
Deputy president denies misuse of state funds for international trips
This statement follows extensive media coverage from various news outlets and public speculation on the matter.
'Categorically, the office and the deputy president have not, as seems to be suggested, misused state funds or been extravagant in financing the costs of the deputy president's international travel,' the statement, issued last night, read.
According to the Presidency, the matter was first raised after a written parliamentary inquiry from ActionSA, which prompted detailed disclosures regarding travel expenses.
Mashatile responds to inquiry
'In light of such an expected phenomenon, the deputy president replied to the question in full and also provided specific details, which include correct figures and breakdown of individual costs by members of the delegation supporting the deputy president.'
The deputy president's office has stressed that all international trips undertaken are in his official capacity, representing the South African government, as directed by President Cyril Ramaphosa.
'Moreover, the majority of these strategic international visits are aimed at strengthening existing bilateral, political, economic and diplomatic relations between South Africa and visited countries.'
Breakdown of international visits and costs
Mashatile has engaged in several significant international working visits since taking office on July 3, 2024, including trips to Ireland, the UK and Japan, with further planned visits to France.
The office has provided a comprehensive breakdown of the expenses associated with these trips, stressing that many figures circulated in the media are inflated.
News24 recently reported that the deputy president's trip to Japan in March cost R2.3m, with R900 000 covering accommodation for him and his wife.
However, the Presidency stated that the Japan visit was particularly highlighted for its strategic relevance, marking the first high-level engagement between South Africa and Japan in a decade, coinciding with the 115th anniversary of diplomatic relations between the two nations.
Japan visit
During the Japan working visit, the country's second-in-command was accompanied by various ministers.
The Presidency believes that the visit was advantageous for South Africa's African Agenda, especially considering the current overlap of South Africa's Group of 20 chairship and Japan's upcoming hosting of the 9th Tokyo International Conference on African Development in August.
'This presents a unique opportunity for South Africa to communicate its own and the continent's position and priorities to Japan, and the expected support and role that Japan could play in this regard.'
Presidency disputes 'blown out' media figures
In addition, the deputy president's office stated that the claims of exorbitant costs for certain officials have been disputed, and that the actual expenditure is significantly lower.
'Regrettably, some of the figures presented by the media are significantly blown out of proportion and do not accurately reflect the cost of the trips. For example, one media liaison officer, referred to by TimesLIVE as the 'most expensive supporting official', is said to have cost R580 582 for Japan alone, when in fact, the total cost for that official is less than R66 000, including flights and accommodation.'
Travel funded under official policy
The office has reassured the public that the deputy president's travels are conducted with fiscal responsibility and in alignment with South Africa's commitment to global relations and investment.
'In terms of the travel policy in the Presidential Handbook, transport for the president and deputy president during travel outside South Africa is the responsibility and for the account of the state.'
In addition, the office mentioned that the financial responsibilities for the visits, which include travel, accommodation and other miscellaneous expenses, are typically shared between the Department of International Relations and Co-operation and other participating departments.
'In all these visits, the Office of the Deputy President has insisted on the most cost-effective provisions for the deputy president and his delegations and has therefore not misused or extravagantly used state funds, as alluded.' – SAnews.gov.za
Breaking news at your fingertips… Follow Caxton Network News on Facebook and join our WhatsApp channel.
Nuus wat saakmaak. Volg Caxton Netwerk-nuus op Facebook en sluit aan by ons WhatsApp-kanaal.
