logo
Six Palestinians to stand trial in a deadly 1982 attack on a Jewish deli in Paris

Six Palestinians to stand trial in a deadly 1982 attack on a Jewish deli in Paris

Independent6 days ago
A terrorism court in France has ordered six suspected Palestinian militants to go on trial for an attack 43 years ago at a Jewish restaurant and deli in Paris that killed six people, a lawyer said Thursday.
Attackers t hrew grenades and then sprayed machine-gun fire into the Jo Goldenberg restaurant on Aug. 9, 1982 in the deadliest antisemitic attack in France since World War II, which also injured 22 people. Two of those killed were Americans.
Though four of the suspects remain abroad and likely would be tried in absentia, investigating judges have issued an order for a trial, which could begin early next year, said David Père, who represents victims. The Paris-based court does not publish its orders publicly, and generally does not respond to journalists.
The suspects are believed to have been members of the Palestinian militant Abu Nidal group at the time of the attack.
The alleged ringleader, Mohamed Souhair al-Abassi, also known as Amjad Atta, is in Jordan where authorities have refused to extradite him. Three other suspects are believed to be in either the Palestinian territories or in Jordan: Mahmoud Khader Abed Adra, also called Hicham Harb; Nabil Hassan Mahmoud Othmane, also known as Ibrahim Hamza, and Nizar Tawfiq Moussa Hamada, also known as Hani.
One of the defendants, Walid Abdulrahman Abu Zayed, had emigrated with his family to Norway and was extradited to France in 2020. The sixth defendant, Hazza Taha, was detained more recently in Paris.
Père, who represents dozens of relatives of the victims and one direct survivor, said the trial is 'historic' for them. 'For them, this is not about the past but the present. It's a trial they intend to follow day by day," Père told The Associated Press.
The one survivor represented by Père wasn't injured in the attack but remains traumatized by it. 'He wants to see the suspects and try to understand,' Père said.
Jo Goldenberg, the owner of the Jewish restaurant and deli, recalled the horror of the lunchtime attack during an interview in 2002.
'They fired on everyone who was eating lunch - everyone,' Goldenberg said at the time. The place, which has since closed, was a centerpiece tourist attraction in the Marais neighborhood.
French authorities announced in 2015 — nearly 33 years after the attack — that international arrest warrants had been issued for the suspects.
The Abu Nidal faction, named after its leader, is considered responsible for nearly two dozen attacks that left at least 275 people dead, including assaults on El Al Israel Airlines ticket counters at the Rome and Vienna airports in 1985 in which 18 people were killed.
The notorious Abu Nidal himself was found dead in his Baghdad apartment in August 2002. Iraqi authorities said Abu Nidal, whose real name is Sabri al-Banna, died by suicide.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Gala Bingo players who thought they had won up to £10,000 each from £1.6m prize pot are left with NOTHING as firm blames 'computer glitch'
Gala Bingo players who thought they had won up to £10,000 each from £1.6m prize pot are left with NOTHING as firm blames 'computer glitch'

Daily Mail​

time2 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Gala Bingo players who thought they had won up to £10,000 each from £1.6m prize pot are left with NOTHING as firm blames 'computer glitch'

Almost 2,000 players were left furious after they believed they had won up to £10,000 each from a prize pot of £1.6million. Some bingo players believed their lives had been changed on Monday night after scooping what they thought were legitimate prizes. But when they attempted to withdraw their winnings, they were told by Gala Bingo that the prizes were in fact glitches and they would not be able to cash the winnings. The glitch in the bingo company's system resulted in the prize pot increasing to £1.6million when it should have only reached a maximum of £150. As a result 1,188 players were left disappointed and out of pocket. The gambling site then sent out an email to it customers explaining the wins were a result of a technical fault. One couple believed they'd won almost £10,000 between themselves on the Monday-night game. The Scottish pair, who wished to remain anonymous, had hoped to spend their winnings on the funeral of a relative but were shocked to find their accounts frozen and the money nowhere to be seen. A Scottish couple had hoped to spend their £7,000 on a funeral for a family member who had recently died and were disappointed when they were told the winnings were not theirs to cash One player even had his account on the website frozen and claims he has had his chat room privileges stopped because he was encouraging others to complain The woman told the Daily Mail that her partner had recently lost his mother and was over the moon to find the 1p game providing winnings of up to £7,200. She added that they were relieved and planned to spent the jackpot on a fully pink-themed funeral in honour of his mother. The woman said: 'My partner went up to get his medication and when he came back and sat down he looked shocked. I double checked and it said we had won £2,400. We thought we could take care of the funeral with no worries about the expense.' But the Scottish native added that she feared something wasn't right when she saw there were as many as 1,000 winners and the jackpost was still available. But her and her partner continued to play and their fears were even soothed by the bingo chat room host who told them to enjoy their winnings. She said: 'I wasn't sure about it all but then the host said "enjoy your winnings" - they obviously didn't realise what was happening.' The 52-year-old woman said that some players were able to withdraw the money straight to their Santander bank accounts but others couldn't. She told the Daily Mail that since the shocking incident, Gala Bingo has frozen her and her partners accounts and even disabled her husband's chat room privileges. because of his complaining. As recompense, she said they had been given some money back in the form of vouchers but felt it wasn't enough. She said: 'My partner is angry and it's become all-consuming, especially at such a difficult time. this has just knocked him sideways. 'It's all been dealt with so badly, it wasn't right.'

