Former AHS CEO denies defamation claims from Alberta premier's ex-chief of staff
Marshall Smith, who left his position as Premier Danielle Smith's top aide in October 2024, filed a lawsuit against Mentzelopoulos in the wake of her own wrongful dismissal lawsuit against AHS and the provincial government.
While they have the same last name, Marshall Smith and the premier are not related.
Smith alleged Mentzelopoulos made false and defamatory statements about him in court documents filed as part of her wrongful dismissal suit.
His statement of claim also names the Globe and Mail newspaper, its Calgary reporter Carrie Tait, and an unnamed man who is believed to be a former board member for the health authority. He is seeking $12 million in damages.
In a statement of defence filed in Court of King's Bench of Alberta last week, Mentzelopoulos said she hasn't defamed Smith, nor has he suffered damages as a result.
The legal filing calls Smith's allegations "invented attempts to allege harm."
It also says his lawsuit appears to try to "distance Smith himself from certain members of the private sector and to downplay the nature of his role in the history of events appropriately recounted by Ms. Mentzelopoulos in her action against the Crown and AHS."
The statement of defence also says Mentzelopoulos's statements are shielded from defamation action because they were made in the course of judicial proceedings.
None of the allegations in Mentzelopoulos's original lawsuit, or in the subsequent statement of claim and defence related to the Smith lawsuit, have been proven in court.
Mentzelopoulos claims she was fired because she'd launched an investigation and forensic audit into various contracts and was reassessing deals she had concluded were overpriced with private surgical companies she said had links to government officials.
AHS and Adriana LaGrange — the former minister of health who is now the new minister of primary and preventative health services — have denied Mentzelopoulos's claims in statements of defence that allege she was fired due to her job performance.
The province has appointed a former chief judge from Manitoba to conduct a third-party investigation into procurement. The auditor general and Alberta RCMP are also investigating the matter.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Fed gets fresh legal headache with lawsuit seeking to make FOMC rate meetings public
The Federal Reserve got a new legal headache Thursday when a money manager sued Chair Jerome Powell and other central bank policymakers in a Washington, D.C., federal court. The lawsuit alleges the Fed is violating a 1976 federal law by keeping its monetary policy meetings behind closed doors. Azoria Capital's lawsuit asks the court to issue a temporary restraining order compelling the Fed's Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) to open its deliberations to the public starting Tuesday and Wednesday, when central bank policymakers gather in Washington to decide on their next interest rate move. This comes as the Fed is under pressure on several fronts by President Trump, highlighted by an unusual presidential visit to the central bank for a tour of the $2.5 billion refurbishment of its National Mall buildings. Trump and other administration officials have criticized the project for its cost overruns. Azoria Capital, the money manager bringing the new lawsuit against Powell and other members of the FOMC, is led by CEO James Fishback, who is close to the Trump administration and served as an adviser to the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Last year, Fishback used Trump's Mar-a-Lago Club as the setting to announce an anti-DEI exchange-traded fund called the Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM), which began trading this month on the New York Stock Exchange. Azoria argues in its suit that "by operating beyond public scrutiny, the FOMC is deliberately undermining the public accountability envisioned by Congress," and that if a firm such as Azoria does not have real-time access to FOMC deliberations, it "cannot fully consider and protect itself against Federal Reserve policy shifts that can create volatility." Azoria also states in its suit that it "is deeply concerned that the FOMC, under Chair Jerome Powell, is maintaining high interest rates to undermine President Donald J. Trump and his economic agenda, to the detriment of American citizens and the American economy" and that the FOMC's current policy stance "appears politically motivated." Fishback made the administration aware of the suit before it was filed, according to a person familiar with the matter. The FOMC has not changed interest rates since Trump took office, as many policymakers argue that more time is needed to assess how Trump's trade policies will affect inflation. Trump has repeatedly hammered Powell and the Fed for this view, arguing that rates should be three percentage points lower. Investors don't expect the Fed to change rates at the meeting on July 29-30, although two Fed governors have said they could support a cut. Read more: What experts say about the possibility of additional rate cuts The Fed's current policy stance, according to Azoria's suit, "raises serious questions about whether politics, not economics, are driving monetary policy. These questions emphasize the need for transparency from the FOMC." The law in question cited by