Deputy president denies misuse of state funds for international trips
The Office of the deputy president has released a statement denying allegations of misusing state funds related to Deputy President Paul Mashatile's international travel.
This statement follows extensive media coverage from various news outlets and public speculation on the matter.
'Categorically, the office and the deputy president have not, as seems to be suggested, misused state funds or been extravagant in financing the costs of the deputy president's international travel,' the statement, issued last night, read.
According to the Presidency, the matter was first raised after a written parliamentary inquiry from ActionSA, which prompted detailed disclosures regarding travel expenses.
Mashatile responds to inquiry
'In light of such an expected phenomenon, the deputy president replied to the question in full and also provided specific details, which include correct figures and breakdown of individual costs by members of the delegation supporting the deputy president.'
The deputy president's office has stressed that all international trips undertaken are in his official capacity, representing the South African government, as directed by President Cyril Ramaphosa.
'Moreover, the majority of these strategic international visits are aimed at strengthening existing bilateral, political, economic and diplomatic relations between South Africa and visited countries.'
Breakdown of international visits and costs
Mashatile has engaged in several significant international working visits since taking office on July 3, 2024, including trips to Ireland, the UK and Japan, with further planned visits to France.
The office has provided a comprehensive breakdown of the expenses associated with these trips, stressing that many figures circulated in the media are inflated.
News24 recently reported that the deputy president's trip to Japan in March cost R2.3m, with R900 000 covering accommodation for him and his wife.
However, the Presidency stated that the Japan visit was particularly highlighted for its strategic relevance, marking the first high-level engagement between South Africa and Japan in a decade, coinciding with the 115th anniversary of diplomatic relations between the two nations.
Japan visit
During the Japan working visit, the country's second-in-command was accompanied by various ministers.
The Presidency believes that the visit was advantageous for South Africa's African Agenda, especially considering the current overlap of South Africa's Group of 20 chairship and Japan's upcoming hosting of the 9th Tokyo International Conference on African Development in August.
'This presents a unique opportunity for South Africa to communicate its own and the continent's position and priorities to Japan, and the expected support and role that Japan could play in this regard.'
Presidency disputes 'blown out' media figures
In addition, the deputy president's office stated that the claims of exorbitant costs for certain officials have been disputed, and that the actual expenditure is significantly lower.
'Regrettably, some of the figures presented by the media are significantly blown out of proportion and do not accurately reflect the cost of the trips. For example, one media liaison officer, referred to by TimesLIVE as the 'most expensive supporting official', is said to have cost R580 582 for Japan alone, when in fact, the total cost for that official is less than R66 000, including flights and accommodation.'
Travel funded under official policy
The office has reassured the public that the deputy president's travels are conducted with fiscal responsibility and in alignment with South Africa's commitment to global relations and investment.
'In terms of the travel policy in the Presidential Handbook, transport for the president and deputy president during travel outside South Africa is the responsibility and for the account of the state.'
In addition, the office mentioned that the financial responsibilities for the visits, which include travel, accommodation and other miscellaneous expenses, are typically shared between the Department of International Relations and Co-operation and other participating departments.
'In all these visits, the Office of the Deputy President has insisted on the most cost-effective provisions for the deputy president and his delegations and has therefore not misused or extravagantly used state funds, as alluded.' – SAnews.gov.za
Breaking news at your fingertips… Follow Caxton Network News on Facebook and join our WhatsApp channel.
Nuus wat saakmaak. Volg Caxton Netwerk-nuus op Facebook en sluit aan by ons WhatsApp-kanaal.
