
How Congress Could Force $1.1 Billion in Cuts on Washington, D.C.
As Senate Democrats debate the House bill passed on Tuesday that would fund the government through Sept. 30, one flashpoint will be the legislation's impact on Washington, D.C. While the measure slightly decreases federal spending overall, it forces a crippling cut of more than $1 billion from the remaining six months of the District of Columbia's budget.
The House measure comes at a time when President Trump has floated a federal takeover of D.C. and Republicans have tried to weigh in on local bills, curbing the city's independence. The current spending bill could force layoffs at schools, the Police Department and other critical city agencies, compounding the economic troubles triggered by the administration's federal work force cuts.
Local officials point out that the city collected the tax revenue necessary to cover its 2025 $21.2 billion operating budget, so the congressional measure, if passed, would simply stop Washington from spending money it already has on the priorities it has deemed necessary to keep the city safe and prosperous. Representative Eleanor Holmes Norton, a Democrat who represents the District of Columbia as a delegate, but has no vote in the House, referred to the omission as 'nothing less than fiscal sabotage of D.C.'
Mayor Muriel E. Bowser has tried to strike a balancing act, taking a diplomatic approach toward Mr. Trump and pledging to work with him on shared priorities. She said on Monday that the spending cut would 'work against a priority that President Trump and I share, and that is to make Washington, D.C., the best, most beautiful city in the world.'
Here's what to know about the proposed freeze on D.C.'s budget.
Why does Congress have say over Washington's budget?
Washington's ability to govern itself has been limited for a long time. Under a law that established 'home rule' in Washington more than 50 years ago, Congress maintains power over the city, including final approval over its laws and annual budget.
But Washington generates most of its own money: It gets about 75 percent of its funding through local revenue. Another 24 percent comes through federal grants, while less than 1 percent comes from direct federal funds.
'Most folks, unfortunately, in this country think the District of Columbia is funded by the federal government,' Phil Mendelson, the chairman of the D.C. Council, said at a news conference on Monday. 'We are not. It is true that we are included in an appropriations act — not that we want to be.'
Typically, D.C. officials create a spending plan for the city, which is then approved by Congress.
How would the cut work?
During this latest struggle to fund the federal government, House Republicans omitted routine language approving the D.C. budget and treated the city like a federal agency.
While agencies have not yet approved their fiscal 2025 budgets, D.C. in June approved a $21.2 billion budget for 2025, 7 percent higher than the previous year's. Officials curbed some spending and offset the overall increase in costs by imposing additional fees, including a public safety fee on hotel stays, and by raising some business taxes, such as the paid family leave tax.
Congress initially approved the budget, but the House bill now forces D.C. to spend in line with its 2024 budget of $19.8 billion, as all other federal agencies are being asked to do.
'We are not a federal agency,' Mayor Bowser said at a recent news conference. 'Our budget was balanced and approved. And if we go back to fiscal 2024 levels, we would be forced to reduce spending by $1.1 billion in only six months.'
District leaders say that the sudden spending reduction is wildly unfair because Washington raises most of its own money but does not have final say over how it is spent.
What will this mean for the city?
District leaders have warned that the effects of the freeze would be 'devastating' for the city, most likely leading to layoffs in public safety and public schools.
That is partly a matter of timing. The city needs to scramble, within a matter of days, to find the necessary savings between now and the end of the fiscal year on Sept. 30. But a lot of its budget is tied up in contracts, leases and Medicaid, and cutting that spending would take time.
So local officials have warned that the most immediate targets would instead be salaries for city workers, such as police officers and teachers.
The city was already facing another kind of economic crisis. The Trump administration has fired thousands of federal workers, which could cost Washington around $1 billion in lost revenue of a different kind over the next three years, according to the city's estimate.
D.C. has also been working on a plan to balance its budget over five years.
Why is this coming up now?