Azoria in its suit is the Government in the Sunshine Act of 1976, passed after President Richard Nixon's Watergate scandal roiled Washington and led to calls for increased transparency in the US government. The act requires federal agencies to keep their meetings open to the public. But it also allows for private meetings in cases covered as exemptions, including when the release of that information could be used in financial speculation. The Fed has cited that exemption in justifying why it holds closed meetings when discussing monetary policy. But Azoria says "not all FOMC deliberations inherently trigger financial speculation" and that the law states that to claim one of these exemptions, the agency must vote to invoke it and then, within one day, publish an explanation of why it made that decision. Azoria said the FOMC has "brazenly flouted this mandate" for five decades, holding nothing but closed meetings since 1977. "The FOMC's decades-long policy of blanket secrecy is unlawful." Alexis Keenan contributed to this article. Click here for in-depth analysis of the latest stock market news and events moving stock prices Sign in to access your portfolio
New York Times
34 minutes ago
- New York Times
U.S. Opens Antitrust Investigation Into NewYork-Presbyterian
The Justice Department is investigating whether the renowned NewYork-Presbyterian health system violated antitrust laws through hidden deals with insurance companies that kept hospital prices high, according to a subpoena reviewed by The New York Times. The civil investigation is examining whether NewYork-Presbyterian persuaded insurance companies to agree to conditions that insulated the hospital system from competition — which would enable it to charge more for common procedures with little worry about losing patients. The federal investigation is likely to send a jolt through some of the city's biggest hospitals and the health insurance companies that negotiate with them. The administrative subpoena states that the review seeks to determine if there has been 'potential unlawful agreement between NewYork Presbyterian Health Care System and health insurance companies relating to steering restrictions and contracting conduct.' The investigation is examining a corner of the health industry that has received little attention from antitrust investigators, outside of cases in North Carolina and California in recent years: the negotiations between hospitals and insurers to build a network of providers. NewYork-Presbyterian includes two of the city's most storied medical institutions: Columbia University Medical Center and Weill Cornell Medical Center. The hospitals are affiliated with the medical schools of Columbia and Cornell. The inquiry could lead to more spirited competition among New York City's leading hospital systems, which might translate into lower prices for childbirth, knee replacements, colonoscopies and other common medical care. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Mary Trump Says Uncle Donald ‘Isn't the Problem Anymore'
President Donald Trump's niece believes that while the Jeffrey Epstein files crisis might weaken him, her uncle 'isn't the problem anymore.' Mary L. Trump, 60, an outspoken critic of her father's younger brother, was responding to a question Sunday during an 'Ask Me Anything' Q&A session on X about whether she thought the Epstein files would serve as the 'catalyst for the MAGA movement ending over a period of time.' 'Maybe in the long term, but not in the short term,' Mary said. She added that, in the immediate future, the outrage among Trump's base over his handling of the late sex offender's case weakens him 'considerably.' 'This goes right to the heart of his base,' said the psychologist and author, who in 2020 published a tell-all book on Trump, Too Much and Never Enough: How My Family Created the World's Most Dangerous Man. But she's far less certain about how things will play out in the long haul, even as the Epstein files bring Trump's personal relationship with the convicted sex offender under an intensifying spotlight. 'Even if it implicates him, nobody's going to indict him,' Mary said, alluding to both the fierce loyalty Trump, 79, has cultivated within his administration and the Supreme Court's 2024 ruling that presidents cannot be criminally prosecuted for 'official acts.' She then theorized, 'if it did kind of end his reign of power, J.D. Vance becomes president.' 'We need to remember this, it's really important—I'm not saying this shouldn't all play out, because of course it should,' Mary said. 'What I'm saying is, Donald Trump isn't the problem anymore. That's what I'm saying. And we need to be very, very clear about that.' During his second term, Trump has assembled a team of supporters who have fully embraced his MAGA brand of politics, unlike in his first term, when internal pushback would sometimes curb his most extreme ideas. Mary, a psychologist, said Trump is reenacting their family dynamic—one where his father, Fred Trump, controlled everyone in his orbit. She noted, however, that 'Donald is acting like he's always acted.' 'The arrogance was always there. The insecure defensiveness was always there. The bullying was always there,' she said. Mary also claimed that Trump's wild rant about windmills on Sunday is 'evidence of serious cognitive impairment.' The Daily Beast has reached out to the White House for comment.