At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
27 minutes ago
- Daily Maverick
Drama, deals, disregard – how another 12,000 Nelson Mandela Bay ratepayers were denied a capital budget
In this second report in our series on wards in Nelson Mandela Bay receiving a zero capital budget, Ward 39 is a large residential area that includes suburbs and the peri-urban area of Theescombe. Some of its residents pay the highest rates in Nelson Mandela Bay, and yet its capital budget was reduced from R1.5m to nothing. When Nelson Mandela Bay Executive Mayor Babalwa Lobishe joined the residents of Ward 39 at their integrated development plan meeting, she presented them with the 2024 budget instead of the 2025/6 budget. In that 2024 budget, the ward had a capital budget of R1.5-million – but ward councillor Margaret de Andrade and her ward committee soon pointed out to Lobishe that she was presenting the wrong budget. 'I told her there is a zero under capital budget in the new budget,' De Andrade said. 'We received nothing but R100,000 for a humanitarian fund that is almost impossible to access.' The R1.5-millon referred to by Lobishe had, in any event, already been spent on resurfacing part of a crucial road, adding traffic calming measures and fixing a busy sidewalk. This is the second ward in the metro, with mostly ratepaying residents, whose budget has been cut to zero. Ward 8, covering Lorraine, a densely populated area, also had its capital budget reduced to zero. The Nelson Mandela Bay council was to meet for the third time on Thursday to try to pass the budget. But according to a letter seen by Daily Maverick, even the National Treasury has become worried about the numbers – the metro's collection rate is at 73% and the budget is based on a collection rate of 76%. This means that there is a shortfall of R1.3-billion. Grants totalling R900-million from the national government that could have been used for capital projects were returned unspent in the past two financial years. For the current financial year, the metro has only spent 38% of its R1.9-billion capital expenditure budget. While the four wards that received zero capital budgets are wards with Democratic Alliance councillors, De Andrade, who sits on the budget and treasury subcommittee, said many ANC councillors were unhappy with the budgets for their wards. 'Hugely disrespectful' De Andrade, who has been a councillor for 19 years, said she had not had to deal with a zero capital budget before. Water leaks, sewage spills and street lights can still, in theory, be fixed under operational budgets for the metro. 'I want a million rand,' she said. 'We have a track record of looking after a capital budget of a million rand. You can't give me zero.' She said they had asked for specific evidence for this decision. She said over the medium term, the situation didn't look much better as the ward would receive only R500,000 for the next financial year. 'That is just stupid. I can tar maybe 500 metres with it.' Below are the projects the ward presented to the municipality to be taken into account for the Integrated Development Plan and the budget: Walker Drive needs to be resurfaced as it is riddled with potholes; Riverstone Road needs an upgrade and drainage; there needs to be a taxi rank constructed for Kragga Kamma; the railing of the low water bridge in the Kabega Road dip should be fixed. Parts of the ward are in urgent need of high mast lights. A substation needs fencing. Kragga Kamma Road, which carries around 5,000 vehicles a day, needs pedestrian walkways and cycle tracks to cut down on accidents. Walker Drive needs a stormwater upgrade, and several gravel roads in the peri-urban areas need tarring. Trees growing into powerlines have to be cut and old electrical infrastructure must be replaced. The ward also has illegal cables running over busy Kragga Kamma Road that often set the area on fire. De Andrade also asked for this to be dealt with. 'I think our ratepayers accept that 80% of their rates go to other areas, but it is hugely disrespectful to give us no capital budget,' De Andrade said. She said that after receiving advice from a city official, she managed to get R500,000 in unspent money to cut trees before the end of the financial year. She said that as she had her meetings about the zero capital budget, acting city manager Ted Pillay had told her to agree to this budget so that 'they can get it through' as they needed the new electricity tariffs to be approved — they would then adjust the budget in August. The electricity department projects a loss of R1.3-billion for the coming year and needs rates to ensure that it doesn't default on its payments to Eskom. In the current financial year, the municipality has already spent R600-million more on purchasing electricity than it received from sales to the public. 'But I said no,' De Andrade said. 'Councillors are delaying the approval of the budget because we want to see the capital budgets in print before we vote.' Municipality's response Municipal director of communications Sithembiso Soyaya said a mistake had been made in presenting the wrong budget to Ward 39 residents. 'During engagements in Ward 39, it was brought to the municipality's attention that the previous year's budget figures may have been presented during an initial consultation session. This matter is currently under internal review, within the relevant framework, and corrective measures will be implemented to ensure such administrative oversights do not recur. 'The concern has been noted and considered during the revision of the draft budget, and the updated, corrected figures should be reflected in the final 2025/26 budget being presented to Council on Thursday. 'The municipality remains committed to ensuring that communities receive accurate, up-to-date information in all budget consultation processes. 'On the response by the city manager, we wish to clarify the context and emphasise that any amendment to the municipal budget must follow a legally compliant process, as provided for in Section 28 of the Municipal Finance Management Act, which allows for a formal adjustment budget to be adopted by council under defined conditions. 'No informal or arbitrary changes can be made outside this regulated process. The municipality upholds these legislative requirements and remains committed to full compliance with the law.