Families demand change to parole rules for missing body murders
Families demand change to parole rules for missing body murders

BBC News

time3 hours ago

  • BBC News

Families demand change to parole rules for missing body murders

The families of two murder victims whose bodies have never been found have backed a bid to change the rules on Fraser and Suzanne Pilley were the focus of two high-profile murder investigations more than a decade of both women want the law changed in Scotland so that Parole Boards must take it into account if a killer refuses to reveal the location of their victim's present the law states that failure to reveal the location may - rather than must - be considered when deciding whether someone will be released from prison. The proposed change is contained in an amendment to the Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform Bill which has been tabled by Liberal Democrat MSP Jamie Secretary Angela Constance said the Scottish government remained "fully committed" to supporting the families said they were "relieved" by that support. Speaking during an emotional press conference, Carol Gillies said she felt guilty to be alive after the death of her sister, Arlene, at the age of husband Nat Fraser, 53, is serving a life sentence for the mother-of-two's murder and would eligible for parole in October Gillies said that not knowing what happened to her sister was "a form of mental torture" and that Fraser had a choice to reveal what he knows."I feel that he controlled Arlene when she was alive and he is controlling her when she is dead," she was last seen on 28 April 1998 when she waved her son and daughter off to school from their home in Elgin, then vanished without a trace. Suspicion quickly fell on her husband Nat, who had previously assaulted his was later charged with her murder alongside his friend, Hector Dick, and a third man, Glenn went on trial in January 2003. In a dramatic twist Mr Dick and Mr Lucas were freed, leaving Fraser alone in the Dick, who became a witness for the prosecution, told the trial that Arlene's husband had hired a hitman to kill her, burn her body and ground up the jury found Fraser guilty of murder and he was jailed for a minimum of 25 conviction was quashed in 2009 and Fraser stood trial for a second time in was again found guilty and ordered to serve at least 17 years in prison for what the judge described as a "shocking and wicked" crime. Suzanne Pilley was captured on CCTV as she got the bus to work in Edinburgh city centre on the morning of 4 May 2010 - but she never arrived at her would later emerge that the bookkeeper had been lured to the basement of the building in Thistle Street by her colleague David Gilroy.A court later heard he murdered her there and hid her body in a Pilley, 38, had recently ended her year-long secret relationship with Gilroy, who was described in court as possessive and following day the married father-of-two drove his silver Vauxhall Vectra more than 130 miles from Edinburgh to Lochgilphead, Argyll and used CCTV to map Gilroy's movements and found it took him five hours and eight minutes to drive from Tyndrum to Inverary - a journey which should take 36 minutes. Gilroy, who turned his phone off to cover his tracks, is believed to have buried Ms Pilley in remote forest but despite extensive searches no trace of her has ever been 49-year-old was jailed for life at the High Court in Edinburgh in April was ordered to serve at least 18 years in prison and will be eligible to apply for parole in March sentencing, Lord Bracadale told him: "I hope that the day will come in your life when you feel able to disclose that information and that may bring some comfort to her bereft family." Suzanne's mother, Sylvia Pilley, said her daughter's life had been cut short."She really wanted a family and she was never given that. We miss her every day so that's really why we are doing it," she said at the press sister, Gail Fairgrieve, said she lived with the trauma of Gilroy's actions every said: "What the Parole Board need to understand is that his crimes are still continuing."Ms Fairgrieve also called for Scotland to go even further and follow the example of Australia where several states have a "no body, no parole" will debate the proposals next month and Victim Support Scotland hope the legislation will be passed before the Holyrood election next changes in Scotland mirror Helen's Law south of the border. It is named after Helen McCourt, from Merseyside, whose killer Ian Simms was freed from jail without disclosing the location of her legislation, known as Charlotte's Law, will be brought forward before the next North Ireland assembly election. Murders without a body Other Scottish cases where no body was found include:Allison McGarrigle, who vanished in June 1997 and was formally declared dead eight years later. Paedophiles Charles O'Neill and William Lauchlan were later jailed for her Spence, who disappeared in April 2011. Colin Coats and Philip Wade were found guilty of abducting, torturing and murdering the Fleming, a vulnerable 19-year-old who was killed by Edward Cairney and Avril Jones between December 1999 and January 2000. Jones then continued to claim £182,000 in benefits until it finally emerged Margaret was missing in October 2016. The pair were finally convicted in July 2019. Liberal Democrat MSP Jamie Greene told the BBC's Good Morning Scotland programme that withholding the whereabouts of a body should be "an important part of the consideration" for said: "There are grieving families out there who have been unable to find closure throughout this process."And there are people, who they see that could be released from prison, that still know to this day where the remains of their loved ones are."I think that's morally indefensible. So do the families and many of the organisations that support them." 'Complex process' Defence Edith Forrest KC told the programme she had every sympathy with the families of murder victims who had never been she said she thought the proposed amendment to the bill would "make little difference to how the Parole Board approach such cases". "Rule 12 is specifically directed at prisoners who withhold that sort of information and whether they may take that into account. Almost inevitably that is exactly the information they would consider in the parole assessment."The Parole Board is there to assess risk, and that is a complex process, and something like that is exactly the sort of thing they would be looking at."Justice Secretary Angela Constance said the families had endured a "terrible journey".She said the Scottish government was "fully committed" to the amendment and there was "no risk of it being watered down".Constance said: "I want to see a strengthening of the law, a law that will require that the Parole Board must take into consideration if a prisoner has not disclosed the remains of their victim."The amendment is also supported by Victim Support executive Kate Wallace said: "It is a simple change of one word, but the impact on the families who have lost a loved one in this way will be enormous."

