logo
DHS used a Thomas Kinkade painting to push ‘anti-immigration' homeland message. His family is livid

DHS used a Thomas Kinkade painting to push ‘anti-immigration' homeland message. His family is livid

Independent30-07-2025
Immigration officials used late artist Thomas Kinkade's painting in a social media post pushing the Trump administration's anti-immigration agenda — a move that the painter's family 'strongly condemns.'
President Donald Trump vowed to execute ' the largest deportation program in American history' and his administration has set a goal to remove 1 million undocumented immigrants each year. Now, his Department of Homeland Security is amplifying his anti-immigration agenda by sharing American painters' works that honor the country's history.
'Protect the Homeland,' the department wrote in a social media post on July 1, alongside a photo of Kinkade's 'Morning Glory' painting that depicts children on their way to a quaint schoolhouse with an American flag flying next to it. The artist died in 2012, but his family now says they are 'deeply troubled' by the use of the artwork.
That prompted the family to release its own statement to blast the use of his artwork.
'We strongly condemn the sentiment expressed in the post and the deplorable actions that DHS continues to carry out. Like many of you, we were deeply troubled to see this image used to promote division and xenophobia associated with the ideals of DHS, as this is antithetical to our mission,' the Kinkade Family Foundation wrote in a statement on its website.
The use of this painting was 'unauthorized,' the foundation said, noting it has requested that DHS remove the post.
'We stand firmly with our communities who have been threatened and targeted by DHS, especially our immigrant, BIPOC, undocumented, LGBTQ+, and disabled relatives and neighbors.'
Kinkade, born in California in 1938, was known for his idyllic landscape paintings and use of light and vibrant colors in his works. Many of his paintings featured scenes of quintessential American life, with some capturing nationally recognized landmarks such as the Golden Gate Bridge or Times Square, while others illustrated quaint countryside scenes, namely cottages dotted by radiant flowers.
Although he was dubbed the 'Painter of Light,' he endured dark periods in his life. He had a rough upbringing rocked by financial instability and later suffered from substance abuse issues, which ultimately led to his sudden death at just 54 years old in 2012, leaving behind his four daughters.
A DHS spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin told the Washington Post that the agency was paying tribute to artwork that 'celebrates America's heritage and history.'
'If the media needs a history lesson on the brave men and women who blazed the trails and forged this republic from the sweat of their brow, we are happy to send them a history textbook,' she told the paper. 'This administration is unapologetically proud of American history and American heritage.'
It's not immediately clear if the DHS plans to take down the post. As of Wednesday morning, the post is still on X. The Independent has reached out to the DHS for more information about whether it plans to take down the post.
According to a statement from Thomas Kinkade Studios about the painting, the artist 'absolutely knew that the United States was a beacon of hope for the world, promising fundamental justice and dignity for all those living here and help for those not allowed their basic human rights no matter where they might be.'
Kinkade's painting is one of several works of art that the department has shared on its social media in the past few weeks alongside anti-immigration messages.
On July 14, the department shared Morgan Weistling's 'A Prayer for a New Life" — but mistitled it — and attached the message: 'Remember your Homeland's Heritage.'
On July 23, the agency posted John Gast's 'American Progress' painting alongside the caption: 'A Heritage to be proud of, a Homeland worth Defending.'
In response to the Washington Post 's article about the DHS's pattern of posting the paintings, the agency addressed the publication directly — and posted Edward Percy Moran's 'The Birth of Old Glory' painting.
'Dear @washingtonpost, add this one to your story. This administration is unapologetically proud of American history and American heritage. Get used to it,' the agency wrote.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tim Scott smacks down CBS anchor over Trump question
Tim Scott smacks down CBS anchor over Trump question

Daily Mail​

time24 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Tim Scott smacks down CBS anchor over Trump question

