King's Birthday Honours shine light on years of unheralded human decency
Her daughter, Lynette, was born without limbs in 1962.
The devastating disability was caused by the drug thalidomide, which Wendy was prescribed for morning sickness when she was pregnant.
A doctor advised Wendy and her late husband Ian to admit baby Lynette to an institution because she would probably live for only six months.
Instead, the couple took Lynette home to their house in Nunawading in Melbourne's east, loved and cared for her, and became her staunch advocates.
Wendy is still by her daughter's side and Lynette is a cherished daughter, sister and auntie.
Lynette describes her Mum as 'a wonder woman' and says Wendy well deserves her OAM in the King's Birthday Honours list which has the citation, 'for service to the community through thalidomide awareness'.
'She's awesome,' said Lynette of Wendy, who has advocated for Lynette and other disabled thalidomide survivors for most of her life.
'I'm very lucky to have somebody like that,' Lynette said.
Wendy reflects now: 'I'm amazed that I've been able to be so strong, actually. I thought I was a bit of a mouse. But when I think back, I have been pretty strong.'
She describes fighting battles from the start, from finding clothes, mobility aids and therapy for Lynette, to dealing with a fever at 11 months that left Lynette in a coma, to handling nasty comments from strangers.
In 2012, Lynette was lead plaintiff in a litigation that yielded a multimillion dollar settlement between Diageo, the company that bought the drug's Australian distributor, and more than 100 thalidomide survivors.
For Lynette, her share funded equipment including a state-of-the-art wheelchair, a modern van and computers and extra care if she needs it in future.
Wendy says it's a weight off her mind, 'to feel that Lyn's going to be catered for, that there will be someone there to keep her safe'.
In 2011, developer Watersun Homes built a brick home, pro bono, for Wendy, Lynette and Ian, with a purpose-built bathroom, ceiling hoists, and technology allowing Lynette to remotely open doors.
Lynette can now get out to chat to neighbours, go to local shopping centres, to the pool and to galleries. And Wendy can go out separately to meet friends for coffee.
Wendy, whose husband Ian died in 2019, insists she did what any Mum would have, but Lynette says some people don't have relatives to support them.
'You're a special mum,' she said. The honour was 'fantastic' and well deserved, Lynette said. 'Because she's a wonder woman. She's there if I need her.'
For their unpaid work, the couple each receive an OAM in the King's Birthday honours.
They volunteer one night a week for the charity Carevan, handing out free meals and groceries from Apex Park, 1 kilometre from the Wangaratta CBD, near the Ovens River.
The Houghtons have also fostered children for 19 years, and are active in Lions clubs that fundraise for charity.
Jennefer volunteers with an after-hours school in Wangaratta that teaches children road safety.
Along with a busy roster of volunteering, the Houghtons own Koffie Bean Cafe in Wangaratta. John also owns an insurance company franchise and Jennefer works in a supermarket office.
The couple said while it was nice to be acknowledged with a King's Birthday Honour, they don't seek recognition.
John said: 'We've been very lucky in the town for a long time, and we're in a situation where we want to be able to give back.'
He said some of Carevan's clients sleep in tents, are couch-surfing or live alone and come for the company.
John has seen clients who are sleeping in their car because their landlord has put up the rent by $20, they have lost their job and can't afford their accommodation, and they have nowhere else to live.
Jennefer says: 'We try to offer them as much help as we can. We give them blankets, beanies and scarves, and make sure they get a shopping bag full of food.'
One young woman was camping and couldn't get a job without a fixed address. Jennefer found her a job in a shop, where two years later, she still works.
Jennefer said Carevan is 'not just for the homeless, it's for anyone in need'.
'We don't ask questions, and we don't turn anyone away,' she said.
The Houghtons and six friends started Carevan in Wangaratta in 2010, after seeing a similar food van running in Albury, 70 kilometres away. Theirs operates four nights a week, year-round, except for Christmas Day.
Jennefer says the van is not connected to a religion or group. It gets no government funding and runs thanks to donations.