Solicitor at UK libel firm facing tribunal over threat allegations tied to fake cryptocurrency
Solicitor at UK libel firm facing tribunal over threat allegations tied to fake cryptocurrency

The Guardian

time4 hours ago

  • The Guardian

Solicitor at UK libel firm facing tribunal over threat allegations tied to fake cryptocurrency

A solicitor at one of Britain's best known libel law firms is facing prosecution before a disciplinary tribunal over allegations that she made inappropriate threats. The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) announced today that it had decided to prosecute Claire Gill, a partner at Carter-Ruck. The decision was taken in March earlier this year. In a statement published on its website the SRA said that a tribunal 'has certified that there is a case to answer in respect of allegations which are or include that, on or around 26 April 2017, Ms Gill sent or arranged to be sent correspondence which contained an improper threat of litigation'. It added that the allegations were subject to a full hearing and were as yet unproven. SRA cases are heard by the independent Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal, which can issue an unlimited fine or bar a solicitor from the profession. Carter-Ruck as a firm is not being prosecuted by the SRA. The nature of the threat, and the identity of the client on whose behalf Gill issued it, are not stated in the SRA announcement. However it is understood that the case relates to Gill's work for OneCoin, which was later established to be a multi-billion dollar fake cryptocurrency, and its founder, Ruja Ignatova. In 2023 the Bureau of Investigative Journalism reported on threats from Carter-Ruck on behalf of OneCoin and Ignatova, including a letter sent on 26 April 2017 to Jen McAdam, a OneCoin victim. The letter was obtained and published by the thinktank Tax Policy Associates and its founder, Dan Neidle, who complained about Gill to the SRA. In the letter published by Neidle, Gill accused McAdam of posting links to online videos alleging that OneCoin was a fraud. 'The statements you have published … go way beyond what may be considered to be legitimate debate,' Gill wrote to McAdam. 'You can be in no doubt therefore of the damage being caused to our clients' reputation and business.' In a statement Carter-Ruck said: 'We are disappointed by the SRA's decision to bring these proceedings against our colleague, who we will be fully supporting in her defence of this matter.' McAdam posted on X that she was unable to comment. The case comes amid public concern about so-called strategic litigation against public participation, or 'slapp', actions involving lawyers being accused of trying to improperly stifle public debate on behalf of clients. Sign up to Headlines UK Get the day's headlines and highlights emailed direct to you every morning after newsletter promotion Ignatova, a Bulgarian national, was the subject of the BBC's podcast The Missing Cryptoqueen, which chronicled the evolution and eventual collapse of the OneCoin fraud and the search for the mysterious Ignatova, who vanished in 2018. Ignatova remains wanted by the FBI in connection with OneCoin, and a reward has been offered for information leading to her arrest or conviction. She was charged with fraud and money laundering offences in the US in 2018, but her whereabouts remain unknown. In 2024 the BBC reported on claims published in the Bulgarian press that the true masterminds of the fraud were members of the Bulgarian mafia, and that Ignatova could have been murdered, dismembered and dumped in the Ionian Sea after the mafia considered her to have become a liability.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store