Cambodia-Thailand conflict: Monks, dancers and volunteers offer respite as violence escalates
SURIN, Thailand (AP) — Long-festering tensions over border territory have escalated into armed conflict between Cambodia and Thailand, leading to dozens of deaths on both sides and displacing tens of thousands of people.
Neither side is prepared to claim responsibility for the first volley on Thursday, and they each blame the other for the continuing skirmishes. While regional and international allies and organizations have called for a ceasefire, scant attempts at mediation had resulted in no peace talks as of early Sunday.
It's a grim situation, but there is some light amid the darkness. On both sides of the border, some people are working around the destruction, intent on creating a safe space or finding normalcy.
A Buddhist temple with a homemade bomb shelter
A temple in Thailand 's northeastern province of Surin has something most of the country's 27,000 active Buddhist monasteries do not: a concrete bunker to shelter from bombs and shelling.
The temple, which asked not to be identified by name because of safety concerns, is about 10 kilometers (6 miles) from the border with Cambodia.
The temple's abbot, Phut Analayo, said the decision to build a bunker was made shortly after a brief armed clash between Thai and Cambodian soldiers in May inflamed cross-border relations, culminating in the current fighting.
Phut Analayo said donations paid for materials and equipment for the bunker, and the temple's monks and nearby villagers built it in four or five days. Construction was speedy because the bunker is made from large precast concrete drainage pipes a little over a meter (yard) in diameter, protected by mounds of earth, metal frames and sheeting.
It's divided into two tubular rooms, each about four meters (yards) long, and wired with electricity. There's a kitchen with a kettle, an electric rice cooker and basic cookware.
It's a tight fit, but because most of the nearby residents have fled to safer areas, there is enough space for the temple's six monks and the dozen or so villagers who sleep there every night.
'When we need to use the bathroom, we have to wait to make sure if things are quiet. If it's quiet out there, we will go out,' Phut Analayo said.
He said his temple has ceased religious activities for now but that the remaining monks stayed out of concern for the monastery and the people it serves.
'If I leave, the people who rely on us will lose their spirit," he said. 'I'm scared too, but I'll just stay here for now, when I can.'
Thai monasteries frequently serve as sanctuaries for stray dogs, and the more than 10 living at the temple are seemingly unbothered by the crisis.
"If I leave them behind, how will they live? What will they eat? So I have to stay to take care of them. Every life loves their lives all the same,' Phut Analayo said.
Ballroom dancers heed the call to help their countrymen
Learning ballroom dancing is how some senior citizens in northeastern Thailand usually spend their leisure hours, but the latest border conflict has motivated them to try to help some of the thousands of people displaced by the fighting.
About a dozen members of the Ballroom Dance for Health of the Elderly of Surin Province club went Saturday to a shelter housing about 1,000 evacuees, where they handed out clothes, toiletries, blankets and pillows.
Retired civil servant Chadaporn Duchanee, the ballroom teacher, initiated the project. On Friday, she gathered with friends at her home to fill small yellow plastic bowls with toiletries and other goods to give to the evacuees.
The 62-year-old posted on Facebook about the donation she made on Thursday, and her pupils proved happy to participate, too.
'We want to help, said Chadaporn. 'Everyone left in a hurry, without bringing their belongings, just trying to escape the line of fire, so they fled empty handed,'
Prapha Sanpote, a 75-year-old member of Chadaporn's donation team, said she hopes the conflict is resolved quickly.
'Our people couldn't go home. They have to leave home, and it's not just the home they had to leave,' he said. 'It's their belongings, their cattle, or their pet dogs, because they left without anything. How will those animals live? Everything is affected.'
A pop-up stall to feed those fleeing fighting and those headed into battle
It looks just like your typical roadside stall found commonly all over Southeast Asia, but this one seems exceptionally well-provisioned.
Also, it's not selling anything, even though there are boxes of bottled water, plastic bags filled with fruit and vegetables and the occasional packet of instant noodles. It is there to solicit donations of food and other essentials to give to evacuees escaping fighting along the border. It also gives handouts to members of the armed forces headed in the other direction, toward the front lines.
