logo
Separated immigrant families will soon get new lawyers — from Trump's DOJ

Separated immigrant families will soon get new lawyers — from Trump's DOJ

Yahoo15-05-2025

Immigrant families separated during President Donald Trump's first term, once a potent symbol of harsh government overreach, are facing new legal obstacles from an emboldened second-term Trump administration.
It's an unusual predicament: The same administration that has been trying to deport them is now trying to take over the responsibility for guiding them through complex legal proceedings in immigration court.
The Justice Department says it's about efficiency. Advocates and independent lawyers who have worked with the families call it an obvious conflict of interest. The issue will come to a head in a hearing scheduled Friday.
The latest clash stems from a 2023 court-approved settlement aimed at supporting the families separated by Trump's immigration policies in 2017 and 2018. The settlement required the administration to provide a wide range of benefits, including government-funded legal services.
Until May 1, the families had been receiving legal support from outside groups, led by the Acacia Center for Justice, a nonprofit immigrant legal defense organization. These independent lawyers have helped them navigate the byzantine process of reunifying, applying for temporary legal status and deciphering immigration court — until the Justice Department abruptly declined to renew the contract with Acacia.
That decision to move the legal services in-house has left advocates for these separated families alarmed, baffled and warning of an inherent conflict. Not only was the cutoff of Acacia's services abrupt, they say, the administration provided no roadmap for how it will take over the legal cases for up to 8,000 people, some of whom are facing urgent court deadlines and imminent deportation or separation once again.
This time, the world isn't watching.
Their cases once drew intense national attention and visits from Democratic presidential contenders. But that has subsided as Trump's second-term immigration agenda — including deportations to El Salvador's mega prison and a slew of other legal battles — has overtaken interest in their plight. Advocates worry the diminishing attention will have real-world consequences for families as they attempt to resist new deportation efforts.
'Haven't we put these families through enough?' said Anilú Chadwick, the pro bono director at Together & Free, a group that has worked with separated families. 'I'm taken back to seven years ago when I was holding babies and trying to find their parents. It's just unbelievable.'
A DOJ official said in a statement to POLITICO that it's 'insulting to suggest' that the department's immigration office, 'which is comprised of neutral, trained professionals and experts in immigration law, cannot provide services more effectively and efficiently than a self-interested, third-party outside contractor.'
The separated families' right to legal aid stems from a 2023 legal settlement overseen by U.S. District Judge Dana Sabraw. The Southern California-based appointee of George W. Bush approved an agreement requiring the federal government provide a range of services for parents and children separated by the Trump administration in 2017 and 2018, from medical care to housing support. The government also had to help the families work toward reunification and temporary legal status in the U.S., as well as provide legal services to help them navigate the complicated paperwork required to gain temporary legal status and access benefit programs.
The settlement required those services to be 'adequately resourced and funded.'
The Trump administration contends there has been no lapse in legal services and that replacing the contractors' outside lawyers with its own in-house services satisfies the requirement of the settlement. Justice Department lawyers said the settlement also 'does not require Defendants to provide legal services through the same method for the term of the agreement.'
DOJ lawyers also said in court filings that its Executive Office for Immigration Review would provide legal services to 'maximize efficiency' — adding that by May 15, it would 'begin providing regularly scheduled group sessions and self-help workshops' to 'equip them with the knowledge and information to successfully navigate their immigration proceedings.' The department intends to lean on other contractors employed by the departments of Health and Human Services and Homeland Security to fill in other gaps in services.
In addition, DOJ's immigration office 'will leverage its existing pro bono network,' to connect 'interested class members with pro bono representatives to provide representation,' the lawyers wrote.
Advocates say this puts separated and reunified families in an impossible position: taking legal advice from the very government they are litigating against to obtain benefits.
A Tuesday court filing from American Civil Liberties Union lawyers identified 187 class members who could lose their humanitarian parole status and work permits in May, 113 in June and another 142 in July. Advocates are also tracking 114 class members who have active removal orders and who 'urgently need access to legal services to file motions to reopen and dismiss their proceedings.'
The immigrant families 'are being told that they have to go to the government, who harmed them and who is going to be adjudicating their cases, for confidential advice about what to do,' said Sara Van Hofwegen, managing director of legal access programs at Acacia. 'There is immediate harm this week and next week, and in the months to come.'
Sabraw, so far, is not crying foul. The judge said the concerns about inadequate representation by the government are speculative, and he could intervene in the future if there is evidence that families protected by the settlement are suddenly missing court deadlines or facing other hurdles due to the change in their legal services. He has called a hearing Friday to further air concerns about this new arrangement.
Acacia's contract with the Justice Department, which began in May 2024, formed the Legal Access Services for Reunified Families program. The organization has overseen the program since, distributing the funding to subcontractor organizations across the country who have managed thousands of individual cases.
Acacia was in active talks to renew the contract with the Trump administration earlier this year, and staff members were stunned by the DOJ's decision, Van Hofwegen said.
'We're having to have conversations letting people know that we will no longer be a provider without being able to tell them about an existing plan,' said Emma Wilson, the program manager at ISLA Immigration, one of the subcontractors that provided legal services under the contract.
In court filings, advocates say they are already aware of class members who have been detained, including a separated child and multiple separated parents who have been unable to access legal services. They warn that these families could turn to predatory attorneys charging high fees in return for incomplete, sloppy paperwork.
'All of this is happening at a time of extraordinary immigration enforcement,' said Kelly Kribs, an attorney and co-director of the technical assistance program for the Young Center for Immigrant Children's Rights, a group that has worked with hundreds of separated families since Trump's zero tolerance policy. 'These class members … are very much at risk of detention and potential deportation.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Video Shows US Ally Confronting China in Contested Waters
Video Shows US Ally Confronting China in Contested Waters

