Hertz's AI car scanners leave US customers hit with surprise damage bills
A new, powerful AI tool is assisting Hertz and other companies in identifying minor scratches, leading to confused renters being held responsible for damage.
Hertz, one of the world's largest car rental companies, first installed the technology in April at Atlanta International Airport, before rolling it out across five other airports in the US.
The scanning system, developed by UVeye, captures thousands of high-resolution images from multiple angles as a vehicle passes through a rental gate during pick-up and return. AI compares those images and uses machine learning algorithms to flag any discrepancies.
The system automatically creates and sends damage reports, which an employee then reviews before flagging any damages to the customer.
Hertz confirms Aussie drivers have been impacted in data breach
MORE: Dua Lipa's $1m flaunt stuns onlookers
According to the rental company, fewer than three per cent of vehicles scanned by the AI system show any billable damages.
While this seems to be a great way to eliminate false charges, it has proven problematic for customers.
According to The Drive, Hertz customer Patrick rented from Hertz at the Atlanta airport and was charged a whopping $US440 for a wheel scratch just minutes after returning his rental Volkswagen.
Hertz using AI scanners to detect any dents or scratches. Picture: UVEYE
Hertz plans to roll out the system at multiple other locations in the US by year's end. Picture: UVEYE
The customer said he was alerted to the damage 'minutes' after dropping off the vehicle and with it, charges for the blemish: $250 for the repair, $125 for processing, and another $65 in administrative fees.
It's unclear if these fees would be the same if the car had been inspected manually by a human, or if the costs are there to cover the expense of Hertz's partnership with UVeye.
When Patrick attempted to address the matter with a customer service representative, he found the challenge to be quite daunting.
A Hertz customer posted a photo on Reddit of minor damage that resulted in a $195 charge. Picture: @professor_pimpcain/Reddit
MORE: $185m scandal engulfs China EV giants
Customers can visit a web portal to view before-and-after photos taken by the scanners. However, if they have any concerns, their options are limited. While a chatbot can flag the issue for review, there is no live agent available to assist them.
However, some customers see it differently. They feel that the AI system is primarily focused on maximising revenue rather than ensuring fairness.
The minor damage was detected by a new artificial intelligence-powered scanner. Picture: @professor_pimpcain/Reddit
The technology's ability to instantly generate fees — with no human interaction and a short window for discounts — feels less like transparency and more like pressure.
One Reddit user shared his thoughts and wrote: 'In reality, the AI picks up a tiny scuff that isn't actually there because of the shiny paint and maybe it's wet out, leaving you to spend months disputing charges for something that is basically just free revenue for the company'
Another user that goes by the name ChefCobra said: 'AI does what it does, just compares how car was sent out and how it came back. Problem is that when you drive car, even if you are the most safest driver, you will have stone chips from actual driving.'
Jlnbos added 'their goal isn't to enhance the rental experience.' Their goal is to extract more money from their customers.'
Another customer tGA1 commented stating they will never rent through Hertz again.
'I will never rent from that company or its subsidiaries again.'
Reddit Example 2. (Picture: Reddit/animemufin)
Reddit Example 2. (Picture: Reddit/animemufin)
Hertz customers are informed of the damages detected by UVeye within minutes of returning their car rentals. Picture: UVEYE
MORE: Car boss' wild call to end Aus tax breaks
While Hertz is the only major rental company using the system extensively, UVeye's technology is already well-established in other automotive sectors, with notable clients such as General Motors, Hyundai, Amazon, and CarMax.
The company's inspection systems are in use at hundreds of dealerships, fleet locations and vehicle auctions worldwide.
UVeye is reportedly in talks with additional US rental agencies, suggesting broader adoption may be on the horizon.
It is unclear if this technology will become available to Hertz rentals in Australia.
