logo
As conservatives push for more babies, Congress proposes cuts that could hurt families, toddler and infants

As conservatives push for more babies, Congress proposes cuts that could hurt families, toddler and infants

Miami Herald15-05-2025
Megan Newsome was 27 weeks pregnant when she was diagnosed with a rare form of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, a cancer of the blood. After her son was born four weeks early, Newsome underwent intensive chemotherapy treatments while her newborn gained strength in the neonatal intensive care unit. Newsome, who lives in Maine, suddenly found herself navigating a complex and expensive web of her own health challenges, as well as her son's.
Luckily for Newsome, there was some relief, thanks to America's federally funded safety net programs. During her pregnancy and treatment, Newsome relied on Medicaid. She enrolled in a food benefits program. And her son enrolled in Early Head Start, where he had access to education, developmental screenings and socialization.
Now, many of the programs Newsome and millions of others rely on to support their infants and toddlers are at grave risk due to cuts proposed under President Donald Trump's "skinny" budget or by congressional Republicans. These cuts would have an outsized impact on the youngest, most vulnerable Americans, experts say.
Unlike funding for preschool and older children, which largely comes from state sources, funding for programs that support babies and toddlers mostly comes from the federal government. Proposed cuts are threatening the infrastructure that babies and toddlers rely on at a time when costs are high for families, said Melissa Boteach, chief policy officer at the nonprofit Zero to Three, which focuses on infants and toddlers.
Here are a few programs targeting the country's youngest that could face devastating cuts:
Medicaid: Cuts to Medicaid, a program that provides health care to lower income children and families, are a real possibility. Lawmakers are also discussing changes to eligibility rules, which could make it harder for families to qualify. Trump's budget, released earlier this month, calls for $674 million in cuts to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services - though officials claim benefits would not be affected. More than 40 percent of births are covered by Medicaid. And millions of infants access critical services like health care and therapies for developmental delays through Medicaid. States that have expanded Medicaid have seen greater declines in infant mortality rates.Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP): Cuts to the food aid program, which are under discussion by lawmakers, could increase food insecurity and affect health and development for infants and toddlers. More than 4.5 million children under the age of 5 received SNAP benefits in 2022. Research shows children who receive SNAP benefits have better nutrition, lower risks of obesity, fewer hospitalizations and develop better emotionally and academically compared to their peers who are eligible but who do not receive such benefits.Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP): In April, the Trump administration terminated the entire staff of LIHEAP, a program that helps low-income families pay home energy bills, often connected to extreme heat or cold. Trump's budget proposes cutting more than $4 million from the program. "We know that babies, as well as elderly, are some of the most vulnerable people to climate change and extreme weather," said Boteach. "And so when you're cutting off cooling and heating assistance, and especially as we're heading into summer, you'd be leaving a lot of families without basic energy assistance."Child Care Access Means Parents in School (CCAMPIS): Trump's budget calls for the elimination of the program that subsidizes child care for college students, calling it "unaffordable and duplicative." Eighteen percent of undergraduate students are parents. Government research has found student-parents who use subsidies from the program are more likely to stay in school; and higher education levels for parents are associated with better care and play interactions with infants and toddlers and later success in school and work.Social Services Block Grant (SSBG) and Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF): While programs like Head Start and the Child Care and Development Block Grant are the most well-known sources of federal funding for child care, other federal funding streams are also used by states, including these two. Many states have taken advantage of the ability to transfer funds from TANF to their child care subsidy programs - transferring more than $1 billion in 2023 alone. Similarly, the block grant is also used by states for some child care funding. Research suggests that eliminating that grant could cause more than 39,000 children to lose care. Cuts or the elimination of these programs have been proposed by congressional Republicans.
Many programs serving the most vulnerable families have already been hobbled - or obliterated - by prior cuts. The Trump administration gutted a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) office that coordinates newborn hearing screenings, slashed maternal health programs and terminated nearly half of the staff in the office of the National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities. In early April, a committee that determines which rare diseases to test for during early infancy was disbanded, as was the CDC's team that investigates and prevents lead poisoning.
For Newsome, federal support programs weren't just helpful, they likely kept her and her son alive, she said. Her toddler is now almost 2 and is walking, feeding himself and working on potty training. Newsome is entering her first semester of college to earn a degree in business administration. Without the help they've received, "We definitely wouldn't be in any of the places we are today," Newsome said. "Both of us are thriving."
Contact staff writer Jackie Mader at 212-678-3562 or mader@hechingerreport.org.
This story about Medicaid cuts was produced by The Hechinger Report, a nonprofit, independent news organization focused on inequality and innovation in education. Sign up for the Early Childhood newsletter.
The post As conservatives push for more babies, Congress proposes cuts that could hurt families, toddler and infants appeared first on The Hechinger Report.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump says US air support possible for Ukraine security guarantee
Trump says US air support possible for Ukraine security guarantee