The bill that carves this slice from Washington's budget is not focused solely on the city. It is part of a broad federal spending bill that lawmakers hope will avert a government shutdown. The most recent interim spending bill, known as a 'continuing resolution,' expires this week.
The measure passed by the House on Tuesday, now pending before the Senate, would fund the government through Sept. 30. While the previous continuing resolution approved the budget for D.C., this one does not.
What happens next?
Washington's fate is now in the hands of Senate Democrats, whose support is necessary for the federal bill to pass. 'I'm looking at options to force a vote on this critical issue in order to enable D.C. to continue operating under its current budget,' Senator Chris Van Hollen, Democrat of Maryland, said in a statement.
After a two-hour closed-door luncheon on Wednesday, Democrats were divided on whether to support the House legislation. Many of them are reluctant to do so because it enables the Trump administration to cut federal spending without consulting Congress.
Some lawmakers said that they could not give Mr. Trump a blank check to continue reshaping the government. Others, though, were wary of forcing a government shutdown, which could prompt political and economic consequences that extend well beyond Washington.
Lawmakers have until the end of March 14, when the current federal spending measure expires, to avoid a government shutdown.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
NIH scientists speak out over estimated $12 billion in Trump funding cuts
By Chad Terhune (Reuters) -Dozens of scientists, researchers and other employees at the U.S. National Institutes of Health issued a rare public rebuke Monday criticizing the Trump administration for major spending cuts that 'harm the health of Americans and people across the globe,' politicize research and 'waste public resources.' More than 60 current employees sent their letter to NIH director Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and members of Congress who oversee NIH. Bhattacharya is scheduled to testify Tuesday at the U.S. Senate appropriations committee about his agency's budget. Overall, more than 340 current and recently terminated NIH employees signed the letter, about 250 of them anonymously. In their letter, NIH staff members said the agency had terminated 2,100 research grants totaling about $9.5 billion and an additional $2.6 billion in contracts since President Donald Trump took office Jan. 20. The contracts often support research, from covering equipment to nursing staff working on clinical trials. These terminations "throw away years of hard work and millions of dollars" and put patient health at risk, the letter said. NIH clinical trials "are being halted without regard to participant safety, abruptly stopping medications or leaving participants with unmonitored device implants." Officials at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, which oversees NIH, didn't immediately respond to a request for comment. In prior remarks, Bhattacharya has pledged support for Kennedy's Make America Healthy Again agenda, and he has said that means focusing the federal government's "limited resources" directly on combating chronic diseases. At his Senate confirmation hearings in March, Bhattacharya said he would ensure scientists working at NIH and funded by the agency have the necessary resources to meet its mission. NIH is the world's largest public funder of biomedical research and has long enjoyed bipartisan support from U.S. lawmakers. The Trump administration has proposed cutting $18 billion, or 40%, from NIH's budget next year, which would leave the agency with $27 billion. Nearly 5,000 NIH employees and contractors have been laid off under Kennedy's restructuring of U.S. health agencies, according to NIH staff. Dr. Jenna Norton, a program director within NIH's division of kidney, urologic and hematologic diseases, was one of 69 current employees who signed the letter as of early Monday. She said speaking out publicly was worth the risk to her career and family. "I am much more worried about the risks of not speaking up," Norton said. "There are very real concerns that we're being asked to do likely illegal activities, and certainly unethical activities that breach our rules." About 20 NIH employees who were recently terminated as probationary workers or "subject to reductions in force" added their names to the letter. In the letter, Norton and other NIH employees asked Bhattacharya to restore grants that were delayed or terminated for political reasons, where officials ignored peer review to "cater to political whims." They wrote that Bhattacharya had failed to uphold his legal duty to spend congressionally appropriated funds. One program director at the NIH's National Cancer Institute, who asked not to be identified for fear of retaliation, said she has repeatedly been asked to cancel research grants for no valid reason and in violation of agency rules. She said she fears she could become the target of lawsuits from grantees challenging those decisions. Dr. Benjamin Feldman, a staff scientist and core director at NIH's Institute of Child Health and Human Development, said he and other researchers want to work with Bhattacharya on reversing the cuts and restoring the NIH as a "beacon for science around the world." "This is really a hit to the whole enterprise of biomedical research in the United States," Feldman said. Dr. Ian Morgan, a postdoctoral fellow at the NIH, signed the letter and said he has heard from university researchers about patients losing access to novel cancer treatments in clinical trials due to the uncertainty over NIH funding. He also worries about the long-term effect from gutting NIH's investment in basic science research that can lead to lifesaving treatments years later. The NIH employees, based in Bethesda, Maryland, named their dissent the "Bethesda Declaration," modeled after Bhattacharya's Great Barrington Declaration in 2020 that called on public health officials to roll back lockdowns during the COVID-19 pandemic. "Our hope is that by modeling ourselves after the Great Barrington Declaration that maybe he'll see himself in our dissent," Norton said.
