What's slithering beneath the Great Lakes has 150 teeth, a serrated tongue, and a ruthless hunger that could collapse the entire ecosystem
Canadian and US agencies are collaborating to combat the invasive sea lamprey in the Great Lakes, aiming to protect the $5.1-billion fishery. Control measures, including lampricides and barriers, are being implemented after a surge in lamprey populations due to pandemic-related disruptions and staffing cuts. Sustained efforts are crucial to prevent further damage to native fish and the regional economy.
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
What are sea lampreys?
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
The 'Trump' factor
The invasive sea lamprey , often dubbed 'vampire fish" for its bloodsucking predation, has prompted Canadian and US agencies to launch a joint campaign to protect the Great Lakes ' $5.1-billion freshwater fishery.Control crews initiated treatments in late April, focusing on Lake Erie and Lake Ontario , with operations expected to continue through October.The methods employed include lampricides (chemical treatments), traps, and barriers aimed at reducing the sea lamprey population, which parasitically feeds on fish.Sea lampreys, native to the Atlantic Ocean, were inadvertently introduced into the Great Lakes via shipping canals in 1921. Lacking natural predators in this new environment, they have wreaked havoc on native fish populations. Using their mouths, equipped with 150 teeth and a serrated tongue, they latch onto prey, often killing up to 40 pounds of fish during their parasitic stage.The COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated the issue. Travel restrictions in 2020 and 2021 forced crews to pause treatments, allowing millions of lamprey larvae to survive.A new study confirms that lamprey numbers rose sharply during this period. In 2024, adult sea lamprey counts were 8,619 above pre-COVID-19 averages, with Lake Superior and Lake Ontario experiencing the most significant increases.Ethan Baker, chair of the Great Lakes Fishery Commission, emphasized the urgency:'Ongoing, consistent sea lamprey control is critically important for preventing damage to Great Lakes fish by invasive sea lampreys. If we take our foot off the gas, even for a short while, sea lamprey populations will increase rapidly and cause considerable damage to fish.'The Great Lakes Fishery Commission, established in 1955, has been instrumental in reducing sea lamprey populations by 90 percent in most areas of the Great Lakes. Their integrated control program combines several methods to attack sea lampreys on multiple fronts.The primary method involves applying the lampricide TFM to target sea lamprey larvae in their nursery tributaries. In the concentrations used, TFM kills larvae before they develop lethal mouths and migrate to the lakes to feed on fish, while most other organisms are unaffected.The Trump administration's mass purge of federal workers, including 12 members of the Great Lakes sea lamprey control program, has raised concerns about the program's efficacy. These staffing cuts represent nearly 14 percent of the lamprey control program's overall workforce, potentially allowing over 1 million lamprey to survive, consuming nearly 5 million pounds of fish and resulting in $105 million in lost economic output.Despite these setbacks, control efforts have resumed. Scientists and officials warn that the damage done during the pause will take years to reverse.The Great Lakes Fishery Commission continues to stress the importance of sustained efforts to safeguard the prosperity of the region.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Trump vs Musk: What happens to Nasa's ISS missions if SpaceX grounds Dragon capsule? Is Russia only other option?