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump says US air support possible for Ukraine security guarantee

President Donald Trump said Tuesday that US air support and European ground troops could be part of security guarantees for Ukraine, warning of a "rough" situation if talks between Moscow and Kyiv fail. "When it comes to security, they're willing to put people on the ground," he told Fox News, referring to European allies whom he met in the White House on Monday. "We're willing to help them with things, especially, probably, if you talk about by air, because no one has the kind of stuff we have, really, they don't," Trump said. He added his "assurance" that no US ground troops would deploy to Ukraine, and he categorically ruled out Ukraine joining the Western military alliance NATO. Post-war security is a key concern for Kyiv after more than three years of Russian invasion. Moscow has long said it will not tolerate Ukraine joining NATO and has been hostile to the idea of Western troops deploying to the former Soviet territory. Trump said that "France and Germany, a couple of them, UK -- they want to have boots on the ground." "I don't think it's going to be a problem, to be honest with you. I think, I think Putin is tired of" the war, he added. Trump said that following his talks Monday with European leaders he is pushing to organize a bilateral summit between Russian President Vladimir Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky -- followed by another where he will join. "I called President Putin, and we're trying to work out a meeting with President Zelensky. We'll see what happens there," he said. "If that works out, if it works out, then I'll go to the trilat and close it up." Saying it was possible Putin would back out, Trump said "I hope President Putin's going to be good and if not, it's going to be a rough situation." Zelensky "has to show some flexibility also." In addition to the question of guaranteeing Ukraine's future security, the other key sticking point in ending the war is the status of the huge swaths of land occupied by Russia. Trump said Ukraine has to accept it will not get its lost territories back -- including the eastern Donbas region -- but in return will get peace. "I assume you've all seen the map. You know, a big chunk of territory is taken and that territory has been taken. Now they're talking about Donbas, but Donbas right now, as you know, is 79 percent owned and controlled by Russia," Trump said. The US leader said Ukraine was not powerful enough to change the situation. "This was a war and Russia is a powerful military nation, you know. Whether people like it or not, it's a powerful nation. It's a much bigger nation," he said. "You don't take, you don't take on a nation that's 10 times your size." "Everybody can play cute and this and that, but, you know, Ukraine is going to get their life back," Trump said about a peace deal involving Ukraine surrendering land. "They're going to stop having people killed all over the place and they're going to get a lot of land." sms/ksb

Trump Targets Corporate America to Achieve Economic and Foreign Policy Goals
Trump Targets Corporate America to Achieve Economic and Foreign Policy Goals

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump Targets Corporate America to Achieve Economic and Foreign Policy Goals

