Ireland's oldest university names its first building after a woman. It only took 433 years
Trinity College Dublin may have been founded by Queen Elizabeth I, but for over 400 years every building on the prestigious university campus has been named after a man. Until now.
This month, an official ceremony marks the renaming of one of the main libraries at Ireland's leading university — formerly named after a supporter of slavery — in honor of the internationally acclaimed Irish poet Eavan Boland.
'Eavan Boland's poetry helped write women back into history,' Mary Robinson, Ireland's first female president and a former United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, told CNN via email. 'She redefined the literary canon to include women's voices and those on the margins,' Robinson said of the poet, who died in 2020.
The striking Paul Koralek designed library that will soon bear the feminist thinker's name is considered the country's best example of Brutalist architecture.
A concrete and ashlar granite cube, the late modernist building also comprises a soft side through curved glass bay windows in bronze frames. The built-in, individual study nooks are still used by students 60 years later. Concrete walls, poured on site into Douglas fir moulds, have a faint woodgrain.
Called the New Library when it opened in 1967, a decade later it was named after the renowned 18th-century philosopher George Berkeley. Berkeley, an academic and bishop, profited from the international slave trade and promoted ideas of enslavement throughout his life.
During the global Black Lives Matter movement that followed George Floyd's murder in 2020, students called for the denaming of the library.
Their petition sparked a three-year denaming and renaming process that engaged both the college community and the wider public.
Had the name gone unchallenged it would have been 'a quiet endorsement of a past in which other people had suffered,' said Philomena Mullen, assistant professor of Black Studies at the university.
On a personal level, Mullen said she found it 'very hard to go in and sit in the building commemorating somebody who thought that somebody like me didn't have any value.'
After almost a year-and-a-half of deliberation, Eavan Boland was chosen from the 855 public submissions made.
Boland, 'Ireland's leading feminist poet' according to the New York Times Book Review, taught at Stanford University in California for years, having served as director of creative writing for over two decades when she died at age 75.
Removing Berkeley's name 'created a freehold on a piece of architecture that was a really good fit for Eavan Boland,' said Gerardine Meaney, professor of Cultural Theory at University College Dublin.
Mullen told CNN she was also pleased with the choice because 'Boland was concerned with who gets written into history, and who is left out.'
It's not the first time Trinity has confronted questions over women's place in its history.
'Over my dead body will women enter this college,' George Salmon, university provost at the end of the 19th century, is reputed to have said.
A month after his death, Trinity enrolled three women students, becoming the first of the historic universities of Ireland and Britain to admit women, in 1904. (Other universities had opened their degree courses to women sooner.)
It now has a student body that is 60% female and elected its first female provost in 2021.
Boland had become the 'public poet' of Ireland, following in the footsteps of the late Nobel Prize-winning poet Seamus Heaney, Meaney told CNN. 'She embodied for people the possibility of being a poet and a woman and a mother.'
But the path to widespread recognition was not easy in a literary establishment dominated by men. Boland's daughter, Eavan Casey, recalled to CNN that her mother once said, 'it would be easier to write a poem about a bomb than a baby!'
'There was no place in Irish poetry for women,' Boland's friend, poet and novelist Theo Dorgan, told CNN. Referencing Boland's seminal 1982 book 'Night Feed,' he said, 'a lot of scholars don't like to go back that far, to poems about breastfeeding and the domestic — it's as if that's not important, and yet it was at the heart of what Eavan did.'
A silt of milk.The last suck.And now your eyes are openBirth-coloured and offended.Earth wakes.You go back to sleep.The feed is ended.
– From 'Night Feed'
At the same time, Dorgan said, 'she could write the most fierce and uncompromising vindication of the rights of women in her poetry and essays.'
That activist approach was shared by Robinson, who quoted her friend Boland – both of them Trinity College graduates – in her inaugural address as Ireland's first female president in 1990.
'I look back on our work together as important in the resurgence of Irish feminism in the 1970s,' she said.
Her work also had international resonance. Boland read her poem, 'Our future will become the past of other women,' at the UN in 2018 to mark 100 years of the first Irish women being able to vote.
And when Ireland served on the UN Security Council from 2021 to 2022, 'we used excerpts from the poem liberally throughout our term, whether working with women from Afghanistan, Myanmar or Northern Ireland; it was inspirational,' Geraldine Byrne Nason, Ireland's then-Ambassador to the UN and now its envoy to Washington, told CNN.
Boland was also 'an extraordinary mentor to so many younger poets,' Meaney said, holding workshops across Ireland during the 1980s which were 'pivotal' for those who attended.