This pop-up operation is at the border of Siem Reap, home to Cambodia's Angkor Wat temple complex, and Oddar Meanchey province, which is an active combat zone. It's a one-stop shop on a key road that convoys of police and military vehicles roar along with sirens blaring.
Chhar Sin, a 28-year-old self-described youth volunteer, mans the stall, which is located in her home Srey Snam district.
'We're used to seeing people bustling around, we're not surprised by that,' she said, between handing out parcels to eager hands.
But even here, 100 kilometers (60 miles) from the border with Thailand, she senses people don't feel safe, as the streets seem emptier than usual.
She and other volunteers, are spending the weekend collecting supplies from ordinary Cambodians to dole out to the less fortunate. Families drive by on tractors to donate vegetables, while others swing by on motorbikes carrying bananas, dragon fruit and rambutans.
'For today and tomorrow, we are standing here waiting to give gifts to the people who are displaced from war zones and are seeking safety,' Chhar Sin said Saturday. 'We will provide them with food because they have nothing, and some of them come with only a few clothes and a hat.'
When she woke up Saturday morning, Kim Muny, made the decision not to open her convenience store, but instead cook rice for members of the Cambodian military and fleeing civilians.
'Cambodians have a kind heart. When we heard that soldiers and displaced people needed help, we decided to help with an open heart,' said the 45-year-old after donating parcels of rice wrapped in banana leaves at the stall. 'We know our soldiers don't have time to cook, so we will do it for them.'
The city empties but its temple's top monk isn't moving
Alone in a mostly evacuated pagoda, Tho Thoross began a Buddhist chant to express gratitude for all that is good in life.
The 38-year-old Tho Thoross is one of the last monks in the city of Samrong, the provincial capital of Cambodia's Oddar Meanchey province, which is on the front line of the cross-border fighting. Most civilians have fled the town, spooked by the sounds of artillery and what they suspect was a Thai military drone hovering above them.
All but seven of the 40 monks at the monastery have left. As chief monk of Wat Prasat Samrong Thom, Tho Thoross ordered more than a dozen of the temple's novices — young monks in training — to evacuate to displacement camps farther from the border with Thailand, which is 40 kilometers (25 miles) away.
The temple is the largest in the town of Samrong, as well as the oldest, dating back over a century.
Its distance from the border does not keep it protected from artillery and aerial attacks, but it nonetheless is considered a relatively safe place. Most Cambodians and Thais are Buddhists.
Nine monks from other temples that felt more insecure are also staying at Wat Prasat Samrong Thom.
In the Buddhist tradition, temples are community centers and almost always places of sanctuary, and on Thursday, several displaced villagers stopped by briefly on their way to a government-arranged safety zone. Tho Thoross provided them with food.
He said the latest fighting is '10 times bigger' than prolonged clashes over similar issues in 2008 and 2011, when the clashes were confined to certain areas.
'But today, the fighting is happening everywhere along the border.' said Tho Thoross, who has lived in Oddar Meanchey for nearly three decades.
'As a Buddhist monk living in a province bordering Thailand, I would like to call on both sides to work together to find a solution that is a win-win solution for all,' he declared Saturday.
