What is the Office of Personnel Management? Trump is relying on this agency to reshape government
The agency has offered millions of federal workers eight months of salary if they voluntarily choose to leave their jobs by Feb. 6. The unconventional plan shows both Trump's desire to bring the bureaucracy under control and the downsizing tendencies of Elon Musk, the multibillionaire Trump supporter who is leading the president's Department of Government Efficiency.
A closer look at OPM:
What is the OPM?
Created in 1979 under President Jimmy Carter, the OPM is the equivalent of the government's human resources department. It helps manage the civil service, including pay schedules, health insurance and pension programs. The U.S. Office of Government Ethics was spun off from OPM in 1989.
As the OPM website notes, the agency's roots go back to 1883 with the Civil Service Act. That law established merit-based hiring for many government workers, replacing a system that was previously prone to political patronage. Trump has argued that the bureaucracy in its current formation is not responsive enough to his agenda, leading him to want to install federal officials who will implement his plans as instructed.
What does the OPM offer to employees say?
Slugged 'Fork in the Road,' the OPM email is officially a 'deferred resignation offer.' Federal workers outside the military, immigration enforcement, national security and the U.S. Postal Service received the email. Those who accept will receive their pay and benefits through the end of September without having to work. Federal employees can accept the offer by typing 'Resign' in the subject line of the response.
The email also hinted that future job cuts are a possibility.
'(W)e cannot give you full assurance regarding the certainty of your position or agency but should your position be eliminated you will be treated with dignity and will be afforded the protections in place for such positions,' the email said.
People who accept the offer can still apply for federal positions in the future, OPM said in a follow-up response to the email.
How involved is Musk?
That 'fork in the road' language might look familiar to former employees of Twitter, the social media company owned by Musk, now called X.
Musk sent the employees an email titled 'A Fork in the Road' after he acquired the company and had already laid off half of the staff. That email was briefer, gave a one-day deadline to decide, and offered three months of severance.
The owner of Tesla and SpaceX, among other companies, tipped his hand by posting on X that the OPM offer provided the most benefits 'legally allowed without Congress passing another appropriations bill.' He also posted that workers who accept the package can take a new job, something the OPM's own breakdown of questions did not address.
'It really is a fair & generous deal,' Musk posted.
It's not just OPM
Trump is using all kinds of federal agencies to rework the bureaucracy, not just OPM.
The White House Office of Management and Budget issued a memo on Monday requiring federal agencies to pause loans and grants, creating turmoil and lawsuits as to the directive's legality and scope. That order was rescinded Wednesday after it sparked widespread confusion.
Trump has ordered the General Services Administration to make sure it promotes 'beautiful federal civic architecture' as the president dislikes styles that are less traditional.
He also gave an order changing the name of the U.S. Digital Service — which handles tech issues — to the Department of Government Efficiency, Trump's cost-cutting initiative known as DOGE.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Metro
12 minutes ago
- Metro
'Trump's sanitising history for his own power - we've moved beyond an Orwellian
The world-renowned Smithsonian Museums give America a negative reputation. At least, that's what Donald Trump thinks. The museum is the latest target of Trump's 'clean-up' of Washington DC. He claims it focuses too much on 'how bad slavery was', and spreads 'anti-American ideology'. The White House has said current and former exhibitions at the museum will undergo a review to make sure they align with Trump's agenda and view of history. Historian and propaganda academic Ian Garner told Metro: 'What Trump is doing looks like a pretty naked attempt at sanitising history in order to maximise his own power.' If Trump's attempts to change how the Smithsonian retells the story of America, he could go beyond skewing understanding of the past and present – but also the direction of the future, Garner warned. 'Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book has been rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street and building has been renamed, every date has been altered. 'And that process is continuing day by day and minute by minute. History has stopped.' Those words were written by George Orwell in his dystopian novel 1984. Regarded as his magnum opus, it is a critique of authoritarianism and warns against the loss of individual thought. It ends with the protagonist Winston Smith agreeing with 'Big Brother', which represents the authoritarian government that wants him to believe that 2+2=5. But Garner points out: 'We now live in a world where we can have the main character believing that 2 + 2 equals 5, but also 10, 12, 14, 28, and anything else, because people can hold all of these things in their heads all at once in the digital world. And that's something that we haven't faced before. 