Newsweek

time32 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Video Shows US Ally Confronting China in Contested Waters

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The Philippine coast guard has released footage of a confrontation with its Chinese counterpart within the Southeast Asian country's maritime zone. Newsweek has contacted the Chinese Foreign Ministry for comment via email. Why It Matters China claims the majority of the South China Sea as its territory, including areas that fall within the exclusive economic zones (EEZs) of the Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia and Taiwan. A Hague-based arbitral tribunal ruled in favor of the Philippines in 2016 and rejected China's claims. Beijing has called the decision illegitimate. The further expansion of Chinese maritime forces into the Philippine EEZ has been met with pushback under Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. The resulting dramatic clashes have raised the specter of the U.S.-Philippine Mutual Defense Treaty, which could draw Washington into a conflict with the East Asian power. A Chinese coast guard ship seen from the Port of Guangzhou in China's southern Guangdong province on February 22. A Chinese coast guard ship seen from the Port of Guangzhou in China's southern Guangdong province on February 22. Pedro Pardo/AFP via Getty Images What To Know While much of the neighbors' dispute has centered on uninhabited reefs and sandbanks, since the start of the year China's coast guard has maintained a steady presence closer to Luzon, the major Philippine island that's home to the capital, Manila. On Saturday, the Philippine coast guard deployed the 144-foot BRP Cabra to challenge the much larger CCG 3105—a Chinese coast guard cutter operating about 86 miles from Luzon's Zambales province and well within the country's 230-mile-wide EEZ, a spokesperson for the Philippine coast guard wrote on X, formerly Twitter, on Sunday. Video shows the Philippine crew broadcasting radio warnings and ordering their Chinese counterpart to leave the EEZ, citing the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, to which both countries are signatories. Later that day, the Cabra responded to a distress call from a fishing boat with engine trouble. The cutter towed the stricken vessel back to Zambales' Subic Port. In Singapore, U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth met with his Japanese, Australian and Philippine counterparts over the weekend on the sidelines of the Shangri-La Dialogue defense summit. The meetings were held amid doubts following U.S. President Donald Trump's tariff broadsides and remarks questioning the utility of Washington's security commitments in the region. The officials voiced concern over China's growing assertiveness and stressed the importance of maintaining the status quo. What People Are Saying Jay Tarriela, a Philippine coast guard spokesperson, wrote on X: "The actions of BRP Cabra and its crew reflect the commitment of the [Philippine coast guard] to uphold the directive of the president, reinforcing the Philippines' rights in the West Philippine Sea." Lin Jian, a Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson, said during Tuesday's regular news conference: "The U.S., together with Japan, Australia, and the Philippines, brazenly spread the false accusation of 'China threat' at the Shangri-La Dialogue and sought to use the East China Sea issue and the South China Sea issue to sow discord and incite confrontation between regional countries. ... We will not flinch in defending China's territorial sovereignty and maritime rights and interests." What Happens Next China and the Philippines are firmly entrenched in their positions, and a diplomatic breakthrough appears unlikely anytime soon. Speaking with Newsweek at the Shangri-La Dialogue on Sunday, Philippine Defense Secretary Gilberto Teodoro criticized China's actions, saying the country suffered from a "trust deficit." He said Manila was working toward building an "international coalition to increase deterrence."

