New plans for MLA pay introduced at Stormont
New plans to set pay levels for Stormont MLAs have been introduced in the assembly.
For five years, the Independent Financial Review Panel (IFRP) set wages and expenses for politicians in the assembly.
But the terms of the three members ended in 2016 and they were never replaced.
The Assembly Members (Remuneration Board) Bill proposes setting up a new independent board.
It is backed by the Assembly Commission, which includes representatives of the main parties.
Unlike the IFRP, the new panel will only have the sole remit of setting pay and pension entitlements for MLAs.
Like the IFRP, it will also be asked to take into account the salaries of MPs, TDs and Senators in the Oireachtas, Members of the Scottish Parliament (MSPs) and the Welsh Assembly.
Members of the Welsh Assembly currently take home a salary of £72,057, while MSPs in Scotland take home £72,196 while MLAs at Stormont get a salary of £52,500.
TUV MLA Timothy Gaston said he believed it was "highly likely" the new board would increase MLAs salaries, given the difference with their counterparts in other parts of the UK and Ireland.
"I do not believe that MLAs should receive a pay rise of one penny, never mind £19,000," he said.
"I urge any independent body reviewing MLA pay to link it to our performance in the house; to consider the fact that we are members of a legislative Assembly that seldom legislates; to consider that MLAs sit on scrutiny committees that do not scrutinise," he added.
Trevor Clarke, the DUP representative on the assembly commission, rejected claims that a pay rise for members was inevitable as a result of setting up of the new body.
"There is a danger that we are calling into question the independence of an independent panel," Mr Clarke said.
"Members have not decided anything. Indeed, members agree with many of the points made about why we should not set our salaries. That was agreed many years ago, hence the need for an independent panel to set them."
MLAs last got a pay rise of £500 in their salary last April, in line with rules set by the IFRP before it ceased nine years ago.
Once the new bill is passed, the power to determine allowances payable to MLAs, which relates to travel and office expenses, will sit with the Assembly Commission.
MLAs previously took issue with some of the rules the IFRP imposed, including limits on salaries for constituency office staff and other matters such as office signage.
A spokesperson for the commission said the new panel will have independent membership and "take independent decisions on the appropriate level for the salaries and pensions" of MLAs.
They added that the assembly had previously agreed to change the system in 2020, which set out that salaries and pensions of MLAs should continue to be determined independently.
They said that after that decision, the changes were delayed due to the Covid pandemic and the suspension of power-sharing.
"However, in introducing this new Bill today, the Assembly Commission has taken the first step towards ensuring that the statute book reflects the position previously agreed by the Assembly.
"It will provide for the independent oversight in relation to members' salaries and pensions to continue."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Best money market account rates today, June 9, 2025 (Earn up to 4.41% APY)
Find out which banks are offering the top rates. Money market accounts (MMAs) can be a great place to store your cash if you're looking for a relatively high interest rate along with liquidity and flexibility. Unlike traditional savings accounts, MMAs typically offer better returns, and they may also provide check-writing privileges and debit card access. This makes these accounts ideal for holding long-term savings that you want to grow over time, but can still access when needed for certain purchases or bills. Even though rates have been falling over the past several months, it's still possible to find money market accounts that pay more than 4% APY. Here is a look at some of today's best money market account rates: Interested in earning the best possible interest rate on your savings balance? Here is a look at some of the best savings and money market account rates available today from our verified partners. This embedded content is not available in your region. Money market account rates have fluctuated significantly in recent years, largely due to changes in the Federal Reserve's target interest rate. In the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, for example, interest rates were kept extremely low to stimulate the economy. The Fed slashed the federal funds rate to near zero, which led to very low MMA rates. During this time, money market account rates were typically around 0.10% to 0.50%, with many accounts offering rates on the lower end of that range. Eventually, the Fed began raising interest rates gradually as the economy improved. This led to higher yields on savings products, including MMAs. However, in 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic led to a brief but sharp recession, and the Fed once again cut its benchmark rate to near zero to combat the economic fallout. This resulted in a sharp decline in MMA rates. But starting in 2022, the Fed embarked on a series of aggressive interest rate hikes to combat inflation. This led to historically high deposit rates across the board. By late 2023, money market account rates had risen substantially, with many accounts offering 4% or higher. However, the Fed finally began cutting rates in late 2024. As of 2025, MMA rates remain high by historical standards, though they've