"Merit will never be compromised," says CJI BR Gavai
Speaking at the Bombay High Court in an event organised by the Bombay Bar Association, CJI Gavai highlighted ongoing efforts to ensure a more inclusive and transparent appointment process. He noted that this approach had been strengthened since the tenure of Justice Sanjiv Khanna.
'...We have tried to dispel the impression that the Supreme Court is a CJI-Centric court,' CJI Gavai said. 'In the interest of the institution, from the period of Justice Sanjiv Khanna, we have tried to infuse more transparency in the matter of appointments.'
He shared that the court had recently interviewed 54 candidates and recommended around 36 appointments. He assured that the selection process would continue to be transparent while ensuring fair representation from all sections of society.
'For the last three days, on the first two days, we held interviews with about 54 candidates, and yesterday we have recommended around 36 appointments...I must assure you that we will ensure that we adopt a complete process of transparency while ensuring that representation is given to all sections of society. The merit will never be compromised,' he added.
Addressing the issue of case pendency, CJI Gavai acknowledged it as a serious challenge. He attributed one of the significant causes of pendency to judicial vacancies and assured that steps are being taken to address them.
'Pendency is a huge issue. We are trying to work on it. One of the reasons for dependency is the vacancies which are not filled up. This is the third function in Nagpur that has flagged an issue about interference in the functioning of the college. I must assure you that we will ensure that we will adopt a complete process of transparency. While ensuring that the representation is given to all sections of the society, the merit will never be compromised, and in so far as my own High Court is concerned, I can assure that the names, whatever are recommended, we will try to follow it up and that as soon as possible the Bombay High Court starts functioning at full strength so that at least the issue of dependency is addressed to some extent.'
Justice Bhushan Ramkrishna Gavai was sworn in as the 52nd Chief Justice of India in May. President Droupadi Murmu administered the oath of office to Justice Gavai, who succeeded CJI Sanjiv Khanna. Justice Gavai is the first Buddhist Chief Justice and only the second from the Dalit community, after former Chief Justice KG Balakrishnan, who held office in 2007, to occupy the highest judicial office in the country. Justice Gavai has also made it clear that he will not take any post-retirement assignments. (ANI)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
25 minutes ago
- Indian Express
1993 serial blasts: Bombay HC says Abu Salem's 25-year jail term prima facie not over yet
The Bombay High Court on Monday prima facie observed that gangster Abu Salem, who has been sentenced to life imprisonment in the 1993 Mumbai serial blasts case, has not completed 25 years of incarceration to qualify for remission of his sentence. Salem has claimed that he has completed nearly 25 years in prison as per extradition treaty between India and Portugal and therefore he should be given a tentative date of release from jail. The HC admitted Salem's plea seeking remission and premature release from jail argued through senior advocate Rishi Malhotra and advocate Farhana Shah 'As per the Supreme Court judgment, it is recorded that the date of arrest is October 12, 2005. On completion of 25 years of incarceration, the central government is bound to exercise the powers of remission and release the applicant. Prima facie, it is clear that the 25 years of incarceration is yet to be completed,' a bench of Justices Ajey S Gadkari and Rajesh S Patil observed and admitted the plea. Additional Solicitor General Anil Singh for Union Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) sought dismissal of Salem's plea stating that honouring the 25-year period mentioned in assurance will arise only when the 25 years were to expire, which will happen on November 10, 2030. The MHA said that it would abide by the period of 25 years at an appropriate time subject to remedies, which may be available. Salem, who was transferred from Taloja Central Prison in Navi Mumbai to Nashik Central Prison last year, was extradited to India from Portugal on November 11, 2005. He was placed under arrest on November 24, 2005, and subsequently tried for the offences he had been charged with. In September 2017, Salem was convicted in the Mumbai serial blasts case. Two years earlier, in 2015, he had been sentenced to life imprisonment for the 1995 murder of Mumbai-based builder Pradeep Jain. On July 11, 2022, the Supreme Court observed that the central government was bound to advise the President to exercise his powers of remission to release Salem after he completes 25 years in prison, in accordance with the sovereign assurance given by the Indian government to Portugal at the time of his extradition. However, the court declined to extend any special privilege to commute or restrict the sentence imposed on him. In October last year, Salem argued before the special court designated under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (TADA) that he had neared 25-year term and same included time spent as an undertrial and later as a convict, along with nearly three years of remission he was entitled to under prison rules. In December, 2024, the special court rejected Salem's claim, after which he approached the High Court. The MHA's affidavit in response stated that the plea was 'entirely misconceived, baseless and is based on a misplaced understanding of law'. The Centre further said that the petitioner should approach the SC for further clarification as it would be the appropriate forum. The MHA said that the petitioner's calculation was 'not correct' and he has 'attempted to combine two separate conviction periods undergone in separate cases to arrive at a conclusion' that he completed a conviction period of 24 years and nine months on December 31, 2024. However, the MHA in its May, 2025 affidavit claimed that till March 31, 2025 he had served 19 years, 5 months and 21 days. The HC will hear the plea in due course.
