Apple renames of one of its biggest brands in shock makeover – and I'm convinced the iPhone is next up for a new name
IS it time for the iPhone to get a new name? Absolutely – and it's looking likelier than ever.
Today, Apple decided to totally rebrand its operating systems. That's what your gadgets run on. We've got iOS for iPhone, iPadOS for iPad, macOS for Mac, and so on.
6
6
Their names had become a bit mad, honestly.
This year, we were expecting to see iOS 19, iPadOS 19, macOS 16, tvOS 19, watchOS 12, and visionOS 3. What a mess!
Thankfully Apple finally (and sensibly) said iBye to that nonsense, and replaced all of those numbers with the year.
So now we've got iOS 26, iPadOS 26, macOS 26, tvOS 26, watchOS 26, and visionOS 26 all due out later this year – and only likely to be replaced in September 2026. Then we'll get 27, presumably.
Now anyone can look at their iPhone and easily work out whether it's running the latest software.
And if you're buying a new model, it's fairly easy to check if it can get the latest download – or if it's going to be left abandoned without updates, features, and security fixes.
Yearly naming is just common sense.
You can see where I'm going with this. Apple, it's time to do the same for iPhone.
Later this year, Apple is widely expected to launch the iPhone 17. Please don't.
Call it the iPhone 26 instead and be done with it.
iPhone 16e review – I've secretly tested Apple's cheapest mobile and I love the new button but that's not the best bit
As a technology journalist, I'm regularly asked the same questions by people. 'What's the latest iPhone?', 'is that the latest iPhone?', 'what iPhone are we on now?', and 'is my iPhone the newest one?'.
I don't blame people for not keeping up. It's messy – but easily fixed.
It wouldn't be the first time Apple had skipped a number.
Long-time Apple watchers will not that there never was an iPhone 9.
6
6
We went straight from iPhone 8 to the (still curiously named) iPhone X, which stood for iPhone 10. This came out in 2017 in celebration of the 10-year iPhone anniversary.
But we needn't wait for 2027 for another iPhone rebrand. Let's just get on with it.
Apple is also clearly willing to experiment.
Remember the the iPhone 3GS? The iPhone XS? The iPhone 5C? Last year's iPhone 16e? They all had weird names, and Apple still flogged bucketloads of them.
Changing the name of the iPhone clearly isn't a mortal wound.
So let's ditch this whole bonkers naming system and just call it iPhone 26.
It'll get a few jokes on the first year, and then no one will think twice about it. It'll just work.
Samsung is already playing ball.
This year it released the Samsung Galaxy S25. The year before that? The Galaxy S24. And before that? The S23. Nice sensible names. Names you can take home to your parents.
Last year, Apple put out an iPhone 16 running iOS 18, that you could pair with an Apple Watch Series 10 and a pair of Apple AirPods 4. I spend all of my time thinking about tech, and even I struggle to keep up.
It makes sense for other products to not follow a yearly system.
The successor to the PlayStation 5 should not be called the PlayStation 2028.
That will only beg the question 'is there a PlayStation 2029?' the very next year. Parents would be driven to insanity.
But for annual (or near-annual) products – like the iPhone and software updates– it makes much more sense to just go with the year.
There's probably some marketing guru in Apple's Cupertino, California HQ worriedly predicting that releasing new iPhones with yearly names will make the old models sound even older – and put people off.
But that might also drive people to snap up the newer models too, so the grand Apple coffers won't go empty.
And it'll make it easier to buy older gadgets and refurbished devices, which is good for wallets and the planet.
It's time to get with the times. Literally.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
WPP Media cuts 2025 global advertising revenue growth forecast to 6% on trade concerns
June 9 (Reuters) - Global advertising revenue is expected to grow 6% this year, WPP Media said on Monday, lowering its earlier target of 7.7% due to uncertainty over U.S. trade policies. Advertisers are appearing to delay making new commitments to their marketing plans because of the shifting policies, according to a report by the media investment arm of ad group WPP (WPP.L), opens new tab. Digital ad spending by companies is a major driver of revenue for Alphabet-owned (GOOGL.O), opens new tab search giant Google and social media firms such as Meta Platforms (META.O), opens new tab, Pinterest (PINS.N), opens new tab, Reddit (RDDT.N), opens new tab and Snap (SNAP.N), opens new tab. Economic uncertainty is accelerating the adoption of AI tools in ad production and targeting, the WPP Media report said. Meta aims to allow brands to fully create and target ads with its AI tools by the end of 2026, the Wall Street Journal reported last week. Research firm Emarketer recently said companies that rely on traditional keyword-based search ads could lose revenue due to the growing popularity of AI-driven search ads. WPP Media now expects global ad revenue to reach $1.08 trillion in 2025, with 6.1% growth projected for 2026. Digital advertising is expected to account for 73.2% of the global revenue this year. In 2025, user-generated content will account for a greater share of ad revenue than professionally produced content, the report said. It forecast print advertising revenue will fall 3.1% to $45.5 billion this year, while search revenue is expected to grow 7.3%. WPP Media said brands are expected to prioritize flexible ad contracts, shift budgets toward media placements that reach consumers directly and focus on secure data strategies amid economic uncertainty. The U.S. remains the largest ad market and is expected to grow 5.6% to $404.7 billion, followed by China and the UK, according to the report.
Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
Chinese chipmaker YMTC sues rival Micron in US over spyware claims
June 9 (Reuters) - Chinese memory chipmaker YMTC has sued Micron Technology (MU.O), opens new tab in federal court in Washington, accusing its U.S. rival of spreading false claims that YMTC's chips threaten U.S. national security. YMTC in a lawsuit filed, opens new tab on Friday said Micron and a public affairs firm called DCI Group 'published and widely disseminated a portfolio of falsehoods' suggesting the Chinese tech company installed 'spyware' on chips that are used in mobile phones. 'The campaign maliciously and falsely linked YMTC's standard commercial memory products to military espionage, criminal conduct, and technically impossible malicious capabilities,' YMTC said in its lawsuit, filed by prominent U.S. law firm Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan. YMTC said the company's founding in China 'does not mean that it is a tool of the Communist Party or the Chinese military.' Idaho-based Micron on Monday declined to comment. DCI, which is based in Washington, did not immediately respond to requests for comment, and neither did attorneys for YMTC. The complaint said YMTC lost revenue and suffered reputational harm and accused Micron of violating federal false advertising and unfair competition laws. The Biden administration in 2024 added YMTC to a list created by the Defense Department to highlight firms it says are allegedly working with Beijing's military. YMTC has denied that its technology is for military use. In the new lawsuit, YMTC accused Micron of funding a website called 'China Tech Threat' that is already run by DCI. YMTC said the alleged advocacy 'far exceeded permissible bounds.' The company said it has suffered 'the loss of millions of dollars in sales to leading computer and consumer electronics manufacturers in the United States and abroad.' The lawsuit is seeking what it called 'corrective' advertising, unspecified monetary damages and disgorgement of profits from Micron. YMTC sued Micron in 2023 for alleged patent infringement. Micron filed counterclaims seeking a declaration that it is the rightful owner of the patents at issue in that lawsuit. The litigation there is ongoing. The case is Yangtze Memory Technologies Inc v. Micron Technology Inc and DCI Group AZ LLC, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, No. 1:25-cv-01795. For YMTC: Robert Schwartz and David Eiseman of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan For Micron: No appearance yet Read more: US considers more Chinese companies for 'entity list,' source says China chip maker YMTC says its tech not for military use after Pentagon list Chinese chipmaker YMTC sues Micron alleging patent infringement Biden blacklists China's YMTC, crackdowns on AI chip sector
Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
US State Department cable says agency using AI to help staff job panels
WASHINGTON, June 9 (Reuters) - The U.S. State Department will use an artificial intelligence chatbot to help it select the people who will perform annual reviews of promotions and moves, according to a cable issued Monday and reviewed by Reuters. The cable said that StateChat, an in-house chatbot which works using technology from Palantir and Microsoft, will be employed to pick foreign service officers for participation on the Foreign Service Selection Boards, the annual evaluation panels which decide whether and how to promote and shuffle around State Department employees. In a statement, a department spokesperson said the evaluations themselves "will not be done by AI." The boards, whose role is governed by the 1980 Foreign Service Act, play a critical role in the State Department's personnel promotion decisions, managing the annual process by which diplomats and others jump from one professional grade to the next. By statute, the boards are meant to include "a substantial number of women and members of minority groups." The State Department has been using StateChat since last year to transcribe notes, draft emails, and analyze diplomatic cables. Last week the agency's acting chief data and AI officer, Amy Ritualo, told a Palantir conference, opens new tab that StateChat had about 40,000 users across her agency. The program's role in the human resources process, however, has not previously been disclosed. Last month the State Department abruptly postponed the boards, and previously selected members received emails saying their services were no longer required. Monday's cable said that StateChat's technology would instead be used to "perform unbiased selection" for the boards based on employees' internally adjudicated skill codes and grades. That list would then be screened - for example for disciplinary and security issues - before being used to create the panels. There was no mention of female or minority representation. President Donald Trump's administration has repeatedly attacked what Republicans refer to as "DEI," a catch-all term covering work protecting civil rights, fighting discrimination, and boosting diversity. The American Foreign Service Association, which represents State Department employees, did not directly comment on the use of AI but said it was seeking clarification from agency leadership about how it intends to comply with its legal obligations around women and minority group representation. Palantir and Microsoft didn't immediately return messages. Although the deployment of AI by officials precedes Trump's reelection in 2024, his administration has aggressively expanded its use since his return to power. Last month Reuters reported that tech tycoon Elon Musk's U.S. DOGE Service was expanding its use of the AI chatbot Grok across the U.S. federal government. In April, Reuters reported that Trump administration officials had told some U.S. government employees that DOGE was using AI to monitor at least one federal agency's communications for hostility to the president.