At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

IOL News
29 minutes ago
- IOL News
'GAYTON MUST GO'
In another, he said the slurs were used by coloureds as solely 'descriptive' terms. In one of his posts, he criticised the term 'Black Diamond' and 'Tenderpreneurs' as replacing the k-word as a slur. However, the EFF called this move hypocritical after pointing out McKenzie's use of the K-word in a string of tweets dating back to 2011. McKenzie made headlines last week when he and the Patriotic Alliance (PA) brought criminal charges against the Open Chats podcast for claiming that coloureds are incestuous and are 'crazy'. McKenzie is being accused by the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF), ActionSA and the African Transformation of using the K-word. GAYTON McKenzie is facing calls to fired as Sports, Arts and Culture Minister. Mr President @CyrilRamaphosa , you appointed a Minister who has publicly uttered deeply offensive and despicable words against Black people. Is this really the vision of unity and inclusivity that the GNU stands for? We demand action NOW! Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. In response, the EFF called for the immediate removal of Gayton McKenzie as Minister of Sports, Arts, and Culture for his history of hateful, racist Remarks An EFF statement said: 'It is also the height of hypocrisy for McKenzie to demand accountability from others when he himself harbours the same hateful attitudes. 'Recently, when podcasters on Open Chats made offensive remarks about coloured people — calling them 'incestuous' and 'crazy' — McKenzie expressed outrage, opened a case against them, and demanded a public apology. 'While he was right to be offended by prejudice directed at his community, this double standard strips him of any moral or ethical standing to lead on issues of non-racialism and social cohesion. 'Leaving him in office sends the message that the government condones such racism.' The African Transformation Movement (ATM), meanwhile, lodged a complaint against McKenzie to the Presidency, Parliament, and the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Ethics and Members' Interests. ATM parliamentary leader Vuyo Zungula said: '(The) tweets employ language steeped in historical racism, the same kind of degrading rhetoric used to strip black people of their humanity during apartheid and colonial eras.' The complaint asks Parliament's ethics bodies to determine whether the remarks breach the Constitution, the Executive Members' Ethics Act, and the Parliamentary Code of Conduct, and to consider removing McKenzie from his ministerial post. It argues that his continued tenure undermines his office and Parliament. Meanwhile, ActionSA has reported McKenzie to the South African Human Rights Commission (SAHRC) for the racist remarks he made, which included the use of outdated and degrading slurs from the Apartheid era. However, McKenzie wrote on his X account saying that: 'This whole campaign to find something racist I ever said is hilarious because you have now gone 13 years back and can't bring out one racist thing I ever said. 'I always and still fight that Coloureds and Blacks are one people being treated differently mistakenly.'

IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
Chief Justice Mandisa Maya unveils new sexual harassment policy for judiciary
Chief Justice Mandisa Maya announced a sexual harassment policy for the judiciary. Image: File As National Women's Day was celebrated on Saturday, Chief Justice Mandisa Maya has announced the introduction of a Sexual Harassment Policy for the South African Judiciary. The Office of the Chief Justice (OCJ) has described it as a historic step in safeguarding the integrity of the courts and protecting the dignity of all who serve within them. The OCJ said this policy reiterates the judiciary's unwavering commitment to the Constitutional values of human dignity, equality, and justice. It said this sends a clear message that sexual harassment has no place in the halls of justice. As custodians of the Constitution, Judges and Magistrates bear a profound responsibility to uphold the highest standards of integrity. The Bangalore Principles of Judicial Conduct and South Africa's own Judicial Codes of Conduct demand nothing less, the office said in a statement. It added that where sexual harassment occurs within the judiciary, it is not only a personal violation; it is also an affront to the rule of law itself, eroding public trust and betraying the very principles the institution exists to defend and uphold. 'This Policy is a necessary and urgent intervention. The Judiciary cannot dispense justice to society if it does not first ensure it within its own ranks. Sexual harassment is a gross abuse of power, a denial of equality, and a stain on the legitimacy of the courts. We are going to tackle it head on and this policy will be a very useful mechanism in that battle,' Justice Maya said. The principles of the policy were set out in a 25-page document, which includes zero tolerance for sexual harassment by or against any judicial officer, staff member, or individual engaging with the judiciary. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ It also sets out guidelines for clear, confidential, and fair procedures for reporting and addressing complaints, with protections against retaliation. The policy calls for accountability, with disciplinary consequences for offenders, as well as for a safe and respectful workplace, free from discrimination and intimidation. The Chief Justice has directed all members of the judiciary to urgently familiarise themselves with the policy and ensure adherence. 'This is not merely a document; it is a covenant with the people of South Africa. We must lead by example,' the Chief Justice emphasised. The policy will further entrench a culture of accountability and respect, ensuring that the judiciary remains a beacon of justice for all, she said. In an annexure to the 25-page sexual harassment policy issued, some examples of verbal, non-verbal, and physical conduct that may be construed as unwelcome sexual harassment were given. These include "gestures, staring, leering, and indecent exposure". It also included the display, or sending by electronic or any other means, of sexually explicit pictures, videos, or messages. The sending of sexually suggestive pictures, including emojis or stickers, was also included. The judicial conduct tribunal, which is investigating complaints against Eastern Cape Judge President Selby Mbenenge, arising out of a sexual harassment complaint, has meanwhile concluded its hearing of oral evidence in the matter. Lawyers acting for the complainant, judges secretary Andiswa Mengo, and Mbenenge's legal team are due to present their final legal arguments before the tribunal in October. It is alleged by Mengo that the judge president had subjected her to sexual harassment, which made her very uncomfortable. This was denied by Mbenenge, who claimed it was consensual flirting between two adults.

