
Ceasefire or Not – Gold Is Still Declining
If so, what could make it actually rally?...
In yesterday's article entitled Trump's Art of the USD, I wrote that the Peak Chaos was likely reached and now the markets are likely to react to even moderate levels of chaos as if the latter was gone, or low. On top of that, it seems that Trump's previous plan to create uncertainty giving him leverage in negotiations is now turning into the stage where some results would be necessary. Please note that it's not just my own interpretation – it's what Trump wrote himself in his Art of the Deal book, which is now the blueprint for his actions.
That's probably why he's insisting on the narrative that Iran's nuclear facilities were completely destroyed despite the report from Pentagon says otherwise.
The latter confirms that we're likely headed into a period of greater stability, however unlikely it may seem given all that happened in the previous weeks.
Gold and mining stocks seem to be already sensing that as they are already declining. In fact, gold did something that it wasn't able to do months – it confirmed the breakdown below its rising support line.
The support line is based on the local bottoms that we saw in January and February. Gold price tried to break below this price four times: in March, in April, twice in May and once in early June. In each of those cases, the breakdown was quickly invalidated. By quickly, I mean that gold never managed to stay below this line for three days.
Until yesterday.
Yesterday marked the third consecutive daily close below this rising support line and since gold is not rallying today (and neither is silver), it seems that we'll get a fourth daily close below it soon. Gold is still holding above $3,300 per ounce, but it might not be for long.
On top of that, we see that this time gold first moved back to this trend line and failed to rally above it. This was a tiny verification, and now we have the final confirmation coming from the daily closes.
Same with gold miners.
Yes, the GDXJ did reverse before the end of the day, but it was still the lowest daily close recorded in June.
Plus, this ETF closed $0.01 (but still) below its highest April price. We still have several days left before the end of the month and given that gold is now declining almost regardless of what's going on in the world, it seems quite likely that we'll see GDXJ in the red in June.
For example, gold ignored USD's move to its recent lows.
When the USD Index declined to about 98 in April, gold soared.
When the USD Index declined to about 98 in early June, gold moved up, but not significantly so.
And now, with USD Index testing 98 once again, gold is declining.
Plus, the USD Index's turning point is about to be reached – the USDX has a tendency to reverse its course close to the turn of the month. Earlier this year, these were local tops, but in the previous years we saw many bottoms on those occasions. As the most recent move was to the downside, this might mark the final bottom.
Again, gold is declining despite the military conflict between Israel and Iran (and even regardless of the involvement of the U.S. bombers) as well as the move lower in the USD Index.
This is a clear sign that gold is ready to fall further – probably significantly so.
No.
I mean, anything could happen on the markets, but this is very unlikely in my view.
The USD Index is sitting on combination of very powerful support levels – the 38.2% Fibonacci retracement based on the 2008 – 2022 rally as well as the 61.8% Fib. retracements based on the 2018 – 2022 and 2020 – 2022 rallies.
Yes, issues like twin deficits remain unresolved, but let's keep in mind that the USD Index is a weighted average of currency exchange rates – and fundamental situations in the Eurozone and Japan are not really better than they are in the U.S. – and the same goes for other countries, but EUR and JPY have the highest weight in the USD Index.
Besides, broad bottoms in the USD Index are quite common – and the final bottoms quite often form close to the middle of the year, which is exactly where we are right now.
As you can see, in the recent years, there were two cases when the broad bottom formed between 50 and 60 trading days. In other cases, those bottoms took longer.
Consequently, with this bottom being formed over 47 trading days (as of today) is completely normal. In fact, if the USD Index rallies from here, it will be the shortest bottoming period in a long time.
This creates the opposite question – has enough time passed for the USD Index to form the final bottom? In my view, the answer is yes, as 47 is not far from 50, and Trump's decision framework now calls for some successes and stability. This should be positive for the U.S. dollar (while being negative for gold).
Did gold rally based on the increased (real and perceived) chaos in the previous weeks and months? Of course.
But does it mean that it will rally more? Not necessarily. Gold has not only managed NOT to rally despite further increases in chaos (Middle East), but even declining in this environment. This, plus the fact that Trump's Art of the USD now calls for results – and likely increased levels of stability – higher values of USD and lower values of gold are to be expected.
Thank you for reading my today's analysis – I appreciate that you took the time to dig deeper and that you read the entire piece. If you'd like to get more (and extra details not available to 99% investors), I invite you to stay updated with our free analyses - sign up for our free gold newsletter now.
Thank you.
Przemyslaw K. Radomski, CFA
Founder, Editor-in-chief
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


