Cambodia artefact rumours ‘false'
Speaking on Friday in her new role as culture minister, Ms Paetongtarn confirmed that the return of 23 artefacts to Cambodia was completed in 2015 after verification of their origin.
The return of another 20 artefacts related to the same case, was approved in principle by the cabinet in 2024. But they remain in Thailand as the Fine Arts Department faces budget constraints, and the issue is not deemed urgent due to ongoing border tensions, she said.
'This is not considered an urgent matter and cannot be funded by the central budget,' Ms Paetongtarn said. She added that the proposal may need to be resubmitted for ministry-level budgeting and cabinet acknowledgement.
'Given the current situation between Thailand and Cambodia, the Culture Ministry recommends further review,' she said.
She said legal action would be taken against those spreading false information, which she added was damaging and misleading.
Ms Paetongtarn also reaffirmed Thailand's sovereignty over the Ta Muen Thom temple complex in Surin, which is protected under the 1961 Ancient Monuments Act.
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs is also working to uphold Thai sovereignty in other disputed areas near the border with Cambodia, she added.
Soft power push
Becoming culture minister gives Ms Paetongtarn an opportunity to focus on her long-standing passion to promote soft power as a means of enhancing Thailand's standing in the world.
She reiterated her commitment to supporting Thailand's creative industries. She highlighted plans to extend cash rebate incentives, previously available to international filmmakers, to Thai productions.
'I want to see Thai films go further. They can subtly showcase our products and culture to the world,' she said.
She also outlined four key soft power industries to be prioritised: film, food, Muay Thai and wellness. These sectors, she said, can quickly enhance Thailand's economic potential, tourism and job creation.
'Where collaboration with the Culture Ministry is possible — be it public or private — I'm ready to support it,' she said.
Ms Paetongtarn also confirmed her commitment to advancing soft power and cultural development, calling them essential tools for stimulating the economy and opening new opportunities for the public.
'I have long advocated for soft power as a development strategy,' she said. 'Despite my suspension, I am committed to doing my best in this role.'
Ms Paetongtarn was suspended from the premiership on July 1 by the Constitutional Court pending a ruling on allegations of ethical misconduct and abuse of power.
Social activist Srisuwan Janya on Friday petitioned the National Anti-Corruption Commission to investigate Ms Paetongtarn and Deputy Prime Minister Suriya Jungrungreangkit for joining a royal audience after the recent cabinet reshuffle.
He said this violated the court's suspension order.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bangkok Post
an hour ago
- Bangkok Post
Cambodia breaks promise on border issues: Thai foreign ministry
The Thai Ministry of Foreign Affairs on Sunday blamed Cambodia for breaking its own promise to resolve border issues through a bilateral boundary committee. The ministry's statement on Sunday followed a reported attempt by Cambodia to bring disputed areas to the United Nations after its approach to the International Court of Justice (ICJ). The Thai Ministry of Foreign Affairs said a memorandum of understanding that both countries signed in 2000 clearly stipulates that both sides must discuss border issues through their Joint Boundary Commission (JBC). The MoU does not let them use any other mechanisms – including the ICJ – and Thailand has always followed the MOU strictly as compliance was in accordance with the principles of international laws and treaties, the ministry said. 'Therefore, it is not Thailand that is in violation of the obligations made to one another under international law by using mechanisms outside of what was previously agreed upon,' the ministry said. Thailand had successfully used the JBC and equivalents to resolve border issues with other neighbouring countries, the ministry said. Its land border negotiations with Laos and Malaysia were 90% completed through their JBC. 'Such mechanisms can be used effectively to produce results if there is a true intention and sincerity in implementing them, without having to rely on external mechanisms such as the ICJ," the Thai ministry said. "In addition to Thailand, this bilateral negotiation method is the same method that, in fact, other neighboring countries of Cambodia use to resolve border issues with Cambodia.' Therefore, the Thai government called on Cambodia to use the JBC to resolve all border issues including those concerning four contested areas that Cambodia refused to discuss in the JBC meeting, the ministry said. Cambodia's refusal to discuss the four areas in the JBC 'is considered a violation of the agreement under the MOU of 2000, which clearly states that all border surveys and demarcations must be carried out jointly under the JBC mechanism, without referring the border issue to other mechanisms that have not been agreed upon,' the ministry said. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs also said that Thailand had waited and called for Cambodia's turn to host a JBC meeting for 12 years before the meeting happened on June 14 and 15. 'Thailand would like to categorically deny the false accusation that Thailand caused the JBC process to stall. In fact, Thailand has never withdrawn from the process and has always called for it to convene and proceed," the Thai foreign ministry said. "Therefore, Thailand would like to urge Cambodia to respect the mutual obligation to negotiate peacefully before resorting to other mechanisms beyond the agreed-upon methods in order to resolve the Thai-Cambodian border issue sustainably and to prevent such tensions from recurring in the future and impacting relations between the countries and the people on both sides, especially the people living along the border areas on both sides,'
Bangkok Post
4 hours ago
- Bangkok Post
Betting on Thailand's casino bill