Key R.I. House committee poised to vote to advance ban on assault-style weapons
Key R.I. House committee poised to vote to advance ban on assault-style weapons

Boston Globe

time33 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

Key R.I. House committee poised to vote to advance ban on assault-style weapons

'I think it will be a really good day for Rhode Island,' Knight, a Barrington Democrat, said Tuesday morning. 'We will be one step closer to making Rhode Island a safer state. I'm glad the politics have finally caught up to the voters, who clearly want this legislation.' If the House approves the legislation on Thursday, as expected, attention will shift to the Senate and whether Get Rhode Map A weekday briefing from veteran Rhode Island reporters, focused on the things that matter most in the Ocean State. Enter Email Sign Up The legislation stands a real chance of becoming law this year thanks in large part to former Senate President Dominick J. Ruggerio, a longtime foe of such legislation who said Advertisement Senator Louis P. DiPalma, a Middletown Democrat, has introduced 'I hope they do the right thing,' Knight said. 'If the bill passes in the House, I hope they pass it in the Senate, even if their Judiciary Committee is structured in a way for it to have a difficult road there.' Advertisement Governor Daniel J. McKee, a Democrat, has long backed a ban on assault-style weapons, and this year he underscored that support by Related : Tuesday's House committee vote comes one day after the Three conservative justices dissented, showing that the high court is still divided on how to handle Second Amendment cases after it expanded gun rights in a 2022 landmark decision. Another conservative justice said the Supreme Court should address the validity of bans on assault-style rifles like the AR-15 in the next term or two. Knight said none of that should prevent Rhode Island from passing a ban on assault-style weapons. 'States should generally go ahead with their legislation unless it's clearly against the law because that is how federalism works,' he said. 'On this issue in particular, I think the Supreme Court has spoken without speaking. They have had opportunity to take up assault weapons bans and haven't done it.' Ten states and the District of Columbia have similar bans on assault-style weapons, covering major cities like New York and Los Angeles. Advertisement In April, the Boston-based First US Circuit Court of Appeals Massachusetts' ban 'does not impose a heavy burden on civilian self-defense,' Judge Gary Katzmann wrote on behalf of the First Circuit court, adding that those challenging it 'do not demonstrate a single instance where the AR-15 — or any other banned weapon — has actually been used in a self-defense scenario.' In Rhode Island, the House Judiciary Committee is expected to consider an amendment to Knight's bill that would replace a requirement that grandfathered assault weapons be registered with police. Opponents had called the requirement clearly unconstitutional. The amendment would create a voluntary program through which those who already own assault weapons could get a certificate of possession from their local police department that would serve as legally admissible proof that their weapon is grandfathered, the House said in a statement. To address concerns that such certificates would serve as a de facto registry, the amendment's language prohibits police from keeping any record of the application or granting of such certificates. Since the certificate program would be voluntary, grandfathered owners could legally opt to do nothing when the bill takes effect, the House said. The amendment also would include 'more precise definitions' of the weapons that would be prohibited, the House said. The legislation would prohibit the manufacture, purchase, sale, transfer and possession of certain assault weapons including certain types of semiautomatic shotguns, rifles and pistols. Anyone convicted of violating the ban would face criminal penalties. The bill would provide exemptions for current and retired law enforcement officers, active-duty members of the armed forces, National Guard or reserves, federally licensed firearm dealers, and anyone who lawfully possesses an assault weapon when the ban would take effect on July 1, 2026. Advertisement The House noted the ban on assault-style weapons is the only major unaddressed recommendation made by a gun-safety working group established by former governor Gina M. Raimondo after the 2018 mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Fla. The General Assembly has passed legislation to ban Edward Fitzpatrick can be reached at

