logo
Family of woman allegedly killed by former boyfriend start petition for stronger federal action on domestic violence

Family of woman allegedly killed by former boyfriend start petition for stronger federal action on domestic violence

Calgary Herald3 days ago
The family of Madisson Cobb, a 23-year-old woman who was fatally shot on July 19 in a Calgary parking garage, are petitioning for stronger legislation around intimate partner violence.
Article content
The petition, started by Cobb's cousin Taylor Matusik, urges parliament to revisit Bill C-332 which, if passed, would amend the criminal code to include an offence of exercising coercive control of an intimate partner.
Article content
Article content
Article content
The petition states that Cobb was failed by 'the system designed to protect.' Prior to the murder, Cobb had taken out a restraining order against her ex-boyfriend, Devon Malik, who has been charged with first-degree murder in connection with her death.
Article content
Article content
'If laws stay the same, more and more innocent people are going to die, and are going to suffer more and more at the hands of their partners,' the petition reads. 'If we fight for a change, and fight for Bill C-332 in honour of my cousin, Maddie, we will be able to help save and better protect people, including young women and their children.'
Doug King, a professor or criminal justice at Mount Royal University, said the law would provide an additional layer of protection to those who have a restraining order against a former intimate partner, on top of protections that are already in place — as well as stronger punishments.
Article content
Article content
'There are other dimensions in the criminal code to provide protection, but the proposed law is particularly targeted to address issues related to violence against women and children,' King said.
Article content
Currently, the maximum punishment for criminal harassment or utterance of a threat is five years of incarceration, but Bill C-332 proposes a maximum of 10 years.
Article content
'Going to a 10-year punishment is a signal that … the notion of coercive control of intimate partners is a serious problem,' King said, 'and it's also a signal that what we're doing right now isn't working very well.'
Article content
Starting in 2023, Bill C-332 passed through three readings in the House of Commons, and two in the Senate. However, because parliament was prorogued in January, the bill won't necessarily just be picked up where it was left off.
Article content
Bills that have not yet received Royal Assent are terminated when parliament prorogues, and must either be reintroduced — meaning the process will start over — or they can be reinstated by a unanimous decision in the House of Commons.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Kinew pitching Indigenous Crown entity to review, approve economic projects
Kinew pitching Indigenous Crown entity to review, approve economic projects

Winnipeg Free Press

time21 minutes ago

  • Winnipeg Free Press

Kinew pitching Indigenous Crown entity to review, approve economic projects

The Manitoba government is proposing a new Crown corporation to proactively assemble Indigenous leaders for reviews and approvals of economic development projects. Premier Wab Kinew started meeting with First Nations and Métis policy-makers in the spring to pitch a 'Crown Indigenous corporation.' 'We need future generations of our people to know that, although we recognize and we stand firm in our treaty, we're willing, at times, to compromise and to make accommodations… that make sense, and this might make sense,' said Derek Nepinak, chief of Minegoziibe Anishinabe, also known as Pine Creek First Nation. The corporation is not simply a board to discuss co-management, but rather one that would create revenue streams with concrete benefits for the Anishinaabe people, Nepinak said. His initial understanding is that First Nations people would be represented on the governing board with just under half of all director seats. Brainstorming is taking place against the backdrop of a Canada-United States trade war and Prime Minister Mark Carney's related push to fund large-scale infrastructure projects. Kinew's office declined to comment on the initiative because of its early stage, but multiple sources confirmed the short-term goal is to secure federal dollars for local 'nation-building' projects. Such projects develop trade corridors, create good-paying unionized jobs and bolster Canada's energy production and natural resource development, as per Bill C-5, the One Canadian Economy Act. The federal legislation, a direct response to U.S. tariffs, allows cabinet to accelerate the approval of initiatives that fall into this category. It received royal assent on June 26, despite pushback from Indigenous groups that have raised concerns projects could be rammed through without their meaningful input. Exactly three months ago, Kinew penned a letter to the then-newly elected Carney to identify Manitoba's top development-related priorities. That list named expanding activity at the Port of Churchill, twinning the Trans-Canada Highway and fast-tracking exploration and extraction in the mineral-rich North. 'We can't forget what's at stake. We're at war with the United States. Maybe it's not a physical war where we're shooting guns or rockets, but it is a war that could cause so much damage and could hurt a lot of people,' said David Chartrand, president of the Manitoba Métis Federation. Chartrand, who oversees the MMF's economic development ministry, said he's worried about the growing financial stress his citizens and their neighbours are facing across the country. There's an urgency required to show Ottawa 'we're ready' as a province to undertake billion-dollar projects, he said. As far as Chartrand is concerned, establishing a board-run entity with proactive, built-in consultation processes would do just that. Pine Creek's chief echoed those comments, although Nepinak has trepidations about how the CIC will operate and the potential for projects to negatively affect waterways. He noted that consultation with Indigenous peoples who could be adversely affected by a nation-building project is explicitly spelled out in Bill C-5. The Assembly of Manitoba Chiefs is meeting later this month to discuss what's at stake with the Crown corporation concept. Nepinak said his conflicting feelings are tied to First Nations maintaining they have unceded title to land and resources in their traditional territories, and that has not been affirmed by the province. At the same time, government officials have extended an olive branch that could yield concrete benefits for Anishinaabe people, he said. He suggested this particular partnership could prove to be one example where compromise makes sense, owing to its potential to drive revenue and bolster the Canadian economy during a particularly difficult time. Tuesdays A weekly look at politics close to home and around the world. Nepinak said there's potential to raise revenue not only through commodities that come of new ventures, but also procurement and taxation. Manitoba Keewatinowi Okimakanak confirmed its involvement in meetings about the matter. The Manitoba Inuit Association indicated its leadership team was aware of the proposal, but it had not been contacted directly to discuss it. There are currently five Crown corporations in the province: Manitoba Hydro; Manitoba Public Insurance; Manitoba Liquor and Lotteries; Manitoba Centennial Centre Corp.; and Efficiency Manitoba. Maggie MacintoshEducation reporter Maggie Macintosh reports on education for the Free Press. Originally from Hamilton, Ont., she first reported for the Free Press in 2017. Read more about Maggie. Funding for the Free Press education reporter comes from the Government of Canada through the Local Journalism Initiative. Every piece of reporting Maggie produces is reviewed by an editing team before it is posted online or published in print — part of the Free Press's tradition, since 1872, of producing reliable independent journalism. Read more about Free Press's history and mandate, and learn how our newsroom operates. Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber. Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.