It costs about $12,000 annually to run. Local supermarkets contribute food and community groups help to cook.
Rural City of Wangaratta mayor Irene Grant said the Houghtons' OAMs are well-deserved and they had 'made a meaningful difference to the lives of many in Wangaratta'.
'We thank you for your leadership and dedication to the wellbeing of our community,' Grant said.
Richard Knight has featured in thousands of customers' photos, usually anonymously, as a volunteer train driver for more than 40 years with Mooroolbark Miniature Railway, in Melbourne's outer east.
He has been the railway's treasurer since 1981, but he also built many of its trains.
They were all petrol-fuelled until, three years ago, Knight's daughter Katrina asked him to build an electric train.
The result is a pint-sized replica of the full-size trains that Katrina drives across Melbourne as a Metro Trains driver.
Last month Knight proudly showed the new miniature train to a delegation from V/Line and Metro.
Knight has received an OAM in the 2025 King's Birthday Honours list, which also recognises the 162 blood donations he has made in 44 years.
The blood donations were inspired by his late wife Margaret needing transfusions after their twins Anne and Russell were born in 1973.
Knight realised that donations of his B negative type blood, one of the rarest types, could help save other people's lives.
Knight also spent 13 years, until 2020, driving about 2000 patients to and from Box Hill hospital, and currently he is the treasurer of Mooroolbark Men's Shed.
His love of trains started as a child, when Knight and his three brothers played with Hornby 00 model train sets.
In 1980, Knight was working as an accountant when the then-Shire of Lilydale asked for volunteers to run the miniature railway it planned to build at Kiloran Park, Mooroolbark.
Knight's four children grew up riding the miniature trains, and Knight's fellow volunteers became friends.
He says volunteering at the railway makes him happy, as does donating money to over a dozen charities. 'It gives you a good feeling.'
As an instructor in taekwondo for over 60 years, Jack Rozinszky still gets a kick out of practising the martial art.
At 84 years old, the founder of the Melbourne Taekwondo Centre continues to teach at black belt level and enjoys seeing the achievements of his students, some of whom have competed in the Olympic Games.
Rozinszky, who fled southern Hungary as a 16-year-old in 1956, said receiving an OAM for service to taekwondo meant recognition of him as an Australian.
As a child, Rozinszky survived the bombing of his house in Hungary during World War II, and then lived under a decade of communist rule.
He said after a brief revolution in 1956, communist troops returned and he narrowly escaped gunfire when they shot into a meeting of residents outside a town hall.
With his parents' blessing, Rozinszky fled with a friend to Yugoslavia and they spent a year in detention before gaining permission to migrate to Australia.
Being a sporty person, while he worked in factory jobs in Melbourne, Rozinszky took martial arts classes at the Silver Top Taxi self defence club in West Melbourne.
'In 1963, Mr Kim, a judo instructor, visited from Korea and he did a sort of taekwondo [which was then called Tang Soo Do] but from the army style of training, and he showed us all the techniques and the jumping kicks and self defence component.
'I decided, 'That's my style, I want to learn it'. It had a lot of moving actions, and I wanted to move.'
Rozinszky started teaching taekwondo in a hall in Barkly Street, St Kilda. He married his girlfriend, a New Zealander, Valerie, in 1967 and on their honeymoon, they sailed to Japan and then Korea to train, and it was in Seoul that he earned his first black belt.
Now, in 2025, Rozinszky's Melbourne Taekwondo Centre has 15 training centres, and his son, Andrew, is head instructor.
Disaster struck last October when their Glen Waverley head training centre burned down.