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Laura Loomer faces internet backlash after ‘body shaming' AOC during NYC's Puerto Rico day
The Internet has come out in full force against far-right activist Laura Loomer after she 'body shamed' New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez — with Internet sleuths digging up a photo of the Trump ally in a similar-looking outfit. 'Yikes AOC has gained at least 50 pounds since getting into Congress,' Loomer wrote on X while sharing a clip of Ocasio-Cortez wearing a red dress as she spoke at New York City's Puerto Rican Day Parade on Sunday. 'She's getting massive,' Loomer added before tagging the congresswoman. However, social media users did not take kindly to Loomer's bizarre criticism. Her post drew in over 13,000 largely negative comments by Monday morning. 'Body shaming isn't the way,' one person commented under the post. Another chimed in: 'I am no Democrat but you attacking another woman's look is very disgusting.' Countless Internet users took the attack on AOC as a moment to dunk on Loomer's appearance. 'If I looked in the mirror and saw what you see staring back at me, I would never speak about another person's appearance,' one person wrote. 'You look like you're wearing a purge mask, no offense,' another chimed in. 'You are the last person who should comment on someone's appearance, Looner. You're a walking plastic surgery nightmare,' a commenter added. 'She could gain another 100 and still be more attractive than you,' another person wrote. Some users even dug up photos of Loomer donning a similar red tank top dress – which they claim looked even worse on the MAGA activist. 'Here's you in an almost identical dress. What's with the belly? Pregnant?' one person wrote. 'Haha good one, is this you?' another person wrote alongside the same photo of Loomer. Other took pity on Loomer's apparent cry for help, with one commentator writing,' You are not being a very nice person. Have you considered going to therapy? @betterhelp can help.'


New York Post
31 minutes ago
- New York Post
Kamala Harris slammed by California sheriff for 'embarrassing' statement on LA riots
A California sheriff has ripped Kamala Harris after the former vice president blamed President Trump for starting the anti-ICE protests that are wreaking havoc in Los Angeles. 'President Trump didn't start these riots. He's not out there lighting cars on fire, hurling projectiles at law enforcement or blocking freeways,' Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco said in a post on X as he shared Harris' remarks. 3 Kamala Harris blamed Donald Trump for the anti-ICE riots taking over Los Angeles. Connor Terry/ZUMA / 'This statement is an embarrassment and does nothing to diffuse the violent riots taking place across the city.' 'The Democrats and their 'leaders' own this,' he added. 3 Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco took aim at Harris on X Monday. Chad Bianco / Facebook Bianco, who is running for governor in 2026, lashed out Harris after she accused the Trump administration of 'stoking fear' by opting to deploy the National Guard to quell the violence. 'Los Angeles is my home. And like so many Americans, I am appalled at what we are witnessing on the streets of our city,' Harris said. 3 Bianco called Harris' statement an 'embarassment.' Fox News 'Deploying the National Guard is a dangerous escalation meant to provoke chaos.'