Ireland is famed for its writers, many of whom studied at Trinity. Samuel Beckett and Oscar Wilde have their names on buildings to prove it. But until this moment Trinity has had a failing grade at commemorating its female literary greats.
It's a blind spot for the wider country too. In 2017, such was the prevalence of an all-male poster of Ireland's writers that the Irish Times felt compelled to create its own version featuring award-winning female best-sellers.
More recently, Irish novelists Sally Rooney and Claire Keegan have had huge international success.
Cillian Murphy starred in 2024's film adaptation of Keegan's Booker Prize- shortlisted novella 'Small Things Like These,' and Sally Rooney's novel 'Normal People,' which has sold over 3 million copies, was adapted into a TV show in 2020 that was streamed over 65 million times that year.
Much of Rooney's novel is in fact set in Trinity College, with actors Paul Mescal and Daisy Edgar-Jones crossing the cobblestoned squares to attend lectures, or, in Mescal's case, study in the library in question.
Boland's name is now part of that campus.
It's a fitting tribute for a writer who explored how women are kept outside of history, left out of the stories that nations tell about themselves with statues and monuments.
'Heritage is something we choose,' Laurajane Smith, professor of Heritage and Museum Studies at Australian National University, told CNN.
'We decide something is heritage because it has meaning for us in terms of what we want to remember and what we want to commemorate,' she said.
Heritage isn't a thing of the past, she added, but 'all about the present' and 'who we want to be.'
A plaque will be unveiled to mark the renaming of the library at a special event on March 10 but a date for the external signage - Eavan Boland's name in big letters for all to behold — has not yet been announced.
A spokesperson for Trinity told CNN there were regulatory restrictions on signage on a Protected Structure like the library, calling the ongoing process 'a procedural matter.'
The delay has frustrated some. 'The new sign needs to go up pronto,' said history student Méabh Scahill, who spoke in favor of Boland at a student-hosted debate on the subject of the renaming.
'I'm sure some people are still calling it the Berkeley library,' she tells CNN. 'I feel like people have reverted back'
Old habits die hard. But Eavan Casey has allowed herself to imagine her mother's name on the facade.
'It will become part of the language of the university,' she said in wonder, as if she couldn't quite believe it.
For Nessa O'Mahony, part of a network of female Irish poets who have campaigned for greater recognition for Boland, the long wait is nearly over.
'What a glorious thing, as an up-and-coming writer, to make an arrangement to meet a friend outside The Boland!' she said.
'Do you know, I'm looking forward to doing that myself.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Los Angeles Times
29 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
U.N. food agency appeals for $46 million to help 2 million Haitians facing severe hunger
UNITED NATIONS — The U.N. food agency is appealing for $46 million for the next six months to help about 2 million Haitians in dire need of food, including 8,500 at the worst catastrophic level of hunger. The appeal was issued by Lola Castro, the World Food Program's regional director for Latin America and the Caribbean, who recently returned from Haiti, where escalating gang violence has displaced well over 1 million people and left half the population — 5.7 million people — in urgent need of food. Two million of them are in the two worst categories in the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification, the leading international authority on hunger crises, and 8,500 are in the worst Phase 5 category, she said. That means at least one in five people or households severely lack food and face starvation and destitution. Haiti is one of only five countries in the world that have people in the Phase 5 category of catastrophic hunger, Castro said, 'and it is really dramatic to have this in the Western Hemisphere.' Gangs have grown in power since the assassination of President Jovenel Moïse in July 2021 and are now estimated to control 85% of the capital and are moving into surrounding areas. Haiti has not had a president since the assassination, and the top U.N. official in the country said in April the country could face 'total chaos' without funding to confront the gangs.. A U.N.-backed mission led by Kenyan police arrived in Haiti last year to help quell gang violence, but the mission remains understaffed and underfunded, with only about 40% of the 2,500 personnel originally envisioned. The WFP, the world's largest humanitarian organization, is among the U.N. agencies facing funding cuts, mainly from the United States, which provided nearly half of its funding in 2024. Castro said WFP reached over 1.3 million people this year until March using carryover funds from last year. But the agency is facing a dramatic situation now with food stocks only until July to assist with emergencies, new displacements or hurricanes, she said. In the past four years, Castro said WFP always had stocks to help between 250,000 and 500,000 people with any emergency. 'This year, we start the hurricane season with an empty warehouse where we have no stocks for assisting any emergency, or we have no cash neither to go and buy (food) locally if it was possible in some areas, or to do a rapid humanitarian response,' Castro said. 