
Foreign investors raise bets that India stock market rally may stall
May 30 (Reuters) - Foreign investors are becoming more cautious about the Indian stock market, indicating a three-month rally may run out of legs despite retail traders growing optimistic, according to monthly derivatives data analysed by two brokerages.
The Nifty 50 (.NSEI), opens new tab has risen about 12% from March through May, largely due to better-than-expected corporate earnings and easing global trade risks. That is nearly double the 6.6% gain in the MSCI Emerging Markets index (.dMIEF00000PUS), opens new tab in that time.
Foreign portfolio investors (FPIs) pumped $2.66 billion into Indian equities over that period and cut their short positions on the Nifty. A short seller borrows stock at a higher price betting its value will decline, at which point they buy the stock and pocket the profit.
However, FPIs have started the June derivatives series -- which runs from May 30 to June 25 -- with about $2 billion in Nifty index futures shorts, the highest since February, according to Nuvama Alternative and Quantitative Research.
In contrast, retail investors and high-net-worth individuals (HNIs), called the client category, turned bullish with long positions worth $1.54 billion on Nifty futures, compared with $546 million in shorts from early May.
"This divergence sets up a potential tug-of-war between institutional caution and retail optimism, and could lead to a brief pause in the market rally in June," said Abhilash Pagaria, head of Nuvama.
Indeed, the Nifty's gains have weakened in each month -- from 6.3% in March to 3.5% in April and to about 2% in May.
"Markets appear to be waiting for some concrete cues before turning bullish," said Sriram Velayudhan, VP at IIFL Securities.
Velayudhan expects the Nifty 50 to trade between 24,300 and 25,300 points over the June series, compared with its current level of about 24,800 points.
Analysts expect the Nifty to hit new highs by end-2025, but say a correction is likely in the next three months, according to a Reuters poll.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Japan's labour crunch forces rethink on traditional homemakers
TOKYO, June 12 (Reuters) - Japan's labour shortage is forcing its conservative lawmakers to consider overhauling decades-old social welfare rules originally designed to encourage married women to spend more hours looking after the home. Policymakers are expected to pass legislation on Friday that would require part-time workers to pay into pension and health-insurance schemes, essentially scaling back exemptions now seen as a major disincentive for women to work longer hours or advance their careers. Introduced in 1986 during Japan's economic boom, the exemptions apply to "dependent" spouses who earn less than 1.3 million yen ($9,028) a year, as part of an expansion of social welfare at the time. While the proposed reforms are aimed at easing a current workers crunch in Japan, they would not completely scrap a system that many argue is both unproductive and a product of outdated gender expectations. Businesses and analysts now say the economic pressures created by the current worker crunch outweigh historic concerns about ensuring all "housewives", no longer a majority of married women, were covered by the pension scheme. "From the standpoint of labour economics, it's an irrational system that not only restricts the supply of high-quality female labour forces but also serves to limit pressure for wage growth," Nobuko Nagase, professor at Otsuma Women's University. Japan's labour shortage is hitting historic levels, particularly among non-manufacturers and small firms, driven by a rapidly aging and declining population. Businesses complain the existing pension scheme makes it extremely difficult to fill shortages with part-time workers who wish to limit annual pay below the thresholds. The Japan Association of Corporate Executives, a major business lobby, this week renewed its call for the abolition of the system. "We urge the government for an immediate review," it said in its policy proposal. "It is necessary to revise the conventional system design that is based on the full-time homemaker ideal." But while arguments to get rid of the system have broadened, the appetite among conservative lawmakers for deeper reform has been mixed. The bill has broad parliamentary support and in its current form effectively requires most part-timers who work more than 20 hours a week to pay into corporate pension and health-insurance schemes regardless of income levels and company size. According to the welfare ministry, the changes, to be implemented in phases, would mean about 900,000 part-time women would start paying insurance fees, shrinking the pool of about 6.7 million dependent spouses, 98% of whom are women. But the bill still preserves the system for dependent spouses, stating bigger changes would require "a national debate" and more research. "In the latest pension system reform, we were unable to reach a consensus," Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba told parliament last week. "There are various people eligible under this system, not only full-time housewives but also those who are unable to work due to illness, childcare, or nursing responsibilities," he said. In December, Ishiba argued the system should not be completely dismissed. "Full-time housewives aren't the type of people living a leisurely life of naps and diligently protect their homes and manage a wide range of responsibilities," he said. Although the government will subsidise the costs temporarily, the 20-hour threshold could simply prompt dependent spouse part-timers to limit their working hours, some say. Maiko Takahashi, 45-year-old mother of three children, said she would choose to remain as a dependent spouse with her two part-time jobs. "I would rather limit work hours instead of having to pay insurance fees, because I also want to spend enough time with my children," she said. "But I always felt it's a strange system. Why do they discourage those who want to work more?" she added. The debate about dependent spouses goes back to 2000, when a government panel was set up to see if pension schemes could better reflect demographic changes. By then, dual-income households already outnumbered families with full-time housewives. The fairness of the scheme has also been