The Pheu Thai-led government is again under pressure to put on hold the controversial entertainment complex bill after Deputy Finance Minister Julapun Amornvivat indicated the bill needs to be reviewed by the newly formed cabinet before proceeding with it further. Originally approved by the cabinet on March 27 following revisions by the Council of State, the bill, proposed by the Ministry of Finance, is regarded as a centrepiece of the government's economic policy. The proposed integrated entertainment complexes which would include legal casinos are projected to attract investment worth 119–283 billion baht annually, boost foreign tourist arrivals by 5–10% and reduce the dependency on seasonal tourism. Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra has repeatedly defended the policy, which was declared in her government's policy statement upon taking office. The bill was fast-tracked for parliamentary debate before the last session ended in April, but was shelved amid mounting opposition. Ms Paetongtarn insisted the bill had not been withdrawn, but she said there were more urgent issues such as the United States' reciprocal tariff measures to focus on. The draft legislation was initially scheduled to top the House agenda on July 9, ahead of four political amnesty and reconciliation bills. However, comments by Mr Julapun last week suggested it may be postponed or even dropped. Tactical retreat? Political analysts view the government's move to postpone deliberation or withdraw the bill as a strategic move amid intensifying public and political pressure. The current political situation draws comparisons to the political crisis that followed the Yingluck Shinawatra administration's passage of the amnesty bill in late 2013. Yuttaporn Isarachai, a political scientist from Sukhothaithammathirat University, said the casino-entertainment complex policy is not off the table, but the political climate leaves no room for missteps. With the Thai-Cambodian border tension, economic slowdown, the slim majority due to the Bhumjaithai Party's withdrawal, the ruling party must reduce risks and defuse tension, he said. "The casino-entertainment complex policy is divisive among parties and the public, so pulling it out is a strategic move. Still, I believe the government won't abandon the project which is intended to stimulate the economy," he said. Olarn Thinbangtieo, deputy dean of Burapha University's Faculty of Political Science and Law, said there are two reasons behind the delay. First, the government has a slim majority after Bhumjaithai exited the coalition over the leaked audio clip between Prime Minister Paetongtarn and Cambodian Senate President Hun Sen. Also, the Prachachat Party, a coalition partner which has support base in the three southern border provinces, has opposed the bill on religious grounds. Other partners such as the United Thai Nation (UTN) Party and Democrat Party may have to weigh the political costs of supporting the bill. Second, public discontent over the government's handling of the Thai-Cambodia territorial dispute is gaining momentum, he said, adding protests against the casino-entertainment policy could gain even more traction if the bill proceeds. When the bill was first placed on the House agenda earlier this year, it sparked protests led by the Network of Students and People for Reform of Thailand (NSPRT). Though the demonstrations subsided after the session ended in April, public sentiment against the bill remains. Mr Olarn said the government might wait for public sentiments to cool off before reviving the bill, but he noted it could be wishful thinking as protests seem to be increasingly justified. The analyst said the opposition People's Party (PP), which has expressed interest in legalising gambling, would likely distance itself from the casino bill for now and focus on the amnesty proposal, which serves its political interests. "If the PP and Pheu Thai share the belief that the old power bloc is aiming to topple Thaksin and Ms Paetongtarn, they may form an alliance for long-term goals and eventually realign on the bill. "But for now, Pheu Thai must survive the fragile coalition and avoid inflaming street protests," he said. Deeper Dive podcast: Legalising casinos Fears of legal gambling Government spokesman Jirayu Huangsap said the bill underwent four rounds of public hearings. The final round was held from Feb 28 to March 14 with 71,289 participants. Of the total respondents, about 80%, or 57,000 people, expressed support for the bill. Despite these figures, the network of anti-gambling advocates remains sceptical due to weak law enforcement. They are also worried the bill could be altered during the examination and the final version could be far worse than the one proposed by the Finance Ministry. Thanakorn Khomkrit, secretary-general of the Stop Gambling Foundation, said the group wants the bill withdrawn entirely, not merely postponed. If the government strengthens its majority in the future, the bill could be brought back. Under the current charter, the bill will remain on the House agenda unless it is formally withdrawn or parliament is dissolved, or the House completes its full term. As long as the bill has not yet passed its first reading, it can be dropped only under those conditions. However, if the bill passes its first reading, deliberation can resume within six months of the first parliamentary session. Mr Thanakorn raised concern over regulatory loopholes and inadequate safeguards, saying they offer no guarantee that the government will be able to control casino operations. He also feared the bill could pave way for legalising online gambling. "At the moment, online gambling isn't discussed. But who knows when it might sneak in later," he said. Despite his group's stance against the casino bill, Mr Thanakorn said the group's objection is issue-specific and they have no plan to join the anti-government protests. Revised draft The bill, revised by the Council of State, included major changes in four areas. First, the prime minister and the interior minister are jointly responsible for enforcing the law. Previously, this role was solely assigned to the prime minister. Second, the policy committee is empowered to review and make recommendations on key issues for cabinet consideration including designated zones for entertainment complexes. Third, the policy committee will appoint the director of the entertainment complex office, without requiring prior cabinet approval. Fourth, the policy committee must present a detailed policy framework to the cabinet and this includes the number of licences to be issued, designated areas for entertainment complexes, investment plans and safeguards for social impacts. The Council of State also introduced new regulations including a 10% cap on casino operations, classification of licensed operators as financial institutions subject to the anti-money laundering laws, mandatory deposits of no less than 50 million baht for at least six consecutive months for Thai nationals to be allowed to gamble in the entertainment complexes.
