logo
Trump says willing to extend trade talks deadline, but says that won't be necessary

Trump says willing to extend trade talks deadline, but says that won't be necessary

Time of Indiaa day ago

Live Events
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
WASHINGTON: U.S. President Donald Trump said on Wednesday he would be willing to extend a July 8 deadline for completing trade talks with countries before higher U.S. tariffs take effect, but did not believe that would be necessary.Trump told reporters before a performance at the Kennedy Center that trade negotiations were continuing with some 15 countries, including South Korea, Japan and the European Union."We're rocking in terms of deals," he said. "We're dealing with quite a few countries and they all want to make a deal with us." He said he did not believe a deadline extension would be "a necessity."Trump said the U.S. would send out letters in coming weeks specifying the terms of trade deals to dozens of other countries, which they could then embrace or reject."At a certain point, we're just going to send letters out ... saying, 'This is the deal. You can take it, or you can leave it,'" Trump said. "So at a certain point we'll do that. We're not quite ready."U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told lawmakers earlier that the Trump administration could extend the July trade deal deadline - or "roll the date forward" for countries negotiating in good faith, in certain cases.A 90-day pause in Trump's broadest, "reciprocal" tariffs will end on July 8, with only one trade deal agreed with Britain and some 17 others at various stages of negotiation."It is highly likely that those countries - or trading blocs as is the case with the EU - who are negotiating in good faith, we will roll the date forward to continue the good-faith negotiations," Bessent told the House Ways and Means Committee. "If someone is not negotiating, then we will not."Bessent's remarks marked the first time a Trump administration official has indicated some flexibility around the expiration date for the pause.Bessent reiterated the possibility of more negotiating time at a second hearing before the Senate Appropriations Committee on Wednesday, saying it was "my belief that countries that are negotiating in good faith could be rolled forward."He said the European Union had previously been slower to come forward with robust proposals, but was now showing "better faith," without providing specifics. Trump echoed that more upbeat view on Wednesday, saying, "They do want to negotiate."A deal struck on Tuesday in London with China to de-escalate that bilateral trade war is proceeding on a separate track and timeline, with an August 10 deadline set last month.The president has been the final decision-maker on his administration's tariff and trade policies, but Bessent's influence has increased in recent months and the Treasury chief has been viewed by many trading partners as a moderating voice.Trump announced the pause on April 9, a week after unveiling "Liberation Day" tariffs against nearly all U.S. trading partners that proved to be so unexpectedly large and sweeping that it sent global financial markets into near panic.The S&P 500 Index plunged more than 12% in four days for its heftiest run of losses since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in early 2020. Investors were so rattled they bailed out of safe-haven U.S. Treasury securities, sending bond yields rocketing higher. The dollar sank.Markets started their recovery on April 9 when Trump unexpectedly announced the pause. The recovery continued in early May when the Trump team agreed to dial back the triple-digit tariff rates it had imposed on goods from China. Those events have given rise to what some on Wall Street have parodied as the "TACO" trade - an acronym for Trump Always Chickens Out."The only time the market has reacted positively is when the administration is in retreat from key policy areas," Democratic Representative Don Beyer of Virginia told Bessent before pressing him on what to expect when the July deadline expires."As I have said repeatedly there are 18 important trading partners. We are working toward deals with those," Bessent said before going on to signal a willingness to offer extensions to those negotiating in good faith.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Rubio warns Iran against targeting U.S. over Israeli strikes
Rubio warns Iran against targeting U.S. over Israeli strikes

The Hindu

time12 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

Rubio warns Iran against targeting U.S. over Israeli strikes

U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio warned Iran late Thursday (June 12, 2025) not to respond to Israeli strikes by hitting American bases, saying Washington was not involved. Israel strikes Iran LIVE: Military official says nuclear targets hit; explosions heard across Tehran "We are not involved in strikes against Iran and our top priority is protecting American forces in the region," Rubio said in a statement. "Let me be clear: Iran should not target U.S. interests or personnel." Israel announced strikes on Iran, where loud explosions were heard, hours after U.S. President Donald Trump publicly said they should not do so. Mr. Trump had said that Israel would ruin chances for a peacefully negotiated solution, which he said was close. A sixth round of talks over Tehran's nuclear program had been scheduled between the United States and Iran on Sunday in Oman. "Israel advised us that they believe this action was necessary for its self-defense," Rubio said, without offering support or criticism of the strikes by the close US ally. "President Trump and the administration have taken all necessary steps to protect our forces and remain in close contact with our regional partners," he said.