President-elect Donald Trump listens as Elon Musk explains the operations ahead of the launch of the sixth test flight of the SpaceX Starship rocket, Nov. 19, 2024, in Boca Chica, Texas. (AP) As US President Donald Trump and Elon Musk exchanged barbs on social media on Thursday, Musk said he might stop using the Dragon spacecraft, which is used to take astronauts and supplies to the International Space Station (ISS). This came after Trump said he may cancel government contracts given to Musk's companies, SpaceX and Starlink. Musk responded on X, saying SpaceX "will begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately.' It is not clear how serious Musk was. But the Dragon spacecraft is important for keeping the ISS working. Nasa also depends on SpaceX for other programs, such as launching science missions and, later this decade, taking astronauts to the moon. SpaceX and Nasa's partnership In 2006, a company named Space Exploration Technologies Corp, or SpaceX, got a Nasa contract to carry cargo and supplies to the ISS. At the time, SpaceX had not launched anything into orbit. Its first successful launch happened two years later with Falcon 1. In 2010, SpaceX launched the first Falcon 9 rocket. By 2012, it began sending cargo to the space station. Nasa gave money to help develop the Falcon 9 rocket. SpaceX then used the Nasa connection to attract other clients to launch satellites using its rockets. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Perdagangkan CFD Emas dengan Broker Tepercaya IC Markets Mendaftar Undo During the Obama administration, SpaceX also got a contract to take astronauts to the ISS. This happened for the first time in May 2020, during President Trump's first term. "Today the groundbreaking partnership between Nasa and SpaceX has given our nation the gift of an unmatched power a state-of-the-art spaceship to put our astronauts into orbit at a fraction of the cost of the space shuttle," Trump said in a speech at Kennedy Space Center in Florida on May 30, 2020, after that flight. He also praised Musk in the same event. As SpaceX made progress, other companies faced difficulties. Today, SpaceX is the main company handling both US civilian and military space activities. The US government now depends a lot on SpaceX. Musk started the company in 2002 with the goal of one day sending people to Mars. For now, the company is the only option the U.S. has to send people and equipment to space. Impact of decommissioning Dragon SpaceX's Crew Dragon capsules are used to take astronauts and cargo to the ISS for Nasa. If Musk follows through on his statement about decommissioning, it could affect the future of the space station. Later in the day, Musk seemed to take back the threat. But if he had followed through, SpaceX would likely bring back the Crew Dragon that is already docked at the space station, along with the four astronauts who plan to return in it. However, there would be no way to send the next group of astronauts to the ISS. Dragon capsule Right now, SpaceX is the only US company that can take crews to and from the ISS, using the Dragon capsule, which can carry four people. Another US company, Boeing, has a capsule called Starliner. But it has flown astronauts only once. That test flight had problems, and the two Nasa astronauts had to return to Earth using SpaceX in March. That was more than nine months after they launched last June. Starliner is still not ready to fly again. Nasa is deciding whether to do another test flight with cargo instead of a crew. SpaceX also uses Dragon capsules for its own private missions. The next such mission, managed by Axiom Space, is expected to launch next week. Cargo versions of Dragon are also used to carry food and other supplies to the ISS. Russia's Soyuz: The only other option The only other way to send crews to the ISS is using Russia's Soyuz capsules. Each Soyuz can carry three people. Usually, each Soyuz trip includes two Russians and one Nasa astronaut. Each SpaceX trip includes one Russian under a mutual agreement. This setup ensures that in an emergency, both US and Russian crew members have a way to return. When SpaceX started sending crews for Nasa in 2020, it reduced Nasa's dependence on Russia. Earlier, Nasa had to pay Russia tens of millions of dollars per seat. For cargo, Nasa also works with Russian spacecraft and a US company called Northrop Grumman.
Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
Premature babies given sucrose for pain relief - but new research shows it doesn't stop long-term impacts on development
Auckland: Infants born very preterm spend weeks or even months in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) while their immature brains are still developing. During this time, they receive up to 16 painful procedures every day. The most common is a routine heel prick used to collect a blood sample. Suctioning of the infant's airways is also common. While many of these procedures provide critical care, we know they are acutely painful. Even tearing tape off the skin can be painful. We also know, from decades of research, that preterm babies' exposure to daily painful invasive procedures is related to altered brain development, stress functioning and poorer cognitive and behavioural outcomes. The commonest strategy to manage acute pain in preterm babies is to give them sucrose, a sugar solution. But my recent research with Canadian colleagues shows this doesn't stop these long-term impacts. In New Zealand, there is no requirement to document all procedures or pain treatments. But as the findings from our Canadian study show, we urgently need research to improve long-term health outcomes for children born prematurely. Long-term effects of pain in early life We collected data on the number of procedures, clinical exposures and sucrose doses from three NICUs across Canada. One of these sites does not use sucrose for acute pain management. This meant we were able to compare outcomes for children who received sucrose during their NICU stay and those who did not, without having to randomly assign infants to different care as you would in a randomised controlled trial - the gold standard approach. At 18 months of age, when children born preterm are typically seen for a follow-up, parents report