Jack assured Andrew they would rebuild, and after operating from a school hall for six months, they opened a new head studio in a Mount Waverley business park six weeks ago.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


7NEWS
10 minutes ago
- 7NEWS
Best sunscreen for kids: Reef-friendly sunscreen winning praise from parents: ‘Absolute must-have'
Shoppers can't get enough of a reef-friendly sunscreen brand that kids actually like wearing. Little Urchin was launched by Aussie dad Christopher Matthews, who wanted an alternative to the chemical-laden SPF brands often used on young children. The result is a dedicated range of natural skin care products, including reef-safe sunscreen, natural moisturisers and a natural tinted sunscreen that parents have described as 'must haves' for their babies and young children. According to Christopher, the name Little Urchin was inspired by the sea urchin, a remarkable creature that produces its own natural sunscreen to protect its young. One of the best-sellers in the range is the Kids Natural Clear Zinc Sunscreen SPF50 ($29.95). This currently has a five-star rating from happy customers, who have written comments like 'amazing' and 'fantastic'. 'My kids like to put it on, not like most zincs, where it's thick and heavy. It applies like normal suncream, but it's still waterproof and provides long protection,' one shopper wrote. ' This is my favourite product ever. It's perfect for all my children, even my daughter who has severe eczema,' another added. Others highlighted that they love the Little Urchin sunscreens because they are easy to apply to their children, as opposed to other brands which kids hate due to stickiness. The Natural Face Sunscreen SPF 50 Clear Zinc ($24.95) is another bestseller. This has been designed specifically as a sunscreen for your face and also boasts five-star reviews. The brand also has zinc sticks and SPF lip balms — which prove invaluable for SPF top-ups on the go. ' Little Urchin is proudly Australian‑made and owned, crafting natural sunscreens, skincare, and lip care that are as kind to your skin as they are to the planet,' founder Christopher tells Best Picks. ' Every product is created with the same care and intention as that very first formula; because I still believe that what we put on our skin should be safe, effective, and inspired by nature.' According to the Cancer Council, when applying sunscreen, you need at least one teaspoon per limb, one for the front of the body, one for the back and one for the head. A full body application for an adult should be at least 35mL or seven teaspoons. It's important to remember that the sun and UV levels are harsh, whether it's sunny, cloudy or raining. With this in mind, wearing a hat, sunglasses and applying sunscreen every couple of hours is an essential way to avoid skin cancer and prevent the signs of ageing.

Sydney Morning Herald
7 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Deanna tried IVF with the lot. None of the costly, unproven add-ons worked, so she went back to basics
Australia's health ministers last month ordered a rapid review of the nation's assisted reproductive sector following a series of bungles and scandals, to determine if greater regulation can increase the safety and transparency of fertility clinics. Victoria is leading the national review, and a Victorian government spokesperson confirmed IVF add-on services would be included in consideration of existing or potential new legislative framework. 'A dedicated team has been established to undertake the review and will report back within three months,' the spokesperson said. Australia has the fifth-highest rate of IVF, fuelled by the strength of the commercial fertility sector and Medicare rebates with broad eligibility criteria that mean patients can continue coming back for cycles regardless of their chances of success. Four out five women accessing IVF also use add-on services during their treatment, which can greatly add to their costs as well as the profits and marketability of the clinics, but which may not increase the chances of success. An analysis of the non-core services being offered to Australian fertility patients by University of Melbourne researchers, prepared for this masthead, highlights the high costs and lack of evidence supporting services commonly upsold to potentially emotionally vulnerable patients. It reveals 44 treatment types ranging from free to $5000, and taking in everything from vitamins to plasma being injected into ovaries, genetic testing of embryos, injecting a single sperm directly into an egg and endometrial scratching, have little to no influence on the chances of having a live birth, pregnancy or miscarriage. Loading The analysis follows the launch of the Evidence-based IVF website in April, which is led by the University of Melbourne's Dr Sarah Lensen as an effort to better inform people undergoing IVF of the unproven add-ons. 'There are research articles out there on these different add-ons but the quality, broadly speaking, is really poor. Different providers are willing to draw the line in different places in terms of how much evidence they think they need before they're willing to offer or recommend something,' Lensen said. 'Sometimes there's a cost for special IVF conception vitamins or whatever, but they're probably pretty low risk, and they're not as big of a deal. 'Down the other end of the spectrum, there's the super-expensive $1000 treatment options that also come with risks because they're playing with patients' immune systems or injecting things into their ovaries that we don't really know what's going to happen. 'A lot of the add-ons that get offered slip through the cracks in terms of the existing regulatory system.' In Deanna Carr's case, she underwent two normal but unsuccessful cycles of IVF before adding steroids, blood thinners, aspirin and clexane during two further cycles. Determined more had to be done, Carr followed advice from online fertility forums and moved to one of Australia's largest clinics to seek out a specialist known for pushing the envelope. 