Foldable iPhone: 2026 Launch Confirmed?
Watch this video on YouTube. Launch Timeline: A Carefully Planned Introduction
The foldable iPhone is scheduled to debut alongside the iPhone 18 series in 2026, with production beginning in late Q3 or early Q4 of 2025. This timeline reflects Apple's commitment to making sure the device meets its rigorous standards for quality, reliability, and performance. Unlike some competitors that rushed to market with foldable devices, Apple's methodical approach is designed to avoid common pitfalls such as durability issues and software optimization challenges. By taking the time to refine its design and manufacturing processes, Apple is poised to deliver a product that lives up to its reputation for excellence. Design and Display: Innovation Meets Functionality
The foldable iPhone will feature a book-style design, similar to the Galaxy Fold, but with Apple's signature attention to detail and refinement. Key design elements include: An outer display measuring 5.5 inches, perfect for quick interactions such as notifications and calls.
An inner display that expands to 7.8 inches, offering an immersive experience for multitasking, media consumption, and productivity.
LTPO technology allowing a 120Hz refresh rate, making sure smooth animations and improved power efficiency.
A 4:3 aspect ratio on the inner screen, optimized for both entertainment and productivity tasks.
To enhance durability and user satisfaction, the device will incorporate ultra-thin glass with an almost invisible crease. This addresses one of the most common complaints about current foldable devices, making sure a seamless and premium user experience. Build and Durability: Designed to Last
Durability is a cornerstone of Apple's foldable iPhone design. The device will feature a titanium alloy chassis and a liquid metal hinge, combining strength with flexibility. Key innovations aimed at enhancing longevity include: Stress-reducing flaps within the hinge mechanism to minimize wear and tear over time.
Built-in heating elements to maintain optimal performance in cold environments, a feature that sets it apart from competitors.
These advancements are designed to establish a new benchmark for reliability in the foldable smartphone market. By addressing the fragility issues that have plagued other foldable devices, Apple is positioning its product as a durable and dependable option for consumers. Hardware Features: A Blend of Elegance and Functionality
The foldable iPhone is expected to be one of the slimmest foldable devices on the market, measuring just 4.5mm when unfolded and 9-9.5mm when folded. Additional hardware highlights include: Touch ID integrated into the side button, offering enhanced security and convenience.
A hole-punch camera on the outer display and an under-display camera on the inner screen, making sure a clean and uninterrupted viewing experience.
These features reflect Apple's focus on delivering a sleek and user-friendly device without compromising on functionality or performance. Software: Tailored for Productivity
The foldable iPhone is expected to run a version of iPadOS, customized to take full advantage of the device's foldable design. Anticipated software features include: Split-screen functionality allows users to manage multiple tasks simultaneously.
Floating windows for enhanced multitasking flexibility.
Drag-and-drop capabilities for seamless file management and improved workflow.
This integration of hardware and software is designed to provide a cohesive and intuitive user experience. By optimizing the software for the foldable form factor, Apple aims to set its device apart from competitors that often struggle with software adaptation. Battery and Performance: Efficiency Redefined
The foldable iPhone is rumored to feature Apple's A20 Pro chip, which is expected to deliver exceptional performance while maintaining energy efficiency. Additional advancements include: A 16nm display driver, designed to optimize power consumption and extend battery life.
A dual-cell battery setup making sure improved power distribution and better thermal management.