questioned because those married to self-employed workers are not exempt from insurance fees. Japan's largest trade union umbrella group Rengo, as well as top business lobbying groups, want more aggressive reform, calling for ditching the dependent spouse system. The system "is disturbing the development of women's careers and causing a gender wage gap," the 7-million member Rengo group said. Tomoko Yoshino, the first female chief of Rengo, said she began to believe the system needed change in the early 1990s, when the economic boom burst and dual-income households increased. "Despite the sense of unfairness shared among women, the issue unfortunately failed to reach decision-making levels at the group for discussions in the past, partly because of the very limited presence of women at those levels," she said. Nagase, professor at Otsuma Women's University, said the reform has to come with a shift in the mindset of employers who still see part-time female workers as a source of cheap labour and supplementary to male workers. Wages for part-time workers are very low compared with those for regular workers and opportunities for promotion are limited, Nagase said. "A failure to tap full potential of those workers would be a loss for the Japanese economy as labour shortages intensify," she said. ($1 = 143.9900 yen)


Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Interbank traders turn focus to dollar-rupee forwards as spot treads water
MUMBAI, June 12 (Reuters) - India's FX market traders have increased activity in the dollar-rupee forwards market as spot market price action continues to be rangebound on two-sided client flows and the lack of firm cues. The rupee has hovered in the 85.30 to 86.02 range against the U.S. dollar over June so far with its 1-month realised volatility declining to 4.5%, the lowest in about six weeks. Dollar-rupee forward premiums, meanwhile, have witnessed sharper moves, sparked by the Reserve Bank of India's outsized rate cut last week and changes in expectations of U.S. rate cuts. The 1-year dollar-rupee implied yield fell to its lowest in nearly one year earlier this month while the 1-month forward premium has fallen about 4 paisa to its lowest level since November. The fall in dollar-rupee forward premiums leaves the rupee vulnerable to further depreciation by reducing the currency's "carry trade" appeal and diminishing the incentive for exporters to hedge receivables, analysts said. Speculative activity has picked up on forward premiums as markets are "largely playing the range (on spot USD/INR)," a trader at a large private bank said. To be sure, large moves in global foreign exchange markets could spur the dollar/rupee to break out of its prevailing range, said Apurva Swarup, vice president at Shinhan Bank India. If the dollar index breaks below the 98 level, that could unlock room for rupee appreciation from prevailing levels, Swarup said. On Thursday, the rupee was nearly flat against the U.S. dollar at 85.5125 as of 11:00 a.m. IST. Asian currencies were mostly stronger with the offshore Chinese yuan rising 0.2% as the latest trade truce between Washington and Beijing raised hopes that the world's two largest economies could avoid escalations in their tariff row.


Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
India to tighten remittance rules, bar offshore time deposits, sources say
MUMBAI, June 12 (Reuters) - India's central bank plans to tighten rules for overseas remittances by resident Indians, barring them from holding foreign currency deposits with lock-in periods, two government sources said. The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) will amend regulations to prevent overseas transfers from being used to park money in time deposits or other interest-bearing accounts abroad, one of the sources said. "This is akin to passive wealth shifting, which is a red flag for the RBI in a still-controlled capital regime," the first source familiar with the thinking of the central bank said. The proposed changes reflect India's cautious stance on a rise in outward remittances and full convertibility of the rupee, as authorities strive to safeguard foreign exchange reserves and manage currency volatility, the sources said. Overseas investments by individuals fall under the central bank's Liberalised Remittance Scheme (LRS) — which allows resident Indians to remit up to $250,000 in a single year — for purposes ranging from foreign education, travel, equity and debt investments to medical treatments. While discussions with the government are ongoing, the RBI aims to ensure such deposits cannot be made even under alternate names, the second source said. Both sources declined to be identified due to the confidentiality of the talks. The finance ministry and the RBI did not respond to emailed requests for comment. The move is part of a comprehensive review of the legal framework governing the scheme to simplify the regulations, a priority highlighted by the central bank in its annual report. RBI data showed that deposits under outward remittances by resident individuals rose sharply to $173.2 million in March from $51.62 million in February. Outward remittances typically spike in March as it allows residents to maximise their annual limits and optimise taxes, making it the busiest month under LRS but the RBI is concerned that a portion of this may be getting passively parked. For financial year 2024/25, total annual outward remittances under the scheme dipped but remained high at nearly $30 billion compared with $31 billion a year ago. The sources did not disclose the amount currently held in foreign currency deposit accounts, but said the move is "preventative". India's outward remittances under the scheme have steadily increased, particularly as fintech platforms and private banks have made global investing easier for retail investors. "The move addresses a growing misuse of the scheme as a vehicle for passive capital export," the second source said. "It also aligns the scheme more closely with India's calibrated approach to capital account convertibility." India has remained cautious on allowing unrestricted outflows, partly to preserve its foreign exchange reserves and manage currency volatility. The revised rules will not affect permissible foreign investments in equities, mutual funds or property under the LRS, the second source said.