'We've moved beyond Orwell, because we're no longer living in the world of analogue communications of television and newspapers. Orwell couldn't have conceived the confusion that we end up with in the present, in the social media era, where reality can be constantly reconstructed,' he added. That reconstruction of reality is still in its early stages, Garner said, but the danger is real and needs to be recognised. There are a few displays and museums that Trump isn't happy with. One exhibit is about Benjamin Franklin, and lists his scientific discoveries, linking them to the slaves he owned. Another reference is to George Floyd's death, which Trump says puts police in a bad light. Trump wrote on Truth Social: 'The Smithsonian is OUT OF CONTROL, where everything discussed is how horrible our Country is, how bad Slavery was, and how unaccomplished the downtrodden have been.' But the museum has already made changes to its exhibits, removing mentions of Trump's impeachment at the American History Museum. If Trump goes further in his attempts to amend exhibits and how they portray history, Garner explained it would damage the reputation of the museum and perpetuate the idea that there is a 'false history' and a 'real history'. Past autocracies have had words for things they deem false, or not enough in line with the country – Stalin referred to these things and ideas that weren't loyal to the Soviet Union as 'cosmopolitan'. Trump's word of choice? 'Woke'. In a tangent on Truth Social about museums, Trump wrote: 'I have instructed my attorneys to go through the Museums, and start the exact same process that has been done with Colleges and Universities, where tremendous progress has been made. 'This Country cannot be WOKE, because WOKE IS BROKE. We have the 'HOTTEST' Country in the World, and we want people to talk about it, including in our Museums.' 'Woke' is an empty vessel of a word, which has become meaningless, Garner argues – but by deploying it, people like Trump and his allies are trying to shut off or close off discussion about the past. Historically, governments have always wanted to control elements of the past, pump out certain narratives. But the more authoritarian the government becomes, the more that version of the past becomes central to their governing idea, and the less tolerance they're able to allow in representing the past. 'Everybody does it,' Garner said. 'But more recently, Hitler did it, Mussolini did it, Stalin did it, and Putin does it. So it doesn't matter whether Trump now goes ahead and changes exhibits in the Smithsonian or not. 'What matters is that he's put out the idea that this should happen, that the Smithsonian is some sort of 'woke' institution that needs to be reformed.' 'They bury it under this torrent of emotion, so that we're not really talking about the past at all. We're just talking about anger, about fury, about rage, disillusionment,' Garner adds. More Trending 'And these are the emotions that brought Trump to power in the first place. That's what he wants people to be engaging in, not the history or the present or the future of the country at all.' It's unclear how far the overhaul of museums in Washington, DC, will go, but if it's anything like Orwell wrote about in his novel, it won't stop just at reangling history in museums: 'Big Brother is infallible and all-powerful. 'Every success, every achievement, every victory, every scientific discovery, all knowledge, all wisdom, all happiness, all virtue, are held to issue directly from his leadership and inspiration.' Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Trump says he wants to get to heaven but is at the bottom of the totem pole MORE: Zelensky should never have to hand over land to Putin MORE: What could happen if Zelensky and Putin actually meet?
The Guardian
13 minutes ago
- The Guardian
California legislature poised to vote on redistricting plan in response to Texas gerrymandering
The California state legislature was poised on Thursday to vote on a plan to redraw its congressional boundaries and create five potential new Democratic House seats – an answer to the Republican redistricting push in Texas, sought by Donald Trump, aimed at tilting the map in his party's favor ahead of next year's midterm elections. The nation's two most populous – and ideologically opposed – states were racing on parallel tracks toward consequential redistricting votes, potentially within hours of each other. As Democrats in Sacramento worked to advance a legislative package that would put their 'election rigging response act' before voters in a special election this fall, Republicans in Austin were nearing a final vote on their own gerrymandering pursuit. Approval by the Texas senate, which is expected as early as Thursday, would conclude a dramatic showdown with the state's outnumbered Democratic lawmakers whose two-week boycott captured national attention and set in motion a coast-to-coast redistricting battle. The California plan, led by the state's Democratic governor, Gavin Newsom, is designed to flip as many as five Republican-held seats in California – the exact number of additional GOP seats Trump has said he is 'entitled to' in Texas. 'This is a new Democratic party, this is a new day, this is new energy out there all across this country,' Newsom said on a call with reporters on Wednesday. 