These innovations address one of the most significant challenges in foldable devices: balancing high performance with long battery life in a compact form factor. Apple's focus on efficiency and reliability is likely to resonate with consumers seeking a premium experience. Pricing and Market Strategy: Targeting a Niche Audience
With an estimated price range of $2,000 to $2,500, the foldable iPhone is positioned as a premium offering aimed at a niche audience. Apple plans to produce 15-20 million units over a two-to-three-year period, reflecting a cautious approach to entering the foldable market. This limited production run will allow Apple to gauge consumer interest, gather feedback, and refine its design before scaling up production. By targeting loyal Apple users and early adopters, the company is laying the groundwork for long-term success in the foldable device segment. Future Prospects: Expanding the Foldable Ecosystem
The foldable iPhone is more than just a new product—it represents a strategic step in Apple's broader ambitions for foldable technology. Success with this device could pave the way for future innovations, including foldable iPads and MacBooks. By addressing the flaws of current Android foldables and setting new standards for durability, usability, and design, Apple has the potential to redefine the foldable device market. This move could further solidify Apple's dominance in the premium device segment and open new opportunities for growth. Challenges and Opportunities: Navigating High Expectations
While the foldable iPhone has generated significant excitement, Apple faces several challenges. The company must meet high expectations for durability, innovation, and user experience, all while adhering to its ambitious timeline. Apple's history of product delays raises questions about whether it can deliver on time, but its meticulous approach and commitment to quality suggest it is well-prepared to overcome these hurdles. If successful, the foldable iPhone could set a new standard for the industry and solidify Apple's position as a leader in innovation.
Browse through more resources below from our in-depth content covering more areas on the Foldable iPhone.
Source: SaranByte Filed Under: Apple, Apple iPhone, Technology News, Top News
Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals
Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
.png%3Fwidth%3D630%26auto%3Dwebp%26quality%3D75%26crop%3D3%3A2%2Csmart%26trim%3D&w=3840&q=100)
Scotsman
29 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Five ways we downloaded music during Y2K, and what happened to those services
The wild west of MP3 downloading - what we used to corral new releases before Spotify took over Sign up to our daily newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to Edinburgh News, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Before Spotify become a household name, P2P clients were how many gained access to new music. Though some of the clients were controversial due to what they offered, many offered users experiences that are still present to this day. Here's five programmes many used to use to - ahem - download music to their MP3 and Minidisc players. It seems timely that I am writing this article on the day that news emerged that several unreleased tracks by Beyoncé were stolen from a car during her Cowboy Carter tour. While torrenting would be the option these days if anyone were to release them, back when the Y2K bug was considered a global issue, there were several different options instead. Many of those options were still illegal, but in some cases with the added caveat that a virus might hop along for the ride with the MP3 or zip file you'd added to your download queue. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Long before Spotify became a household name, and around the time Apple launched their revolutionary first iPod and their own music download service, many of us took to the World Wide Web armed with one of five programmes to access music that today is as easy as just swiping on a screen. The same could also be said about dating, but that's another story for another series of apps. It would be another wave of capitalist panic when Peer-to-Peer file sharing started coming into vogue around the turn of the millennium. While many felt that music should be free and that the likes of Napster were actually helping those get heard without the need for expensive radio campaigns, others equated it to a woodworker having a chair stolen from them. Who else remembers the classic 'you wouldn't steal a car' adverts played before every cinema outing back in the day? But for a generation of music listeners, where TikTok seems to be the conundrum facing musicians and copyright law, they might have missed all of this; the trials and tribulations of risking your computer security just to listen to that new Metallica or Spice Girls track. So, what did some of us of a certain age (and, apparently, low moral fibre) use to gain access to the latest musical releases, and where did those programmes go when streaming services became the norm? Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Fives ways we used to download music before Spotify existed Long before Spotify gave you the world of music at your fingertips, music fans used some 'less-than-legitimate' ways to download music back at the turn of the millennium. | Canva/Getty Images Napster We start with where most of us all began - launched in 1999 by Shawn Fanning, Napster was the original revolutionary. It was a centralized P2P file-sharing service primarily focused on MP3 music files. Its genius was in its simplicity: users could search a central server for songs, and the software would then connect them directly to other users' computers to download the files. At its peak in early 2001, Napster had nearly 80 million registered users. Napster became the poster child for copyright infringement . Its most famous legal battle was with Metallica, who, along with Dr. Dre, sued the company in April 2000 after discovering their unreleased song 'I Disappear' circulating on the platform - cue crude animations of Lars Ulrich and James Hetfield bellowing out 'Napster, bad!' However, the lawsuit that truly brought Napster down was the massive $20 billion infringement case filed by the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA), representing major record labels like A&M Records. The courts consistently ruled against Napster, rejecting its claims of "fair use" and holding it liable for contributory and vicarious copyright infringement. Faced with crippling injunctions and legal pressure, Napster was ordered to block copyrighted material and ultimately shut down its original free service in July 2001. The company filed for bankruptcy. In 2002, its brand and logo were acquired by Roxio , which rebranded its own streaming service as Napster 2.0, attempting to go legit with a paid subscription model. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Over the years, Napster's name changed hands multiple times (including Best Buy and Rhapsody). Today, the Napster brand still exists as a legitimate, paid music streaming service, albeit a much smaller player in a market dominated by Spotify and Apple Music. LimeWire While a more popular option after the heat Napster received, LimeWire was one of two P2P clients notorious for containing malware, adware and the ease of downloading viruses. | Limewire/Submitted One of two sure fire ways to infect your computer with a virus just for a chance at listening to a track before its release… Launched in 2000 by Mark Gorton, LimeWire quickly became one of the most popular decentralized P2P file-sharing clients after Napster's demise. Unlike Napster, LimeWire operated on the Gnutella network , meaning there was no central server controlling searches or file transfers. This decentralized nature made it harder to shut down. It was known for its user-friendly interface and became a go-to for music, movies, software, and more. LimeWire faced years of legal battles with the RIAA. In 2010, after a lengthy lawsuit initiated by Arista Records and other labels, a U.S. federal court judge issued an injunction ordering Lime Wire LLC to disable all file-sharing functionality of its software. The RIAA initially sought astronomical damages (reportedly up to $72 trillion) but eventually settled for $105 million. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Following the injunction, Lime Wire LLC stopped distributing its software, and later versions were disabled. While older versions (pre-5.5.11) remained functional for a time, the company itself ceased its operations related to file-sharing. In a surprising twist, the LimeWire brand was acquired by new management in 2021 (with no affiliation to the original company) and has been repurposed as an NFT marketplace and Web3 platform focusing on music and content. AudioGalaxy AudioGalaxy had a unique feature where music lovers would be recommended artists similar to what they have opted to listen to - similar to Spotify's related artists algorithm. | Reddit Created in 1998, AudioGalaxy was initially an MP3 indexing site that evolved into a robust P2P system with client software (the AudioGalaxy Satellite) and a web-based search engine. It gained popularity, especially after Napster's legal woes, known for its strong community features like chat-enabled groups and directly linking to other artists you might also like - almost a proto Spotify daily playlist before it existed. AudioGalaxy also faced a lawsuit from the RIAA in May 2002 due to the widespread sharing of copyrighted material. Despite its attempts to implement filtering mechanisms (which users often circumvented), the pressure was immense. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad In June 2002, AudioGalaxy reached an out-of-court settlement with the RIAA. As part of the agreement, it was required to implement a "filter-in" system, meaning only music with explicit consent from rights holders could be shared. This effectively ended its P2P file-sharing operations. It then licensed and rebranded itself as a promotional website for the Rhapsody music subscription service for many years. Kazaa Kazaa was the talk of schoolyards around the world back in the early '00s - part due to the ease of finding music and videos, part due to how much damage it caused to numerous PCs that lacked anti-virus software. | Reddit The second sure-fire way to end up infecting your computer with viruses - launched in 2001 by Dutch company Consumer Empowerment (later sold to Sharman Networks), Kazaa became one of the dominant P2P networks after the fall of Napster. It used the FastTrack protocol (which was also the basis for Skype) and allowed users to share not just music, but also videos, software, and documents. It was notorious for bundling adware and spyware, leading to many users opting for Kazaa Lite . Kazaa faced intense legal pressure globally. In 2001, a Dutch court ordered its owners to prevent copyright violations. In the US, the RIAA and MPAA (Motion Picture Association of America) filed suit, leading to the landmark MGM Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd. Supreme Court case (though Grokster was the named defendant, Kazaa's FastTrack protocol was central to the broader issue). Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad In Australia, the Australian Record Industry Association (ARIA) also sued, culminating in a 2005 ruling that Sharman Networks had "authorized" illegal file sharing by its users. The RIAA also pursued thousands of individual users for infringement, including the high-profile case against Jammie Thomas-Rasset. Kazaa's legal issues ended with a $100 million settlement paid to the four major music companies. Sharman Networks agreed to convert Kazaa into a legal music download service, but this venture ultimately failed. The original Kazaa file-sharing application effectively shut down around 2006. Like Napster, the brand was later licensed and briefly relaunched as a legitimate music subscription service, but it too failed to gain significant traction and is now defunct as a music service. Soulseek Soulseek was considered a more 'niche' community which mainly focused on rarer releases and bootlegs compared to other clients who focused on the more mainstream and popular. | Wikimedia Commons The music connoisseur's method of downloading; created by Nir Arbel around 2000, Soulseek was distinct from the outset. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad While it was a P2P file-sharing network, it was less about mainstream hits and more about fostering a community of music enthusiasts, particularly for underground, independent, and niche electronic music, rare tracks, and live sets. It emphasized sharing and community, with users often having specific rules for who could download from them. Unlike the other major players, Soulseek has largely avoided direct, high-profile lawsuits that led to its shutdown. Its more decentralized structure, combined with its focus on less commercial, underground music, made it a less attractive target for major record labels compared to the mass-market platforms. There have been instances of servers being targeted or legal pressure, but no singular, defining case that brought the entire network down. Soulseek still exists and is actively used today, maintaining its niche status. It has evolved, with an emphasis on its community and the sharing of diverse and often obscure music. While it's certainly not mainstream, it remains a beloved tool for audiophiles and those seeking music beyond the commercial charts. Did you ever use any of the software or websites mentioned in this article? Share the ways you used to access music in the new millennium by leaving your memories below.
Daily Mail
4 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Six popular Apple devices are now classed as VINTAGE - and may leave users unable to get repairs if they break
They were some of the hottest gadgets in Apple's recent history. But the tech giant has added another six products to its official 'vintage' list – most of them not even a decade after their release. Unfortunately, 'vintage' doesn't necessarily mean you'll be able to sell them for large amounts online. In fact, if you still own a vintage Apple product, it means you may not be able to get it repaired by Apple if and when it breaks. Meanwhile, three Apple products have gone from the vintage list to the dreaded 'obsolete' list – signifying their days are nearly numbered. All Apple products progress through three categories – current, vintage, and obsolete. Even the new iPhone 16 will become obsolete one day, consigning it to the great technology scrap heap. But Apple and other tech companies have received criticism for giving their devices such a short lifespan as it fuels the problem of electronic waste. As first noticed by MacRumors, the six products Apple has just added to its vintage list include the 2013 Mac Pro, nicknamed 'trash can' due to its appearance. This cylindrical desktop computer, also compared with a rice cooker and R2-D2 from Star Wars, originally cost $2,999 when released over a decade ago. Something of a cult favourite, the 2013 Mac Pro was criticised for an 'unsustainable' design that didn't meet the needs of professional users. The 2013 Mac Pro was discontinued in 2019 when its successor – the $6,000 'cheese grater' – was released, but it is finally officially 'vintage'. A 'vintage' product means Apple stopped selling it more than five years ago and as a result it may or may not be able to receive Apple services. Apple retail stores and Apple Authorised Resellers are still able to offer repairs for 'vintage' devices, but only if the required parts are available. The other five products now 'vintage' are not as old as the 2013 Mac Pro, making