(Bloomberg) -- He didn't campaign on it. It wasn't even broached during his first administration. He criticized his predecessor for it. Chicago Schools Seeks $1 Billion of Short-Term Debt as Cash Gone A Photographer's Pipe Dream: Capturing New York's Vast Water System A London Apartment Tower With Echoes of Victorian Rail and Ancient Rome Why New York City Has a Fleet of New EVs From a Dead Carmaker Princeton Plans New Budget Cuts as Pressure From Trump Builds But this month President Donald Trump made clear that he's willing to use the full force of the US government to directly intervene in corporate matters to achieve his economic and foreign policy goals. Trump, backed by his team of Wall Street financiers, took the unprecedented step of seeking to collect a portion of money generated from sales of AI chips to China by Nvidia Corp. and Advanced Micro Devices Inc. And in a move that could see the US government become Intel Corp.'s largest shareholder, the administration is said to be in talks for taking a 10% stake in the beleaguered chipmaker. Last month, the Pentagon also decided to take a $400 million preferred equity stake in a little-known rare earth mining company. It's a series of moves that has surprised Wall Street and Washington policy veterans, who privately and publicly acknowledged they've never seen anything like it in their decades-long careers. The actions, if successful, could leave private investors and average 401(k) savings holders enriched while catapulting US national security further ahead of China. But they're also risky bets that could end with taxpayer losses and distort markets in ways investors can't predict. 'I'm very concerned that we're going to have these rolling sectors where the president starts saying 'you have to pay us just to sell internationally,'' Lee Munson, the chief investment officer at Portfolio Wealth Advisors, with $390 million in assets under management, said. 'Where does this end? I don't even know how to buy companies right now that have exposure to China that have high-tech IP.' The Trump administration's direct involvement in corporate matters is becoming a marker of the president's second term. Trump, a self-described dealmaker, has a mixed track record of success yet has vowed to bring more of a business approach to governing in Washington. In addition to the Nvidia and AMD revenue promise and potential Intel investment stake, his administration secured the 'Golden Share' from Nippon Steel Corp., a Japanese steelmaker that gives Trump personal power to make decisions on United States Steel Corp. corporate decisions. In these cases, the administration is picking winners and losers, and risks undermining the free flow of capital. 'The Trump administration's focus on industries like steel, semiconductors, and critical minerals is not arbitrary – these sectors are critical to our national and economic security,' White House spokesman Kush Desai said in an emailed statement. 'Cooled inflation, trillions in new investments, historic trade deals, and hundreds of billions in tariff revenue prove how President Trump's hands-on leadership is paving the way towards a new Golden Age for America.' Trump surprised markets earlier this month when he announced Nvidia and AMD agreed to pay the US government 15% of their revenue from AI chip sales to China. The move rankled investors, trade experts, lawmakers and others who feared a much broader slippery slope in which the federal government could begin forcing pay-for-play scenarios in everything from trade negotiations to defense contracts. Word that the White House is contemplating using Chips Act money to take a direct stake in chip-maker Intel added to the uncertainty around changing norms between private sector companies and the US government. The move could provide a much-needed boost to Intel's ambitious plan for a sparkling new chips facility in Ohio, which is vital to rebuilding domestic chip production in the US but which has been delayed amid shrinking sales and mounting losses at the company. SoftBank Group Corp. agreed this week to buy $2 billion of Intel stock in a surprise deal. 'Chinese Model' In America's free market economy, the government typically doesn't buy stakes in companies. There are exceptions, of course, such as during the financial crisis of 2008-2009, when it stepped in to support major names like Citigroup Inc., American International Group Inc. and General Motors Co. While Intel has performance issues to grapple with, it isn't facing the imminent threat of collapse. That's in part why investors, lawmakers, national security experts and others interviewed repeatedly referred to 'uncertainty' and 'uncharted territory' when asked to contemplate the risks associated with Trump's new policies. 'It's state direction that we haven't had in the US, it's very much the Chinese model making its way into US government,' Gary Hufbauer, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, said. The Trump administration's approach to public companies in the first year of his second term is in some ways an evolution of the economic statecraft tools he deployed in his first four years as president. Back then he deployed trade levers that hadn't been used in years or decades, from Section 301 tariffs on entire countries, like China, to Section 232 tariffs on sectors like steel and automobiles. The policies weren't popular and they rattled markets, but supporters argued that the tariffs tamped down Chinese and other foreign products that flooded the US market and drove some American companies out of business. Trump has continued to push the boundaries of using novel tools in his second administration. 'What we see here is when it comes to big economic questions like tariffs and fees for exports and also the MP Materials deal, he is willing to push legal boundaries on big economic issues in a way that he wasn't in the first term,' said Peter Harrell, a nonresident scholar for the American Statecraft Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Caitlin Legacki, a former Commerce Department official in the Biden administration, said an argument in favor of 'national champions' is understandable, however a 'lack of transparency' around the deals in concerning. 'Instead of making this a cause for national security or technological independence that people from both parties can rally around, it feels more like a shakedown,' she said. --With assistance from Josh Wingrove and Ryan Gould. Foreigners Are Buying US Homes Again While Americans Get Sidelined What Declining Cardboard Box Sales Tell Us About the US Economy Women's Earnings Never Really Recover After They Have Children Americans Are Getting Priced Out of Homeownership at Record Rates Yosemite Employee Fired After Flying Trans Pride Flag ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Letters to the Editor: A high school student walking his dog is hardly ‘the worst of the worst'
Letters to the Editor: A high school student walking his dog is hardly ‘the worst of the worst'

Los Angeles Times

time19 minutes ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Letters to the Editor: A high school student walking his dog is hardly ‘the worst of the worst'

To the editor: Shame upon shame. An 18-year-old high school student walking his dog is arrested by Immigration and Customs Enforcement ('An L.A. high school senior was walking his dog. Then immigration agents grabbed him,' Aug. 14). I thought President Trump was after arresting 'the worst of the worst.' The 18-year-old arrested is Benjamin Guerrero-Cruz, who had overstayed his visa — hardly fitting Trump's arrest profile. Overstaying a visa is not a criminal offense; it is a civil violation. Second shame: The dog the student was walking was tied to a tree by ICE agents and then his collar was unclipped, allowing the, I imagine, scared animal to run loose on Sepulveda Boulevard, according to a GoFundMe page. Really, Trump? What are you doing? I wonder what happened to both the student and the dog. Hugo Pastore, Harbor City

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store