National Post
21 minutes ago
- National Post
NHL, NHLPA close to agreeing on a new collective bargaining agreement: Sources
The NHL and NHL Players' Association are on the verge of extending the collective bargaining agreement more than a year before it expires and expanding the regular season to 84 games. Article content The league and union have been in talks since April and are closing in on a memorandum of understanding addressing a number of high-profile topics long before the current agreement runs out in September 2026. The extension that could be announced as soon as Friday at the draft in Los Angeles would provide extended labor peace in a sport that has had multiple work stoppages, including the 2004-05 lockout that wiped out an entire season. Article content Article content Article content The league and union closing in on a deal was confirmed Thursday by three people familiar with the negotiations who spoke with The Associated Press on condition on anonymity because the deal had not yet been finalized. It was first reported by Daily Faceoff. Article content Two of the people said the new CBA will increase the regular season to 84 games from 82, shorten the maximum length of contracts and add a playoff salary cap for the first time. Extending the regular season from a total of 1,312 games to 1,344 would also come with curtailing exhibition play. Article content Since 2013, players have been able to re-sign with their own team for up to eight years and sign with another for up to seven years. Under the new CBA terms, each would be reduced by a year, to seven for re-signing and six for changing teams. Article content A salary cap in the postseason would prevent teams from using long-term injured reserve rules to load up their rosters. Currently, teams with players on LTIR can exceed the cap by roughly the amount of the players' salaries until the playoffs begin. The option has been used, for example, by Chicago (Patrick Kane in 2015), Tampa Bay (Nikita Kucherov in 2021) and the Vegas Golden Knights (Mark Stone in multiple seasons) during their playoff runs. Article content NHL Commissioner Gary Bettman and NHLPA executive director Marty Walsh foreshadowed a quick conclusion to labor talks speaking at the Stanley Cup Final earlier in June. Bettman said the sides were 'in really good shape, having really good discussions,' and Walsh added that talks were 'moving forward, and I feel good with where we are.' Article content A full, new CBA would be the first since 2013. The league and the union have been working on the memorandum negotiated in 2020 to finish that season during the pandemic and would meld that agreement with the framework from 12 years ago. Article content


Winnipeg Free Press
24 minutes ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
US signs agreements with Guatemala and Honduras to take asylum seekers
GUATEMALA CITY (AP) — Guatemala and Honduras have signed agreements with the United States to potentially offer refuge to people from other countries who otherwise would seek asylum in the United States, U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said Thursday at the conclusion of her Central America trip. The agreements expand the Trump administration's efforts to provide the U.S. government flexibility in returning migrants not only to their own countries, but also to third countries as it attempts to ramp up deportations. Noem described it as a way to offer asylum-seekers options other than coming to the United States. She said the agreements had been in the works for months. with the U.S. government applying pressure on Honduras and Guatemala to get them done. 'Honduras and now Guatemala after today will be countries that will take those individuals and give them refugee status as well,' Noem said. 'We've never believed that the United States should be the only option, that the guarantee for a refugee is that they go somewhere to be safe and to be protected from whatever threat they face in their country. It doesn't necessarily have to be the United States.' During U.S. President Donald Trump's first term, the U.S. signed such accords called safe-third country agreements with Honduras, El Salvador and Guatemala. They effectively allowed the U.S. to declare some asylum seekers ineligible to apply for U.S. protection and permitted the U.S. government to send them to those countries deemed 'safe.' The U.S. has had such an agreement with Canada since 2002. The practical challenge was that all three Central American countries at the time were seeing large numbers of their own citizens head to the U.S. to escape violence and a lack of economic opportunity. They also had extremely under-resourced asylum systems. In February, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio signed deals with El Salvador and Guatemala that allowed the U.S. to send migrants from other nations there. But in Guatemala's case it was to only be a point of transit for migrants who would then return to their homelands, not to apply for asylum there. And in El Salvador, it was broader, allowing the U.S. to send migrants to be imprisoned there. Mexico President Claudia Sheinbaum said Tuesday that Mexico would not sign a third safe country agreement, but at the same time Mexico has accepted more than 5,000 migrants from other countries deported from the U.S. since Trump took office. She said Mexico accepted them for humanitarian reasons and helped them return to their home countries. The U.S. also has agreements with Panama and Costa Rica to take migrants from other countries though so far the numbers sent have been relatively small. The Trump administration sent 299 to Panama in February and fewer than 200 to Costa Rica. The agreements give U.S. authorities options, especially for migrants from countries where it is not easy for the U.S. to return them directly. __ Sherman reported from Mexico City.


Globe and Mail
34 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Why One Top Analyst Is Bullish on Amazon Stock (AMZN) Despite AWS Cost Pressures
Amazon (AMZN) rose 2% on Tuesday to close at $212.77, and one top Wall Street analyst sees more upside ahead. In a new update, analyst Michael Morton at MoffettNathanson raised his price target on the stock from $250 to $253 while keeping a Buy rating, suggesting about 19% potential upside from current levels. Morton believes Amazon is well-positioned to beat profit estimates in 2025 and 2026, even as cost pressures rise in its cloud unit, Amazon Web Services (AWS). Confident Investing Starts Here: It is worth noting that Morton has a success rate of 70%, with an average return per rating of 22.5% over a one-year timeframe. Top Analyst's Take on Amazon The analyst said that while Amazon is known for its shopping business, its real profits come from AWS and advertising. Following Amazon's latest quarterly breakdown on segment-level depreciation, Morton updated his AWS forecast and believes that most analysts may be underestimating the rising costs from Amazon's large cloud investments. He expects Amazon to spend about '$200 billion from FY24 to FY26 ' to expand AWS, mostly on servers and network equipment, which lose value quickly over time. As a result, depreciation costs at AWS are set to rise from '13% in Q424 to 23% in Q426.' This could lower AWS profit margins by about 10 percentage points. Even with some margin pressure ahead, Morton remains upbeat about Amazon's outlook. He sees the next 18 months as strong, particularly for AWS margins in 2025. He expects Amazon to beat profit estimates in both 2025 and 2026, supported by strong demand, better cost efficiency, and steady growth in its high-margin advertising business. His updated price target of $253 reflects the view that Amazon's strong earnings performance in the near term is not yet fully priced in by the market. What Is the Price Target for Amazon Stock? Overall, Wall Street is bullish on Amazon stock, with a Strong Buy consensus rating based on 47 Buys and one Hold recommendation. The average AMZN stock price forecast of $243 indicates 14.21% upside potential. See more AMZN analyst ratings