Trump tele-stumps for ‘true champion' Jack Ciattarelli ahead of New Jersey gov primary early voting
Trump tele-stumps for ‘true champion' Jack Ciattarelli ahead of New Jersey gov primary early voting

New York Post

time33 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Trump tele-stumps for ‘true champion' Jack Ciattarelli ahead of New Jersey gov primary early voting

Early voting in New Jersey's hotly contested gubernatorial primary began Tuesday, hours after President Trump held a tele-rally to boost GOP hopeful Jack Ciattarelli. The president bashed New Jersey as a 'high-tax, high-crime sanctuary state' and hailed Ciattarelli, a former member of the Garden State's General Assembly, as a 'champion' who could turn the state red again. 'New Jersey is ready to pop out of that blue horror show and really get in there and vote for somebody that's going to make things happen,' Trump said during remarks lasting roughly 10 minutes. 'I'm asking you to get out and vote for a true champion for the people of your state – Jack Ciattarelli. He's been a friend of mine, and he's been a real success story,' the president added. Ciattarelli has promised that one of his first executive orders will be to scrap policies that bar state and local authorities from cooperating with federal immigration agents. 3 Jack Ciattarelli is generally seen as the frontrunner in the GOP primary for New Jersey governor. AP 3 President Trump is eager to see New Jersey flip red in November. REUTERS Sparse polling has pegged Ciattarelli as the odds-on favorite in the Republican primary, with conservative radio host Bill Spadea and state Sen. Jon Bramnick polling a distant second and third. 'It was certainly disappointing,' Spadea told Fox News about Trump backing Ciattarelli. 'I mean, we made no bones about this. We absolutely wanted the president's endorsement. Unfortunately, the president endorsed a poll and not a plan.' 'I have been a supporter of President Trump since he came down the escalator [in 2015].' Trump owns several properties in New Jersey and periodically spends weekends at his golf club in Bedminster. 'It's like Make America Great Again,' the president exhorted his audience. 'It's Make New Jersey Great Again.' Off-year elections in New Jersey and Virginia are often seen as key tests of a president's popularity just shy of one year into office and a harbinger of what might come in the midterm elections the following year. Ciattarelli was the Republican gubernatorial nominee in 2021, when he shocked observers by narrowly losing to incumbent Democratic Gov. Phil Murphy by just over three percentage points. 3 Jack Ciattarelli had narrowly lost New Jersey's gubernatorial race in 2021. Getty Images Last November, Trump lost New Jersey to Kamala Harris by just 5.9%, an improvement of 10 percentage points on his margin of defeat by Joe Biden in 2020. Republicans have not won statewide office in New Jersey since Chris Christie was elected to a second term as governor in 2013. On the Democratic side, Rep. Mikie Sherrill is the polling favorite to win the primary, followed in various orders by Jersey City Mayor Steven Fulop, Newark Mayor Ras Baraka, Rep. Josh Gottheimer, teachers' union president Sean Spiller, and former state Senate President Steve Sweeney. Sherrill, a former Navy pilot and federal prosecutor who flipped a longtime GOP House seat in 2018, has largely vowed to stick with policies pursued by the term-limited Murphy while vowing to protect the state from what she describes as Trump's excesses. There are roughly 800,000 more registered Democrats in New Jersey than Republicans, though independents have significant sway in state politics.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store