nine Kurds have secured seats in local councils across Finland, while two others have been elected to the Welfare District Council, signaling a growing Kurdish presence in the Finnish political landscape.
Two of the successful candidates, Mohis Azizi and Seida Sohrabi, lauded Rudaw's coverage of the elections as playing a significant role in raising awareness among voters and encouraging them to participate in the ballot.
Speaking to Rudaw's Sima Abkhezer, Sohrabi, who ran under the National Coalition Party (NCP), said that 'Kurdish candidates who secured seats were able to win votes in various areas, which means we gained support from both Kurds and non-Kurds alike.'
For his part, Azizi underscored that large numbers of Kurds live in Finland. He highlighted the crucial role played by educated Kurdish youth, noting their growing contribution to Finnish society.
"The Kurdish fingerprint is more visible than ever before in Finland and it is time that the voice of Kurds be heard," Azizi said.
A total of 37 Kurdish candidates ran in the local elections, including 22 men and 15 women, representing an array of political parties such as the NCP, Left Alliance, Social Democrat Party (SDP) and the Green League.
SPD emerged on top, while the NCP and the Centre Party of Finland came in second and third, respectively.
In terms of Kurdish origins, 15 of the candidates descend from Eastern Kurdistan (Rojhelat), 14 from Northern Kurdistan (Bakur), 6 from Southern Kurdistan (Bashur) and 2 from Western Kurdistan (Rojava).
In Finland's southwestern city of Turku alone, nine Kurds were nominated.
Walat Nahri, former president of the Kurdish Associations Union in Finland, told Rudaw that 'more than 18,000 Kurds live in the country according to official statistics.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Shafaq News
6 hours ago
- Shafaq News
Kurdistan's $110B gamble: A new front in the Baghdad-Erbil oil war
Shafaq News/ More than two years after the suspension of Kurdish oil exports following an international arbitration ruling, tensions between Baghdad and Erbil have reignited once again. This time, the dispute centers on a $110B oil and gas agreement between the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) and two American companies. Signed during a high-profile visit by KRG Prime Minister Masrour Barzani to Washington, the deals target the development of strategic gas fields in the Region's al-Sulaymaniyah province. The first contract involves HKN Energy, a US-based company active in Kurdistan since 2007. HKN holds a 62% majority stake in the Sarsang block in northern Kurdistan, alongside ShaMaran (18%) and the KRG (20%), and has extracted over 63 million barrels of oil from the Swara Tika and East Swara Tika fields and employs between 200 and 500 staff across its offices in Erbil and Texas. The second company, WesternZagros, is a Canadian energy firm founded in 2003 and operating in Kurdistan since 2005. Headquartered in Calgary, it manages operations from Erbil and al-Sulaymaniyah and has invested more than $1B in the Region, with main assets including the Kormir and Karmian fields, estimated to contain 5 trillion cubic feet of natural gas and 900 million barrels of recoverable oil. According to KRG officials, the Miran and Topkhana-Kormir fields covered by the agreements are expected to supply 24-hour electricity to the Region and potentially export surplus power to the rest of Iraq. 'This is not just about energy security—it's about political leverage,' local energy analyst Kovand Sherwani told Shafaq News. 'If implemented, these projects could drastically reduce the Region's reliance on Iranian fuel and grant it more bargaining power with Baghdad.' The United States welcomed the deals as a step toward enhancing Iraq's energy sovereignty. A senior State Department official told Shafaq News, 'The United States believes that Iraq will be more stable and sovereign by achieving energy independence and distancing itself from Iran's harmful influence,' the official stated. 