US not involved in strikes against Iran, says Marco Rubio
US not involved in strikes against Iran, says Marco Rubio

Time of India

time16 minutes ago

  • Time of India

US not involved in strikes against Iran, says Marco Rubio

Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel Following the Israeli strikes on Iran US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Washington was not involved and warned warned Tehran not to respond to the attack by hitting American bases."We are not involved in strikes against Iran and our top priority is protecting American forces in the region," Rubio said in a statement on Thursday."Let me be clear: Iran should not target US interests or personnel." Israel announced that it struck Iran hours after US President Donald Trump publicly said they should not do so, adding that Israel would ruin chances for a peacefully negotiated solution.A sixth round of talks over Tehran's nuclear program had been scheduled between the United States and Iran on Sunday in Oman."Israel advised us that they believe this action was necessary for its self-defense," Rubio said, without offering support or criticism of the strikes by the close US ally."President Trump and the administration have taken all necessary steps to protect our forces and remain in close contact with our regional partners," he said.

Why US judge ruled Trump's deployment of National Guard in California was illegal
Why US judge ruled Trump's deployment of National Guard in California was illegal

Hindustan Times

time21 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Why US judge ruled Trump's deployment of National Guard in California was illegal

A federal judge issued a temporary restraining order Thursday directing President Donald Trump to return control of the National Guard to California. The order, which takes effect at noon Friday, said the deployment of the Guard was illegal and both violated the Tenth Amendment and exceeded Trump's statutory authority. The White House had no immediate comment on the ruling, but the federal government immediately filed an appeal with the Ninth Circuit court. U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer said Trump overstepped his bounds in ordering the deployment of roughly 4,000 National Guard members to Los Angeles after protests erupted over the immigration crackdown. It was not immediately clear how that would change the situation on the ground. ALSO READ| What is 'No Kings' protest? Movement planned against Trump during Army's 250th anniversary parade California Gov. Gavin Newsom sued to block the Guard's deployment against his wishes. California later filed an emergency motion asking the judge to block the Guard from assisting with immigration raids. He argued that the troops were originally deployed to protect federal buildings and wanted the court to block the troops from helping protect immigration agents during the raids, saying that involving the Guard would only escalate tensions and promote civil unrest. The Trump administration called the lawsuit a 'crass political stunt endangering American lives' in its official response Wednesday. In a broad ruling, the judge determined Trump had not properly called the Guard up in the first place. Maj. Gen. Scott Sherman, speaking in an interview with The Associated Press and one other media outlet, said that as of Wednesday about 500 of the Guard troops have been trained to accompany agents on immigration operations. Photos of Guard soldiers providing security for the agents have already been circulated by immigration officials. Sherman is commander of Task Force 51, which is overseeing the Guard troops and Marines sent to Los Angeles. ALSO READ| No US involvement in Israel's attack on Iran, claim officials Typically the authority to call up the National Guard lies with governors, but there are limited circumstances under which the president can deploy those troops. Trump federalized members of the California National Guard under an authority known as Title 10. The lawsuit argued that Title 10 requires, among other things, that the president go through governors when issuing orders to the National Guard. Brett Shumate, an attorney for the federal government, said Trump complied with the statute by informing the general in charge of the troops of his decision and would have the authority to call in the Guard even if he had not. In a brief filed ahead of the Thursday hearing, the Justice Department said Trump's orders were not subject to judicial review. 'Courts did not interfere when President Eisenhower deployed the military to protect school desegregation. Courts did not interfere when President Nixon deployed the military to deliver the mail in the midst of a postal strike. And courts should not interfere here either,' the department said. 'Our position is this is not subject to judicial review,' Shumate told the judge. Breyer, who at one point waved a copy of the constitution, said he disagreed. 'We're talking about the president exercising his authority, and the president is of course limited in that authority. That's the difference between a constitutional government and King George,' he said. The protests over immigration raids in Los Angeles intensified after Trump called up the Guard and have since spread to other cities, including Boston, Chicago and Seattle. Federal immigration agents have been arresting people at Home Depot parking lots and other businesses, sparking fear in immigrant communities, after the Trump administration said it wanted to dramatically increase arrests under its immigration crackdown. ALSO READ| Trump's DC birthday parade could be canceled amid 'No Kings' protest Trump has described Los Angeles in dire terms that Bass and Newsom say are nowhere close to the truth. The Marines have not yet been spotted in Los Angeles, and Guard troops have had limited engagement with protesters. Dozens of mayors from across the Los Angeles region banded together Wednesday to demand the raids stop and the troops leave.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store