A top Republican in the U.S. Senate stepped up to defend his Christian faith and relationship with President Trump during an interview on CBS Tuesday. Republican South Carolina Senator Tim Scott appeared on 'CBS Mornings Plus' to promote his new book on Christian faith in America. CBS anchor Adriana Diaz bluntly asked Scott about how he reconciles his 'support for President Trump when many people see his actions as lacking Christian values.' Diaz mentioned Trump's hardline immigration policies as well as cuts to foreign aid. Scott, a practicing Christian, fired back: 'Being able to put ourselves back on solid ground is really important.' He then listed off a slew of actions taken under Trump, which he sees as policy wins for all Americans, including Christians, including his big tax bill and lowering inflation. 'When we passed the Trump tax cuts in 2017, we lowered the taxes for a single mother by 70%. If you look at the expansion of the child tax credit, $2,200 today, it was $2,000 when we first passed it, it was only $1,000 before we passed it,' Scott said, harkening back to Trump's first term. On foreign aid, Scott pointed to Trump's action on PEPFAR, the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, which Trump has 'reinforced' to provide 'billions of dollars to Africa for AIDS.' 'I would say, without any question, the most compassionate approach to providing the best future for the American people is by giving them as many of their resources to make their own decisions,' Scott argued. The South Carolina Republican was additionally asked if he agreed with Trump's recent firing of the Commissioner of the Bureau of Statistics (BLS). Although Scott did not give a direct answer on whether or not he believed the former BLS Commissioner had been a 'political hack,' he did share the belief that the agency had been 'mismanaged.' Trump and Scott have had a long history together, as far back as their time as rivals during the 2016 presidential primary election. Scott is the longest-serving African American in U.S. Senate history, and the only one to have served in the House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate. The senator is doing media rounds to promote his new book on Christian faith in America, 'One Nation Always Under God: Profiles in Christian Courage.' In the book, Scott's overall argument is that America has shifted from its Judeo-Christian values. Scott has long been outspoken about his Christian faith. Fox News host Ainsley Earhardt then asked Noce how she knew Scott was 'the one.' 'God shows you the path,' Noce responded. She added that she ignores critics who say they got married because he was a presidential nominee and are 'upset he is a black man.' Tim Scott became a stepfather after marrying Mindy Noce last year. Fox & Friends host Ainsley Earhardt questioned the couple about the criticism they've received - particularly from ABC's The View, who suggested the senator only got engaged to be in the running for vice president. 'They are ridiculous, period. It is not just comments about me, they get paid to tear people down,' Scott replied. He added he 'goes into prayer' when the negativity about their relationship surfaces.

Dolphins quarterback Tua Tagovailoa says sitting on Trump's sports council will be ‘an honor'
Dolphins quarterback Tua Tagovailoa says sitting on Trump's sports council will be ‘an honor'

The Guardian

time24 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Dolphins quarterback Tua Tagovailoa says sitting on Trump's sports council will be ‘an honor'

Miami Dolphins quarterback Tua Tagovailoa has spoken of his pride at being named to Donald Trump's council on sports, fitness, and nutrition. Tagovailoa joins two other current NFL stars on the council, Nick Bosa and Harrison Butker, who have been backers of Trump's Maga movement. While Tagovailoa has not publicly expressed his support for the president, who once described NFL players who knelt for the national anthem as 'sons of bitches', he said he was happy to align himself with Trump. 'I think it's pretty cool – it's an honor, [to serve on the council]' Tagovailoa said on Wednesday. 'I don't know too much about it, but it's an honor.' Trump has revitalized the council under an executive order that will also being back the presidential fitness test for American children, which was phased out during the Obama administration. Tagovailoa said he did not know why he had been named to the council. When Trump announced the council's members he mispronounced Tagovailoa's name. On Wednesday. the quarterback laughed off the president's error. 'I don't think he's had the worst – I heard a couple worse at Alabama,' said Tagovailoa. 'It is what it is, I don't take that to heart.' Earlier this week, Philadelphia Eagles running back Saquon Barkley said he had declined his invitation to sit on the council. 'A couple months ago, it was brought to my team about the council,' Barkley told reporters after Monday's Eagles practice session. 'So I'm not really too familiar with it. I felt like that I am going to be super busy. Me and my family thought it would probably be of best interest to not accept that. I was definitely a little shocked when my name was mentioned. I'm assuming it's something great, so I appreciate it but was a little shocked when my name was mentioned.' NFL commissioner Roger Goodell will also be a member of the council.

A far-right ‘1st Amendment' group lost its defamation lawsuit. Now the New York Times is suing them back
A far-right ‘1st Amendment' group lost its defamation lawsuit. Now the New York Times is suing them back

The Independent

time26 minutes ago

  • The Independent

A far-right ‘1st Amendment' group lost its defamation lawsuit. Now the New York Times is suing them back

