City delays release of Palisades fire report at request of federal officials, mayor says
The U.S. attorney's office for the Central District of California made the request late last week, the mayor said. The city will not release the report until the conclusion of the federal investigation.
The delay comes more than seven months after the Palisades fire broke out in January, killing 12 and largely destroying the Westside neighborhood.
'We want to see the report. It's fire season. We need to know what worked and what didn't,' said Sharon Delugach, who serves on the city's Fire Commission, a citizen panel overseeing the Los Angeles Fire Department.
Delugach said commissioners had not been shown the report.
Officials believe the Palisades fire was first detected about 10:30 a.m. on Jan. 7 as high winds sent flames coursing through the mountainous area near the Pacific Ocean.
Much of the focus of the investigation has been on whether a blaze sparked by fireworks a week earlier — which firefighters believed they had put out — might have reignited.
That fire, called the Lachman fire, was reported on New Year's Day, and forward progress was stopped after just a few hours.
Still, investigators have not ruled out whether the fire was sparked on Jan. 7.
Because there are no power poles near the point of origin and the trail area is well traveled, the fire could have been caused by a person.
The city's report could answer questions about the LAFD's response to the fire. In the aftermath of the blaze, Bass removed LAFD Chief Kristin Crowley from her position, saying the top fire official did not contact her until after the fire broke out, despite worsening wind conditions.
LAFD officials had decided not to pre-deploy any engines or firefighters to the Palisades, which they had done in the past, despite being warned about the severe winds.
Several former top officials for the LAFD said the department could have deployed at least 10 additional engines to the Palisades to patrol before the fire.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
Former LA Fire Chief Files Defamation Lawsuit Against City For 'Unlawful Retaliation'
Former LA Fire Chief Files Defamation Lawsuit Against City For 'Unlawful Retaliation' originally appeared on L.A. Mag. Former LAFD Chief Kristin Crowley says that she was fired for "telling the truth" about department resources in the aftermath of deadly wildfires that tore through Los Angeles in January, and now she wants the city to pay for defaming her. In a lawsuit filed against the city Wednesday, L.A.'s first female and LGBTQ+ fire department leader said Mayor Karen Bass not only unfairly fired her, but has since undertaken a "smear campaign" to defame her. The war of words between Bass, who was traveling on a diplomatic mission to Ghana when the deadly wildfires exploded across Los Angeles County on January 7, and Crowley began after the former Chief spoke about her frustration that firefighters' efforts were hindered by tapped hydrants in the Pacific Palisades, understaffing and broken down rigs. "When Fire Chief Crowley confirmed to the public that Bass cut the LAFD's operating budget by $17.6 million, she was targeted and removed from her position. The Mayor and her office simultaneously launched a smear campaign built on falsehoods," according to Crowley's attorneys. "Integrity, truthfulness and serving others before self have guided me throughout the years," Crowley said in a statement Wednesday morning. "As the Fire Chief for nearly three years, I advocated for the proper funding, staffing and infrastructure upgrades to better support our Firefighters, and by extension, our communities." Crowley said the mayor then began to lie about, exaggerate and misrepresent the Fire Department's budget and issues. "As Firefighters, we run towards uncertainty and are willing to risk it all. Doing the right thing even when it is hard is always the right decision and that is why I am continuing to fight for the resources our Firefighters need to keep us all safe." Crowley wants the Mayor to apologize and retract all of what the lawsuit calls defamatory statements about her response to the fires. Crowley's attorneys say she was "demoted, sidelined, and denied opportunities to return to leadership roles for which she was qualified," by an angry Bass, who was heavily criticized for celebrating the swearing in of a leader in a country with a history of homophobia. Ghana's Parliament passed a 2024 Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill which criminalizes LGBTQ+ individuals and their supporters - an action that has received widespread international condemnation by human rights activists. "Former Fire Chief Crowley's tort claim presents her extensive advocacy efforts to obtain the funding and resources the LAFD needed to fulfill its public safety mission. It also shows Mayor Bass' repeated refusals to provide those resources," her attorney Genie Harrison said in a statement, adding that the former chief is putting herself "on the line" again to give Angelenos the truth about the sorry state of the Fire Department's resources. The lawsuit comes just hours after Bass announced that the city's after-action Report on the Palisades Fire - the cause of which remains a mystery more than seven months later - was paused after the U.S. Attorney's Office for California's Central District said the release could bungle what the mayor called an "ongoing investigation." The U.S. Attorney's office had no comment. The Mayor's office did not immediately return a request for comment on Crowley's lawsuit. This story was originally reported by L.A. Mag on Aug 20, 2025, where it first appeared. Solve the daily Crossword