'We encourage Baghdad and Erbil to work together to begin gas production as soon as possible,' he added. American energy expert Dr. Paul Sullivan of Johns Hopkins University also told Shafaq News that 'Erbil's decision to strike massive deals with US companies signals closer ties between Kurdistan and Washington in a vital sector, and may imply implicit American support for the Region.' However, he cautioned that 'unless constitutional disputes are resolved through a federal oil and gas law, this move will only deepen the crisis with Baghdad.' The Iraqi government responded swiftly to the deal. The Oil Ministry issued a statement rejecting the deals as 'null and void,' asserting that they violate Iraq's laws and the authority of the federal government. Citing the constitutional status of Iraq's natural resources, Baghdad argued that the KRG has no right to unilaterally sign contracts, especially while operating under a caretaker government awaiting elections, due to possible obligations on future administrations. MP Basim Naghamish, a member of the Parliamentary Oil and Gas Committee, echoed the ministry's stance. 'It is unacceptable for any party to operate independently of the federal government on the oil file. What Erbil has done—signing contracts with foreign companies unilaterally—constitutes a serious constitutional and financial violation. We will use all legal means to stop this unilateral move and protect Iraq's national wealth,' he stated. The deals also triggered a backlash in Parliament, including from some of the KRG's traditional allies, with several Baghdad-based parties within the governed Shiite Coordination Framework accusing the Region of violating revenue-sharing agreements, warning that such unilateral moves could derail national budget negotiations and legislative cooperation. In response, Kurdish officials defended the deals as essential to securing energy stability and financial sustainability in the face of continued delays in federal budget transfers and the suspension of oil exports through Turkiye. The Region has faced mounting liquidity pressures since March 2023, when the International Chamber of Commerce ruled against Turkiye's unilateral export of Kurdish crude, leading to losses exceeding $20B in potential revenue. Economist Mustafa Faraj told Shafaq News the deal could be a 'double-edged sword' for the KRG. 'There's no doubt these agreements represent a major investment opportunity. They could revitalize Kurdistan's economy through infrastructure development, job creation, and expanded power generation.' But, he added, 'They're not a magic bullet. Their success hinges on legal clarity and political stability. If the dispute with Baghdad remains unresolved, investors may hesitate, and implementation could be delayed.' At the same time, the KRG garnered support from Kurdish and American lawmakers, who pointed to Baghdad's repeated delays in disbursing the Region's financial entitlements, including unpaid May salaries, leaving Erbil with no choice but to seek independent solutions to meet its basic energy and fiscal needs. At the core of the legal conflict is Iraq's 'failure' to enact a federal oil and gas law. Article 112 of the 2005 Constitution calls for cooperative management of natural resources between Baghdad and the regions, yet in the absence of binding legislation, both sides have adopted clashing interpretations of the constitution. 'The legislative vacuum has created a constitutional gray zone,' political analyst Yassin Aziz told Shafaq News. 'There is no operational clarity between the center and the regions—especially regarding who oversees which stage of oil production, from exploration to export.' He added that divergent views on federalism itself exacerbate the conflict. 'While Kurdistan believes the constitution grants it real and broad powers, many in Baghdad remain committed to a centralist mindset, viewing any independent economic initiative as a challenge to state authority.' Observers agree that the only long-term solution lies in passing a comprehensive federal oil and gas law that balances regional rights with federal oversight. Yet after nearly two decades of impasse, that breakthrough remains out of reach. In the meantime, Erbil appears determined to proceed, leveraging US backing and investor confidence to solidify its energy sector, though Baghdad must decide whether to double down on legal confrontation—or return to the negotiating table.