on their child's behaviour. Our findings replicate earlier research: very preterm babies who were exposed to painful procedures early in life showed more anxiety and depressive symptoms by toddlerhood. Our findings are similar regarding a child's cognition and language, backing results from other studies. We found no link between preterm babies' later behaviour and how much sucrose they were given to manage pain. Sucrose is thought to activate centres of the brain that modulate pain and lead to the release of endorphins, but the exact mechanism remains unclear. It has become the worldwide standard of care for acute neonatal pain, but it doesn't seem to be helping in the long term. Improving pain treatment About 1 in 13 babies are born preterm each year in Aotearoa New Zealand. Some 1-2% are very preterm, two to four months early. Māori and other ethnic minorities are at higher risk. Studies in New Zealand show children born very preterm have up to a three-fold risk of emotional disorders in preschool and by school age. This remains evident through adulthood. Sucrose may stop preterm babies from showing signs of pain, but physiological and neurological pain responses nevertheless happen. As is the case internationally, sucrose is used widely in New Zealand, but there is considerable variation in protocols of use across hospitals. No national guidelines for best practice exist. Infant pain should be assessed, but international data suggest this isn't always the case. What's more, pain isn't always managed. Routine assessment of pain and parent education videos are useful initiatives to encourage pain management. Minimising the number of procedures is recommended by international bodies. Advances in clinical care, including the use of less invasive ventilation support and the inclusion of parents in the daily care of their infant, have seen the number of procedures decrease. Pain management guidelines also help, but whether these changes improve outcomes in the long term, we don't know yet. We do know there are other ways of treating neonatal pain and minimising long-term impacts. Placing a newborn on a parent's bare chest, skin-to-skin, effectively reduces short and long-term effects of neonatal pain. For times when whānau are not able to be in the NICU, we have limited evidence that other pain management strategies , such as expressed breast milk, are effective. Our recent research cements this: sucrose isn't helping as we thought. Understanding which pain management strategies should be used for short and long-term benefits of this vulnerable population could make a big difference in the lives of these babies. This requires additional research and a different approach, while considering what is culturally acceptable in Aotearoa New Zealand. If the strategies we are currently using aren't working, we need to think creatively about how to limit the impact of pain on children born prematurely. (The Conversation)
Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
Elon Musk pulls back on threat to withdraw Dragon spacecraft
A social media dispute erupted between President Trump and Elon Musk, leading Musk to initially threaten the decommissioning of SpaceX's Dragon capsule, crucial for ISS operations. This capsule is vital for transporting astronauts and supplies, with NASA heavily reliant on SpaceX for various missions, including lunar landings. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads As President Donald Trump and Elon Musk argued on social media on Thursday, the world's richest man threatened to decommission a space capsule used to take astronauts and supplies to the International Space Station A few hours later, Musk said he wouldn't follow through on the Trump threatened to cut government contracts given to Musk's SpaceX rocket company and his Starlink internet satellite services, Musk responded via X that SpaceX "will begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately."It was unclear how serious Musk's threat was, but several hours later - in a reply to another X user - he said he wouldn't do capsule, developed with the help of government contracts, is an important part of keeping the space station running. NASA also relies heavily on SpaceX for other programs including launching science missions and, later this decade, returning astronauts to the surface of the Dragon capsule SpaceX is the only U.S. company capable right now of transporting crews to and from the space station, using its four-person Dragon Starliner capsule has flown astronauts only once; last year's test flight went so badly that the two NASA astronauts had to hitch a ride back to Earth via SpaceX in March, more than nine months after launching last remains grounded as NASA decides whether to go with another test flight with cargo, rather than a also uses a Dragon capsule for its own privately run missions. The next one of those is due to fly next week on a trip chartered by Axiom Space , a Houston versions of the Dragon capsule are also used to ferry food and other supplies to the orbiting other option: Russia Russia's Soyuz capsules are the only other means of getting crews to the space station right Soyuz capsules hold three people at a time. For now, each Soyuz launch carries two Russians and one NASA astronaut, and each SpaceX launch has one Russian on board under a barter system. That way, in an emergency requiring a capsule to return, there is always someone from the U.S. and Russia on its first crew launch for NASA in 2020 - the first orbital flight of a crew by a private company - SpaceX enabled NASA to reduce its reliance on Russia for crew transport. The Russian flights had been costing the U.S. tens of millions of dollars per seat, for has also used Russian spacecraft for cargo, along with U.S. contractor Northrup other government launches The company has used its rockets to launch several science missions for NASA as well as military year, SpaceX also won a NASA contract to help bring the space station out of orbit when it is no longer Starship mega rocket is what NASA has picked to get astronauts from lunar orbit to the surface of the moon, at least for the first two landing missions. Starship made its ninth test flight last week from Texas, but tumbled out of control and broke apart.