Democratic Detroit lawmaker Joe Tate drops out of US Senate race
Democratic Detroit lawmaker Joe Tate drops out of US Senate race

Winnipeg Free Press

timean hour ago

  • Winnipeg Free Press

Democratic Detroit lawmaker Joe Tate drops out of US Senate race

LANSING, Mich. (AP) — A Detroit lawmaker is dropping out of the race to represent Michigan in the U.S. Senate, he announced Friday, leaving three Democratic front-runners to compete in the primary. State Rep. Joe Tate, who was the first Black speaker of the Michigan House of Representatives, told The Associated Press on Thursday that he is suspending his campaign to move 'in a different direction of service.' He struggled to compete with the fundraising numbers put up by the three other Democratic candidates, U.S. Rep. Haley Stevens, state Sen. Mallory McMorrow and public health official Abdul El-Sayed. The race is likely to be one of the most watched in 2026, as Republicans seek to defend their majority in the U.S. Senate. 'The past three months have been wonderful, just to touch base with Michiganders,' Tate said of his campaign. Tate was the fourth Democrat to jump into the race after Democratic U.S. Sen. Gary Peters announced his intention to retire at the end of his term. The other three candidates far outpaced Tate in fundraising, according to recent campaign finance reports. Stevens reported a haul of $2.8 million, McMorrow brought it $2.1 million, and El-Sayed banked about $1.8 million. Stevens' amount includes $1.5 million she transferred from her previous U.S. House campaign. Meanwhile, Tate raised around $193,000 and reported having about $70,000 on hand as of June 30. Tate said he is looking into seeking reelection for his House seat. Tate stepped down as speaker after Republicans gained a majority in the November election. On the Republican side of the ballot, former U.S. Rep. Mike Rogers is running again after losing to Democrat Elissa Slotkin in the state's 2024 U.S. Senate race by just 19,000 votes. The way was all but cleared for him after GOP U.S. Rep. Bill Huizenga, who was exploring a run, announced in July that he would not seek the seat. Rogers' main campaign account reported bringing in about $1.2 million as of June 30, according to his Federal Election Commission filing.

Carney sidesteps a national dispute to claim small win in Métis meeting
Carney sidesteps a national dispute to claim small win in Métis meeting

