More than 100 traps found at popular Invercargill reserve
Photo:
Invercargill City Council
More than 100 leg-hold traps have been discovered in a popular Invercargill reserve, prompting warnings that someone or their pet could get seriously hurt.
The traps were found around Sandy Point, which is used for walking, mountain biking and horse riding.
Invercargill City Council parks and recreation manager Caroline Rain said a member of the public alerted them after finding a leg-hold trap between Sandy Point Road and Christies Track.
Rangers then found and removed more than 100 of them during about a two kilometre sweep, she said.
They did occasionally find traps in the area, but it was highly unusual to find them on that scale, Rain said.
"We've not seen this many illegal traps in this area. These are things we didn't permit to happen, it's beyond what I've seen before," she said.
"We want the public to be safe out there."
She urged people to take extra care as there could be more, and reminded people that it was illegal to put them on the council's recreational reserve.
"Please never place leg-hold traps in our public parks - these are areas where people walk and where pets often roam. It would be far too easy for someone or their pet to be seriously injured," the council said.
She said no injuries had been reported, but she had heard of people's pets getting caught and injured in one "a couple of times" in the five years she had been with the council.
Anyone who found a leg-hold trap on council land was encouraged to contact the council's parks and recreation team immediately, not to approach or tamper with it and to note the exact location.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
11 hours ago
- RNZ News
Wellington councillors baulk at spending $7 million to fence stretch of waterfront
Graphics show how the Wellington waterfront would appear with balustrades. Photo: Supplied / Wellington City Council Wellington City Council has voted against spending $7 million to fence a stretch of its waterfront. On Thursday, the environment and infrastructure committee debated fencing sections of Kumutoto and Queens Wharf - from about the Maritime Police Station to Shed 6 - to address safety concerns. Councillors wanted more time to assess the effectiveness of the safety measures that had already been put in place, such as extra lighting. The effort to improve safety followed recommendations made to the council after a coronial inquest into the death of 30-year-old Sandy Calkin . Coroner Katharine Greig found Wellington's waterfront lacked adequate measures to prevent Calkin's death and recommended installing permanent edge protection. Council officers recommended installing the balustrades on Kumutoto and Queens Wharf without community consultation to give urgency to the coroner's recommendations. Chief operating officer James Roberts told the meeting balustrading was the only practical option for those areas, which were narrow in parts and busy, with a high concentration of bars and restaurants. "Our advice is that, given the limited options available, which is either balustrade or do nothing, you are able to make that decision today, enabling officers to get on and address this outstanding public safety issue without delay. "For the rest of the waterfront, there are multiple practicable options and public consultation can help guide your decision-making." He acknowledged council had improved safety already with measures like extra lighting, but said the risk of an accidental fall was not fully removed. "If council wants to improve public safety here, there really is no other way of doing it." Councillor Iona Pannett urged councillors to heed both expert advice and the coroner's report, and said the council's first obligation was to keep people safe. "While I'm generally in favour of public consultation... what is the purpose in this case?" she said. Some councillors felt they had mitigated danger with the extra measures and wanted to find out whether it had made enough difference before deciding whether to spend the money. Councillor Ben McNulty said, while he voted against the spend, he still wanted improved waterfront safety. "I'll be voting against the paper, so that we can have some time given to monitor the effectiveness of the improvements that have already been made or are underway. "Targeted safety improvements could be presented to a future council, if required." Councillors Sarah Free, Iona Pannett, Laurie Foon and Nureddin Abdurahman voted for, with the remaining 13 councillors voting against. What would happen now was not clear. "Council officers will be working through next steps related to edge protection, following today's decision," a council spokesperson said.
RNZ News
15 hours ago
- RNZ News
Senior first responder facing child exploitation charges keeps name secret, faces new charges
Photo: RNZ / Nate McKinnon A senior first responder facing child exploitation charges will keep his name hidden after fresh charges have been laid against him. The man, aged in his 50s, appeared in the Christchurch District Court on Thursday afternoon on five charges relating to the possession and exportation of child exploitation material. The charges were brought by Customs earlier this year. Interim suppression of the man's name and occupation was due to lapse, however, his lawyer Craig Ruane sought an extension to the order after revealing four new charges have been laid in recent days. Details of the charges were not discussed in court, however, Ruane said it was likely pleas would be entered at the man's next appearance next month. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
a day ago
- RNZ News
Uber driver Jomon Perumayan Joseph loses job after stun gun found on his dashboard
By Tara Shaskey, Open Justice reporter of Jomon Perumayan Joseph was caught with a stun gun on the dashboard of his Uber vehicle. Photo: NZME An Uber driver was found with a homemade stun gun on his dashboard, which a judge has alluded to as being a method of protection for the man. Jomon Perumayan Joseph, 39, was stopped by police for an unrelated traffic matter in New Plymouth about 4pm on 13 November last year. At the time, he was operating as an Uber driver, according to a police summary of facts. Police spotted a "cylindrical device with two metal probes" on the dashboard of Joseph's vehicle. "An expert examination of the device determined it was a homemade stun gun of a form and size held in the hand, which had a push switch that latches when pressed to continually operate the device," the summary stated. Testing of the gun showed it would cause a severe electric shock, electrical burning and could render a person wholly or partially incapable of resistance. Joseph was charged with unlawful possession of a restricted weapon and, when speaking with police, said he made it "as an experiment". Jomon Perumayan Joseph appeared in New Plymouth District Court. Photo: NZME / Tara Shaskey On Tuesday, he appeared in New Plymouth District Court where he advanced an application for a discharge without conviction. Judge Ajit Swaran Singh said Joseph had reported making the stun gun was a "hobby" and he had no intention of using it on anyone. However, the judge noted that during his time in the courts he had seen many cases of Uber, taxi and bus drivers being attacked. "Understandably their concern is self-protection in the event of being attacked. "That is quite a common feature in a lot of offending. Be that as it may, you must understand that having weapons is not acceptable ... there are better ways of dealing with situations." In considering Joseph's application, Judge Swaran Singh said as a result of the charge, Joseph had lost his job as an Uber driver and his passenger licence endorsement had been suspended, "suffering a form of punishment already". The judge considered affidavits from Joseph, his wife and an immigration expert, as well as a presentence report which assessed him as a low risk of reoffending, his genuine remorse, and that he had donated $500 to charity. There were no aggravating features, such as the offending being drug or gang-related, and the immigration expert had advised a conviction could impact Joseph's prospects of remaining in New Zealand, and his possible migration to Australia. * This story originally appeared in the New Zealand Herald .