Memri
9 hours ago
- Memri
Chinese Influencer Tianjiao: The Jews View Non-Jews As Dirty, The Rabbis And Talmud Spew Hatred; They Do Not Deserve Our Pity, They Share In The Blame For The Massacres And Persecution They Have Suffe
On November 11, 2024, the Tianjiao Talks channel on Duoyin, the Chinese version of TikTok, published a video titled 'Why Are The Jews Unworthy of Sympathy.' In the video, Chinese influencer Tianjiao said that the Jews consider other peoples to be 'dirty' and 'forsaken by God,' and she said that Jewish rabbis spew hatred of other peoples and espouse teachings such that billions of non-Jews deserve to die. She elaborated that the Talmud and Jewish educational philosophy teaches that only Jews have the right to wage war and that they have the right to take married women from among the pagan nations they wage war against. She also said that some people say that the Jews deserve sympathy because they have 'wandered' for 2,000 years and have suffered persecutions, but that their suffering 'is connected to their sins.' She added: 'Those who deserve pity must also have some blame. When a people who consider themselves superior to us view us as ants, why should we keep trying to curry favor with them?' Tianjiao: "Jews consider themselves to be God's 'Chosen People.' In their eyes, other ethnic groups are dirty, forsaken by God, and inferior races that don't even have the right to live. "A past speech by an Israeli rabbi once triggered a huge storm online. Rabbis are a special class among Jews – originally meaning 'teacher,' but now broadly referring to sages and spiritual leaders of the Jewish people. A rabbi named Rabbi Mizrachi said: 'At least six billion people in the world do not deserve to live. Chinese, Indians, Japanese, Nepalese, Thais, and so on... There are so many of them. They are all pagans, and every second they are alive makes God angry. According to our doctrine, they do not deserve to live and should be sentenced to death immediately.' One must know that for a Jews to become a rabbi, he must undergo so-called 'Orthodox' Jewish education, studying canonical Jewish texts such as the Tanakh and the Talmud. And yet such hateful spiritual leaders are the outcome. So just how terrifying is the Jewish educational system? Let's take a look at the Talmud, the most important religious text in Judaism. "This book, second only to the Bible in the eyes of Jews, imparts what kind of educational philosophy? The Talmud says that only Jews have the right to wage war, and only Jews may seize women during war. In Jewish law, a married woman may only be taken by others if she is taken captive – but since non-Jews are not granted the right to wage war, only Jews may wage war against pagans, so Jews are the only group allowed to take married women. Many people say that the Jews wandered the world for 2,000 years, suffering countless persecutions and massacres throughout history, and that we should sympathize with them. Moreover, [they say that] Jews are smart and good at business, and can be useful to us. But as the old saying goes, 'those who deserve pity must also have some blame.' The suffering the Jewish people have experienced is connected to their sins. When a people who consider themselves superior to us view us as ants, why should we keep trying to curry favor with them?"
Rudaw Net
a day ago
- Rudaw Net
German politician slams Berlin's push to tighten migration policies
Also in World Rojava Kurds launch new pro-Kurdish organization in the Netherlands US urges Iran to accept its proposal for nuclear deal EU announces €175 million package to support Syria recovery UN hails 'historic' progress in Ankara-PKK peace talks A+ A- BERLIN - A German politician criticized Berlin's move to tighten migration policies and speed up deportations, and warned against mainstreaming the term 'illegal migration.' 'Until three years ago, there was no term 'illegal migration,'' Volkan Baran, member of the North Rhine-Westphalia parliament from the center-left Social Democratic Party (SPD), told Rudaw in an interview on Wednesday. He said use of the phrase 'illegal migration' has risen with a growth in right-wing politics and called it 'catastrophic.' At the federal level, Baran's SPD is in a governing coalition with the center-right CDU/CSU alliance. The cabinet this week approved new migration measures to tighten asylum laws, including making deportations easier. The new rules must still be approved by the parliament. Baran accused the CDU of unilaterally shaping the coalition government on the issue. 'I don't believe there are illegal people,' he said, while acknowledging that 'of course, there are laws that must be followed.' 'If someone came here and misused the asylum issue, then they must also leave, because those who truly need asylum must be protected,' he said. Baran supports allowing asylum seekers to enter the labor market after three months, warning that making applicants wait up to two years without being able to work or access education could have problematic consequences. 'This makes you crazy, so you radicalize yourself,' he said. Baran voiced strong opposition to deportations to Syria, citing instability and risks to vulnerable populations. After the collapse of the dictatorship in Syria, many refugees are hoping to finally return home. The United Nations estimates some 1.5 million Syrians will choose to go home in 2025. Baran acknowledged that Syrians who choose to return voluntarily should be free to do so, he opposed forced returns, stating, 'I think deportation to Syria is too early at the moment.' 'Especially for minorities, Syria is not safe,' he added. Regarding Syria's interim President Ahmad al-Sharaa, he said, 'I believe his hands are stained with the blood of many people. Just because he took off his robe and cut his beard, that doesn't make him a democrat or diplomatic in my view.'