James Chung
Digital Content Creator
James is a Digital Content Creator at news.com.au and is part of the News Corp Australia's digital real estate team. His previous experience includes working for Sky News Australia.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
Australia has ‘big problems' as AI revolution creeps in
Nationals MP Barnaby Joyce has warned millions of Aussies could lose their jobs, drawing parallels between AI's growing presence in Australian workplaces and working from home. Joyce criticised a new proposal from the Australian Services Union (ASU), which calls for employers to be required to give employees six months' notice before mandating a return to the office. The union also proposes that work-from-home requests should be presumed approved unless an employer validly objects, with any changes to arrangements also subject to the same six-month notice. The union also argues that employers must genuinely attempt to reach an agreement with the employee, respond within 14 days to work-from-home requests, and if refusing, set out the business grounds for doing so. But Joyce says that's all 'absurd'. 'What you're doing there is encouraging people not to employ people. You can't just say you're going to work from home today or you won't have a job,' he said on Channel 7's Sunrise. Host Natalie Barr pushed back, informing the politician that many people can and do work from home successfully. But Joyce says employees should be 'doing everything in their power' to ensure their position remains viable as AI creeps into the workplace. 'I think you got to be careful. It's not a myth, AI is coming. What you're doing is encouraging people to say 'OK, stay home for the whole week because you don't have a job anymore'. AI is coming into clerical work and remove jobs left, right, and centre,' he rebutted. 'I'd be doing everything in your power to try and keep your jobs because if people can prove they don't need to come to the office, then the office can prove they can be replaced by AI. Be really careful in not being enthusiastic about not going to the office and getting to work.' When asked on exactly how Australia could safeguard jobs, Joyce took a defeatist tone. 'I don't know whether you can, that's the problem,' he said. 'What you have to do is broaden the base of the economy, so there are alternate jobs to go to. But in our genius, we have decided to go to net zero and intermittent power, so we don't have an industrial base to absorb those jobs and that is one of the big problems we've got.' Barr then questioned minister for Social Services Tanya Plibersek about claims that AI could generate a net increase in jobs. 'I think there will be different types of jobs. A lot of the repetitive work will be done by AI in the future and what we need to do is make sure there are good jobs available for Australians in new and emerging industries as well,' she said. 'We've got real capacity to develop some of those AI tools right here. 'The big data centres we're going to need to run some of these programs can be based right here and they can be powered by renewable energy. We have the cheapest form of energy available to us here in Australia. Solar, wind, we know it's the cheapest form of new energy.' Barr then pointed out that AI cannot readily replicate skilled trades and asked if Australians should learn trades instead. 'You are dead right,' Joyce responded. They should because I can assure to my accountancy days, electricians overwhelmingly earn more money than people who have graduated with arts degrees. Doctors can go and make good money, no doubt about that. But AI won't be able to turn itself into a plumber or itself into an electrician or a chippy, so trades are a place where you can sustain a good level of employment. But if you are just in clerical work ... that's what its genius does, (it) replaces people but it doesn't have hands and it doesn't have feet.' Jobs and Skills Australia forecasts that routine clerical roles (receptionists, general and accounting clerks) are most vulnerable to automation, while most occupations (79 per cent) face low automation exposure and high augmentation potential. AI is already being used in place of customer service and administration roles, with real-life examples already emerging in Sydney, such as the sacking of medical receptionists after their employer found AI systems could complete their job. The Social Policy Group estimates up to one-third of the Australian workforce could face temporary unemployment by 2030 at current AI adoption levels. Meanwhile, some CEOs are warning the public that those who don't get in line will fall behind, with Airwallex CEO Jack Zhang warning that employees must use AI daily, or risk losing their jobs. A recent report into the Australian government's AI ecosystem shows rapid growth in AI businesses, research output, and AI-based hiring, particularly across Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, and Perth. But sentiments are mixed on the revolutionary and potentially dangerous technology. A recent Ipsos survey showed that while 40 per cent of workers believe AI makes jobs easier, roughly the same proportion (39 per cent ) worry about security. Academic analysis reveals that AI is increasing demand for complementary human skills, including digital literacy, teamwork, and resilience, but is quickly diminishing roles tied to repetitive skills. Net demand for human skills is rising, especially where AI augments rather than replaces.
ABC News
4 hours ago
- ABC News
Tariffs are beginning to push US prices higher, says BlueScope CEO
BlueScope chief executive, Mark Vassella told The Business he's seen the impact of US tariffs on prices but the full impact is yet to play out.
News.com.au
9 hours ago
- News.com.au
Barnaby Joyce warns ‘AI is coming' for clerical workers
Nationals maverick Barnaby Joyce is warning artificial intelligence is 'coming' for workers, and that those who work from home are most at risk. It comes as governments and businesses around the world scramble to figure out guardrails on AI while reaping its economic benefits. Decision makers flocking to Canberra for Labor's Economic Reform Roundtable have already flagged the challenge as a hot topic in the productivity-centric talks. Amid a flare up in debate over flexible employment arrangements, sparked by union demands for a four-day work week, Mr Joyce on Monday took aim at recent changes giving employees the right to ask to work from home. He said it was 'encouraging people not to employ people'. 'You can't just say you're going to work from home today or you won't have a job,' the former deputy prime minister told Seven. 'I think you've got to be careful. 'If your job is a keyboard, yourself and a computer, AI is coming.' He said if he were a clerical worker, he would 'be doing everything to keep your jobs because if people can prove they don't need to come to the office then (they) can prove (you) can be replaced by AI'. Asked if he had an idea how to protect jobs, Mr Joyce said he did not know if it was possible. But he did welcome the idea of getting more Australians into trades. 'They should because I can assure you from my accountancy days, electricians overwhelmingly earn more money than people who have graduated with arts degrees or junior degrees,' he said. 'Doctors can go and make good money, but AI won't be able to turn itself into a plumber or itself into an electrician or a chippy so trades are a place where you can sustain a good level of employment.' In a report released this month, the Productivity Commission warned against taking a 'heavy-handed' approach to AI regulation, saying to do so could stifle innovation and cause Australia to fall behind other countries. Instead, it recommended making existing regulations fit-for-purpose. That included plugging gaps around consumer protection, privacy, and copyright. The commission said AI-specific regulation should only be considered as a 'last resort' for specific use cases where existing laws were clearly insufficient to mitigate harms.