Time of India
30 minutes ago
- Time of India
Supreme Court stays HC order on Goa weightlifting coach recruitment
Panaji: The Supreme Court on Monday stayed an order of the high court that directed govt to proceed with the recruitment of a weightlifting coach for the Sports Authority of Goa (SAG). Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Woman weightlifter Vaishnavi Ugadekar, a two-time gold and silver medallist for the state in weightlifting who also participated in the National Games, challenged the order of the high court in the Supreme Court. The apex court on Monday issued notices to govt and stayed the order of the high court in the petition filed by Ugadekar, represented by advocate on record Salvador Santosh Rebello, with advocates Pradosh Dangui and Kritika. Ugadekar alleged bias by the examiner against whom she had complained in the past for harassment. Following her complaint, Goa govt last month decided to conduct the skill test process again for weightlifting with independent examiners/selectors. Mahesh Kavlekar, the other applicant who was found eligible, then went to the high court, which directed govt to proceed with the selection process as per schedule. The high court stated that it found govt's stand 'little surprising' and observed that merely because a complaint was filed by an unsuccessful candidate, only the written examination for the stream of weightlifting was cancelled, while the examinations for the post of coach in other streams like swimming and basketball were to be conducted as per schedule on June 26. 'It appears that the authorities are not conscious of the fact that once the candidate has appeared and participated in the process, he cannot thereafter call into action the whole process, and definitely not at the intermediate stage when the whole process is not yet complete,' stated the division bench comprising Justices Bharati Dangre and Nivedita Mehta. The bench said that upon clearing the preliminary test in the form of a skill test and physical test, it is imperative for the candidate to appear for the written examination, and upon that, the entire selection shall be said to be completed. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The high court held that state authorities attempted to interject the whole process despite the fact that Kavlekar proved to be successful in the two preliminary rounds and qualified himself for the written test. It added that merely because a complaint was filed, the test cannot be postponed, and he cannot be made to wait till a fresh advertisement is issued in respect of other streams when he will be subjected to the physical test and skill test. The high court added that this would cause immense injustice to the petitioner, who has experience working at SAG for more than a decade and definitely deserves a fair chance to participate in the process of selection. Ugadekar then went to the Supreme Court.
India Today
30 minutes ago
- India Today
Political war erupts over Bihar poll roll revision, 5 family members lynched over witchcraft suspicion in Purnia
In this episode of 'To The Point,' the focus is on two major events in Bihar. The first segment discusses the Supreme Court's upcoming hearing on the Bihar voter roll revision ahead of the Assembly elections. The RJD, Congress, TMC, and civic groups have challenged the Election Commission's exercise, alleging it is rushed and could strip citizens of their voting rights. The Supreme Court will hear the matter on July 10th, with significant attention on whether it will support the pleas or uphold the EC's revision. The second segment covers a tragic incident in Purnia, Bihar, where five people were lynched and their bodies burned over suspicions of practicing black magic. The incident took place in Tet Gama village, and so far, police have arrested three accused and recovered the burnt bodies for autopsy. The victims were reportedly from a tribal community. This incident has raised concerns about law and order in Bihar, with opposition leaders criticizing the state government. Police are investigating the motive, which may be linked to local disputes.