'We are very concerned that a single storm can put hundreds of thousands of people in Haiti again into humanitarian catastrophe and hunger.' WFP normally provides a meal every day for around 500,000 school children, but that number will be cut in half without additional resources, she told a video press conference on Tuesday. With $46 million, she said, WFP will be able to help the 2 million Haitians in most need of food, keep providing school meals for half a million children, and provide social protection for very vulnerable people in camps for the displaced. Haiti must not be forgotten as the world deals with other crises, Castro said, urging donors to be generous. 'We really need to stop this and to hold the line on hunger,' she said. 'We continue calling the humanitarian community to provide support.' With $46 million, she said, WFP will be able to help the 2 million Haitians in the two worst IPC categories, keep providing school meals for half a million children, and provide social protection for very vulnerable people in camps for the displaced. Lederer writes for the Associated Press.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Pattern of defiance: Israel expands settlements in face of Western pressure
Israel's international allies are growing louder in their condemnation of its war on Gaza and its continued construction of illegal settlements in the occupied West Bank. United Nations experts, human rights groups and legal scholars have all previously told Al Jazeera that Israel is carrying out a genocide in Gaza and committing abuses that may amount to war crimes and crimes against humanity in the West Bank. And yet less than two weeks after receiving a stern warning from its Western allies, Israel approved 22 illegal settlements in the West Bank, amounting to what has been described as the largest land grab since Israeli and Palestinian leaders inked the Oslo Peace Accords in 1993. 'Israel is all about showing [the world] who calls the shots. They are saying … you can condemn us all you want, but in the end, you will bow down to us and not the other way around,' said Diana Buttu, a legal scholar and political analyst focused on Israel and Palestine. The Oslo Accords were ostensibly aimed at creating a Palestinian state, including the Gaza Strip and the West Bank, with occupied East Jerusalem as its capital. However, in practice, Israel has continued to expand illegal settlements and render the two-state solution impossible, analysts told Al has often announced the building of new illegal settlements in response to signals of support for Palestinian statehood from the UN or its allies. In 2012, Israel went so far as to approve 3,000 new settler homes in the occupied West Bank after the Palestinian Authority (PA) – the entity created out of the Oslo Accords to govern swaths of the West Bank – was granted non-member observer status in the UN General Assembly. Last year, Israel's far-right Finance Minister, Bezalel Smotrich, warned that a new illegal settlement would be built for every country that recognises a Palestinian state. The announcement came after Spain, Norway, and Ireland took the symbolic step in May 2024. 'I certainly think there is a pattern where Israel responds to pressure regarding its occupation – or anything else – by announcing settler expansion,' said Omar Rahman, an expert focused on Israel and Palestine for the Middle East Council for Global Affairs. 'We see that pattern repeated over and over again,' he told Al Jazeera. As global pressure mounts against Israel's war on Gaza, Israel has continued to test the patience of its allies. On May 21, Israeli troops fired warning shots at a group of European, Asian and Arab diplomats who were on an official mission to assess the humanitarian crisis in Jenin refugee camp, which has been subjected to a months-long attack and siege by the Israeli army since the start of the year. 'I don't know where the red line is. It is clear that there is no red line,' said Zionist militias ethnically cleansed some 750,000 Palestinians to make way for the state of Israel in 1948 – an event referred to as the 'Nakba' or catastrophe – Israel has increasingly annexed and occupied the little that remains of Palestinian land. Annexation of the occupied West Bank has accelerated in recent years thanks to far-right settlers who occupy positions in the Israeli government, said Khaled Elgindy, a visiting scholar at Georgetown University's Center for Contemporary Arab Studies. He believes Israel was always planning to approve the 22 illegal settlements irrespective of the joint statement issued by France, the UK and Canada, as it fit in with the state's ultimate goal of expanding Jewish settlement of the occupied West Bank. 'Nobody can really think that if those countries didn't issue an announcement that [further] annexation wasn't going to happen. Of course, it was going to happen,' he told Al Jazeera. Rahman, from the Middle East Council, believes Israel's tactic of announcing pre-planned settlement expansion in the face of Western pressure simply aims to dissuade its allies from taking concrete action. He suspects Canada, the UK and France will likely not slap on targeted sanctions against Israeli officials, as they have threatened to do, instead using the argument that any moves against Israel will lead to a backlash against Palestinians.'