Martin Lewis welcomes plans to consult on fairer council tax debt collection
Consumer champion Martin Lewis and charities have welcomed a Government pledge to look into making council tax collection practices fairer.
Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster Pat McFadden told ITV's Good Morning Britain on Wednesday that a consultation will take place.
On the programme, alongside presenter Susanna Reid, Mr Lewis contrasted council tax debts to situations where people owe money to financial firms.
He said: 'When a financial services firm, a credit card firm, even a payday lender has debt, they have a Consumer Duty.
'The Consumer Duty says they must look at what's in the consumers' interests first.
'It means if they're collecting debt, they have to signpost them towards help, go through it gradually, and it would take six months to a year before they could throw bailiffs in.
'When it comes to council debt collection, it would make banks blush, it is so aggressive, and so rapid.'
Mr McFadden said: 'Well, we're consulting on changing it, is the truth, and in particular this point of the system where, when somebody falls into arrears, they're expected to pay the whole amount – that's obviously very difficult for people.
'So we're consulting on changing that, so that there can be a reasonable period of time over which people can pay their debt.
'I would hope that councils approach this with sympathy and understanding. They of course have a duty to try to collect the council tax because they need that to keep the services running, but when someone gets into difficulty I would hope that councils approach it with some sympathy.'
Mr McFadden said the consultation will be put out soon and local government minister Jim McMahon 'will be in charge of this'.
Mr Lewis said he is 'delighted' to hear about the consultation.
Speaking to co-host Ms Reid about how council debts can rapidly escalate, he said: 'You miss a monthly payment and within three weeks they can ask for the year's payment, which begs the question: How can someone who can't afford a month's payment pay for a year's payment?'
Mr Lewis founded charity the Money and Mental Health Policy Institute which has been running a 'council tax trap' campaign urging change on the issue, as well as consumer help website MoneySavingExpert.com.
Mr Lewis later posted a video on X, in which he said: 'I'm a bit teary if I'm honest… I cannot tell you how many desperate people I have met whose lives have been ruined by this form of debt collection. It's only a consultation, but I'm hoping that this could be the start of changing things.'
Helen Undy, chief executive of the Money and Mental Health Policy Institute, said: 'We are absolutely delighted that the Government has listened to sense and is taking the first steps towards making council tax debt collection fairer.
'It's our second campaign win on this in a month, as the Welsh Government just launched a consultation on the same issue.
'We will be responding robustly to both, and hope to see people given more time to pay, and an end to the unreasonable charges being piled on top of already unmanageable debts.
'If the consultation delivers the change that's needed, this really has the potential to transform lives.'
StepChange Debt Charity also welcomed the announcement.
A YouGov survey of more than 2,200 people for StepChange found that more than four-fifths (84%) oppose households having to pay their annual council tax bill in full if they miss one month's payment – a measure which the charity said is currently standard practice for many councils across England and Wales.
StepChange chief executive Vikki Brownridge said: 'Our advisers hear day in, day out about the harmful impact of aggressive council tax debt collection, particularly on vulnerable households.
'As one of our core campaigns and key asks, we have been calling on the Government to review rules around imprisonment, rapid escalation of debt, and to ensure bailiffs are placed under proper regulation.'
She added: 'We look forward to working closely with Government on this consultation, to ensure that people are protected from harmful debt collection which only serves to exacerbate hardship and worsen debt problems.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
26 minutes ago
- The Sun
Keir Starmer doubles down on Israeli ministers' sanctions despite being slammed by US
SIR Keir Starmer yesterday doubled down on sanctioning Israeli ministers, despite being savagely rapped by the US. Donald Trump 's administration hit out at Britain after the PM broke with tradition and imposed a travel ban and asset freeze on two far-right members of Israel's government, Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich. 4 4 4 In a scathing attack on the move, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the sanctions 'do not advance American efforts to achieve a ceasefire, bring all hostages home and end the war'. Mr Rubio warned Britain 'not to forget who the real enemy is'. The US ambassador to the UK said he 'fully supported' Mr Rubio's slap down and warned the PM against 'impeding constructive dialogue'. Ben-Gvir, who is pushing to annex the West Bank and wants to permanently expel Palestinians from Gaza, said: 'The American administration is a moral compass in the face of the confusion of some Western countries that choose to appease terrorist organizations like Hamas. 'Israel is not afraid — we will continue to fight terrorism. 'History will judge the Chamberlains of our time.' At PMQs Sir Keir defended the sanctions as a bid to 'uphold human rights and defend the prospect of a two-state solution'. The PM said: "Acting alongside our allies, we have sanctioned individuals responsible for inciting appalling settler violence and expansion. "We will continue to support all efforts to secure a ceasefire, the release of all hostages despicably held by Hamas and the humanitarian aid that needs to surge in. Greta Thunberg's Gaza 'Freedom Flotilla' boarded & seized by Israeli forces 4
Reuters
28 minutes ago
- Reuters
European game generated 38 bln euros in 2023-24 season, study shows