'And we're going to fight fire with fire.' The redistricting tit-for-tat is an extraordinary deviation from the norm. Traditionally, states redraw congressional maps once a decade based on census data, with both the Texas and California maps originally intended to last through 2030. The California state legislature, where Democrats have a supermajority, is expected to easily approve new congressional maps despite sharp Republican objections. Newsom's signature would send the measure to the ballot in a special election this November. The California changes would only take effect in response to a gerrymander by a Republican state – a condition that would be met when the Texas legislatures sends the maps to the state's governor, Greg Abbott, for his promised signature. California was acting after a dramatic showdown in Austin, where Democratic lawmakers fled the state earlier this month to delay the GOP redistricting plan. When they returned, some were assigned police minders and forced to sign permission slips before leaving the capitol. Several spent the night in the chamber in protest ahead of Wednesday's session, where Republicans pushed through a map designed explicitly to boost their party's chances in 2026. The legislative action on Thursday followed a weeks-long showdown in Texas, after Democratic lawmakers fled the state in an effort to delay the GOP redistricting plan. They returned only after California moved forward with its counterproposal. California Democrats are moving ahead after days of contentious debate over the cost – and consequences – of a referendum to temporarily toss out the maps drawn by the state's voter-approved independent redistricting commission. Republicans estimated that a special election could cost more than $230m – money they said would be better spent on other issues like healthcare. On Wednesday night, the state supreme court declined an emergency request by Republican lawmakers seeking to block the Democratic plan from moving forward. The redistricting push has also caused angst among some Democrats and independents who have fought for years to combat gerrymandering. Sign up to This Week in Trumpland A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration after newsletter promotion Testifying in favor of the changes during a hearing earlier this week, Sara Sadhwani, a political science professor who served as a Democratic member of the state's independent redistricting commission in 2020, said the map-drawing tit-for-tat presented California voters with a 'moral conflict'. But she argued that Democrats had to push back on the president's power grab. 'It brings me no joy to see the maps that we passed fairly by the commission to be tossed aside,' she said. 'I do believe this is a necessary step in a much bigger battle to shore up free and fair elections in our nation.' The plan also drew the backing of former president Barack Obama and other champions of fair redistricting, such as his former attorney general, Eric Holder. But Newsom's redistricting plan – a high-stakes gambit for the term-limited governor who has made no secret of his 2028 presidential ambitions – is not assured to succeed. It faces mounting opposition from high-profile Republicans, including the state's former governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, who has vowed to 'terminate gerrymandering'. Early polling has been mixed. But a new survey conducted by Newsom's longtime pollster David Binder found strong support for the measure in the heavily Democratic state, with 57% of voters backing it while 35% opposed it. In a memo, Binder noted that support for the redistricting measure varies depending on how it is presented to voters. When framed as eliminating the state's independent redistricting commission designed to prevent partisan gerrymandering, support drops. However, when voters hear that the initiative would allow temporary map changes only in response to partisan actions in other states, like Texas, while retaining the commission, the measure enjoys a double-digit margin of support.
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
Vladimir Putin says he is 'READY to meet' Volodymyr Zelensky face-to-face
Russian President Vladimir Putin has said he is ready to meet his Ukrainian counterpart face-to-face, according to Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov. Lavrov told reporters today that Putin is ready to meet President Volodymyr Zelensky as long as all issues that need discussing are well worked out beforehand. The minister's comments seemed to be a confirmation of reports from the White House yesterday which declared a tentative agreement had been reached between the two foes. Donald Trump's press secretary Karoline Leavitt said "encouraging conversations" between Trump and Putin had led to the maligned Russian leader agreeing to "the next phase of the peace process". Such a meeting could be followed by trilateral talks with Trump "if necessary". But further details, such as where and when a meeting could take place, are not yet clear and Ukraine has not yet responded. Zelensky has previously said he is willing to meet with Putin, but it is likely any such summit would be at a neutral venue. A Ukrainian source told the BBC that Ukraine "immediately rejected" a suggestion from Putin that he and Zelensky could meet in Moscow. Leavitt said Trump hopes the pair can "engage in direct diplomacy". She did not comment on reports Putin has suggested the Russian capital as a place bilateral talks could be held. Trump said earlier he had been working on arranging a meeting. "They haven't been exactly best friends," he told Fox News. "It only matters if we get things done… I hope that President Zelensky will do what he has to do. He has to show some flexibility also." A face-to-face meeting between the pair could be a remarkable development and step towards ending a war that has raged since Putin's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. In the time since, the UN's Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights estimates more than 13,800 civilians have been killed. Civilian deaths in Russian-occupied areas are hard to calculate.