Daily Maverick
27 minutes ago
- Daily Maverick
A discussion about the coloured community and other conversation-stoppers
Against my better judgement, I stepped into a discussion on social media. It was one of those discussions that is marked by conversation-stoppers, deflections and presentations of innocence that is so de rigueur in South African society. It was a discussion about actual or perceived marginalisation of the coloured community in South Africa. This is a country built on decades of racism, but there are no racists. It is a country where citizens compare miseries, where individuals or groups of individuals attempt, constantly, to outmanoeuvre one another in the races to show who is or has been most persecuted, whose persecution matters most, and where the country's myriad problems are explained by monocausal simplicities and convenience. None of these is, of course, unique to South Africa. Conversation-stoppers are swung about like a rapier, slashing, and killing conversations, dead. You may say, for instance, that there may be a reason why people are opposed to your (Caligulan) brutality and cruelty, and the conversation-stopper is that you harbour an ancient hatred of the cruel brute and his people caught in flagrante delicto, so you cannot, possibly be intellectually honest. You may say that someone is wilfully marginalised through some biblical punishment where the sins of the fathers shall be visited upon the children. The deflection is slipped in; the children have been and will always be guilty, and exploit their intergenerational privileges, which, in some ways, may well be true. As a former colleague said after I admonished her for abusing a (white) child of about six or seven running through the newsroom: 'A snake gives birth to a snake.' This logic – hard to dispute the snake-gives-birth-to-a-snake, or kill them in infancy before they kill you – has been applied to present-day conflicts where innocent children are being killed almost daily. If I have not made it clear previously, I should do it again, here: I don't particularly care for identity politics or race-based politics, and I am not a specialist of coloured politics… there are people who, I am sure, are better placed for this purpose. All of this does not make me blind to the way privileges, powers and influences are handed down to successive generations, and how later generations will conspire to protect such privileges. It is an empirically verifiable fact that power and influence, privileges and benefits (the various forms of capital, political, financial, social or symbolic) accumulated over more than 300 years do not evaporate within 30 years… it is power and privilege that is vertically segmented. We speak, in this respect, about the 'development thesis' in terms of which powers, material and otherwise (ownership of property, development of technology and knowledge production, in general), tend to develop over time and become more powerful. When these powers are under threat, or even questioned rhetorically, those who wield the power feel 'uncomfortable', or 'fragile', and egads! they cry persecution, injustice and oppression, conveniently forgetting their (historical) roles and functions in getting us to where we are. Coloured community concerns and the deflection Let's leave all that as a backdrop, and return to my brief foray into the discussion of the coloured community I mentioned above. First, I should set out those nasty racial classifications, definitions and conceptions of purity and belonging. I refer hereafter to black people to exclude those South Africans who are classified coloured, and considered to be 'not black enough' or 'non-African'. Again, my personal identity affiliations or lack thereof (political, racial, ethnic or cultural) are set aside. The conversation I refer to went something like this: A coloured guy stands up and explains that the coloured community is marginalised, especially in the Western Cape. Also in Panayaza Lesufi's Gauteng, it should be said, and all of which makes a nonsense of the non-racialism that we fought for in South Africa. Before the topic of actual or perceived marginalisation is even considered, the host of the discussion deflects and asks why the coloured community persists with their coloured identity. Absent are the facts that the Afrikaner nationalists created the vile and contemptible racial classification system, and the African nationalists have simply adopted what has always been a vile and contemptible racial classification system. Those are just the facts. The Afrikaner nationalists may tell us that they meant well. I am absolutely sure that the African nationalists have only the best interests of South Africa in mind. That's the thing about oppressive or unjust regimes: Joseph Stalin or Pol Pot did not say they were going to kill millions of people. Kaiser Wilhelm II and Adolf Hitler did not say, up front, that they would be responsible for the death of more than 100 million people in Europe. (See this essay by my favourite 20th-century historian, Eric Hobsbawm) They meant well, no? The National Party (Afrikaner nationalist) and the ANC (African nationalists) would proclaim innocence, to be sure. Julius Malema's ethno-nationalism of a particular kind, where those people whom he considers to be non-African don't matter and don't belong. His staunchest of followers would tell you, I am sure, that he means well… Coloured community concerns and denials, and counter-accusations It's marvellous to behold. Frightening is probably a better word, but never mind. Criminal organisations or unjust regimes have at least one thing in common. Privileged people who are reminded of their ill-begotten status and the forms of capital mentioned above, have the same habit. Deny everything (we are not racist), admit nothing (we worked hard for our money) and make counter-accusations (you're racist/reverse racist). Before seriously considering the cries of the coloured community's leaders, the counter-accusation (a veritable conversation-stopper) is that coloured people are racist, and