June 11 (Reuters) - Europe's soccer market grew by 8% in terms of revenue in the 2023-24 season to 38 billion euros ($43.46 billion) with England's Premier League generating the most, Deloitte said in a study published on Wednesday. In its Annual Review of Football Finance, Deloitte said the top five leagues -- Premier League, Bundesliga, LaLiga, Serie A and Ligue 1 -- generated 20.4 billion euros in revenue, an increase of 4%. Premier League clubs had the highest revenue of Europe's top leagues at 6.3 billion pounds ($8.50 billion). However, the traditional 'big six' clubs in England's top flight reported lower average revenue growth (3%) than other clubs that were in the Premier League in both the 2023-24 and 2022-23 seasons (11%). The study said the growth was largely driven by expansion of clubs' commercial offerings, which also led to the teams cumulatively generating more than two billion pounds in commercial revenue for the first time. "A focus on stadia development and diversification of commercial revenues led to growth across the European football market in the 2023-24 season," Tim Bridge, lead partner in Deloitte's Sports Business Group, said. "However, clubs and leagues cannot afford to take their eye off the ball as new challenges, including an evolving regulatory landscape and changing fan behaviours, arise. "The pressure is mounting for more clubs to drive additional revenue at the same time as managing rising costs. "More so than ever, leaders and owners must recognise the great responsibility they have of managing these businesses, capturing the historic essence of a football club while honouring its unrivalled role as a community asset for generations to come." Clubs in Europe's 'big five' leagues reported an aggregate operating profit (0.6 billion euros) for a second successive season, while the aggregate wages/revenue ratio fell from 66% to 64%. Clubs in England's Women's Super League (WSL) jointly generated revenue of 65 million pounds in the 2023-24 season, a 34% rise. Each WSL club had a double-digit increase in revenue, while all 12 clubs reported over one million pounds in revenue for the first time, with an average revenue of 5.4 million pounds. "Through developing more robust fan engagement strategies, strong commercial deals and securing central distributions, WSL clubs unlocked a new phase of growth," Deloitte Sports Business group's knowledge and insights lead Jennifer Haskel said. "Plus, as the reporting and attribution of commercial revenue remains inconsistent between clubs, we may be scratching the surface on the value now being generated by the women's game." ($1 = 0.7409 pounds) ($1 = 0.8743 euros)
Daily Mail
31 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Experts cast doubt on Reeves' plan to make her sums add up by saving billions through ‘technical efficiency gains', slashing admin spending and clamping down on tax
Experts have cast doubt on the Chancellor's plan to make her sums add up by saving billions through 'technical efficiency gains', slashing admin spending and clamping down on tax. The Treasury said it planned to make more use of artificial intelligence, reforming the workforce – including through job cuts – and selling off its London property portfolio. The plans are forecast to save £13.8 billion a year by 2028/29 – including £9 billion a year from the health and social care budget alone. At the same time, a drive to recover more owed taxes is predicted to deliver a £7.5 billion annual gain by 2029/30. And government department administration costs will be culled by 11 per cent by the time of the next election, the Treasury projects – with another huge cut pencilled in for 2026 which will take the savings to 16 per cent, or £2.2 billion. Raoul Ruparel, a former Downing Street adviser to Theresa May, said the latter were 'pretty brutal real-terms cuts across the board'. 'Traditionally, these sorts of cuts are very hard to deliver,' said Mr Ruparel, who is director of the Boston Consulting Group Centre for Growth. The plans for efficiency savings rely heavily on making the National Health Service more productive – that is, doing more with less. They assume annual productivity growth of 2 per cent a year in the NHS, which the Treasury admits would mark a 'substantial increase' on improvements achieved in past years. The productivity plan 'will deliver efficiencies across all healthcare services, primarily through the combined impact of operational and clinical improvements, technology and digital transformation and workforce initiatives', the Treasury said. They will include reducing the use of agency staff and levels of sickness absence. The Government also plans to relocate more civil servants out of London, cutting the number by 12,000 by 2030. But at the same time, its ambition to bring in more unpaid taxes will involve hiring more people – with 5,500 compliance and 2,400 debt management staff expected to be brought in. The closure of 11 central London offices will save £94 million a year by 2032 and the disposal of properties no longer needed will bring in £1 billion, the Government said. Julian Jessop, economics fellow at the Institute of Economic Affairs think-tank, said: 'There is huge scope to boost productivity and make efficiency savings in the public sector. 'It is much less obvious that this Government will be the one to do it.' Also among the expected savings is the claim that the Ministry of Housing will use AI to speed up routine tasks such as checking errors and note taking. 'This will reduce demands on staff time by an estimated 500,000 hours per year,' the Treasury said. Ms Reeves also announced that she will tear up Treasury rules designed to safeguard value for money in order to pour money into infrastructure projects in the Midlands and the North, where Labour is under threat from Reform. Regional mayors have railed for years at the Treasury's so-called 'Green Book' rules which direct investment to areas where it will produce the most economic benefit. Under the new system, the Treasury will limit the use of 'benefit-cost reviews' which have been blamed for halting investment in the North. The new proposals will mean that even projects where the costs outweigh the benefits may not 'automatically constitute poor value for money'.