Bangkok Post
11 hours ago
- Bangkok Post
Stop blaming migrant workers
The latest border dispute between Cambodia and Thailand, as well as the influx of refugees fleeing unrest in Myanmar, is triggering nationalistic fears that foreigners will take away jobs and social services from locals. Yet we must understand that migrant workers are not our enemy. The situation in Mae Sot, a busy border town in Tak province, opposite Myanmar, is a glaring example. Wiroj Lakkhanaadisorn, lawmaker and deputy leader of the opposition People's Party (PP), recently took to social media to post about a recent trip there. In it, he noted illegal border crossings, corruption, land grabs, fake businesses by call centre mafias and migrant-run businesses that make locals less competitive. Some netizens praised his effort to expose crime and corruption, but labour rights experts warn his views on migrant workers may fuel a dangerous form of nationalism and miss the real issue behind the matter: outdated laws and a corrupt employment system. With his post, Mr Wiroj has a point. Mae Sot is a hub of crime and exploitation. Local officials routinely take bribes from undocumented workers and underworld bosses. Some migrant-run shops skip taxes and permits. Rich criminals can buy their way out of sticky situations, but poor migrants have no power to protect themselves. These problems are real, but blaming migrants never makes the problem go away. At the root of the issue is outdated migrant labour laws. Thailand allows migrants to legally do few manual labour jobs. But the truth is that these laws often fail to reflect on the ground. In towns like Mae Sot, migrants are the local economy's lifeline. The market depends on them as many migrant workers are also consumers, making their presence important to Thai businesses. However, since the law does not recognise them as legal workers, they live in fear, and employers also risk getting fined by the authorities for hiring illegal workers. The country's rigid registration system makes things harder. Registration is confusing, expensive and often has a short opening window. Workers in Mae Sot must travel to Chiang Mai to register, and many would just give up, as it is easier to stay undocumented and pay bribes than to follow the law. This is how the "police card" system emerged. Migrants pay 600 baht per month to some officers in exchange for protection from arrest. The government knows about this practice, but nothing ever happens. Worse still, the law makes it so that registered workers are tied to their initial employer in Thailand, making them unable to easily change jobs. Some rights advocates say migrant workers should be registered simply as legal migrants, free to change jobs and contribute more effectively to the economy. This aligns with human rights principles but is not possible under Thailand's rigid laws. To make a difference, reforms must focus on making registration simple, affordable and flexible to prevent exploitation and reduce opportunities for corruption. Currently, the rules are designed to control rather than protect. A fair system should make it easy to legally work, not make it impossible. International labour standards say that work is a basic right. Migrants should not be punished for working, nor should they be locked into particular jobs. Many have lived and worked here for years. Their children go to Thai schools and universities, making them valuable human resources. Yet, they are still treated like outsiders. The state must therefore stop treating migrants like a threat and start seeing them as essential to our economy. If the government wants fewer undocumented workers, it must make it possible for them to register to become legal. If it wants less corruption, it must ensure migrants and employers are not pushed underground. This is not just about Mae Sot, it is about how we choose to manage our borders, our economy and our future. A country cannot claim to stand for justice if it builds its system around silence, fear and blame. Thailand has a choice: stay trapped in outdated laws, corruption and jingoism, or take a step forward by making the law match the reality on the ground. Migrant workers are not a burden, they keep our economy running. Treating them fairly isn't just good policy, it also defines us as a decent, humane society.