'There's lots of conversation about which specialists to see, because these specialists are willing to be a lot more experimental – and, when we say experimental, it is literally meaning experimental. 'They're willing to try more add-ons, regardless of how inclined the research is to say that it doesn't work.' Tests at that clinic found Carr had a partial DQ Alpha gene match which may make her body more likely to attack or reject an embryo, though research suggests treatment for it does not significantly improve IVF success rates. To address the issue, a team of specialists gave Carr lymphocyte membrane immunotherapy, in which up to eight vials of blood were taken from her husband so his white blood cells could be extracted and then injected into her arm to correct her immune system with material that is genetically matched to their embryo. 'It's like weird blood brother stuff, and quite expensive,' Carr said. She was given a toxic cocktail of drugs including naltrexone and tacrolimus, which are more commonly used to treat cancer, as well as an intralipid infusion to 'knock out' her immune system. Added together, this cycle cost more than $8000. 'It didn't work. It ended up the same way all our other cycles ended,' she said. Carr's specialists then offered to step up the add-on treatments even further. They proposed a $5000 EMMA and ALICE test which would have seen Carr undergo another full IVF cycle but, rather than try for a pregnancy, the doctors would take a biopsy of her uterus to see if bacteria were present that might be impacting her pregnancies. If it found abnormalities, Carr was then to be prescribed cefalexin – a common antibiotic used for infections and cheaply available on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme. 'It's what the doctor would give you for a sore throat. Why would they make me pay five grand for it? Why not just give me the medication?' Rather than spending $12,000 for another add-on-laden IVF cycle, Carr consulted the Evidence-based IVF site and realised there was little science to support the proposed treatment, then switched clinics to undergo a traditional – and successful – cycle. 'You get persuaded to add on because you obviously want it to work, and you're already spending so much, so this can financially tip you over the edge,' she said. 'A lot of these IVF companies know that. It does feel really unethical [because] a lot of the time people aren't being provided with proper information around the add-ons that are being suggested and the efficacy around them. And people are really desperate, so they'll just keep saying yes to things.' A Macquarie University professor of bioethics in the discipline of philosophy, Wendy Lipworth, last year published a study based on interviews with 31 doctors working in assisted-reproductive technology to see what their 'moral justification' for using add-ons was. The specialists' responses revealed evidence and innovation was not the driving consideration in many instances, and that regulatory reforms to only allow the use of unproven treatments in the context of formal scientific evaluation might be required. Lipworth said add-ons were often marketed as a point of difference between clinics, which may undermine individual doctors' ability not to offer them for patients. As a result, she believes any new regulation would need to focus on the clinics and what they are offering, rather than individual doctors wanting the best for their patients. 'Generally, there should be some expectation that they might at least be beneficial, even if there's no good evidence for it. That's a real balancing act,' Lipworth said. 'In fertility, the balance is going a little too far in the direction of too many things being offered without enough evidence. 'There might be room for some more regulation of how the products are advertised, how patients come to know about them, what they charge for them and so on. But the very act of using them is not in and of itself in any way unethical. 'What really matters is that people know that they're getting treatment for which there is not good evidence, and that they are able to make informed decisions about whether or not to use them. Loading 'That doesn't mean that anything goes and that patients should necessarily be able to walk into a doctor's surgery and say, 'my friend saw this on Facebook', or 'my friend used this and she got pregnant, therefore I want you to offer it to me'. 'There is still a duty of care to offer things that you, at the very, very least, are absolutely certain won't do harm.' Add-ons are not the only factor separating clinics, or the fees they charge. Lensen said premium clinics typically provide continuity of care so patients always get to see the same specialist and nurse, as well as improved customer service, which may not be provided at low-cost or public clinics. And, in many cases, the proliferation of add-on services is often more patient-driven than due to marketing by doctors or their clinics – which is why Lensen believes reforms are even more important, so regulators can step in when doctors fail to uphold their responsibility to dissuade patients from treatments that may not be in their best interests. 'The evidence is not that strong, but the patients are asking for it, or the clinic down the road is offering it, and so they end up using it too. But then when the research community does come out with robust evidence later, I think they do act,' she said. 'So it would be nice if we said from 'now on, no more offering a high dose of corticosteroids to patients. If you want to do that, they can take part in a placebo controlled trial'. 'A lot of the time, though, regulations are not aligned with the commercial interests of whoever they're trying to regulate – that's the whole reason we need them.'