The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
Minister Macpherson faces backlash from ActionSA over alleged derogatory remarks
Bongani Hans | Published 1 day ago Public Works and Infrastructure Minister Dean Macpherson is standing his ground against pressure to retract utterances that were allegedly degrading ActionSA supporters to worthless people amid threats to report him to the South African Human Rights Commission (SAHRC). The ActionSA held an online meeting on Thursday, discussing further steps to be taken against the DA's KwaZulu-Natal chairperson. The party, which had already referred Macpherson to the national Parliament's Joint Committee on Ethics and Members' Interests for disciplinary action, is furious that he, outside the Pietermaritzburg High Court late last month, referred to 'over 500 Black ActionSA members' as pharas. ActionSA was demanding that the issue of calling its supporters pharas be given the same condemnation as Open Chats Podcast hosts, who are now being probed by the SAHRC for making derogatory remarks about coloured people. During a TikTok livestream discussion, ActionSA MP Alan Beesley said the SAHRC was the next step to hold the minister accountable for his utterances. 'After we reported Macpherson to the ethics committee in Parliament, and since we were hoping that he was going to apologise after we gave him a week to do so, which he had not done; that is going to continue. 'And we are going to launch a formal complaint with the SAHRC as this was a violation of the human rights of people, who were predominantly black, in a racist manner,' said Beesley. Instead of bowing to pressure to apologise, Macpherson accused ActionSA of being an attention seeker that was hellbent on distracting him from the fight against corruption. 'It's interesting that every time I am fighting corruption or dealing with critical issues in the department, ActionSA is trying to divert attention away from that issue,' he told this reporter last week. When asked to comment on the threats to refer him to the SAHRC, Macpherson said: 'My comment still stands.' Beesley announced taking alleged racist remarks to the SAHRC, shortly after Macpherson was at the Cape Town Central Police Station to open a case against the Independent Development Trust (IDT) suspended chief executive officer, Tebogo Malaka, and the trust's spokesperson, Phasha Makgolane, for trying to bribe a journalist. Beesley said Macpherson violated the rights that were protected by the Bill of Rights. Macpherson was caught in a video that found its way to social media, addressing DA supporters and leaders, including its Francois Rodgers, about the presence of ActionSA supporters outside the court, saying: 'There is a smallanyana (little) party (referring to ActionSA); they just brought up some people, and we don't know who they are since they are pharas; they gave them some green T-shirts. 'When you ask which party (they belong to), they said 'angazi' (I don't know), 'I am just here for one meal and one drink', and they were here for just singing and dancing.' Both the ActionSA and DA were in court attending a case they brought together against eThekwini Municipality for failing to fix sewage spillage around the city. Beesley said it was not premature to refer the matter to the SAHRC before being dealt with by Parliament, which is currently in recess. 'The SAHRC is here to protect human rights, while the ethics committee is here to protect the ethics of Parliament. We cannot divorce the fact that Macpherson is a member of Parliament and is a human being who is treating people differently. 'We should pursue him both as a member of Parliament and as an ordinary South African, because even if he made those comments as an ordinary South African, they would be out of line because you cannot mistreat people who are suffering the most, like that,' said Beesly. ActionSA provincial leader Zwakele Mncwango said Macpherson was refusing to apologise because 'he believed in what he said'. 'I think he does not see a reason why he must apologise as he stands by his words, and that is how he sees black people in South Africa. Unfortunately, he does not see anything wrong with what he said while he is a minister,' said Mncwango. He said Macpherson portrayed himself as a minister who was not prepared to use his ministerial position to help the homeless people out of their situation by building them houses. 'His arrogance will always show off, and even the DA has not said anything about this, and that tells you that it is in their DNA to stand with his views because if they also believed he is wrong, they should by now have spoken to him to apologise,' said Mncwango. ActionSA MP Mika Ngobeni, who was the livestream host, asked Mncwango to comment on parties in the Government of National Unity that were not criticising Macpherson in the same way they did against the podcast hosts who allegedly insulted coloured communities. Mncwango said this was because the legacy of apartheid was still hanging over. 'This requires all of us to work toward unity and to be true when it comes to reconciliation. If we ignore such matters or we look at them depending on who is saying what, we will never heal,' he said. [email protected]