Boston Globe
12 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Judge denies dismissal motion from Brian Walshe, charged with killing wife Ana Walshe in Cohasset
The night before Ana Walshe's disappearance, Freniere wrote, the couple hosted her former boss, Gem Mutlu, for a New Year's Eve party. 'Mutlu noted that the atmosphere on New Year's Eve was jovial, and Brian and Ana appeared very happy,' the ruling said. 'Mutlu described Brian as very attentive that night.' Advertisement The trio drank wine and champagne, Freniere wrote, and they all signed the champagne box, with Brian Walshe inscribing, 'Gem Ana Brian NYE 2023! To the Best Triumvirate Ever! Love Brian.' When Brian Walshe later told Mutlu his wife had gone missing, Freniere wrote, Mutlu asked if the couple had argued or if 'something happened.' The ruling said Brian Walshe replied, ''Did it look like we had an argument that night? You saw us. You know, you know you saw what she wrote on the - ' or words to that effect.' Advertisement The judge said grand jurors could make a damning inference from that anecdote. 'The grand jury could infer from such an interaction that Brian had used the New Year's Eve dinner with Mutlu as a facade so that Mutlu would deflect any suspicion away from Brian when Ana went missing,' Freniere wrote. Notably, Freniere wrote, Brian Walshe told Mutlu on New Year's Eve that he'd lost his phone and later told him he'd found it on Jan. 2. He told police the same thing on Jan. 5, adding that once he recovered the device, he tried calling and texting his wife and her friends about her disappearance. But phone records contradict that account, indicating Brian Walshe's phone was unlocked four times on Jan. 1 between roughly 8 a.m. and 12:45 p.m., when he was the only adult in the house. The phone was also unplugged from a charger at 1:42 p.m. on Jan. 1, one day before Walshe purportedly found his phone, the ruling said. 'The grand jury could infer that Brian lied to Mutlu about losing his phone on the night before he killed Ana, so Mutlu would corroborate that story to others including the police to explain why Brian had not been trying to contact Ana on Jan. 1, 2023 and why he had not told others she was missing,' Freniere wrote. She said the grand jury also heard evidence that on the Christmas weekend before the New Year's Eve gathering, Brian Walshe asked the couple's nanny to babysit their three children at 2 p.m. on Jan. 1, so he and his wife could go to brunch. Advertisement Freniere said grand jurors also heard testimony that Ana Walshe during the day on Dec. 31 went to a nail salon for a pedicure, telling another customer she had plans on New Year's Day to attend an 'elaborate dinner' with many courses in Marblehead without her children. 'Given evidence ... that Brian had told multiple lies about his and Ana's whereabouts on Jan. 1, 2023, it was reasonable for the grand jury to infer that Brian had also lied to Ana and [the nanny] about New Year's Day plans, and that he had done so to ensure that Ana did not make other plans and their children were occupied to allow himself time to further conceal his crime,' Freniere wrote. She said grand jurors also heard evidence that the couple's marriage was under strain owing to financial stress, physical distance with Ana Walshe living part of the week in Washington, D.C. for work, and Brian Walshe's In addition, the judge wrote, Ana Walshe was also having an affair with another man whom she communicated with via text and Instagram, and Brian Walshe told police he could sometimes access his wife's texts and Instagram account, where he could see 'messages people were leaving for Ana.' Brian Walshe also conducted an Internet search on Dec. 27 for 'Best state to divorce for a man,' learning from that inquiry that Massachusetts was the third-worst state for men splitting from their spouses, the ruling said. He also repeatedly searched on Instagram for the man Ana Walshe was seeing, according to the ruling. Advertisement And, the ruling said, the grand jury heard evidence that Brian Walshe was the beneficiary of 'multiple life insurance policies' that Ana Walshe had. 