_____
Sopheng Cheang and Delgado reported from Samrong, Cambodia; Peck reported from Bangkok. Associated Press video journalist Tian Macleod Ji in Surin, Thailand contributed to this report.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
14 Things People Say When They're Picking A Fight On Purpose
Ever had someone just pick a fight out of the blue, and you're left wondering what sparked it? You're not alone. Sometimes people go on the offensive for reasons that have nothing to do with the actual trigger. Whether it's stress, unresolved issues, or plain old boredom, these conflicts can leave you feeling frustrated and confused. Let's break down some things people say when they're itching for a fight, and why these phrases might be more loaded than they appear. 1. "Why Are You Always Like This?" This phrase immediately puts you on the defensive. It suggests there's something fundamentally wrong with your behavior, even if you're just being yourself. Saying "always" implies a pattern, making you feel like you're in a rerun of a show you never wanted to watch. Dr. John Gottman, a relationship expert, notes that phrases like this can lead to defensiveness, one of the "Four Horsemen" that predict relationship breakdowns. It's not just an attack on your current action; it's a critique of your character, making you feel like you need to defend your very existence. Once you're cornered into defending yourself, the actual issue often gets lost in translation. The person who said it may not even care about what they're critiquing; they just want to pick a fight. It's a diversion tactic, shifting the focus from whatever the real problem might be. This can leave you feeling like you're trapped in a maze with no way out. Understanding the underlying intent can help you navigate these verbal landmines more effectively. 2. "You Never Listen To Me." This statement is a classic way to ignite a conflict. It's accusatory and sweeping, making you feel like you're inadequate. It forces you to reflect on every conversation you've ever had with this person, trying to pinpoint where you went wrong. The problem is that it doesn't offer specifics, leaving you guessing what the root issue might be. Without a clear example, it's tough to address the problem constructively, and you're both left spinning in circles. Feeling attacked, you might start listing all the times you did listen, which can escalate the situation. The conversation derails into a tit-for-tat, and the original concern is left unresolved. Often, the real issue isn't about listening at all; it's about feeling undervalued or ignored. Instead of engaging in defensive maneuvers, try asking them what they need from you. It can change the direction of the conversation into something more productive. 3. "You're So Sensitive." Being called sensitive can feel like a slap in the face, especially when you're just expressing your feelings. It delegitimizes your emotions, making them seem like an overreaction. Dr. Elaine Aron, who specializes in studying sensitivity, points out that sensitivity can be a strength, fostering empathy and deep connections. However, in a fight, this phrase aims to make you question your emotional responses, pushing you to react more strongly. It's a punch disguised as an observation, forcing you to justify your feelings rather than addressing the actual issue at hand. This tactic can make you feel isolated and misunderstood, as if your emotions are invalid. It's a diversion, intended to derail the conversation from the actual issue. Rather than diving into a debate over your sensitivity, steer the conversation back to the real topic. Question why your emotions are being brought into the argument in the first place. It's a way to regain control and shift the focus back to what truly matters. 4. "I Guess You Think You're Perfect." This is a loaded statement designed to provoke. It suggests arrogance on your part, even if that's far from the truth. By accusing you of thinking you're perfect, it puts you in a no-win situation. Any attempt to defend yourself can be twisted into further evidence of your alleged arrogance. It takes the focus off the issue and turns it into a personal attack, making it harder for you to engage constructively. Responding to this effectively requires a bit of finesse. Acknowledge that no one is perfect, including yourself. This can defuse the situation, showing that you're open to constructive dialogue. It redirects the conversation back to resolving the issue at hand rather than dwelling on personal shortcomings. Keeping the focus on problem-solving rather than personal attacks can help calm the storm. 5. "You Always Make Everything About You." This accusation can come out of nowhere, blindsiding you and putting you on the defensive. The word "always" is key here—it's another sweeping generalization that paints you as self-centered. Psychology professor Dr. Lisa Firestone suggests that such statements can stem from past grievances that haven't been aired properly. Instead of discussing specific instances, the accuser opts for a blanket statement that's hard to counter. It leaves you scrambling to prove your selflessness, all while the real issue goes untouched. The statement itself is often more about the accuser's feelings than any real pattern of behavior on your part. They might feel sidelined or neglected, making it less about your actions and more about their emotions. Rather than arguing over the accusation, focus on understanding their perspective. Ask what specifically made them feel this way and work from there. It shifts the dialogue from blame to understanding, which is far more productive. 