their addition to the list rather more surprising. They are the 13-inch MacBook Air (2019), iMac (2019), 11-inch iPad Pro (2018), 12.9-inch iPad Pro (2018) and iPhone 8 with 128GB of storage (2017). At the time of its release in 2016, MailOnline called iPhone 8 'the best handset Apple has ever made' with its all-glass back and wireless charging At the time of its release in 2017, MailOnline called the $699/£699 iPhone 8 'the best handset Apple has ever made' with its all-glass back and wireless charging. But the new update means all three iPhone 8 storage options (64GB, 128GB and 256GB) are now vintage. Meanwhile, the 11-inch and 12.9-inch iPad Pro, released in 2018, was described by MailOnline as 'the best tablet out there' with a 'stunning screen' and 'blazingly fast' processing speeds. Also, three Apple routers – AirPort Express, 2TB and 3TB AirPort Time Capsules, and 802.11ac AirPort Extreme – have become 'obsolete'. Apple considers a product 'obsolete' when it stopped distributing it for sale more than seven years ago. As Apple explains, an obsolete device has lost support and is no longer eligible for repair at an Apple Store or an authorised third-party service. Essentially it means if the product stops working Apple is not obliged to fix it – rendering it barely more than a relic from the past. Apple explains on its website: 'Apple discontinues all hardware service for obsolete products, and service providers cannot order parts for obsolete products. 'Mac laptops may be eligible for an extended battery-only repair period for up to 10 years from when the product was last distributed for sale, subject to parts availability.' Although Apple releases several devices to feverish fanfare every year, even more are quietly consigned to the technology scrap heap. But environmental campaigners believe a lifetime of less than a decade isn't reasonable for a tech device retailing for several hundreds of pounds. Tech companies including Apple have faced fierce criticism for fuelling an 'e-waste crisis', where piles of electronic waste are building up in landfill. A 2020 report from MPs said companies like Apple and Amazon have been 'dodging their environmental responsibilities' for the products they sell. 'Too many devices have a limited, and sometimes decreasing, lifespan and end up in bins, eventually going to landfill or incineration,' said former Environment Audit Committee chair Philip Dunne. For some dated phones, you might struggle to find a retailer that'll give you much money, or any at all, according to Which? In this instance, your best option is to recycle your phone directly. National recycling campaign Recycle Now can check if you can recycle your mobile phone at home or at a nearby recycling point so its materials can be used again elsewhere. If you enter your postcode, it will give you a list of local recycling facilities where you can take your devices - preventing them from ending up in landfill. After a device is discarded and e-waste is warmed up, toxic chemicals are released into the air, damaging the atmosphere. E-waste in landfills can also seep toxic materials into groundwater, affecting animals and plants.
Scottish Sun
5 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
‘Hideous' new iPhone colour leak shocks Apple fans – and it could be just weeks away
Find out about our top Apple predictions from The Sun's Head of Technology and Science below SOUR APPLE 'Hideous' new iPhone colour leak shocks Apple fans – and it could be just weeks away Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) RUMOURS are already swirling about Apple's next iPhone and people aren't convinced by an "ugly" new colour reportedly on the way. In a few weeks, the tech giant is expected to lift the lid on a number of fresh gadgets. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 1 Apple's next big product event could throw up some big surprises Credit: AFP Apple usually releases new iPhones every September so new iPhone 17 models are widely expected to play centre stage. Among the upgrades and design tweaks, the company tends to introduce new colours. And according to a leak, an orange model could be on the way. "iPhone 17 lens protection cover will match the phone color," Sonny Dickson tweeted. "The orange one for the Pro Max might hint at a new shade, possibly dark gold or copper." If true, it would be the first time Apple has opted for this bold shade. Judging by the reaction online, not everyone is sold on the idea. "The Orange color is foul, To be honest the color looks like Dried Urine," one person reacted on X. "That orange is hideous," another commented. "The Orange absolutely has to go, that is not a good choice AT ALL," a third added. Apple created eerily lifelike AI 'video clone' of me in 20 seconds – can you tell which part of my body is totally fake? For anyone not keen on orange, there are some other rumoured options. It's also thought that there could be blue, green, and purple finishes in the works. But we won't find out until September when Apple is expected to officially unveil its latest big innovations. Rumours at the moment suggest that the special event might land on September 9. There could be four iPhone models as in previous years, including: iPhone 17 iPhone 17 Air iPhone 17 Pro iPhone 17 Pro Max