'From such evidence, the grand jury could infer that Brian knew about Ana's affair, thought their marriage was likely coming to an end, ... and viewed her death as more beneficial to him than a divorce,' Freniere wrote. Prosecutors have said Brian Walshe, after killing his wife, also made Those searches allegedly included 'how to embalm a body,' '10 ways to dispose of a dead body if you really need to,' 'how to stop a body from decomposing,' and 'how long before a body starts to smell.' The searches were conducted between 4:55 a.m. and 5:47 a.m. on New Year's Day of 2023, prosecutors said. Prosecutors also said investigators searched a dumpster near Brian Walshe's mother's residence, where they found clothes and jewelry he said his wife wore when she left home for a work emergency early on Jan. 1. Investigators also found a hacksaw that contained a bone fragment, officials said. He also allegedly disposed of her remains in dumpsters in Abington and Brockton. 'Where the evidence presented to the grand jury here established Brian took some steps before Ana went missing in furtherance of his later efforts to mislead the police investigation into her disappearance, it was sufficient to meet the probable cause standard to believe that he intended to kill Ana and that he decided to do so after a period of reflection,' Freniere wrote. Walshe, 50, is currently being held without bail. His next hearing is scheduled for Aug. 28, records show. His trial is scheduled to begin in October. Advertisement Material from prior Globe stories was used in this report. Travis Andersen can be reached at
Yahoo
12 hours ago
- Yahoo
Brian Walshe murder case: Judge denies another defense motion ahead of trial
Another key ruling was made Tuesday in the case against Brian Walshe, the Cohasset man accused of dismembering his wife, Ana Walshe, with a hacksaw and disposing of her remains after using his son's iPad to Google the best ways to get rid of a body. Judge Diane Freniere denied a defense motion to dismiss an indictment charging Walshe with first-degree murder on the ground that the grand jury heard insufficient evidence to sustain an indictment. In the motion filed last week, lawyers claimed that prosecutors violated Walshe's rights by not reviewing 'confidential materials' that could aid his defense. Prosecutors, however, argued that they are unable to review these materials due to federal regulations, as they are reportedly tied to the Karen Read murder case. The specifics of these materials and their connection to the Read case remain unclear. In denying the motion, Freniere stated that evidence presented to the grand jury was 'sufficient to meet the probable cause standard to believe that he intended to kill Ana and that he decided to do so after a period of reflection.' Brian Walshe motion to dismiss denied - Aug. 19, 2025 by Boston 25 Desk Prosecutors allege that Walshe killed his 39-year-old wife on Jan. 1, 2023, and misled investigators about her disappearance in early 2023. In March 2023, a Norfolk County grand jury indicted Walshe on a charge of murder, misleading a police investigation/obstruction of justice, and improper conveyance of a human body in connection with his wife's death. He has pleaded not guilty to those charges. Ana Walshe, a mother of three young children and a real estate professional who worked in Washington, D.C., vanished on New Year's Day 2023 and was reported missing a few days later, authorities said. Prosecutors have alleged that Walshe killed his wife in their Cohasset home on New Year's Day. The couple's three young boys were reportedly home at the time. Days after Ana's disappearance, a hacksaw and a blood-soaked rug believed to contain biological evidence were recovered from their home by investigators. Police later searched trash bins, dumpsters, trash trucks, and trash facilities in the areas where Brian Walshe traveled following her disappearance. Earlier this summer, Freniere issued a ruling allowing the prosecution to use evidence from Walshe's son's iPad, including alleged Google searches for the best ways to get rid of a body and how long DNA lasts, during the trial. Freniere determined that investigators did not exceed the scope of Walshe's consent when searching his devices, despite pushback from the defense. Prosecutors have also previously said that a broken knife with blood on it was found in the basement of the Walshe family home. The Norfolk District Attorney's Office previously said that it was awaiting DNA test results from dozens of items. In September 2024, prosecutors announced that they wouldn't call then-suspended-and-now-fired Massachusetts State Police trooper Michael Proctor to testify in Walshe's upcoming trial. Proctor was the lead investigator assigned to Ana Walshe's murder. State police suspended Proctor in July 2024 following Karen Read's mistrial. While testifying during Read's trial, Proctor received criticism for inappropriate texts he sent about Read. He was fired from his role with the law enforcement agency in March, and Read was acquitted of murder and manslaughter charges just months later. Walshe has been held without bail since his arrest. He is currently serving a three-year prison sentence for selling fake Andy Warhol paintings. His murder trial is scheduled to begin on Monday, October 20. Ana's body has never been found. Download the FREE Boston 25 News app for breaking news alerts. Follow Boston 25 News on Facebook and Twitter. | Watch Boston 25 News NOW