6. "I'm Not The Problem Here." This phrase is a clear sign that the other person is not willing to take any responsibility. It immediately sets a confrontational tone, implying that all the blame lies with you. Even if there's shared responsibility, this statement dismisses any potential for a balanced conversation. It shuts down constructive dialogue and leaves you feeling cornered. When someone is unwilling to acknowledge their part, it becomes difficult to find a resolution. In this scenario, any attempt to discuss the real issue becomes sidetracked by personal defenses. The situation can quickly escalate into a blame game, with both parties talking past each other instead of to each other. Instead of getting sucked into this vortex, try to steer the conversation back to the issue at hand. Highlight the importance of both parties contributing to the solution. This can create a more balanced atmosphere where both of you can speak openly. 7. "Why Can't You Be More Like [Someone Else]?" Comparisons like this are a surefire way to spark conflict. It immediately makes you feel inadequate and undervalued, as if you're being measured against an impossible standard. Research from Dr. Brené Brown shows that comparisons can trigger feelings of shame and disconnection, making productive conversations difficult. By bringing someone else into the mix, the focus shifts from the current issue to your perceived shortcomings. It's not a fair fight; it's a rigged game where you're set up to lose. Instead of embracing the challenge, you may find yourself becoming defensive. This statement can make you dig in your heels, reinforcing the divide rather than bridging it. The key is to redirect the conversation away from comparisons and back to the real issue. Highlight your unique strengths and ask how they can contribute to resolving the problem. It's a way to bring the focus back to what matters, rather than who you're not. 8. "You're Overreacting." Being told that you're overreacting can feel invalidating, as it trivializes your emotions. It suggests that your feelings are out of proportion to the situation, making you question your judgment. The underlying message is that you're the problem, not the issue at hand. It's a dismissive tactic that can leave you feeling small and misunderstood. This phrase can shift the focus from the actual problem to your emotional state, complicating any attempt to resolve the issue. In response, you might feel the urge to defend your emotions, inadvertently escalating the conflict. The conversation shifts from the issue at hand to a debate over your emotional responses. This can make it difficult to address the original concern and find a resolution. Instead of engaging in this emotional tug-of-war, try to steer the conversation back to the facts. Focus on what can be done to address the real problem, rather than dwelling on emotional reactions. 9. "You Just Don't Get It." This statement is a conversation stopper. It immediately places you on the outside, suggesting you lack understanding or insight. It's a subtle way to suggest intellectual or emotional inferiority, leaving you with little room to maneuver. When someone says this, they're not just challenging your viewpoint; they're dismissing it entirely. It can feel like a dead end, making it hard to engage in any meaningful dialogue. The frustration is palpable, often making you feel defensive. Your natural response might be to demand clarification, but that rarely leads to constructive conversation. The key is to dig deeper and ask them to explain their perspective without getting defensive. Encourage them to share what you're supposedly missing, which can open up the lines of communication. It's a way to turn the confrontation into a learning opportunity, bridging the gap that "You just don't get it" creates. 10. "I Should Have Known Better." This phrase carries a heavy load of regret and accusation. It's essentially saying they wouldn't be in this mess if it weren't for you. It implies they've compromised by trusting you, and now they're paying the price. While it might seem like they're blaming themselves, the undercurrent is that you're the real culprit. It's a passive-aggressive way of holding you responsible for their disappointment or frustration. The weight of this statement can trigger a defensive response, leading to arguments rather than solutions. It can feel like you're being held accountable for someone else's choices, which isn't fair. Instead of accepting blame that isn't yours, encourage an open dialogue about what went wrong for both parties. Focusing on shared responsibility can help shift the conversation from blame to collaboration. It's about creating a space where both parties can express their perspectives and work towards a resolution. 11. "Whatever, Do What You Want." This phrase might seem like a nonchalant surrender, but it often carries an undercurrent of resentment. It's dismissive, indicating the person has given up on reaching a consensus. While it may sound like they're giving you freedom, it's more about relinquishing responsibility. The implication is that they've stopped trying to engage constructively, leaving you to navigate the situation alone. It's an emotional withdrawal that can feel more like punishment than freedom. Faced with this, your instinct might be to assert your independence, which can further distance you from the real issue. It shifts the dynamic from collaboration to autonomy, which can hinder resolution. Instead of letting the conversation end there, try to re-engage them in dialogue. Express that you value their input and would prefer to find a mutual solution. This can encourage them to re-enter the conversation and work towards a resolution together. 