The Age
7 hours ago
- The Age
Deanna tried IVF with the lot. None of the costly, unproven add-ons worked, so she went back to basics
Australia's health ministers last month ordered a rapid review of the nation's assisted reproductive sector following a series of bungles and scandals, to determine if greater regulation can increase the safety and transparency of fertility clinics. Victoria is leading the national review, and a Victorian government spokesperson confirmed IVF add-on services would be included in consideration of existing or potential new legislative framework. 'A dedicated team has been established to undertake the review and will report back within three months,' the spokesperson said. Australia has the fifth-highest rate of IVF, fuelled by the strength of the commercial fertility sector and Medicare rebates with broad eligibility criteria that mean patients can continue coming back for cycles regardless of their chances of success. Four out five women accessing IVF also use add-on services during their treatment, which can greatly add to their costs as well as the profits and marketability of the clinics, but which may not increase the chances of success. An analysis of the non-core services being offered to Australian fertility patients by University of Melbourne researchers, prepared for this masthead, highlights the high costs and lack of evidence supporting services commonly upsold to potentially emotionally vulnerable patients. It reveals 44 treatment types ranging from free to $5000, and taking in everything from vitamins to plasma being injected into ovaries, genetic testing of embryos, injecting a single sperm directly into an egg and endometrial scratching, have little to no influence on the chances of having a live birth, pregnancy or miscarriage. Loading The analysis follows the launch of the Evidence-based IVF website in April, which is led by the University of Melbourne's Dr Sarah Lensen as an effort to better inform people undergoing IVF of the unproven add-ons. 'There are research articles out there on these different add-ons but the quality, broadly speaking, is really poor. Different providers are willing to draw the line in different places in terms of how much evidence they think they need before they're willing to offer or recommend something,' Lensen said. 'Sometimes there's a cost for special IVF conception vitamins or whatever, but they're probably pretty low risk, and they're not as big of a deal. 'Down the other end of the spectrum, there's the super-expensive $1000 treatment options that also come with risks because they're playing with patients' immune systems or injecting things into their ovaries that we don't really know what's going to happen. 'A lot of the add-ons that get offered slip through the cracks in terms of the existing regulatory system.' In Deanna Carr's case, she underwent two normal but unsuccessful cycles of IVF before adding steroids, blood thinners, aspirin and clexane during two further cycles. Determined more had to be done, Carr followed advice from online fertility forums and moved to one of Australia's largest clinics to seek out a specialist known for pushing the envelope. 'There's lots of conversation about which specialists to see, because these specialists are willing to be a lot more experimental – and, when we say experimental, it is literally meaning experimental. 'They're willing to try more add-ons, regardless of how inclined the research is to say that it doesn't work.' Tests at that clinic found Carr had a partial DQ Alpha gene match which may make her body more likely to attack or reject an embryo, though research suggests treatment for it does not significantly improve IVF success rates. To address the issue, a team of specialists gave Carr lymphocyte membrane immunotherapy, in which up to eight vials of blood were taken from her husband so his white blood cells could be extracted and then injected into her arm to correct her immune system with material that is genetically matched to their embryo. 'It's like weird blood brother stuff, and quite expensive,' Carr said. She was given a toxic cocktail of drugs including naltrexone and tacrolimus, which are more commonly used to treat cancer, as well as an intralipid infusion to 'knock out' her immune system. Added together, this cycle cost more than $8000. 