The New York Times is firing back against the far-right 'paramilitary group' that accused the paper of defamation, filing a new lawsuit after the organization's $100 million case was thrown out of court. In a complaint that was filed in New York this week, the Times is suing 1st Amendment Praetorian for 'reasonable costs, attorney's fees, and disbursements pursuant to New York Civil Rights Law' while noting that the paper incurred at least $50,000 in legal fees defending against the organization's 'meritless' litigation. It is a lawsuit under anti-SLAPP provisions designed to protect First Amendment rights. 'Judge [Mary Kay] Vyskocil's careful opinion granting our motion to dismiss recognized that the claims against The Times were meritless,' a New York Times spokesperson told The Independent. 'New York's anti-SLAPP law therefore requires that 1st Amendment Praetorian pay the costs of The Times's defense. Fee shifting is an important deterrent to frivolous lawsuits against the press and The Times looks forward to recovering its costs.' The Independent has reached out to the 1st Amendment Praetorian for comment. 1st Amendment Praetorian, otherwise known as 1AP, initially brought its lawsuit against the Times in January 2023 in response to several articles the outlet published about the scrutiny the group had received surrounding the January 6 Capitol attack. These reports were in relation to the House committee that investigated January 6 issuing a subpoena to 1AP and its founder Robert Patrick Lewis in November 2021. 'The subpoena compelled 1AP to produce documents pertaining to the events leading up to and transpiring on that day. The Committee specifically sought documents related to the security that 1AP had provided to allies of President Trump—including Stop the Steal campaign organizer Ali Alexander and Lt. Gen. Michael T. Flynn—as well as various social media posts made by 1AP on or around January 6, among other materials,' the Times noted in its complaint this week. 'The subpoena also compelled Mr. Lewis to appear for a deposition before the Committee.' Following the subpoena of Lewis, the Times published an article in January 2022 that reported on the close ties 1AP had with allies of Donald Trump who were looking to undermine confidence in the results of the 2020 presidential election, which Trump lost to Joe Biden. 'By their own account, members of the 1st Amendment Praetorian helped to funnel data on purported election fraud to lawyers suing to overturn the vote count,' Times reporter Alan Feuer reported in that article. 'They guarded celebrities like Michael T. Flynn, Mr. Trump's former national security adviser, at 'Stop the Steal' rallies, where huge crowds gathered to demand that Mr. Trump remain in office. And they supported an explosive proposal to persuade the president to declare an emergency and seize the country's voting machines in a bid to stay in power.' In subsequent articles by Feuer later that year, it was noted that 1AP had provided security for Flynn amid Trump's efforts to overturn the election results, adding that the group also helped former Trump lawyer Sidney Powell gather open-source intelligence about claims of election fraud. Additionally, citing the House committee's description of the organization, 1AP was described as 'far-right,' 'extremist,' and a 'paramilitary group' similar to the Oath Keepers and Proud Boys. 1AP filed a $100 million lawsuit in January 2023 against the Times and Feuer, alleging that the articles and social media posts sharing the pieces defamed the group by 'stating or implying to their Twitter followers and readers that 1AP 'stormed the Capitol' on January 6, 2021.' The paper would reply in court that none of the social media posts presented in the complaint mentioned 1AP and that the articles in question never stated that the group stormed the Capitol. 1AP would later file an amended complaint that alleged the Times made 24 materially false statements about the group, once again seeking $100 million in compensatory and punitive damages. In March of this year, the court granted the Times' motion to dismiss the complaint with prejudice. In its ruling, the court stated that 1AP not only failed to sufficiently show that the Times published any alleged defamatory statements with actual malice, but also didn't show 'any level of specificity' with its defamation claim. Beyond that, many of the supposed defamatory statements the group highlighted were not 'of or concerning' 1AP, with the group also failing to even show that many of the statements were false. Meanwhile, at the time of its lawsuit, Rolling Stone suggested that 1AP was taking on a highly litigious stance in an effort to distance itself from other right-wing organizations and figures associated with the Capitol attack. Instead, the organization was attempting to rebrand itself as a 'civil liberties group' and 'non-partisan.' 'The litigation is part of a pattern of high-dollar defamation suits brought by 1AP that are ostensibly attempting to clear its reputation,' the magazine reported in February 2023. 'Seen in another light, the lawsuits present a vivid irony: They are filed by an organization that presents itself as a protector of first amendment rights, against parties who've leveraged their own freedom of the press to raise concerns about 1st Amendment Praetorian.' Rolling Stone added: 'The court blitz complicates efforts to scrutinize 1AP, which the Jan. 6 Committee's final report describes as a 'paramilitary group,' and whose founder Lewis has touted the need for a 'second American revolution.'' Citing New York's anti-SLAPP law, which gives publishers increased protections against frivolous lawsuits and allows them to recover damages incurred in defending against those complaints, the Times is now demanding that 1AP pay its attorneys' fees in the dismissed case. ' The Times incurred more than $50,000 in legal fees and costs to defend against 1AP's lawsuit that had no basis in law or fact,' this week's complaint alleges, adding: 'The District Court's opinion makes clear that 1AP both commenced and continued its Action without a substantial basis in fact and law.' The New York Times pushing back against a Trump-adjacent organization over what was ultimately deemed a frivolous and baseless complaint comes at a time when the current president has used the courts to bully media companies with his own 'meritless' lawsuits. Trump, who is currently suing the Wall Street Journal and its owner Rupert Murdoch for $10 billion over a Jeffrey Epstein article, recently obtained a $16 million settlement from Paramount in his lawsuit over a CBS News interview with Kamala Harris. That settlement – which was similar in the amount Disney paid Trump to settle his ABC News lawsuit – came shortly before his administration approved Paramount's $8 billion merger with Skydance Media, which also came just days after CBS announced it was cancelling the late-night show of outspoken Trump critic Stephen Colbert.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store