12. "You're Impossible To Deal With." This statement is a direct challenge to your character, suggesting you're inherently difficult. It closes down the conversation by implying that there's no point in trying to resolve the issue. When someone says this, they're not just critiquing your behavior; they're dismissing any chance of collaboration. It's a verbal shut door, indicating they see no value in further discussion. Such phrases can leave you feeling isolated and frustrated, as if there's no way forward. In response, you might feel the need to defend yourself, which can escalate the situation. The conversation moves from problem-solving to character defense, which isn't productive. Instead of accepting this characterization, focus on reopening the dialogue. Acknowledge their frustration and ask what can be done to make the situation more workable for both parties. It's about turning "impossible" into a challenge that both of you can tackle together. 13. "I'm Done Talking About This." When someone says they're done talking, it's a signal they're not interested in finding a solution. It's a way to shut down the conversation and exit the dialogue altogether. This phrase often masks deeper issues that haven't been addressed, leaving unresolved tension. It leaves you hanging, feeling like there's no way to move forward. Instead of closure, it creates a communication gap that can widen over time. Your first reaction might be to push for more dialogue, but that can lead to further resistance. The more you push, the more the other person might dig in their heels. Instead of trying to force a conversation, suggest revisiting the issue later when emotions have cooled. Give both parties the time to reflect and come back with a fresh perspective. It's about creating space for a more productive conversation down the line. 14. "This Is Pointless." Saying a conversation is pointless undercuts any effort to resolve the issue. It communicates a sense of hopelessness, implying that no solution exists. This phrase is often used to express frustration when someone feels unheard or misunderstood. Instead of encouraging collaboration, it puts a damper on efforts to work things out. It's a verbal endgame, suggesting that continued dialogue is a waste of time. When faced with this, you might feel disheartened and inclined to give up. The challenge is to find a way to reignite the conversation without dismissing their feelings of futility. Acknowledge their frustration and propose a change in approach to tackle the issue. This can open the door to creative problem-solving, turning "pointless" into an opportunity for new strategies. It's a way to breathe life back into a conversation that feels stalled. Solve the daily Crossword
Washington Post
19 hours ago
- Washington Post
Thailand sets up safe spaces for pets whose owners fled border violence
SURIN, Thailand — As residents along Thailand's border with Cambodia fled the ongoing fighting , many tried to take their animals with them. For those who were unable to do so, livestock officials stepped in to help. Thailand's Livestock Department asked its local offices to provide safe space for animals whose owners have had to evacuate, and the offices in several border provinces announced they were ready to do so.
Associated Press
19 hours ago
- Associated Press
Thailand sets up safe spaces for pets whose owners fled border violence
SURIN, Thailand (AP) — As residents along Thailand's border with Cambodia fled the ongoing fighting, many tried to take their animals with them. For those who were unable to do so, livestock officials stepped in to help. Thailand's Livestock Department asked its local offices to provide safe space for animals whose owners have had to evacuate, and the offices in several border provinces announced they were ready to do so. In Surin province, several cages were placed under cover at the front of the local Livestock Breeding and Research Center as temporary kennels. Five dogs and two cats were staying at the center as of Sunday. The capacity is around 20 animals. Sornchai Kongsook, director of the livestock center, said owners can leave their pets for free, but they have to be able to visit every day to take care of the animals. 'We have opened our space for cats and dogs that the residents, or farmers, can't take into an evacuation center,' he said. 'There are also some owners who have chosen to stay at a hotel, which doesn't allow pets.' He said livestock are welcome at the center, although none has been left there so far. Officials have prepared food to be distributed to cows and buffaloes left behind in danger zones. Many northeastern Thais are farmers and usually own livestock. Several of them roam the fields in areas that are now largely deserted. The armed clashes between Thailand and Cambodia since last week have killed dozens of people and displaced thousands. Wilawan Duangvao, an elementary school teacher, left her dogs, Khawtom and Khaitun, at the shelter Saturday after she received an order to evacuate her home in Prasat district. She was able to return to check on them the following day. As she approached the cage they were being kept in, they stood up barking, wagging their tails and jumping around excitedly. A tearful Wilawan picked up Khawtom, a 2-year-old mix of shih tzu and poodle. Khaitun, a younger mix of American bully and Thai street dog, stood on his hind legs inside the cage as Wilawan and her husband played with both dogs and comforted them. Wilawan said it was a difficult decision to leave her pets, but she couldn't stay at home and needed to find a safe place for them. 'At our home now, water and electricity have been cut. I don't feel comfortable leaving them at home. I'm afraid they'll go into shock,' she said. Wilawan said she is now taking care of evacuees staying at her school, which has been converted to a temporary shelter, which does not allow animals. She said she can't thank officials enough for offering a safe space for her pets. 'I'm so grateful. Everyone here is very welcoming. They took them in and I'm relieved. They didn't ask for anything in return,' she said.
