logo
Court blocks Donald Trump's birthright citizenship order for illegal migrants

Court blocks Donald Trump's birthright citizenship order for illegal migrants

A federal judge has blocked an executive order by US President Donald Trump that would have ended the ability for the children of illegal migrants to claim birthright citizenship.
Mr Trump issued the order upon his return to the White House in January, in effect denying citizenship to those born to parents living in the US illegally or temporarily.
But the order has been appealed on behalf of a pregnant woman, two parents and their infants on the grounds that it may infringe on the US constitution's 14th amendment.
The ruling by Judge Joseph LaPlante in New Hampshire puts the birthright citizenship issue en route to the Supreme Court.
Judge LaPlante issued a preliminary injunction blocking Mr Trump's order and certified a class action lawsuit including all children who will be affected.
"This is going to protect every single child around the country from this lawless, unconstitutional and cruel executive order," said Cody Wofsy, an attorney for the plaintiffs.
The order, which followed an hour-long hearing, included a seven-day stay to allow for appeal.
Numerous cases have been launched since Mr Trump's January order denying citizenship to those born to parents living in the US illegally or temporarily.
In the New Hampshire case, the plaintiffs are represented by the American Civil Liberties Union and others.
Lawyers for the US government had been arguing in court that the 14th amendment had been misinterpreted, and that the US could deny citizenship to children of women in the country illegally.
"Prior misimpressions of the citizenship clause have created a perverse incentive for illegal immigration that has negatively impacted this country's sovereignty, national security, and economic stability," government lawyers wrote.
Judge LaPlante said while he didn't consider the government's arguments frivolous, he found them unpersuasive.
He said his decision to issue an injunction was "not a close call" and that deprivation of US citizenship clearly amounted to irreparable harm.
"[Citizenship] is the greatest privilege that exists in the world," he said.
Judge LePlante's decision means the birthright citizenship issue is likely to return to the Supreme Court.
The justices could be asked to rule whether the order complies with their decision last month limiting judges' authority to issue nationwide injunctions.
Several federal judges had issued nationwide injunctions stopping Mr Trump's order from taking effect, but the US Supreme Court limited those injunctions in a June 27 ruling that gave lower courts 30 days to act.
With that timeframe in mind, opponents of the change quickly returned to court to try to block it.
AP
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US stops visitor visas for people from Gaza
US stops visitor visas for people from Gaza

Perth Now

timean hour ago

  • Perth Now

US stops visitor visas for people from Gaza

The US State Department says it is halting all visitor visas for individuals from Gaza while it conducts "a full and thorough" review. The department said a small number of temporary medical-humanitarian visas had been issued in recent days, but did not provide a figure. The US issued more than 3800 B1/B2 visitor visas, which permit foreigners to seek medical treatment in the United States, to holders of the Palestinian Authority travel document, according to an analysis of monthly figures provided on the department's website. That figure includes 640 visas issued in May. The State Department's move to stop visitor visas for people from Gaza comes after Laura Loomer, a far-right activist and an ally of President Donald Trump, said on social media on Friday that the Palestinian "refugees" had entered the US this month. Loomer's statement sparked outrage among some Republicans, with Randy Fine describing it as a "national security risk". Gaza has been devastated by a war that was triggered on October 7, 2023, when Palestinian militant group Hamas launched an attack on Israel, killing 1200 people and taking 251 hostages, according to Israeli figures. Israel's offensive against Hamas in Gaza since then has killed more than 61,000 Palestinians, according to local health officials. The US has not indicated that it would accept Palestinians displaced by the war. However, sources told Reuters that South Sudan and Israel are discussing a plan to resettle Palestinians.

In high-stakes summit, Trump, not Putin, budges
In high-stakes summit, Trump, not Putin, budges

The Australian

timean hour ago

  • The Australian

In high-stakes summit, Trump, not Putin, budges

Donald Trump wanted to go bold -- a high-pomp, high-stakes summit with Vladimir Putin to test whether the Russian leader would compromise on the Ukraine war. In the end, it looks like it was Trump, not Putin, who budged. Putin, visibly delighted as he stepped foot in the West for the first time since ordering the 2022 invasion, made no apparent concession at the talks at an Alaska air base. In a brief joint media appearance with Trump, who unusually took no questions, Putin again spoke of addressing the "root causes" of the Ukraine war and warned Kyiv and Europeans against disrupting "emerging progress" with the United States, the top defender of Ukraine under Trump's predecessor Joe Biden. Trump, who bills himself as a master negotiator, acknowledged there was "no deal" but said there were "very few" areas of disagreement, although he was vague on what they were. But posting hours later on his Truth Social account, Trump said he wanted Russia and Ukraine to "go directly to a peace agreement, which would end the war" and not a ceasefire. Trump's own administration had been pushing a ceasefire for months, with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky signing on after intense pressure from Trump. Putin had repeatedly rejected truce offers and kept up attacks on Ukraine, seeking to maximize battlefield advantage. - Putin again woos Trump - Trump had vowed to be firm with Putin after wide criticism of the US president's cowed appearance before him at a 2018 summit in Helsinki. But Putin again found ways to flatter and trigger Trump, who in his second term constantly speaks unprompted about his many grievances. Putin told Trump before the cameras that there would have been no war -- which Putin himself launched -- if Trump were president in 2022 rather than Biden, a frequent Trump talking point. Trump bemoaned the effect on ties with Putin of what he again called the "hoax" of the findings by US intelligence that Russia meddled in the 2016 election to help him. In an interview with Fox News host Sean Hannity after the summit, Trump said that "one of the most interesting things" Putin told him was about... the US voting system. Trump said approvingly that Putin -- who has held power in Russia since 2000 and was declared the winner of elections last year with 88 percent of the vote -- told him of the risks of mail-in ballots and said of Trump's 2020 loss to Biden, "You won that election by so much." US election authorities and experts have found no evidence of wide-scale fraud from mail-in ballots in the 2020 election, which Trump, uniquely in US history, refused to concede. - 'Shameful' or wait and see? - Trump's Democratic rivals voiced outrage that the summit secured no breakthrough and said it only served to normalize Putin, who faces an arrest warrant from the International Criminal Court. "By quite literally rolling out the red carpet, Trump has legitimized Russia's aggression and whitewashed Putin's war crimes. It's shameful," said Representative Gregory Meeks, the top Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs Committee. Experts said it was too early to write off the summit completely, as much is not known about what was discussed behind closed doors. Trump will meet Zelensky on Monday at the White House. Jennifer Kavanagh, director of military analysis at Defense Priorities, which backs US restraint, said that Trump's critics have been proven wrong in saying he would "give Ukraine to Putin or force Kyiv to accept surrender." "His focus has been and remains getting Putin to the negotiating table. Mr. Trump deserves credit rather than condemnation for his efforts so far," she said. But Kristine Berzina, a senior fellow at the German Marshall Fund, said an initial read was that "Putin scored a victory by showing up, and Trump's limited words and tense demeanor left Putin to control the narrative." "For a man so attached to showmanship, Trump unusually allowed Putin to be the star of what should have been the Trump show," she said. sct/md

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store