begun a downward trajectory following the Fed's most recent rate cuts. Today, online banks and credit unions tend to offer the highest rates. When comparing money market accounts, it's important to look beyond just the interest rate. Other factors, such as minimum balance requirements, fees, and withdrawal limits, can impact the total value you get from the account. For example, it's common for money market accounts to require a large minimum balance in order to earn the highest advertised rate — as much as $5,000 or more in some cases. Other accounts may charge monthly maintenance fees that can eat into your interest earnings. However, there are several MMAs available that offer competitive rates without any balance requirements, fees, or other restrictions. That's why it's important to shop around and compare accounts before making a decision. Additionally, ensure that the account you choose is insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) or the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA), which guarantees deposits up to $250,000 per institution, per depositor. Most money market accounts are federally insured, but it's important to double-check in the rare case the financial insitution fails. Read more: Money market account vs. high-yield savings account: Which is best for you? The national average interest rate for money market accounts is just 0.64%, according to the FDIC. However, the best money market account rates often pay around 4% to 4.50% APY — similar to the rates offered on high-yield savings accounts. The amount you will earn on $50,000 in a money market account depends on the annual percentage rate (APY) and the time period you leave the money in the account. For example, if you deposit $50,000 into a money market account that pays 4.5% APY and left it in your account for one year, you'd earn $2,303 in interest. There are currently no money market accounts that pay 5% APY. However, some high-yield savings accounts from online banks do. You can also check with your local bank or credit union to find out if they offer a 5% APY account that fits your needs. This embedded content is not available in your region.
The Intercept
41 minutes ago
- The Intercept
The Intercept Appoints Maia Hibbett as Managing Editor
Support Us © THE INTERCEPT ALL RIGHTS RESERVED The Intercept welcomes back Maia Hibbett, who is returning to the publication as managing editor. In this position, Hibbett will shape The Intercept's distinctive coverage and oversee newsroom operations. 'We are thrilled to welcome Maia back to The Intercept. Her experience and skills will help us take on powerful interests and produce journalism with real impact,' said Ben Muessig, The Intercept's editor-in-chief. Hibbett was most recently the politics editor for Gothamist & WNYC, where she directed coverage of the ongoing scandals surrounding New York City Mayor Eric Adams and expanded a statewide coverage network. Before that, she was managing editor at New York Focus and participated in ProPublica's Investigative Editor Training Program. Hibbett served as an associate editor on The Intercept's politics team from March 2021 to October 2022. At The Intercept, she oversaw award-winning reporting on the poultry industry's mass culling practices during bird flu outbreaks, edited investigations on topics from Sen. Joe Manchin's coal investments to the killing of Honduran environmental activist Berta Cáceres, and reported on controversial research that drew scrutiny during the Covid-19 pandemic. Her reporting and editing experience spans the globe, covering political developments in Asia and Latin America. 'For years, I've admired The Intercept's fearless reporting and commitment to holding the powerful accountable — no matter who is in office,' Hibbett said. 'I'm so excited to return to The Intercept and help this team draw attention to the scandals and injustices that would otherwise go unexposed.' Join The Conversation
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Mike Johnson Offers Bizarre Justification For ICE Masks. Backlash Follows.
House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) faced criticism after he defended the wearing of masks by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents during immigration raids. Johnson was asked by Fox News to respond to concerns from Democrats who say ICE agents shouldn't conceal their identities while conducting arrests as part of the Trump administration's immigration crackdown. 'From the people who mandated mask-wearing for years in America, it's absurd,' Johnson fired back, referencing the face-covering measures that Democrats implemented during the coronavirus pandemic in a bid to stop the spread of COVID-19. 'They need to back off of ICE and respect our agents and stop protesting against them,' he added, arguing that agents would be doxed if they were able to be identified. Critics pointed out the irony of Johnson's acceptance of agents wearing masks, given his history of opposing mask mandates for medical reasons, and suggested he had conjured up an extreme example of false equivalence. Agents should be able to be held accountable, they argued. Johnson was also criticized over the weekend for dismissing concerns about Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's talk of active-duty Marines tackling protests against immigration enforcement in Los Angeles. 'I don't think that's heavy-handed,' Johnson said. Karoline Leavitt Squirms Over Maria Bartiromo's Blunt Question About Elon Musk Trump Accused Of Inciting Violence With Chilling New Rhyme German Leader Politely Shuts Down Trump's Hot Take On D-Day