have always been racist towards black people. It does not help, of course, that very many coloured people have shimmied up to the party of white settlers, the DA, as they did to the National Party with the Tricameral Parliament. If we accept that more than one thing can be true at the same time – that the coloured community has been left behind in whatever resembles a peace and prosperity dividend of the democratic era, and that coloured people have shimmied up to the illiberal, undemocratic and unjust forces in the country – the least one can do is listen, and look at the evidence. Instead, when coloured groups raise issues of crime, disproportionate incarceration, unemployment, drug abuse (all social problems that stem from poverty and alienation), the black African response is: well, coloureds are racist, or they (themselves) reproduce myths about being coloured, when the African nationalists actually reinvoked and reapplied the vile and contemptible racial classification system – because the higher you are on the scale of racial superiority, the more money there is to be made. For instance, when the Dutch, then British, and then Settler Colonialists (during the Afrikaner nationalist era) placed and kept whites on the top rung, they reaped the benefits of everything; from the proceeds of gold and diamonds, to agriculture and education, which helps explain the development thesis referred to above. The main problem, the way I see it, is that in this great-tjank – everyone is in tears about being persecuted and we're in a state of national paralysis – claims of eternal innocence give one group a monopoly on persecution (they have been the most persecuted in history), and gives that group a free reign with meting out punishment (everyone else must suffer biblical punishment and, anyway, a snake gives birth to a snake), and nobody can be as innocent as the ones who claim eternal innocence, and nobody can be innocent enough. As a pessimist, I don't expect things to get any better for the coloured community. This is quite apart from declinism, although it is profoundly Panglossian to be positive. I will leave one example. Somewhere in the Northern Cape, somewhere between Springbok and Upington, there is a black man working on a farm. Once he got a job on the farm, he brought his family from Mpumalanga. Now, let me be clear. As much as South Africa belongs to everyone who lives in it, people are free to move around the country as they wish! Now, that man from Mpumalanga was employed after a coloured man from the area was replaced because black economic empowerment and affirmative action policies (according to the farmer) awards more points for employing a 'black African' as opposed to a coloured. The first problem with this is that the area has been predominantly coloured/Khoi/San for centuries. The ANC has had a policy of converting every corner of the country to reflect the demographics of South Africa; in other words, if, as Jimmy Manyi said when he was still in the ANC and a government spokesperson, coloureds are overconcentrated in any particular region, that had to be changed 'to reflect the demographics of South Africa'. This means that if there happens to be a street in which coloured people are in the majority, as in most of the Northern Cape, that has to change to the point where the street represents the approximately 80% of 'black Africans' in the country. It does not end on the streets of townships. I shan't complain, but I was told that I should forget about applying for an academic post at UCT as it would be futile, because the institution would rather employ a 'real African' from any of the 54 states on the continent than a coloured person. All told, the great-tjank has made us all wrestle over who has been most persecuted, who faces the most injustice and who has the right to mete out punishment, because, you know, a snake gives birth to a snake and at the extremes you must kill a baby before the baby grows up and kills you.
The South African
2 hours ago
- The South African
Mayibuye Mandela charges 'refugees', AfriForum with treason
Mayibuye Mandela, the great-grandson of Nelson Mandela's sister, has laid charges of treason against the group of Afrikaner 'refugees' who arrived in the US as 'persecuted' people. The outspoken politician also charged activist organisations AfriForum and Solidarity Movement for their comments about South Africa. On his X account, Mayibuye Mandela – who refers to himself as 'Nelson Mandela's great grandson' – revealed that he had officially taken action against the group of Afrikaner 'refugees'. Mayibuye posted official documents stating that he had laid a charge of treason against the group, as well as Afrikaner rights organisations, AfriForum, and Solidarity Movement. In the papers, Mayibuye accused the 'refugees' and the organisation of spreading 'fake news' and a 'false narrative' of a 'white genocide' in South Africa. The 30-year-old stated that the 'refugees' had violated numerous laws, including: Incitement to cause public harm or racial hatred over their 'propaganda'. Misinformation and Cyber Defamation for 'causing reputational harm to South Africa'. Immigration Act for 'knowingly submitting false claims of persecution'. Apart from being charged by Mayibuye Mandela, AfriForum is also facing a treason probe after four dockets of high treason were opened against it. The lobby group has been condemned for calling for the US to 'intervene' in domestic affairs. It has also been accused of spreading misinformation about the Expropriation Act. Afrikaner 'refugees' depart South Africa for the US. Image: X/ According to reports, the Haws are currently interviewing witnesses in their investigation. Hawks head, Godfrey Lebeya, said: 'These kinds of matters need to be approached carefully. We are dealing with a serious crime here.' AfriForum CEO Kallie Kriel has repeatedly claimed that he was 'not concerned' over the probe. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 . Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp , Facebook , X, and Bluesky for the latest news.