[Canada, UK and France] may say they are acting for the preservation of the two-state solution by not doing anything to save the two-state solution,' Rahman told Al Jazeera. Analysts believe that sanctions on Israel would be the only way to rescue the two-state solution and end Israel's war on Gaza, but accept that comprehensive sanctions against the Israeli state would still be unlikely at this stage. Instead, Western countries like Canada, France and the UK may target sanctions at the far-right ministers most associated with pro-settler policies, Smotrich and National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir. 'These men … are trying to jam in everything they can do now because they know there is no guarantee they will maintain their positions of power indefinitely,' Elgindy told Al Jazeera. Buttu fears that European countries will merely resort to more symbolic measures such as 'recognising Palestine', which will have little impact on the ground. 'By the time everyone gets around to recognising Palestine, there won't be any land [for Palestinians] left,' she told Al Jazeera.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Supreme Court strikes down Mexico's lawsuit against US gun manufacturers
The United States Supreme Court has rejected a lawsuit from the government of Mexico that argued American gun manufacturers like Smith & Wesson failed to prevent illegal firearm sales to cartels and criminal organisations. In one of a slew of decisions handed down on Thursday, the top court decided that the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act shielded the gun manufacturers from Mexico's suit. The court's decision was unanimous. Writing for the nine-member bench, Justice Elena Kagan explained that even 'indifference' to the trafficking of firearms does not amount to willfully assisting a criminal enterprise. 'Mexico's complaint does not plausibly allege that the defendant manufacturers aided and abetted gun dealers' unlawful sales of firearms to Mexican traffickers,' Kagan wrote (PDF). 'We have little doubt that, as the complaint asserts, some such sales take place — and that the manufacturers know they do. But still, Mexico has not adequately pleaded what it needs to: that the manufacturers 'participate in' those sales.' The Mexican government's complaint, she added, 'does not pinpoint, as most aiding-and-abetting claims do, any specific criminal transactions that the defendants (allegedly) assisted'. The case stems from a complaint filed in August 2021 in a federal court in Boston, Massachusetts. In that initial complaint, the Mexican government — then led by President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador — argued that the sheer volume of firearms illegally smuggled into its country amounted to negligence on the part of gun manufacturers. Those firearms, it said, had exacted a devastating toll on Mexican society. The country has some of the highest homicide rates in the world, with the United Nations estimating in 2023 that nearly 25 intentional killings happen for every 100,000 people. Much of that crime has been credited to the presence of cartels and other criminal enterprises operating in Mexico. The Igarape Institute, a Brazil-based think tank, estimated that Mexico's crime cost the country nearly 1.92 percent of its gross domestic product (GDP) from 2010 to 2014. The US is the largest arms manufacturer in the world — and also the largest source of illegally sourced firearms. The stream of firearms that pour into Mexico and the broader Latin America region, for instance, has been dubbed the 'iron river'. Nearly 70 percent of the illegal guns seized in Mexico from 2014 to 2018, for instance, were traced to origins in the US, according to the Department of Justice. That has led countries like Mexico to demand action from the US to limit the number of firearms trafficked abroad. In its lawsuit, Mexico targeted some of the biggest names in gun manufacturing in the US: not just Smith & Wesson, but also companies like Beretta USA, Glock Inc and Colt's Manufacturing LLC. But the firearm companies pushed back against the lawsuit, arguing they could not be held responsible for the actions of criminals in another country. The Supreme Court itself cast doubt on some of Mexico's arguments, including the idea that the gun manufacturers designed and marketed their products specifically for cartel buyers. 'Mexico focuses on production of 'military style' assault weapons, but these products are widely legal and purchased by ordinary consumers. Manufacturers cannot be charged with assisting criminal acts simply because Mexican cartel members also prefer these guns,' Justice Kagan wrote. 'The same applies to firearms with Spanish language names or graphics alluding to Mexican history,' she added. 'While they may be 'coveted by the cartels,' they also may appeal to 'millions of law-abiding Hispanic Americans.'' On Thursday, an industry trade group, the National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF), celebrated the Supreme Court's decision as a 'tremendous victory' against an unfair charge. It had filed an amicus brief in support of the defendants in the case. 'For too long, gun control activists have attempted to twist basic tort law to malign the highly-regulated U.S. firearm industry with the criminal actions of violent organized crime, both here in the United States and abroad,' the group's senior vice president, Lawrence G Keane, said in a statement. Keane added that he and others in the firearm industry felt 'sympathetic to plight of those in Mexico who are victims of rampant and uncontrolled violence at the hands of narco-terrorist drug cartels'. But he said the issue was about 'responsible firearm ownership', not the actions of gun manufacturers.