National Observer

time3 hours ago

  • National Observer

Carney sidesteps a national dispute to claim small win in Métis meeting

Prime Minister Mark Carney just dodged a bullet in his ongoing efforts to secure Indigenous support for Bill C-5. This follows Thursday's meeting between the prime minister and Métis leaders from across Canada. The Métis Major Projects Summit, held in Ottawa, was the third of three summits Carney had promised the three Indigenous groups in Canada — First Nations, Inuit, and Métis — following widespread criticism over the failure to consult Indigenous leaders while Bill C-5 was being crafted. But it was nearly a disaster: the day before Métis leaders converged on Ottawa, one of their most powerful members — David Chartrand, president of the Manitoba Métis Federation (MMF) — denounced the prime minister's decision to invite both the Métis Nation of Ontario (MNO) and the Métis National Council (MNC) to the summit; as a result of their presence, Chartrand said that the Manitoba Métis would boycott the meeting entirely. 'Canada cannot ask us as the National Government of the Red River Métis to sit in a room with a non-rightsholder like the MNC, a body that has no legitimate path forward under its own bylaws, having lost all but two of its members — one of which is MNO,' Chartrand said on Wednesday. Chartrand was referencing a complex dispute that goes back several years, and illustrates the minefield of diplomacy Carney must navigate as he courts Indigenous leaders from across the country. It isn't just the federal government that some of those leaders distrust; many have longstanding conflicts with other groups and governments, making it virtually impossible for the federal government to gain unanimous support. The rift between the Métis organizations of Manitoba and Ontario marked a painful illustration of this dynamic. Few Indigenous leaders have been as vocally supportive of Bill C-5 as Chartrand, making him a key ally for the prime minister; losing that support would have been a serious blow. 'To the prime minister: the door is open,' Chartrand told reporters on Wednesday. 'If you want to come and sit down with my cabinet in a government-to-government relationship, we will meet. But if you want to insult us, then we'll see each other in a different political realm in the future.' Prime Minister Mark Carney just dodged a bullet in his ongoing efforts to secure Indigenous support for Bill C-5. This follows Thursday's meeting between the prime minister and Métis leaders from across Canada. Defusing an 'awkward predicament' Carney was able to defuse the situation, starting with a phone call Wednesday night. 'He called me, and we had a good chat,' Chartrand told Canada's National Observer, expressing sympathy for the 'very awkward predicament' that Carney was in. 'I don't blame him personally,' Chartrand said. During their phone call, the prime minister promised Chartrand a bilateral meeting in the near future to discuss how Bill C-5 would be implemented in accordance with Indigenous rights. 'We talked about the future, where we will be working to try to combat the issue that we face, and it's a serious issue … Trump, the regime of the 51 st state, that's serious stuff. The economic war is a serious matter.' The prime minister also sent the ministers of Crown-Indigenous Relations and Indigenous Services — Rebecca Alty and Mandy Gull-Masty — to meet with Chartrand and the Manitoba Métis Nation cabinet on Wednesday evening. That, too, was 'a very good discussion,' Chartrand said, though it didn't touch on C-5 specifically. Instead, the ministers promised that the MMF's long-awaited treaty and land claims would be prioritized by Parliament when it resumes in the fall, something Chartrand regards as a vital prerequisite to engaging on any major projects under C-5. 'That would give us the tools to become a real partner on these national projects,' Chartrand said of securing his nation's treaty and land claim, which would deliver a financial windfall 'in the billions' to the MMF; that, in turn, will enable the Manitoba Métis to finance their own nation-building projects. 'For example,' he said, 'we're finishing off the tendering for 600 megawatts of wind power in Manitoba — it's going to cost $450 to $500 million to put up those towers.' Inside the Summit While Chartrand didn't change his decision to boycott the Ottawa summit, several other Métis leaders did attend, including the president of the Métis Nation of Ontario, Margaret Froh. 'It was a very positive day,' Froh told Canada's National Observer. 'A very full day of good, positive, respectful conversation.' Asked what Canadians should make of the dispute between her nation and the Manitoba Métis, Froh said, 'I think Canadians need to know more about our history as Metis people. I'll say very simply, Ontario is home of the only Supreme Court of Canada decision that actually has recognized the Métis community with rights under Section 35 of the Constitution. … And the position that the Manitoba Métis Federation has been putting forward, this narrative that Red River Métis are the only Métis and that MMF is the only Métis government, completely defies the facts of history and common sense.' Rather than engage with that dispute, Froh said, 'We are looking forward to continuing our dialogue with the prime minister, with cabinet, with other Metis governments that will come to the table.' Froh's comments were echoed by Andrea Sandmaier, president of the Otipemisiwak Métis Government (formerly the Métis Nation of Alberta), who also attended Thursday's summit. 'There were a lot of like-minded people around that table today that want to move our Métis governments forward, and move Canada forward,' Sandmaier told reporters in a press conference after the meeting. 'So it was a great day, it was really good.' As with the two previous summits Carney held with First Nations and Inuit leaders, this one didn't delve into any specific major projects that either Carney or Métis leaders had in mind. Instead, Froh said, Métis leaders reiterated their concerns over proper consultation and made clear that 'we do support development, but never at the expense of Section 35 rights-holders.' Carney has promised that the major projects office will be established by Labour Day, along with an Indigenous advisory council whose composition and purpose was also a subject of discussion on Thursday, albeit without any concrete details. Asked if she supports Bill C-5 following the summit, Froh said, 'I actually do feel very hopeful coming out of today's conversation. I thought it was very respectful, very forward-looking, and we were really focused on rolling up our sleeves and doing the hard work together in order to make a better world for our communities and for the broader country.' By the end of Thursday, then, Carney managed to keep the support of those Métis leaders who attended his summit, along with that of the boycotting Manitoba Métis Nation. The real work will begin in the fall, once specific projects start to come into view. But for now, the prime minister can fairly claim to have snatched a small victory from the jaws of defeat.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store