'It didn't work. It ended up the same way all our other cycles ended,' she said. Carr's specialists then offered to step up the add-on treatments even further. They proposed a $5000 EMMA and ALICE test which would have seen Carr undergo another full IVF cycle but, rather than try for a pregnancy, the doctors would take a biopsy of her uterus to see if bacteria were present that might be impacting her pregnancies. If it found abnormalities, Carr was then to be prescribed cefalexin – a common antibiotic used for infections and cheaply available on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme. 'It's what the doctor would give you for a sore throat. Why would they make me pay five grand for it? Why not just give me the medication?' Rather than spending $12,000 for another add-on-laden IVF cycle, Carr consulted the Evidence-based IVF site and realised there was little science to support the proposed treatment, then switched clinics to undergo a traditional – and successful – cycle. 'You get persuaded to add on because you obviously want it to work, and you're already spending so much, so this can financially tip you over the edge,' she said. 'A lot of these IVF companies know that. It does feel really unethical [because] a lot of the time people aren't being provided with proper information around the add-ons that are being suggested and the efficacy around them. And people are really desperate, so they'll just keep saying yes to things.' A Macquarie University professor of bioethics in the discipline of philosophy, Wendy Lipworth, last year published a study based on interviews with 31 doctors working in assisted-reproductive technology to see what their 'moral justification' for using add-ons was. The specialists' responses revealed evidence and innovation was not the driving consideration in many instances, and that regulatory reforms to only allow the use of unproven treatments in the context of formal scientific evaluation might be required. Lipworth said add-ons were often marketed as a point of difference between clinics, which may undermine individual doctors' ability not to offer them for patients. As a result, she believes any new regulation would need to focus on the clinics and what they are offering, rather than individual doctors wanting the best for their patients. 'Generally, there should be some expectation that they might at least be beneficial, even if there's no good evidence for it. That's a real balancing act,' Lipworth said. 'In fertility, the balance is going a little too far in the direction of too many things being offered without enough evidence. 'There might be room for some more regulation of how the products are advertised, how patients come to know about them, what they charge for them and so on. But the very act of using them is not in and of itself in any way unethical. 'What really matters is that people know that they're getting treatment for which there is not good evidence, and that they are able to make informed decisions about whether or not to use them. Loading 'That doesn't mean that anything goes and that patients should necessarily be able to walk into a doctor's surgery and say, 'my friend saw this on Facebook', or 'my friend used this and she got pregnant, therefore I want you to offer it to me'. 'There is still a duty of care to offer things that you, at the very, very least, are absolutely certain won't do harm.' Add-ons are not the only factor separating clinics, or the fees they charge. Lensen said premium clinics typically provide continuity of care so patients always get to see the same specialist and nurse, as well as improved customer service, which may not be provided at low-cost or public clinics. And, in many cases, the proliferation of add-on services is often more patient-driven than due to marketing by doctors or their clinics – which is why Lensen believes reforms are even more important, so regulators can step in when doctors fail to uphold their responsibility to dissuade patients from treatments that may not be in their best interests. 'The evidence is not that strong, but the patients are asking for it, or the clinic down the road is offering it, and so they end up using it too. But then when the research community does come out with robust evidence later, I think they do act,' she said. 'So it would be nice if we said from 'now on, no more offering a high dose of corticosteroids to patients. If you want to do that, they can take part in a placebo controlled trial'. 'A lot of the time, though, regulations are not aligned with the commercial interests of whoever they're trying to regulate – that's the whole reason we need them.'